Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask, if you’re a teacher

219 replies

Playingvideogames · 06/02/2026 19:24

How many children in your class are diagnosed with autism or ADHD?

I often see the ‘1%’ quoted, but my anecdata is a lot higher than this.

This isn’t a value judgement thread btw, I’m truly just curious to see the responses and if they align with the ‘official’ statistic.

OP posts:
Mathsdebator · 07/02/2026 16:34

7 diagnosed in one of my maths classes (FE) No support. I suspect 2 of the other boys have ADHD too.

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 16:30

Arrivea · 07/02/2026 16:20

I'm genuinely asking - does the NHS data include only those diagnosed? Because at the moment in my area they are taking over 6 months to even triage referrals. The waiting lists for children are enormous. It used to be perfectly possible to get referred end of Y2 and prescribed medication if needed by summer term of Y3. Now those same children are waiting until Y6. That's a lot of primary children in the system without a diagnosis.

Yes it does. Some studies look at probable figures based on calculations of waiting lists.

Where I live there is a 10 year wait for CAMHs who carry out the diagnosis for children. Most children will age out of the system.

The DfE data is based on schools reporting SEND lists. You don’t need a diagnosis to begin that, it is dependent on whether the school thinks there are needs to be addressed.

Im not saying that there are potentially more than 5% in population. But the actual amount cannot be calculated from an an anonymous, biased, internet forum.

Arrivea · 07/02/2026 16:20

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:32

I give up. What you are asking for is anecdotal stories that you have no way of knowing if true. And you aren’t considering the bias in answering.

You can not believe it all you like, the 5% statistic is based on actual data from NHS/DfE. Not asking opinions on the internet.

You can not believe in gravity if you like, still makes it real.

I'm genuinely asking - does the NHS data include only those diagnosed? Because at the moment in my area they are taking over 6 months to even triage referrals. The waiting lists for children are enormous. It used to be perfectly possible to get referred end of Y2 and prescribed medication if needed by summer term of Y3. Now those same children are waiting until Y6. That's a lot of primary children in the system without a diagnosis.

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:32

I give up. What you are asking for is anecdotal stories that you have no way of knowing if true. And you aren’t considering the bias in answering.

You can not believe it all you like, the 5% statistic is based on actual data from NHS/DfE. Not asking opinions on the internet.

You can not believe in gravity if you like, still makes it real.

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:28

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:26

Because as researchers and statisticians know, people are more likely to respond to a question like this if they have a larger number. If they have none then they are less likely to respond.

You cannot extrapolate any useful data on increase or rates based on replies on an anonymous forum.

I extrapolated it from my own experience and just wanted to know if others experience similarly. It seems they do. I simply don’t believe 5% of children have ASD when no real life scenario reflects this. Maybe somebody reading who teaches will tell me otherwise?

OP posts:
FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:26

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:21

There’s a big overlap though - you’d expect it to be 8% if you consider even one or two in every class overlap.

But not a single reply here is that low, bar one. Most of them are many times higher.

Because as researchers and statisticians know, people are more likely to respond to a question like this if they have a larger number. If they have none then they are less likely to respond.

You cannot extrapolate any useful data on increase or rates based on replies on an anonymous forum.

Pickingupabitnow · 07/02/2026 15:26

ClawsandEffect · 06/02/2026 20:25

And then when you meet the parents, you see it was genetic!

I want the laughing emoji back!! 😂

(Only because this post is so true 🤪)

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:21

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:16

5% is for adhd, autism is also 5%, not necessarily the same 5! You asked for SEND, which includes dyslexia, dyspraxia, Tourette’s, cerebral palsy, wheelchair users, Down’s syndrome, learning disabilities.

So whose do you want to know? ND or SEND?

There’s a big overlap though - you’d expect it to be 8% if you consider even one or two in every class overlap.

But not a single reply here is that low, bar one. Most of them are many times higher.

OP posts:
Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:19

BillyBites · 07/02/2026 15:11

10 out of 30 in one of my KS2 classes at the moment. Not far off that number in others.

Is that ND in particular or all SEN?

OP posts:
FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:16

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:09

But equally we accept there has been a true rise in that. I don’t know if that’s the case here, but if the figure of less than 5% was true, at least a few of these replies would reflect that. None of them do.

5% is for adhd, autism is also 5%, not necessarily the same 5! You asked for SEND, which includes dyslexia, dyspraxia, Tourette’s, cerebral palsy, wheelchair users, Down’s syndrome, learning disabilities.

So whose do you want to know? ND or SEND?

BillyBites · 07/02/2026 15:11

10 out of 30 in one of my KS2 classes at the moment. Not far off that number in others.

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 15:09

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:04

I give up trying to explain why asking a question like this in an anonymous form will not give accurate answers. You didn’t put in title, but loads of people will read the OP and not reply. A lot of work goes into making studies as unbiased as possible.

I see it as a bit of an affront because you don’t state your purpose. Many ND, disabled people spend a lot of time reading about how their diagnosis is made up, diagnosis can be bought, there is an unsustainable level of diagnosis. Weirdly cancer diagnosis is far more common now and we don’t have anything similar about that or blaming the people with cancer.

But equally we accept there has been a true rise in that. I don’t know if that’s the case here, but if the figure of less than 5% was true, at least a few of these replies would reflect that. None of them do.

OP posts:
FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 15:04

I give up trying to explain why asking a question like this in an anonymous form will not give accurate answers. You didn’t put in title, but loads of people will read the OP and not reply. A lot of work goes into making studies as unbiased as possible.

I see it as a bit of an affront because you don’t state your purpose. Many ND, disabled people spend a lot of time reading about how their diagnosis is made up, diagnosis can be bought, there is an unsustainable level of diagnosis. Weirdly cancer diagnosis is far more common now and we don’t have anything similar about that or blaming the people with cancer.

Pandersmum · 07/02/2026 14:47

Needlenardlenoo · 07/02/2026 13:55

That's interesting and they're lucky to have you!

I met DH (not diagnosed but very similar to our AuDHD child) in his early 30s and looking back, he was really struggling with the people aspects of work. Fortunately us getting together set him on a different career path and he found something better for him eventually.

I do all our admin though. His house was a right rats nest when I moved in.

Thank you. My DH and I would agree, but that doesn’t make it fair does it. Your DH is also lucky to have you to support him and to help him be the best he can be. Child tries so hard to just get on with stuff, but life is quite overwhelming for them at times. I am genuinely very proud of them. So much more difficult than their siblings because of how their brain is wired. But they also have the ability to think outside the box and are great in a crisis! We are trying to support them into financial independence but it’s not easy. They are not even eligible for any benefit financial support as they have savings (from working from 16 to save for a car for work and they don’t go out very often). Also have never considered PIP and have no formal diagnosis.

What does your DH do for a job?

Nineandahalf · 07/02/2026 14:24

Pandersmum · 07/02/2026 13:03

Doesn’t a diagnosis give more financial benefit support?

For the school? No, a diagnosis does not do this.

wafflesmgee · 07/02/2026 14:20

Fearfulsaints · 07/02/2026 10:34

Can I add a question - do you feel your school is accurately recording SEN on the register and as part of their census return or do you feel that the thresholds to being on the register are rising so its under reported / or the reverse quicker to add to the register as better at recognising need?

my school sometimes have our hands tied by parents, to be honest, as we can’t add children to the register without parental support. It’s a really complex journey for many parents to accept.

sometimes we identify clear need and parents “don’t want to label” their child, so delay things by years which massively negatively impacts their children’s access to funding they are entitled to and the help they need.

in contrast, we also have parents who insist their child has Sen needs who don’t unfortunately present at school at all because the child is masking, which is very tricky in terms of supporting everyone and getting correct diagnoses and funding

finally we also have parents who fight for a diagnosis because they can’t parent well for a variety of reasons and want a get out clause of “well my child is running around punching others because they have adhd you know, not because I have never enforced boundaries or attended to their needs, oh no, it’s adhd. Now can I have the form so I get more benefits?”.

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 14:13

ExperiencedTeacher · 07/02/2026 14:01

12% of children in my county are on the ND pathway.

Presumably that includes those already diagnosed and those awaiting diagnosis?

OP posts:
ExperiencedTeacher · 07/02/2026 14:01

12% of children in my county are on the ND pathway.

CurlyKoalie · 07/02/2026 14:00

ClawsandEffect · 07/02/2026 10:10

100% this. It's always been there.

All the media hype and hysteria is ridiculous. It's natural human variation.

Totally agree with this. These issues have always existed but giving the learning difficulty a label doesn't solve the issues associated with it.
Whilst putting a name to the problems might be better these days, in my experience SEN students with a good work ethic engage with the prescribed adaptations and do well whereas SEN students who treat the diagnosis as an excuse to give up working in class perform badly.
That's the way it's always been. If a child doesn't try, they don't progress however many accomodations and adaptations a teacher makes.
Parents need to be realistic too. I have known parents complain that their child's diagnosis has only given them entitlement for 15 mins longer on a GCSE. They honestly expected the exam to be made easier in terms of rigour for their child because of their diagnosis.
Seriously- they expected easier questions and more lenient marking!

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 13:59

Needlenardlenoo · 07/02/2026 13:58

I mean if I worked in one of those grammars I wouldn't be posting on here about this. It'd be like another planet. There are autistic kids at those schools of course, but ones who could get top scores in 11+ at 10.

Someone from a grammar has posted.

OP posts:
Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 13:59

Needlenardlenoo · 07/02/2026 13:57

Threads like this obviously attract people with an interest, and SEN tolerant schools (not just those paying lip service) have much higher SEN.

The grammar schools near me have single digit EHCP and ditto pupil premium!

I didn’t include SEN in my title for that very reason.

OP posts:
Needlenardlenoo · 07/02/2026 13:58

I mean if I worked in one of those grammars I wouldn't be posting on here about this. It'd be like another planet. There are autistic kids at those schools of course, but ones who could get top scores in 11+ at 10.

Needlenardlenoo · 07/02/2026 13:57

Threads like this obviously attract people with an interest, and SEN tolerant schools (not just those paying lip service) have much higher SEN.

The grammar schools near me have single digit EHCP and ditto pupil premium!

Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 13:56

FoxRedPuppy · 07/02/2026 13:52

No, I think everyone who is ND should be diagnosed. I don’t like anecdata so wouldn’t agree that this thread shows what is actually going on in our society.

I think it has been massively under diagnosed in the past, and so it feels like it is more diagnosed.

20% of pupils with ALL SEND is the current statistic. Based on actual data from DfE. Current adhd diagnosis rates are about 1%. Again that is actual data from NHS/diagnosis providers. That means some classes with have 5%, some 0, some 20 and that data is still correct.

I think we know more about it and especially signing girls, so we seek diagnosis tha might not have happened. The current estimate (based on full population data) is that about 5% of the population is ND (that includes dyslexia, dyspraxia, Tourette’s and others).

But none of the responses have 0% in some classes, or even 5%. They’re all uniformly higher. I don’t know why you’re seeing this as some kind of offensive statement and value judgement, it isn’t. There are SENCOs here saying the same thing.

OP posts:
Playingvideogames · 07/02/2026 13:55

Ladyfromthehill · 07/02/2026 13:33

I teach secondary, so I talk about a variety classes (I usually have 10+ classes per year). The SEN needs are not spread evenly across the classes, there will be more SEN in some than in others.
I absolutely will stand by the fact that there are not more kids with needs than 15 years ago. The cuts made it that there are fewer SEN places, people are more aware to ask for SEN school places than push their kids into mainstream. but this also means there are fewer SEN places, and more SEN kids who dont belong in mainstream are pushed into the system, but those kids always existed. In the past they just dropped off the map and out of education altogether and no one kept track of the numbers, while now we do.
There was a ignorant post a few days ago about the number of school refusers from someone who thinks it's a currentl only issue, when school refusers existed, but no one was reporting on the numbers. Kinda like, never seen Peru, so surely the country does not exist.

I can definitely think of children that would’ve been diagnosed when I was at school. I wouldn’t have said nearly half though, probably more like 10% or a 15% at a push. 40% and some of the numbers quoted here are very very high and far beyond what I suspected. I don’t see why some posters are taking offence at what is an objective question. Of course it begs the question as to how much value can be attached to a diagnosis that a third of the population have (in terms of accommodations, extra support etc).

OP posts: