Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that 4 G.C.S.E's needed to do business studies is ridiculous

694 replies

magicalmadmadamim · 26/01/2026 12:17

My eldest DS is 16 and been at college since September. He has 2 G.C.S.E equivalent certificates in English and Maths.
I'm sure back when I was in college business studies was always a foundation course?
He really wanted to do business studies and they have put him on some really rubbish courses that he is super bored with.
Is it me or is education getting much harder now?
Hardly any of his school friends passed any g.c.s.e's :(

OP posts:
Alltheyellowbirds · 27/01/2026 11:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I know. Especially when waiting just a couple of years would have seen him out of education - what was the urgency to buy a house? I can’t get my head round moving overseas during my child’s important GCSE years particularly when the father works such long hours and isn’t able to be around to supervise homework etc.

x2boys · 27/01/2026 11:52

x2boys · 27/01/2026 11:49

Wrong again plenty of children get less than a grade 4 . In their GCSE,s and it's classed as a level 1 qualification, and they wont have SEN either .

That was quoting @Tigerbalmshark
And can posters stop assuming that children who are not academic must have SEN.

x2boys · 27/01/2026 11:49

Wrong again plenty of children get less than a grade 4 . In their GCSE,s and it's classed as a level 1 qualification, and they wont have SEN either .

DearShark · 27/01/2026 11:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Tigerbalmshark · 27/01/2026 11:38

labtest57 · 27/01/2026 09:43

Wrong. Functional Skills level 2 is GCSE equivalent. Entry level and Level one FS qualifications are obviously lower than FS2, so Fs2 are not the lowest level qualification you can get?

Ok, they are the lowest qualification that a 16+ child in mainstream education with no SEN can get.

The fact that children in special schools can achieve qualifications in independent life skills is not really relevant to this boy, who simply hasn’t done any work for the past five years. It is disrespectful to children with SEN who do work hard, to conflate the two situations.

Entry level qualifications were never going to be on offer for this boy, and he is even turning his nose up at doing his level 2 qualifications because he thinks he’s too good for them.

Casperroonie · 27/01/2026 11:30

Biskieboo · 27/01/2026 10:11

It's outrageous - these days you can't even bully a Muslim, for being a Muslim, film it, and put in on the internet for the whole world to see, without some bloody do-gooder 'playing the racist card'. It's political correctness gone mad. The OP's son is clearly a fine individual - a prince of a boy - who has been subject to worse unfair persecution than Jesus himself.

Too funny!

Casperroonie · 27/01/2026 11:29

magicalmadmadamim · 26/01/2026 16:54

I probably should have added more detail to the original post but i didn't think the expulsion reason would be so relevant.
Over the last couple years during years 10 and 11 he had persistant lateness, as well as generally being a bit of a backchat to the teachers, disagreeing with what they say etc, mainly because he enjoyed making other students laugh.
We had both spoken to him about these things many times and i told him to just keep his head down and get on with it rather than rocking the boat.
Anyway he has never got into serious trouble before this but the thing that got him expelled was that him and a few other friends (not close friends), took the mickey out of their other muslim friend, while he was praying in the prayer room.

Now i understand he was disrespectful, and call me naive, but to me expelling is for seriously bad behaviour when chairs get thrown at teachers or drugs are found, abusive behaviour etc.
It's obviously far too late now but i feel that suspension should have been enough for this.

Edited

Only a hate crime then. 🤡

Casperroonie · 27/01/2026 11:25

magicalmadmadamim · 26/01/2026 12:32

He have never been great in a school environment but is very switched on with techy things, he already has a little side hustle online which is doing well.
He is very interested in economics, investing etc.
Sadly he was expelled a few weeks before his exams which IMO was completely out of order. It wasn't worth expulsion at all.
Because of this he got to do 'Functional skills' english and maths and passed.

Ah OK. So it's everyone else's fault. Expelled for no reason, of course.... hahahaha sounds like the apple didn't fall far from the tree.

KnitFastDieWarm · 27/01/2026 11:22

The point isn’t the level of qualifications - it’s the lack of effort, hard work, and appropriate behaviour that’s the problem. If the OP’s son had worked his arse off to get his functional skills then that’s a
huge achievement and one to be proud of. But it sounds like he’s actually fucked about, misbehaved, and done the bare minimum, and therefore not achieved what he might have been capable of achieving. This suggests to me that he’s not been given much in the way of guidance or firm boundaries from his parents.

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 27/01/2026 11:14

Siarli · 26/01/2026 23:19

Once he gets to 18yrs hes an adult. He needs to get up in the morning off his backside and get his bum in gear. Nothing like keeping a fat cuckoo in the nest. If he thinks that the tax payer will provide and he can sign on. He can think again. He won't get any benefits. There's plenty of these cuckoos thinking they can earn money influencing, gaming etc. Sitting in front of screens through the night, sleeping in the day. It doesnt work out . This lad has lacked structure and discipline, poor parenting and yep schools lose interest in nuisances, they're happier when they dont turn up but it breeds depression, mental illness, loneliness and trouble. Sadly, its getting a bit late by 16 when a boy still has little to offer.

We live next door to a lady and her adult son. He's in his 30s. He's up all night, often playing loud video games or rap music. He has a dog that he never walks which is always barking. He doesn't work. He had a girlfriend but she got sick of his abuse, jealousy and cheating and left. He has at least one child who occasionally visits. He spends a lot of time on the phone shouting at people and threatening them.

He's in the room next to ours (the master bedroom) because he wanted it, even though his mum also wanted it and she's the one renting the house. So we have to hear all his bullshit through the wall. He spends most of his time smoking weed. She says he's her "baby" and he's completely indulged by her.

Seems like if your parents are willing to enable you, you never have to grow up.

TunnocksOrDeath · 27/01/2026 11:01

He didn't just mess up once. He showed persistent poor behaviour: showing up late, messing about in classes, disrespecting staff and making it harder for those of his classmates who were trying to concentrate in class.
In most families, the need to respect the staff, and not dick around in class and disrupt the lessons is instilled during the early years of primary school. OP is still making "boys will be boys" excuses for a 16 year old. I feel sorry for him, really he's been failed.
I'd also challenge his "it wasn't racist, because we're mates" excuse about the video - I know people from a predominantly white area who genuinely thought that the (only) South Asian boy in their class was their friend - He told me years later that what he mostly remembers from their time at school was that all of the group 'banter' which involved him was focussed on his race, and he'd be happy never to see any of them again.

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 27/01/2026 10:39

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 08:28

His dad went to a meeting with the school and appealed it. They basically said it was more about the lateness and backchat to the teachers, the incident was the perfect excuse to play the racist card to get rid of him.
I spoke to the head of year myself who was actually really nice, he did not sit the first 3 exams due to anxiety about returning to school after the incident with the other boy.
He sat all the others but he was actually devastated and cried to me for the first time in years.
He has enjoyed college much more than school so far.

Edited

Why would they bother to go through all the paperwork to exclude a disruptive child 2 months before GCSE OP? There would only have been a short time to go before study leave started anyway, so it's not as if it was a case of not wanting him ruining lessons anymore. If it wasn't that serious, they could easily have suspended him for a week or two until he would have been off anyway.

Biskieboo · 27/01/2026 10:11

It's outrageous - these days you can't even bully a Muslim, for being a Muslim, film it, and put in on the internet for the whole world to see, without some bloody do-gooder 'playing the racist card'. It's political correctness gone mad. The OP's son is clearly a fine individual - a prince of a boy - who has been subject to worse unfair persecution than Jesus himself.

BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 27/01/2026 10:10

RedToothBrush · 27/01/2026 09:43

If you were an employer and had two candidates who otherwise looked equal you'd take the one with GCSEs not functional skills qualifications.

It's a tough market out there. He's not fighting an up hill battle from the bottom of the pile in a competitive world.

The attitude of him and his parents is going to be everything at this point.

None of them are getting it yet even now. He's fucked.

None of them are getting it yet, even now

That is the key. No one has learned anything from the experience. Not even the adults involved. As was said wayyyy back in the thread, education is a ladder and the OP's son must build on every step. His life isn't over at 16. He can move on from this and improve his chances, but so much has to change. There has to be a fundamental shift in values and attitude in the son and his parents.

RedToothBrush · 27/01/2026 09:59

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 09:45

Nothing sinister, we moved abroad so we could afford to buy. Covid hit our businesses hard in the UK and we had better opportunities leaving. We gave my son the option to come with us, he chose to stay and finish education in the UK. I make regular trips back and he spends the summer with us.

What education? Great mates btw.

This has badly backfired.

You dumped him for financial reasons, didn't think about who he was hanging around with and clearly haven't had a clue how bad things had got with school.

It would have been apparent at least two or three years ago it wasn't working out as planned. He would have failed his exams regardless of the expulsion and this would have been apparent for some years.

Stop making excuses. Face up to your part in this and where you have ended up.

Other people don't just move abroad when the going gets tough. They stick it out for the kids.

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 09:45

RampantIvy · 27/01/2026 09:32

Unfortunately, I think functional skills qualifications are perceived as lesser qualifications compared to GCSEs because young people who take them are unable to pass foundation GCSE maths and English, so the logic is that if they are equivalent to GCSEs why haven't the young people taken and passed them at GCSE?

I admit that I was guilty of thinking that as well as most posters because I had no idea that they were considered an equivalent. I suspect that most employers think so as well.

Congratulations to those whose DC have struggled and managed pass them though. That must have been quite an achievement.

What I don’t understand is why this has come as a shock to you @magicalmadmadamim

I suppose as the non-resident parent you wouldn’t have engaged with the school, but why hasn’t your son’s father? Are relations between you so bad that your ex hasn’t kept you informed of what is happening? And the fact that so many children have failed their GCSEs doesn’t say much about the school. Was it a pupil referral unit? Why do you not know much about your child’s education? Why did you have to distance yourself from your child?

There is more to this than meets the eye.

Nothing sinister, we moved abroad so we could afford to buy. Covid hit our businesses hard in the UK and we had better opportunities leaving. We gave my son the option to come with us, he chose to stay and finish education in the UK. I make regular trips back and he spends the summer with us.

OP posts:
labtest57 · 27/01/2026 09:43

Tigerbalmshark · 27/01/2026 08:37

They are literally the lowest level qualification you can get! As evidenced by the fact he took them in one term.

Did you think they were equivalent to a PhD or something?

Wrong. Functional Skills level 2 is GCSE equivalent. Entry level and Level one FS qualifications are obviously lower than FS2, so Fs2 are not the lowest level qualification you can get?

RedToothBrush · 27/01/2026 09:43

RampantIvy · 27/01/2026 09:32

Unfortunately, I think functional skills qualifications are perceived as lesser qualifications compared to GCSEs because young people who take them are unable to pass foundation GCSE maths and English, so the logic is that if they are equivalent to GCSEs why haven't the young people taken and passed them at GCSE?

I admit that I was guilty of thinking that as well as most posters because I had no idea that they were considered an equivalent. I suspect that most employers think so as well.

Congratulations to those whose DC have struggled and managed pass them though. That must have been quite an achievement.

What I don’t understand is why this has come as a shock to you @magicalmadmadamim

I suppose as the non-resident parent you wouldn’t have engaged with the school, but why hasn’t your son’s father? Are relations between you so bad that your ex hasn’t kept you informed of what is happening? And the fact that so many children have failed their GCSEs doesn’t say much about the school. Was it a pupil referral unit? Why do you not know much about your child’s education? Why did you have to distance yourself from your child?

There is more to this than meets the eye.

If you were an employer and had two candidates who otherwise looked equal you'd take the one with GCSEs not functional skills qualifications.

It's a tough market out there. He's not fighting an up hill battle from the bottom of the pile in a competitive world.

The attitude of him and his parents is going to be everything at this point.

None of them are getting it yet even now. He's fucked.

RampantIvy · 27/01/2026 09:32

Unfortunately, I think functional skills qualifications are perceived as lesser qualifications compared to GCSEs because young people who take them are unable to pass foundation GCSE maths and English, so the logic is that if they are equivalent to GCSEs why haven't the young people taken and passed them at GCSE?

I admit that I was guilty of thinking that as well as most posters because I had no idea that they were considered an equivalent. I suspect that most employers think so as well.

Congratulations to those whose DC have struggled and managed pass them though. That must have been quite an achievement.

What I don’t understand is why this has come as a shock to you @magicalmadmadamim

I suppose as the non-resident parent you wouldn’t have engaged with the school, but why hasn’t your son’s father? Are relations between you so bad that your ex hasn’t kept you informed of what is happening? And the fact that so many children have failed their GCSEs doesn’t say much about the school. Was it a pupil referral unit? Why do you not know much about your child’s education? Why did you have to distance yourself from your child?

There is more to this than meets the eye.

CaptainMyCaptain · 27/01/2026 09:30

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 08:28

His dad went to a meeting with the school and appealed it. They basically said it was more about the lateness and backchat to the teachers, the incident was the perfect excuse to play the racist card to get rid of him.
I spoke to the head of year myself who was actually really nice, he did not sit the first 3 exams due to anxiety about returning to school after the incident with the other boy.
He sat all the others but he was actually devastated and cried to me for the first time in years.
He has enjoyed college much more than school so far.

Edited

play the racist card ffs. It was 100% racist.

RedToothBrush · 27/01/2026 09:27

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 08:28

His dad went to a meeting with the school and appealed it. They basically said it was more about the lateness and backchat to the teachers, the incident was the perfect excuse to play the racist card to get rid of him.
I spoke to the head of year myself who was actually really nice, he did not sit the first 3 exams due to anxiety about returning to school after the incident with the other boy.
He sat all the others but he was actually devastated and cried to me for the first time in years.
He has enjoyed college much more than school so far.

Edited

The school have probably done the best thing for him and other students 'despite it not being about the racist incident' (it was the racist incident).

Expelling him has meant he has received a punishment and is having to reflect on his own behaviour and other students don't have to put up with him being a dick around them.

And newsflash he would still have flunked out.

He's got a short sharp shock that his behaviour isn't ok. Better now than when he's horsing around in the real world and ends up on a racial harassment or worst charge.

You and him now have the opportunity to reflect on this and change.

It looks like neither of you are. That's your fault and your problem. Not the schools.

He needed a rocket up his arse. You still aren't getting the message that he needs a rocket up his arse.

I's wish you well for the future but it's not your problem as you don't give a shit anyway and it won't affect you because you are busy non parenting from a distance already.

Miloarmadillo2 · 27/01/2026 09:24

My son is y11 this year and wants to study business - he’s had a hard time at school but is now working hard and grades improving, so we have looked at a number of post 16 options. They get three years of post 16 funding, so would suggest @magicalmadmadamimlooks at college as a three year stint and see what could be achieved. My son’s preference is to take A levels for which he needs 5 x 5 at GCSE including English and maths, with grade 6/7 in the subjects he wants to take (so business A level requires a 6 in business GCSE if you took it) The level 3 BTEC business course entry requirement is 5 GCSEs at 4+ including English and maths. They offered a level 2 BTEC in a ‘foundation year’ which I think was 4 GCSEs passes and if you didn’t already have English and maths at grade 4 you could retake them alongside, then progress to the level 3 course. We also looked at level 3 apprenticeships and they all require GCSE English and maths as an absolute minimum plus are super competitive. He’s hardly likely to get a glowing reference from school.

The point is there are various routes to get where he wants to be but he’s at a very low starting point with only 2 FS qualifications. Whether he can succeed will depend on whether he can grow up, knuckle down and accept that he’s made his progression more difficult for himself. It would be worth enquiring if you can privately fund study beyond Y14 as he may not have long enough to get from level 1-level3 in the 3 years the local authority will fund.
Is he ready to knuckle down or does he still think he’s the dog’s bollocks and any employer would be lucky to have him?

Thepeopleversuswork · 27/01/2026 09:13

magicalmadmadamim · 27/01/2026 08:28

His dad went to a meeting with the school and appealed it. They basically said it was more about the lateness and backchat to the teachers, the incident was the perfect excuse to play the racist card to get rid of him.
I spoke to the head of year myself who was actually really nice, he did not sit the first 3 exams due to anxiety about returning to school after the incident with the other boy.
He sat all the others but he was actually devastated and cried to me for the first time in years.
He has enjoyed college much more than school so far.

Edited

Sorry OP, I know this is painful but you're still minimising this. Your son has clearly exhibited a pattern of behaviour which showed he was not applying himself and being rude and disrespectful to teachers over some period of time. He then went on to be racially abusive to another child at prayer.

This is very serious stuff and it wasn't a one off: the school had to do something and saying it "played the racist card" demonstrates that you haven't begun to engage with how serious it was.

Its understandable that you feel got at: by school and now by people on here. But you and your son have two choices: you face up to what's happened, you read the riot act and make clear to your son that its now on him to get his head down and apply himself. Then he can maybe turn around his fairly poor academic credentials and demonstrate he has the chops to do well.

Or, you can continue to blame the system and convey to him that he will never succeed because people are out to get him, prompting him to bounce from one failure to the next.

It's not pleasant, but this is an opportunity for growth. If you don't learn from mistakes, how do you expect your son to do so?

Pricelessadvice · 27/01/2026 09:10

“The racist card”

You aren’t painting yourself in a good light either OP.

CatkinToadflax · 27/01/2026 09:06

noworklifebalance · 27/01/2026 09:00

Not sure whether this is comment is directed at me but to clarify, I am not doubling down - I have not once made a comment on the equivalence of qualifications and nor will I.

I am saying, that based on OP’s comments, the GCSE grades are poor, it’s not normal for a cohort to come out with no GCSEs (if that is true) and racist behaviour is definitely not just “horseplay”.

No, not directed at you. There are several posters insisting relentlessly that Functional Skills Level 2 is not the equivalent of a grade 4 pass at GCSE. They are wrong.