Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

People who don't read the WHOLE thread before commenting

188 replies

ExpatInSlavikLand · 26/01/2026 06:56

Unless you're completely new to commenting on MN and therefore aren't aware you can:

a) see how many pages of comments have already been made, and therefore check them before commenting, and:

b) click to read all of the OP's responses and updates

Why do you blithely ignore (what are often) reems and reems of comments and relevant responses from the OPs to put your two penneth'orth on a long-passed or clarified original post, usually parroting what multiple others have already written?

We've seen a great example of this yesterday, on the post written by a poor lady in the ME whose husband had clearly not really been in a barber shop for the two hours he'd said he'd be. We're currently on 36 pages of comments on this particular post, and we still have people commenting on the OP's original point, ignoring everything else she's since written (and in many cases being extremely unfair and nasty to her), promoting dozens of other people to kindly leap to her defense and ask these latecomers to read the entire thread before commenting.

What a mess.

OP posts:
Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 12:14

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 10:35

I was responding to the title of the thread. Please read it. You are mentioning something different.

of course, I always read ALL or the relevant of OP’s posts. Some op just post once and run anyway leaving pages of pages of pp’s input.

Oh I've read it , my comments were around the OP opening comment. About reading all the OPs comments in a thread.

CannotBeBothered01 · 26/01/2026 12:06

Not everyone's got time to sit and read the whole thread, and my just want to respond to one post they've seen

Funnywonder · 26/01/2026 12:02

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 09:51

If you think commenting on MN means you think it's "end of world stuff", that suggests you also think this is that important, as you have commented on MN about it.

So many posters love to engage in this hypocrisy - you shouldn't have commented, but it's fine for me to do so - and I find it funny every time!

Yeah, it’s hilarious. They chastise the OP for their pointless thread by leaving a comment on same thread, thereby shoving it back to the top of active discussions. Ignoring it would take less energy. But then nobody would be able to see how intelligent and superior they are.

GoAndReadBeowulf · 26/01/2026 11:54

roshi42 · 26/01/2026 08:51

Omg, just caught up on the husband / barber / anniversary dinner thread and it’s the same bloody poster as the dog crate suggestion who waded in criticising the OP without reading the updates. I assume they’re just a troll tbh.

Although the passive-aggressive remarks about Beowulf were Peak Mumsnet comedy gold Grin

yorkshiretoffee · 26/01/2026 11:22

TheatreTheatre · 26/01/2026 11:15

If I was in charge of MNHQ I would suspend posters who do this.

It interrupts discussion, interferes with genuine support, fills up the thread with what is essentially litter, and is rude and arrogant.

Could the Talk Guidelines point out the ‘see all’ facility and ask people to use it before responding? Could OP’s be asked to / be able to add a big UPDATED banner to their thread title?

In the end pp who do not RTFT make themselves look thick. And I think most just post and run and don’t engage so filling up a thread with numerous RTFT posts only fills up the thread and interrupts it even more.

I think if I was in charge of MNHQ there would only be about 5 posters!

TheatreTheatre · 26/01/2026 11:15

If I was in charge of MNHQ I would suspend posters who do this.

It interrupts discussion, interferes with genuine support, fills up the thread with what is essentially litter, and is rude and arrogant.

Could the Talk Guidelines point out the ‘see all’ facility and ask people to use it before responding? Could OP’s be asked to / be able to add a big UPDATED banner to their thread title?

In the end pp who do not RTFT make themselves look thick. And I think most just post and run and don’t engage so filling up a thread with numerous RTFT posts only fills up the thread and interrupts it even more.

yorkshiretoffee · 26/01/2026 11:03

It annoys me too. It also annoys me that someone will post "DD hasn't come home", multiple pages happen and people are still saying "county lines" "she's been trafficked" 16 pages in when actually on page 2 OP has written "oh she's back now, she went to the shops on her way home"

phoenixrosehere · 26/01/2026 10:56

SnowFrogJelly · 26/01/2026 09:50

Let people post how they want and just ignore those that annoy you

Think there should be a hide function for posts like there are for threads because it would make it easier to get through and ignore posts that you don’t want to see while trying to follow along.

Most social media have a hide functions for comments.

dollyblue01 · 26/01/2026 10:47

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 09:51

If you think commenting on MN means you think it's "end of world stuff", that suggests you also think this is that important, as you have commented on MN about it.

So many posters love to engage in this hypocrisy - you shouldn't have commented, but it's fine for me to do so - and I find it funny every time!

Boring 🥱

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 10:35

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 09:29

You don't need to read the whole thread though that's the point. Just the OP posts usually takes a couple of mins max.

I was responding to the title of the thread. Please read it. You are mentioning something different.

of course, I always read ALL or the relevant of OP’s posts. Some op just post once and run anyway leaving pages of pages of pp’s input.

ElectoralControversy · 26/01/2026 10:31

@LamentableShoes
When this has been discussed before, someone suggested that people who aren't used to traditional discussion forums treat it as comments under a Facebook post, rather than an actual thread of discussion

That's an interesting point I hadn't thought of.
I actually came to the barber thread from a FB link, which obviously runs a few hours behind anyway.

I suppose people are posting in the same way you see under a FB post, where it's less of a discussion and more of a yelling into the void

As others have said, it's the arrogance that does it for me

"Well there are 700 posts I can't be bothered to read on here, but I'm sure no-one will have mentioned my fascinating take that maybe the husband just wanted some me time and op is controlling"

brunettemic · 26/01/2026 10:27

Yes…but a lot of times the OP (apparently) misses out all sorts of information. You get things like “my DH has gone out for the evening and only text me once, he’s a cruel man AIBU”, to which the answer is obviously no. Then you get an OP follow up saying well actually they are in a car accident 3 days before, have two broken legs, new born twins, a 9 year old in hospital with a fractured spine, they’re also caring for their terminally ill DM whilst mourning their DF who died the day before*. It’s that sort of nonsense that means people will ignore up because people clearly change the message in their posts.

*this may be an exaggeration to make a point.

mamajong · 26/01/2026 10:16

Espressosummer · 26/01/2026 09:16

That's a really unpleasant attitude to take towards the woman on the barber thread. There is clearly a significant issue in her marriage and you are accusing her of seeking attention and saying she should "bore off".

Oh, and you can edit your posts. You can also read before posting instead of reading afterwards.

Oh the irony...i was directing that at the THIS post! The OP of this post, making a post about a non issue and clogging up other posts, with endless posts telling people to read the updates, which is unnecessary when people already have, and have already clarified their points.

It's up to each of us how we add further comments, i dont need to be policed by you, especially when you have completely missed my point. Unbelievable

LiveToTell · 26/01/2026 10:14

Lowbuy2026 · 26/01/2026 07:04

Recent example, the "what's in my wardrobe" thread. Op told us on page 3. Cue a million further posts still guessing 🤦🏼‍♀️

That thread was DULL 😆

roshi42 · 26/01/2026 10:08

SnowFrogJelly · 26/01/2026 09:49

On the app I can’t click to read all OP’s responses actually and cba to read whole thread

Yeah you can on the app - it’s the 3 little dots at the top right of the original OP message and then ‘see all messages by this user’. You can only do it for the OP as a non-premium user.

AnnieLummox · 26/01/2026 09:53

What’s even worse is people who barely bother to read the opening post, never mind the updates. There’s a thread going on at the moment about the OP’s partner’s son not being invited to her nephew’s wedding. She says right at the start that she has checked with her nephew and it is not a mistake/oversight. Yet still people are lining up to say “Have you spoken to him? Are you sure it’s not an oversight?”

Also, check when a thread was started. I’m looking at you, posters on the “Should I let my friend in who arrived early?” thread. There are STILL people posting “Of course you should let her in - go outside right now and offer her a cup of tea!!” even though the thread started on Saturday. The OP never came back, suggesting it’s all made up anyway - but on the off-chance it really happened, the bloody woman isn’t going to be sat in her car two days later!

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 09:51

dollyblue01 · 26/01/2026 09:05

Oh fgs get a life , not end of world stuff is it really ?

If you think commenting on MN means you think it's "end of world stuff", that suggests you also think this is that important, as you have commented on MN about it.

So many posters love to engage in this hypocrisy - you shouldn't have commented, but it's fine for me to do so - and I find it funny every time!

SnowFrogJelly · 26/01/2026 09:50

Let people post how they want and just ignore those that annoy you

SnowFrogJelly · 26/01/2026 09:49

On the app I can’t click to read all OP’s responses actually and cba to read whole thread

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 09:48

Fulmine · 26/01/2026 08:44

The problem is that the people who fill up the threads telling off other posters for not reading the OP's posts become just as tedious. It becomes really difficult to find posts that actually relate to the original topic when it gets so full of virtue signallers competing with each other to slag off other posters.

That's why I suggest being able to report and have deleted the really egregious posts that very clearly are only posting about the first post and not the days' worth of updates. If it's deleted, less derailing!

velvetgeranium · 26/01/2026 09:46

Many posters don't even bother to read the title and/or the first sentence of the OP's post before putting in their two bob's worth.

ExpectZeroContext · 26/01/2026 09:37

In many occasions it's the OP's fault.

AnnieLummox · 26/01/2026 09:35

LifeIsA · 26/01/2026 07:29

I agree with reading all the OP's posts but the whole thread? Maybe if it's 2-3 pages but otherwise, who has time for that unless it's of particular interest? I don't know about you but I have a very busy and full life, pop on and off here between things, and reading long threads of comments, other than OP's, is just not practical. If comments are repeated, oh well, maybe OP sees a trend in the advise and thinks about it a bit more?

But if a thread is so long that you can’t be bothered to read it, why make it longer? Why assume what you have to say is special and important?

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 09:29

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 09:17

I have NEVER needed urgent help on MN- so thank God!

However, if I was an OP distressed about DP behaviour, sick child- I would rather someone who thought their advice is what I needed, posted even if that advice may have already been posted before or even if it has already been eliminated.

people are busy working etc etc and therefore it’s unreasonable to impose such a draconian rule of reading whole thread first. The economy is already struggling so people are working or busy with whatever, but still feel they might assist op in some way.

yes, it’s annoying seeing it but that is just what it is. Kudos to those who always have ample time to read whole threads first!

You don't need to read the whole thread though that's the point. Just the OP posts usually takes a couple of mins max.

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 09:17

I have NEVER needed urgent help on MN- so thank God!

However, if I was an OP distressed about DP behaviour, sick child- I would rather someone who thought their advice is what I needed, posted even if that advice may have already been posted before or even if it has already been eliminated.

people are busy working etc etc and therefore it’s unreasonable to impose such a draconian rule of reading whole thread first. The economy is already struggling so people are working or busy with whatever, but still feel they might assist op in some way.

yes, it’s annoying seeing it but that is just what it is. Kudos to those who always have ample time to read whole threads first!

Swipe left for the next trending thread