Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to want my wife to do more of the child-related tasks as she wants a large family?

608 replies

dadtosomekids · 31/01/2026 13:19

I know this is mostly a women’s space, but that’s kind of why I’m here: I’d really like some female perspectives. For context I’m a man, married to a woman I love. She’s genuinely a great mum and a wonderful person that I’m proud of being married to. We’ve got 2 kids, one is 4 and the other is 1.

From the very start she was clear she wanted a big family, 3-4 kids. I’ve always been more of a one-kid person. If I’m being totally honest, 2 already feels like a lot to me. Parenting is hard, and I don’t find it fulfilling in the way she does, I mostly find it exhausting, although I love my children.

That said, I love her and I wanted / want to be with her. I knew that lots of kids were basically part of the deal, so I went along with it. I don’t regret my children, I love spending time with them (but struggle when it’s full days or long stretches of solo parenting) but I also can’t pretend this was ever my dream.

I’m usually out of the house from around 8am until about 6pm for work, 5 days per week. I very rarely get time that feels properly “off”, especially at weekends because we tend to spend the weekends as a family.

My wife is a SAHM, which was always what she wanted. Her day-to-day expenses (things like clothes, coffees, dentist, general spending) are covered by her or family money or inheritance, so money isn’t really a stressor for her in the long term. The house is paid for 50/50 by us. Everything else (bills, children’s clothes, nursery, meals out as a family, holidays) are covered by me.

The thing we keep clashing over is expectations around childcare. She wants everything to be very 50/50: nights, weekends, early mornings, all of it. She also still wants a third child, possibly a fourth, whereas I really don’t. And this is where I get stuck. From her side, it’s “this is my purpose in life, I want a big family”. I get that, and I respect it. But from my side, this already feels like more than I can comfortably handle. It feels like I’m being asked to sign up for something I never really wanted, and then expected to put in exactly the same level of energy and enthusiasm as someone who does. I guess, bluntly, my thinking is this: if having 3-4 kids is something she wants far more than I do, is it unreasonable to think she should be doing more of the work that comes with that choice? Because at the moment it feels like “I want more kids, let’s do this together, but you still have to carry half, or more, of the load”.

I love my wife, I love my kids, and I want to stay with her. I’m not trying to opt out of being a parent. Im
happy to occasionally wake up with the baby or to help get everyone ready in the morning for the day. I just don’t want to pretend that this is equally my dream when it isn’t. I can’t wake up every other morning at 6am because our toddler does, or spend large chunks of the day firefighting tantrums and overtired behaviour.

So am I being unfair here? Would it be unreasonable to say that if you want another 1-2 children be prepared for your load to go up disproportionately to mine?

Would really appreciate honest thoughts

OP posts:
AprilinPortugal · 31/01/2026 16:50

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 31/01/2026 16:20

The op said he would like this but the wife doesn’t want it

Oh I missed that! That's a shame.

Gymnopedie · 31/01/2026 16:46

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:36

And going to get your nails done isn't a 'break'.

Well if it isn't a break then it must be a chore.

It's me time. When you're having something done that is purely for you, no-one else.

SteelyEyed · 31/01/2026 16:43

Minortour · 31/01/2026 15:23

The whole point of having a SAHP is they take the lion’s share of night wakings/ earlies

Why is that, exactly? One person being constantly fatigued and the other well-rested doesn't seem at all reasonable

It's entirely fair! And is how it actually works in the real world for 90% of houses where one half is a stay at home parent and the other half is working full-time, I will bet.

Yes being a stay at home parent is difficult but with one child in nursery and another one aged 1 – they have plenty of naps and you can pretty much lie on the living room rug and nap with them for an hour or two a day if you like, but the deal is, you do the nights & the early mornings and so on. If you're a zombie the next day nobody is going to fire you.

The partner who has to sit upright in an office all day should not be expected to do 50% of the nights and early mornings. They can't nap during the day or just push a pram around the park like a zombie (I've done this, haven't we all?). They have to be alert and perform and WORK in a way that doesn't get them fired.

This is simple common sense and how 90% of families work. Unfortunately we've got the 10% (no doubt divorced by now because of their very unreasonableness) laying in on the poor OP.

Isittimeformynapyet · 31/01/2026 16:41

Fern95 · 31/01/2026 16:25

In your situation I would book a vasectomy. You are lucky enough to have that control over your reproductive system that your wife doesn't have.

If you aren't wearing protection EVERY time you are intimate then the chances are high that she will end up pregnant and it will be your fault even though you didn't want more children.

I'm a woman and have two kids. I wouldn't have any more but my husband definitely would so opposite situation to you.

Why do you think OP needs advice on contraception and how babies get made?

"If you aren't wearing protection EVERY time you are intimate then the chances are high that she will end up pregnant" indeed!

Tulipsriver · 31/01/2026 16:40

The problem with your proposal is that you'd be setting an awful example for your children.

They won't learn 'mum and dad made a compromise because she wanted more kids and he didn't'. They will learn that childcare is a woman's responsibility and men are 'allowed' more free time.

And what if she didn't stick to her side of the arrangement? Would you resent the children?

If you're not both fully onboard with more children I don't think you should have them.

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:40

Megifer · 31/01/2026 16:39

Of course it is

Is it fuck. I have never, ever on my 45 years see anyone suggest that a man sitting in a barber chair is a break either. Absolute bullshit messaging.

LittleBearPad · 31/01/2026 16:40

DuckbilledSplatterPuff · 31/01/2026 14:53

" she’ll remind me that I’m a dad, ask what time I’ll be home, act like she’s heroically managed the kids alone all day when I do come home…"

BUT SHE HAS BEEN HEROICALLY MANAGING THE KIDS ALONE ALL DAY!!!!

Why do you think she feels she has to remind you that you are a dad?

Also for pps pointing out that he pays the bills.
She's not working but using her private income to pay half the mortgage as well as her own expenses - she's not getting NI on that is she? She chooses to be at home ATM to look after pre school children, not an uncommon choice if people can afford it.
But if she did want to go out to work - what level of support could she expect? Would he suddenly think that joint parenting/housework/lilfe admin after 6.00 pm and at weekends was fair? I doubt it.

Anyone else think he checks when he's out with the kids because she knows he isn't familiar enough with this to think about whether they need a hat or not?

OP. Don't have any more kids, you are not really parenting the ones you've got.
Tell your wife honestly how you feel so that she can decide if she can cope with your resentment or not. And also so that she knows what level of freely given support she could expect in future if she did return to work.

But she’s chosen to look after them all the time. Even when she’s away from them she micromanages both OP and any babysitter

OP is talking about his going to the pub to meet friends. She doesn’t want to do the same but it’s ok that he does from time to time.

She sounds both spoilt and suffocating.

Finally not sure why you are mentioning NI. She can get that via child benefit claim even if OP earns too much and so they don’t receive the cash

Megifer · 31/01/2026 16:39

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:36

And going to get your nails done isn't a 'break'.

Of course it is

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:39

Sunshineandoranges · 31/01/2026 16:36

Sorry i dont agree. If the mum is sahm and so keen on having more children she should be happy to do more of the childminding when husband home unless he has a relaxed job. I was a sahm for 4 years and you do get some periods of sitting in the sunshine with friends in the park or having coffee on playdates while your children play with friends' children. You sound like a great dad op, doing your share. I wanted a third child but the thought of making my husband do the extra stuff a new baby entails when he already did so much made me realise i was being selfish so we were happy with our two children.

I wonder if he would see sitting in a park watching two children as some kind of leisure time. Somehow I doubt many on here would see it as down time for any man. Different standards, as per.

Franpie · 31/01/2026 16:38

You shouldn’t have any more children than you want. It is really really wrong for you to bring children into this world that you don’t want. And I seriously doubt that your marriage would survive it.

I have seen plenty of marriages fail after the 3rd child because 1 of the couple didn’t actually want the 3rd child in the first place and once they are here, that 3rd child is what pushes the marriage to breaking point.

Needlenardlenoo · 31/01/2026 16:38

I think this would be a good one to take to a marriage guidance counsellor because neither of you are right or wrong: you've got conflicting priorities.

Sunshineandoranges · 31/01/2026 16:38

Sorry op i was replying to another reply...I agree with you.

BlackCat14 · 31/01/2026 16:37

I think if you agreed to have children, then you do 50:50 with your wife. Did she know you weren’t that fussed about having them?
Unless you made it abundantly clear to her before having children that you didn’t want to share the load, and told her you expected to do more child care, then I don’t think you have a right to expect her to do more.
I say this thinking of a good friend of mine. She has three kids aged between 3-12. She does EVERYTHING for/with them. Her husband never wanted kids but he knew it was her dream so was honest with her from the start and said he’d have kids with her but the legwork was on her. She agreed. Apparently he never did a bottle or changed their nappies as babies, has never taken them to football or swimming. She says she is fine with this as she knew it was the deal all along.

Sunshineandoranges · 31/01/2026 16:36

dadtosomekids · 31/01/2026 13:37

@bitterexwifeso far I’ve done my fair share with the 2 children that we’ve had. In the newborn days I didn’t wake up because my wife told me there’s no need, she breastfed. Then when we had early wakings, with both children, I’d wake up at say 6am or 5am or whatever time the baby was “up for the day” and let her sleep till 7-7:30 when I’d have to start getting ready for work. In the later stages I’d also sometimes take our eldest back to bed if she woke up in the middle of the night, settle her, cuddle her back to sleep.
My proposal is that next time I am not prepared to do this. I don’t want to wake up again at 5am or 6am. I don’t want my load to increase again.
At the moment I’d say I’m doing my fair share. I just don’t want or need more work.

Sorry i dont agree. If the mum is sahm and so keen on having more children she should be happy to do more of the childminding when husband home unless he has a relaxed job. I was a sahm for 4 years and you do get some periods of sitting in the sunshine with friends in the park or having coffee on playdates while your children play with friends' children. You sound like a great dad op, doing your share. I wanted a third child but the thought of making my husband do the extra stuff a new baby entails when he already did so much made me realise i was being selfish so we were happy with our two children.

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:36

And going to get your nails done isn't a 'break'.

CopeNorth · 31/01/2026 16:35

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 31/01/2026 15:56

Well presumably she owns half the house so fair enough

Yeah 🤷🏻‍♀️ maybe it is. But my comment was in response to the - she only spends her money on coffees and clothes point. Hard to know what’s ‘fair’ I’d generally think it’s fair to live as a unit financially if you’re married with kids. That said it doesn’t sound like money is stretched here though…

usedtobeaylis · 31/01/2026 16:35

Out of interest, how did you simultaneously 'go along with her' because you love her, and make it clear your absolute limit was two children? Did you 'go along with her' knowing you would roll back on it? You shouldn't have kids you don't want but that would be a dick move if that's what you've done. And not unheard of either.

Switcher · 31/01/2026 16:34

The way that worked for us is that whoever was not working for money would get up at night. And weekends are always shared, assuming no paid work at weekends. Basically the person bringing home the bacon has protected nights on working days. But don't forget that kids are pretty self sufficient by about 7 so there's not quite the same early morning drama. You don't have to have more if you don't want them.

Megifer · 31/01/2026 16:33

Cherrytree86 · 31/01/2026 16:20

@Megifer

well, go for a swim and sauna, or for her nails doing or whatever. Op has offered her time out, it’s on her if she refuses it. But it’s doesn’t mean he can’t have his break.

You know what, I just made a comment that op should make sure she gets time to herself too. He can "offer" but only he knows if its something the wife actually wants to do, perhaps she could do with more of a "get yourself a bath love ill sort the kids out", or i dunno, whatever he thinks.

Im frankly baffled people are arguing back against that comment but ill assume its because my post was only 99% in complete support of op.

BowstotheSettingSun · 31/01/2026 16:33

ArseSkinForAFriend · 31/01/2026 13:27

So am I being unfair here? Would it be unreasonable to say that if you want another 1-2 children be prepared for your load to go up disproportionately to mine?

Yes this would be unfair.

What you need to do is grow a spine and tell her you do NOT want any more children.

What she does with that information will then be up to her.

But you need a vasectomy pronto.

You can't go into parenthood half-arsed.

You either want more kids or you do not.

^^This. You dont owe it to her to have more children but it's your job to act to prevent pregnancy and to be a proper engaged father to the ones you have, however many that may be.

Even if your wife agreed to your scheme there's no reasonable way of enforcing it. What happens if she gets PND or develops an illness that means she can't manage the children - are you just going to stand there saying "not my problem? What happens if you lose your job or cant work full time any more? You are supposed to be a team and life does not always work out the way you expect.

Theonlywayicanloveyou · 31/01/2026 16:30

Fern95 · 31/01/2026 16:25

In your situation I would book a vasectomy. You are lucky enough to have that control over your reproductive system that your wife doesn't have.

If you aren't wearing protection EVERY time you are intimate then the chances are high that she will end up pregnant and it will be your fault even though you didn't want more children.

I'm a woman and have two kids. I wouldn't have any more but my husband definitely would so opposite situation to you.

While I agree with your overall point, it really is very easy for guys to actually just make sure they ARE wearing protection every time.

Isittimeformynapyet · 31/01/2026 16:29

Monty34 · 31/01/2026 16:10

The OP is not the wife.

Sigh.

"OP (the husband) wants her (his wife) to have equal downtime, presumably to do what she (his wife) wants."

Frugalgal · 31/01/2026 16:29

PurpleThistle7 · 31/01/2026 16:27

i always said I wanted 3-4 kids. My husband said he really wanted 2 but we could come back to it for a discussion once we saw how it would be. Turns out it took us years to have our daughter and then our son and I was left with some life changing issues from childbirth. By the time we went through all that, I was grateful for the two children we both definitely wanted and content with what we were lucky enough to have.

all this to say that these conversations aren’t set in stone and you should both have the ability to reassess. Like you say, the reality of parenting isn’t always what you imagine and it sounds like you both find it pretty difficult. It’s pretty concerning that she can never loosen up about it and hates being away from her kids to that extent as well so I’d be worried about what it would look like as time goes on.

The problem is that once you agree to children, you have them and you have no choice but to step up. It can’t be transactional - particularly as you have no idea what it could be like with 3, 4, etc. You might have a child with additional needs, your wife might have PPD, any other sort of family difficulty could happen. So you have to both be in it and committed to the family you’re creating. It’s fair to say ‘this is me and this is what I can give’ and I’d hope she values you enough to respect that. But you can’t be a conditional parent and opt in and out using a maths equation.

(I’d honestly stop answering her hovering texts when you take the kids out. Just say all is fine and I’m going to focus on the kids now. That’s super controlling behaviour)

Really good advice.

Gymnopedie · 31/01/2026 16:29

You say no to more children. You were honest from the start, so was she but she's thinking that she can talk you round/'accidentally' get pregnant, when she says that she will get her own way. And the guilt tripping that her job as a SAHM is more difficult and more dangerous than yours is to my mind manipulation. Not pouring boiling water over a child is a basic tenet of parenting, not something that deserves an award.

I'm not even sure she honestly sees you as a husband. It sounds more like she wants a sperm donor and somebody to share the parenting load 50/50 for the children she so desperately wants. Even though when you do care for the children she has to micromanage you without accepting that you are an equal parent. So she wants it equal when it suits her but not when it doesn't.

I know you say you love her and you love the children you have, but any more and the resentment you'll feel will eventually erode that love and then everyone, including the children, will suffer.

Say no and mean it. If she leaves you that's on her. It shows you where you are in her priorities, which is not very high by the sound of it.

Parker231 · 31/01/2026 16:28

dadtosomekids · 31/01/2026 13:30

@PevenseygirlQQ I have always made it clear that I want 1 child, 2 is my absolute limit.
She always made it clear that she’d like 3-4, and jokes that she’ll get her way. She’s never talked about kids in a way that would suggest she’d ever stop at 2. It’s a “given” that she’d have more. I know she’d leave me if I refused to father more children.

If you don’t want more children, don’t have them. However for any hours you’re not at work it should be 50:50. If you have a child free afternoon one weekend, your wife is entitled to the same. Parents don’t get time off!