Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To reckon that Reform will win the next election, and to be utterly terrified about it? 😪

584 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 26/01/2026 14:33

i am a leftie

I think they’ll win

If don’t, they’ll have the majority in a hung parliament and govern as a minority party before joining with the Tories.

i’m going to tighten my belt re running my home and prepare for onslaught as the country becomes unrecognisable

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Goldenbear · 30/01/2026 16:01

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:29

Point me to where I said that.

Goodness, why so craven about their political opinions, surely it loses all meaning if you don't demonstrate the courage of your convictions?

Goldenbear · 30/01/2026 15:54

Khayker · 30/01/2026 15:05

Where did I say it was about resources, equipment and staff?. So you attribute those extra staff members to rises in NI do you? You know it was a direct result of government action? Its about accountability and culture change, what its not about is resources, equipment and staff. Great that those patients benefitted from extra funding which could have come from a multitude of sources, now multiply that benefit by 100 times as that's what's needed throughout the NHS to cut waiting lists across the country.

And Reform are going to do that are they- is someone going to come along and pop your balloon of delusion!

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 30/01/2026 15:49

Khayker · 30/01/2026 15:21

So the public have two choices, a partly privatised health system where people choose what services they use supplied by private companies all of which will be competing for business or give the NHS extra money with no accountability to spend even more of tax payers money. Why do you think its fair to raise the publics taxes to provide a service which is failing and generally unavailable? I don't see an improvement plan there. NHS managers shouldn't be allowed to have budgets. They've proved time and again that they can't balance their books because money has been used irresponsibly to the detrement of patients. Their is a vast difference between NHS and European hospitals and its not availability of care its the fact they are well run and deal with inefficiency, NHS can't do that.

people choose what services they use supplied by private companies all of which will be competing for business

You'd think that privatisation would improve efficiency through market competition, but does that ever happen in practice? In my experience, private healthcare companies charge the maximum they think the market will bear. Also, don't forget that an insurance-based (or hybrid) system, requires extra layers of administration and extra middle-men in the form of insurance companies.

Do you think private fertility clinics in the UK offer good value for money? After all there are plenty of them, which should keep prices affordable, right?

What about private dental practices? At my local practice, a scale and polish by a dental nurse costs £85 and they still don't have any appointments available until June!

Do you think that vet practices in the UK offer reasonable rates? These days, many owners have pet insurance (and some insurers pay the vet directly), so the combination of market competition and the expert negotiation offered by insurance companies ought to keep prices low. But does it?

US private healthcare companies have been desperate for years to run the NHS. They wouldn't be so keen if there weren't enormous profits to be made.

Khayker · 30/01/2026 15:21

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 30/01/2026 15:02

If one health service spends £6,000 per person per year and another spends £9,000, you'd reasonably expect the second health service to offer more. The fact that one system is funded through taxation and the other is funded through a hybrid system shouldn't make much difference. Either way, the public pays.

It's virtually impossible to compare the efficiency of the two systems when their budgets are so different.

Edited

So the public have two choices, a partly privatised health system where people choose what services they use supplied by private companies all of which will be competing for business or give the NHS extra money with no accountability to spend even more of tax payers money. Why do you think its fair to raise the publics taxes to provide a service which is failing and generally unavailable? I don't see an improvement plan there. NHS managers shouldn't be allowed to have budgets. They've proved time and again that they can't balance their books because money has been used irresponsibly to the detrement of patients. Their is a vast difference between NHS and European hospitals and its not availability of care its the fact they are well run and deal with inefficiency, NHS can't do that.

Khayker · 30/01/2026 15:05

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 14:36

Really? let me give you an example, real life, first hand....

My DD dept had a waiting list of 22 weeks, from discharge to getting therapy (for Stroke)
After Reeves NI hikes, they got funding for 3 more staff, those 3 extra people have bought waiting lists down from 22 weeks to less than 4 weeks.

Its a very intensive 1 to 1 process, sometimes 2 to 1, where the patient has v limited mobility, their work gets people moving, back to work, back into the community.
Speed after hospital discharge is vital.

So tell me again its not about resources, equipment and staff?

Where did I say it was about resources, equipment and staff?. So you attribute those extra staff members to rises in NI do you? You know it was a direct result of government action? Its about accountability and culture change, what its not about is resources, equipment and staff. Great that those patients benefitted from extra funding which could have come from a multitude of sources, now multiply that benefit by 100 times as that's what's needed throughout the NHS to cut waiting lists across the country.

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 30/01/2026 15:02

Khayker · 30/01/2026 13:54

Absolutely correct it is like comparing apples and oranges, so why do people do that? We don't have a partially privately funded health system like France, Netherlands so blaming inefficiency in our NHS on not having the same funds available as partially private health services is rediculous. Equally throwing taxpayers money at a public service without expecting fundamental change is rediculous.

Edited

If one health service spends £6,000 per person per year and another spends £9,000, you'd reasonably expect the second health service to offer more. The fact that one system is funded through taxation and the other is funded through a hybrid system shouldn't make much difference. Either way, the public pays.

It's virtually impossible to compare the efficiency of the two systems when their budgets are so different.

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 14:36

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:25

Throwing more money at NHS will not fix it. It needs a culture change and let's be honest, Labour are doing exactly the same as the Tories did. Voting for the same thing over and over again and expecting radical change is madness.

Really? let me give you an example, real life, first hand....

My DD dept had a waiting list of 22 weeks, from discharge to getting therapy (for Stroke)
After Reeves NI hikes, they got funding for 3 more staff, those 3 extra people have bought waiting lists down from 22 weeks to less than 4 weeks.

Its a very intensive 1 to 1 process, sometimes 2 to 1, where the patient has v limited mobility, their work gets people moving, back to work, back into the community.
Speed after hospital discharge is vital.

So tell me again its not about resources, equipment and staff?

Khayker · 30/01/2026 13:54

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 30/01/2026 13:02

If we actually try funding the NHS to same per capita level as France, the Netherlands or Germany and its performance doesn't significantly improve, then fair enough, start looking at alternative systems.

But at the moment we're comparing apples and oranges.

Absolutely correct it is like comparing apples and oranges, so why do people do that? We don't have a partially privately funded health system like France, Netherlands so blaming inefficiency in our NHS on not having the same funds available as partially private health services is rediculous. Equally throwing taxpayers money at a public service without expecting fundamental change is rediculous.

ChangePrivacyQuestion · 30/01/2026 13:42

It'll be rough, but the way they've courted trussonomics so far, even if they win, it won't be long until they sabotage themselves out of no.10. Lettuce lifespan and all that.

That being said, I will admit daft.ie HAS been getting an unusual amount of traffic from my IP.

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 30/01/2026 13:02

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:25

Throwing more money at NHS will not fix it. It needs a culture change and let's be honest, Labour are doing exactly the same as the Tories did. Voting for the same thing over and over again and expecting radical change is madness.

If we actually try funding the NHS to same per capita level as France, the Netherlands or Germany and its performance doesn't significantly improve, then fair enough, start looking at alternative systems.

But at the moment we're comparing apples and oranges.

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:29

Goldenbear · 30/01/2026 12:07

So your dream is to replicate some ICE style force here in the UK, I can't believe you're British to think that such a violent direction is wanted or needed.

Point me to where I said that.

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:25

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 07:08

I agree with some of what you until i get to the Reform bit...

NHS change is very difficult, we need a working NHS 364/24/7 service but at the same time introduce change, which is always highly unsettling.

On AE waits, yep terrible in my local Hospital and yes sometime family do take up seats but this state of affairs has only happened in recent years, in 2014, 15 patients waited more than 12 hours in AE, now its over 40,000, ambulances queuing outside AE wasn't normal at all, now i see 20 or 30 vehicles treating people in a car parks now set up for this, same with corridor care.

Now all this happened under the Tories, the same Tories who now populate Reform..... and you think they'll fix the NHS?

Which can only be done by far more funding... an insurance based model is basically an extra tax on us all and on business too, will be hugely wasteful too.

Throwing more money at NHS will not fix it. It needs a culture change and let's be honest, Labour are doing exactly the same as the Tories did. Voting for the same thing over and over again and expecting radical change is madness.

Khayker · 30/01/2026 12:18

StandFirm · 30/01/2026 08:01

If you vote Reform for that reason, you will be bitterly disappointed. The only plan for the NHS is to end its domination over meds buying. The NHS regulates pricing in a way that big US pharma resents. Farage will not be interested in fixing the service, he couldn't care less about the service, he's really interested in making sure his mates in the US can extract extortionate fees from us for access to their drugs. I'll let you guess where that leads us. The wealthy may still gain access to cutting edge treatment but the rest us will be treated worse than in developing countries. It's quite literally your funeral mate.

Absolute nonsense, where's your proof? Just spouting propaganda that suits your narrative. You haven't addressed any of the points I've made just general rhetoric without facts. Try reading what I've written and form a logical fact based argument to support your view of what you want to believe. People who adopt the approach you've demonstrated above are the reason this country is a mess, too many people are jumping on a bandwagon without understanding the implications of what they are saying/doing. Fed up of listening to Reform is this or that, supply some facts to support your claims.

Goldenbear · 30/01/2026 12:07

Khayker · 29/01/2026 15:26

How nieve are you? Do you honestly think Starmer isn't a millionaire? He ownes assets in London in excess of £4,000,000 on top of his cash assets which have never been made public. Ed Milliband on the other hand has made his financial status clear, he's worth £15,000,000. I suggest you look again at what you've said and get your head out of the sand. We are not America, we don't carry guns and generally those law enforcement officers in the UK that do carry guns rarely shoot anyone. The people ICE are targetting albeit in a rather blunt way are rapist, drug dealers, paedophiles and overstayers. They are doing it to protect the public. In this country, we do very little to protect ourselves from a minority of the immigrants in this country that commit the same crimes as those illegal immigrants in USA. Why would anyone in the USA be supporting these vile people and interfering in an arrest which will only have one winner. The key to not becoming the USA is to learn from their mistakes and intervene before it gets too late to stop the influx of undocumented males. As far as health is concerned Farage has repeatedly said the NHS will be free at the point of contact which is the case now. Having not long paid out £1,400 for a tooth extraction which if left could have had serious health implications, I can say without a shadow of a doubt, the NHS is overburdened as my only other choice would have been to wait 2 years for my turn. Not much point having something 'free' if you can't access it. So think again about your choices, being gullible is not an excuse to inflict these Labour/Conservative politicians on us for a moment longer.

So your dream is to replicate some ICE style force here in the UK, I can't believe you're British to think that such a violent direction is wanted or needed.

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 09:03

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:44

To explain - the increasing employment costs for employers together with uncapped damages for unfair dismissal and reduced qualifying period for unfair dismissal (coming in 2027) mean a lot of pressure. They would have been better to bring in the unfair dismissal changes this year so that employers do not seek to fire this year before the changes come in. That would be worth raising with an MP. Unfair dismissal case law will be helpful to employers so they shouldn’t panic but I know many are.

Its 6 months instead of 2 years, bringing fwd isn't going to help? & it will only affect hose employers who sack unfairly, not for properly done redundancies.

On NI, yes will have an effect but whats the alternative? you'd need to raise income tax by about 5% to get the same money and we have huge financial commitments... PO and Blood Scandals, NHS, Defence, SENDs and an unfunded NI cut by the Tories, thats £11billion alone.

UK companies are doing very well, record profitability, but a 5% rise in income tax would have destroyed consumer confidence and led to many more claiming in work benefits,

FitnessTrainer2020 · 30/01/2026 08:55

smallglassbottle · 26/01/2026 15:03

What's going on? 👀

It's a shitshow, partly because of the takeover of billionaire tech bros and MAGA.

But if you vote Reform you'll get the UK version of Davos. Based on the fact that Brexit was an isolationist strategy that we are now all paying for, because Farage has the same views on race as Elon and Trump, uses the same race baiting, and because he's a Trump admirer who wants what Trump has. And where they have beem voted in, its been a disaster.

I don't know who I'll vote for yet but its not going to be Elon/Trump supporters Reform thats for sure as I don't want to see a Minneapolis here, and you'llalways get that kind of situation if your image relies on dividing people and making people fear eachother.

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:55

Yes I think it’s pretty clear - obviously not ‘everyone’ and obviously there will not be an actual bloodbath. I am just genuinely concerned for people this year and do hope they are able to bring the changes forward.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 30/01/2026 08:50

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:29

I’m afraid when it comes to being being fired this year it is true. I work in an area where I see this and advise on this on a daily basis. It is very worrying.

I think its more the ‘everyone’ will be fired or broke comment

obviously thats not the case

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:44

To explain - the increasing employment costs for employers together with uncapped damages for unfair dismissal and reduced qualifying period for unfair dismissal (coming in 2027) mean a lot of pressure. They would have been better to bring in the unfair dismissal changes this year so that employers do not seek to fire this year before the changes come in. That would be worth raising with an MP. Unfair dismissal case law will be helpful to employers so they shouldn’t panic but I know many are.

BIossomtoes · 30/01/2026 08:42

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:29

I’m afraid when it comes to being being fired this year it is true. I work in an area where I see this and advise on this on a daily basis. It is very worrying.

Never mind facts and statistics then.

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 08:41

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:29

I’m afraid when it comes to being being fired this year it is true. I work in an area where I see this and advise on this on a daily basis. It is very worrying.

So no one will be fired under Reform, none under the Tories... only happens under Labour.
People lose their jobs constantly, even in boom times, unemployment stabilised last quarter at 5.1%

Some industries are recruiting like there is no tomorrow, Babcock near me, need 4000 extra staff, in Plymouth, Bristol and Rosyth.

900 of them are graduate/apprentice rolls.

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:29

I’m afraid when it comes to being being fired this year it is true. I work in an area where I see this and advise on this on a daily basis. It is very worrying.

Alexandra2001 · 30/01/2026 08:22

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:16

Agree. I just don’t want more of this current government. Everyone will be fired or completely broke by the end of it. Watch for the bloodbath this year as employers face the reality of the rising costs and new employment laws. Be nice to your managers.

Thats simply not true.

Business profits across most sectors are up, substantially & growth is higher over the last 18months, than the 18months prior to the last GE, under the Tories.

Unemployment is up but still below historic long term levels and much is because of AI.

I think Labour have made some big screw ups but to say they have or will wreck the economy is untrue.

If people vote Reform, we will get a Reform Govt, its complacent to say otherwise BUT their popularity is falling and polling yesterday showed Starmer is 2nd behind Farage (by 4%) on trust issues and doing what is best for the UK, Badenoch was nowhere.

Sunshinebound99 · 30/01/2026 08:16

Agree. I just don’t want more of this current government. Everyone will be fired or completely broke by the end of it. Watch for the bloodbath this year as employers face the reality of the rising costs and new employment laws. Be nice to your managers.

StandFirm · 30/01/2026 08:10

Yes, but in the meantime, they're poisoning the political debate. Populists are really like bad magicians: they hypnotise you with a big flag as they take everything else from you.
Ask recovering MAGA voters, or Russians...

Swipe left for the next trending thread