Husband left his friends who I don’t know alone in our house with our 6 month old

It’s not a double standard. If DH was the primary carer for the baby, had never been out without her and was anxious about leaving her for the first time then yes, I’d say he would be justified in being upset about this too if the roles were reversed.

Why? What do you think they are going to do? Paedophiles make the headlines but are not the norm. These were friends!

Yes but human babies are almost unique amongst mammals in that they are actually very good at separating from primary care givers from an early age. In humans extended family have always cared for babies. Secure attachment literally involves being able to separate from the primary caregiver without too much distress and then also being happy and pleased when they return.

Weird take. His friends have probably been asking to meet up, but he has a baby and is a responsible father. So he said "actually, would it be okay if you came over mine, it's easier as all baby's stuff is here, why don't you come Saturday as I'm home alone and have no plans". This is a perfectly normal thing to do and the kind of thing I did all the time when mine were babies.

Not did the baby's father. He'd known these people all his life ( longer than his wife) so how can they be strangers

This

So would you leave your baby with your best friend?

FTR, the OP did know them, has met them before a few times, just doesn't know them that well, so they weren't even strangers.

The point was, the childs parent had an emergency and left his child with his friends that he has know all his life and trusts.

It is NOTHING like you leaving your child with a friend and then that friend palming them off on someone else. Its the same as you leaving your child with your friend.

Don't you trust your husband’s judgement?

But that isn’t what has happened here though is it? At least get your facts right.

A child was being cared for by one of its parents. There was an unforeseen emergency. The parent left the child with their trusted, lifelong friends for an hour.

The fact this was the dad shouldn’t make a difference. He’s either an equal parent or he isn’t.

since when was your husband on the same social par as your friend?

he is the childs parent.

What a question I don’t trust someone I don’t know my husband has nothing to do with it .

That's not what happened though. In your convoluted analogy it's the same as the mother leaving the child with a friend she's known since she was a toddler.

You are all insane saying it’s not a stranger, so if you leave your baby as the mother with your friend and your friend leaves your baby with her bestie who you don’t know then it’s ok with you ? It’s exactly the same you don’t know them so they are a stranger , go ahead leave your kids with anyone related to anyone you know .

They weren’t a stranger to her husband. The child’s other parent.

do you not trust your husband?

She said her husband’s friend she doesn’t know a stranger to me is a stranger to my baby I don’t know how they are .

I agree. Good thing that’s not what happened here.

The baby wasn’t left with strangers 🤷🏼‍♀️

Not a stranger, three friends the husband has known since he was a toddler.

Faced will a role reversal, would you have left your baby with your lifelong friends? Would you expect your husband/partner to be upset if you felt your trusted friends were capable?

I wouldn’t leave my baby with a stranger in any circumstance ,unless the house of full of cameras that I can access and monitor .

I would have been uncomfortable with that.

I agree. He did the right thing. I hope your sister in law is okay.

almost certainly he’d be helping his mum and sister get into a&e and that would be far easier without a baby strapped to his chest. Two broken bones is a lot!

My daughter has broken a couple of bones and was very calm, but she couldn’t walk and needed a wheelchair and to be moved really carefully. So it was really good your husband could help

It seems to me to be undeniable that the absolute priority in this situation should have been the 11 year old with broken bones. Which is what happened. Well done, that man. Which is not something I say very often.