Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

People who don't read the WHOLE thread before commenting

188 replies

ExpatInSlavikLand · 26/01/2026 06:56

Unless you're completely new to commenting on MN and therefore aren't aware you can:

a) see how many pages of comments have already been made, and therefore check them before commenting, and:

b) click to read all of the OP's responses and updates

Why do you blithely ignore (what are often) reems and reems of comments and relevant responses from the OPs to put your two penneth'orth on a long-passed or clarified original post, usually parroting what multiple others have already written?

We've seen a great example of this yesterday, on the post written by a poor lady in the ME whose husband had clearly not really been in a barber shop for the two hours he'd said he'd be. We're currently on 36 pages of comments on this particular post, and we still have people commenting on the OP's original point, ignoring everything else she's since written (and in many cases being extremely unfair and nasty to her), promoting dozens of other people to kindly leap to her defense and ask these latecomers to read the entire thread before commenting.

What a mess.

OP posts:
GoAndReadBeowulf · 26/01/2026 21:24

Cosyblankets · 26/01/2026 21:24

Has thread 3 of the lady in the ME been deleted? I can't see it now

See my post at 21.12.

Although apparently it’s back again. It must have hit a report limit which automatically removed it for moderation.

Cosyblankets · 26/01/2026 21:24

Has thread 3 of the lady in the ME been deleted? I can't see it now

GoAndReadBeowulf · 26/01/2026 21:12

RhaenysRocks · 26/01/2026 17:33

Neither is 99% of MN posts. If it's all too trivial for you, pop off to something heavy weight.

Beowulf?

The Middle East barber thread #3 having been removed for a bit of the old ‘looking at’ by MNHQ seems somehow ironic (in the very modern sense) right now.

Will it be back? Will it not? Is this someone’s life? Is it trivial? Is it not? Meta stuff.

LifeIsA · 26/01/2026 20:40

AnnieLummox · 26/01/2026 09:35

But if a thread is so long that you can’t be bothered to read it, why make it longer? Why assume what you have to say is special and important?

This place is a free for all. I'm here, like everyone, to entertain myself. I approach that my own way. You approach that your way. Who really cares that much? If it's so important to someone that they have having emotions about how other people post, then I suggest they get a life outside Mumsnet.

Obviously more thought is needed when posting on 'heavy topic' threads.

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 20:25

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 19:01

Was busy with work to pay my bills. Pp’s earlier responses- which I read and where OP concedes on important points, was informative.

i had a far more important point to make on behalf of genuine ops in need of advice. My post clearly proved my point.

Now, continue read the rest if the thread, will you. My point - very important- has been made. You are not even the op.

I'm not the OP well spotted. I think it's a very very important point for people to aware if they need urgent advice to tread carefully with the advice given. The amount of people who don't understand nor read the opening post could be a problem if people needed that urgent advice and took it seriously.

Anyway I'm off to work, my service to MN done.

FringeTime · 26/01/2026 19:13

I find people who quote the op far more annoying tbh.

Christmasnewyear · 26/01/2026 19:01

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 12:14

Oh I've read it , my comments were around the OP opening comment. About reading all the OPs comments in a thread.

Was busy with work to pay my bills. Pp’s earlier responses- which I read and where OP concedes on important points, was informative.

i had a far more important point to make on behalf of genuine ops in need of advice. My post clearly proved my point.

Now, continue read the rest if the thread, will you. My point - very important- has been made. You are not even the op.

MsSomebodyNow · 26/01/2026 18:48

Cakencookieobsessed · 26/01/2026 07:09

Do you really, honest and truly care about this?

She most likely does or she wouldn’t have posted about it. Strangely enough there are some people who actually care, even about strangers or people they don’t know, when they see them getting a rough deal. I’m one of those people who cares too. It’s just inbuilt in me to give a shit, sometimes I wish it wasn’t, but I guess, that’s just how some of us are 🤷‍♀️

yorkshiretoffee · 26/01/2026 18:31

I don't mind if people don't read every comment, it may even be useful if lots of people say the same thing.
But not reading the OP posts and commenting when something has moved on is kind of pointless. If you care enough to comment, then you should care enough to see if OP situation is resolved before you do.

marcopront · 26/01/2026 18:31

CannotBeBothered01 · 26/01/2026 12:06

Not everyone's got time to sit and read the whole thread, and my just want to respond to one post they've seen

So they are not interested in giving helpful advice. They just want to post.

jbm16 · 26/01/2026 18:28

To be honest, if there are 30 pages, I'm not reading every comment. The issue sometimes is that the OP drip-feeds the story; if all the information is upfront, not sure it's necessary to read every single comment.

MissCooCooMcgoo · 26/01/2026 18:24

Cancel the cheque

Sadworld23 · 26/01/2026 18:23

Absolutely me 💯, Hrft here either.

Truly don't have time to read every comment, but will post on those that I think have a relevant point to make.

Discounting people who don't have time TRFT is almost discriminating, as many will be working people who having caring responsibilities in some way.

UnhappyHobbit · 26/01/2026 17:37

I try to read all the replies from the OP before commenting. If a thread is pages long though, and I think I have something to contribute I will do so.

I think a lot of people don’t have time to read the full thread.

RhaenysRocks · 26/01/2026 17:33

dollyblue01 · 26/01/2026 09:05

Oh fgs get a life , not end of world stuff is it really ?

Neither is 99% of MN posts. If it's all too trivial for you, pop off to something heavy weight.

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 15:41

mamajong · 26/01/2026 14:08

And yet the title of this thread states the WHOLE in capital letters and therein lies part of the problem. Many of these (non) 'issues' would be solved if the thread title and first post were an accurate representation of the point, but they are often not which exacerbates the misunderstandings. Its a non issue though really, anyone can read, write, quote, skip, ignore anything they want, its really not that deep is it!

If the OP took umbrage, to a degree, fair point but its all the other post police clogging up threads with passive aggressiveness that cause just as many, if not more issues imo.

Live and let live - their are moderators to police threads if needed, we dont need an army of people with nowt better to do 🙄🤣

Edited

Apple

Lowbuy2026 · 26/01/2026 15:37

Didshejustsaythatoutloud · 26/01/2026 13:58

Ooh, what was in the back of the wardrobe then?

I think it was Xmas chocs or something incredibly mundane, it was so dull I didn't actually commit the answer to memory, but I do remember a million further answers guessing long after the op had revealed it in all it's dullness

Should be a MN acronym NWRT (not worth reading the thread)

WaryHiker · 26/01/2026 14:15

ExpatInSlavikLand · 26/01/2026 07:34

Not exactly, I wanted to write "oops" but wrote and posted something like "oof", thanks to predictive texting.

Frankly, if I really had been foisted upon my own petard there I'd have been equal parts mortified and amused 😂

Hoist with.

mamajong · 26/01/2026 14:08

Thisiswhathings · 26/01/2026 09:29

You don't need to read the whole thread though that's the point. Just the OP posts usually takes a couple of mins max.

And yet the title of this thread states the WHOLE in capital letters and therein lies part of the problem. Many of these (non) 'issues' would be solved if the thread title and first post were an accurate representation of the point, but they are often not which exacerbates the misunderstandings. Its a non issue though really, anyone can read, write, quote, skip, ignore anything they want, its really not that deep is it!

If the OP took umbrage, to a degree, fair point but its all the other post police clogging up threads with passive aggressiveness that cause just as many, if not more issues imo.

Live and let live - their are moderators to police threads if needed, we dont need an army of people with nowt better to do 🙄🤣

Didshejustsaythatoutloud · 26/01/2026 13:58

Lowbuy2026 · 26/01/2026 07:04

Recent example, the "what's in my wardrobe" thread. Op told us on page 3. Cue a million further posts still guessing 🤦🏼‍♀️

Ooh, what was in the back of the wardrobe then?

phoenixrosehere · 26/01/2026 13:53

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 12:22

I suppose people are posting in the same way you see under a FB post, where it's less of a discussion and more of a yelling into the void

Exactly. Perhaps MN should have a special "reply only to the original post" form alongside the normal "post" box on the thread. People could choose that form, type out their response, hit "send" and it can go into a special MN filing cabinet instead of appearing on the thread.

Considering some can’t be bothered to read a post properly or click read all OP’s posts, not sure having a second form will work.

TulipCat · 26/01/2026 13:10

I do have a chuckle at some of the ones where a poster comments, sometimes years after the OP though. There was one recently where the OP was asking for advice about her sick toddler. Someone responded about taking him to the GP, to which the OP came back and said "Thanks for your concern, but he's 8 now and well over it" 😂

MilleniumMouse · 26/01/2026 12:49

AnnieLummox · 26/01/2026 09:53

What’s even worse is people who barely bother to read the opening post, never mind the updates. There’s a thread going on at the moment about the OP’s partner’s son not being invited to her nephew’s wedding. She says right at the start that she has checked with her nephew and it is not a mistake/oversight. Yet still people are lining up to say “Have you spoken to him? Are you sure it’s not an oversight?”

Also, check when a thread was started. I’m looking at you, posters on the “Should I let my friend in who arrived early?” thread. There are STILL people posting “Of course you should let her in - go outside right now and offer her a cup of tea!!” even though the thread started on Saturday. The OP never came back, suggesting it’s all made up anyway - but on the off-chance it really happened, the bloody woman isn’t going to be sat in her car two days later!

Agree, it's so unfuriating when people don't even bother to read the OP properly before wading in!

A post will literally start with "I have two kids, 8 and 12...", and guarantee there will be multiple different responses "We need to know how old the kids are before we can make a judgement". "How many kids do you have?" "What year are they in, OP?"

Isobel201 · 26/01/2026 12:27

Its the A&E ones that get me when people haven't read OP's updates and say "go to A&E" when its a day or so later and they've been and gone lol. But I agree I come to a thread and often see pages and pages of people's replies - I haven't got the time or the patience to go through all that.

LamentableShoes · 26/01/2026 12:22

I suppose people are posting in the same way you see under a FB post, where it's less of a discussion and more of a yelling into the void

Exactly. Perhaps MN should have a special "reply only to the original post" form alongside the normal "post" box on the thread. People could choose that form, type out their response, hit "send" and it can go into a special MN filing cabinet instead of appearing on the thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread