Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If you had been Stephen.... (Traitors spoilers)

138 replies

Allswellthatendswelll · 24/01/2026 21:28

It's a Traitors one sorry! I know this has probably been discussed elsewhere.

Would you have taken all the money when you had the chance at the end (by voting with Jack to banish Rachel)? A few people have told me they would have and I'm now looking at them in a different way (lightheartedly)!

I wouldn't have but part of it is I would never have been able to face Rachel or Jack afterwards and that wouldn't be worth 50k to me.

YABU- He should have taken the money, 50k is alot and its a game about lying.

YANBU- No he made a promise. It was good he kept his integrity.

OP posts:
auntfanny6 · 25/01/2026 13:23

The ball was very much in his court at the end. He could have easily got rid of Rachel and kept all the money but I think it would have left a sour taste. I love that they won together and played as a team throughout. I wonder if Rachel would have done the same?

In that situation I would have done what Stephen did. Telling Jack he was a traitor would have been awful and he’d have lost his integrity with Rachel too. I know it’s only a game but I do think morals come into it too.

CloakedInGucci · 25/01/2026 13:21

CraftySeal · 25/01/2026 13:18

You've got to consider also what he wants to get out of his time on the show in the long term, and how his personal branding plays into that. If he's looking to build any kind of media/influencer career, it makes much more sense for him to lean into the image of the "nice guy" that he essentially seems to be, rather than a ruthless cutthroat, which I don't think fits him and he can't do as much with IMO. He's very different to Harry.

I think this is why he made the right decision - not really based on whether he could do it to Rachel, but based on making a statement about the kind of person he is, when the whole country is watching.

Edited

I think Harry was a very different situation. Unless he had deliberately sabotaged himself completely so that he got voted out (which no reasonable person would expect him to do), he was going to take that money from Molly.

CloakedInGucci · 25/01/2026 13:19

Toomuchleopard · 24/01/2026 21:47

If he’d voted for Rachel, not only would he have gone against Rachel but Jack would have thought that he had won along with Stephen the faithful. Then he would have had to reveal to Jack he was a traitor despite promising he wasn’t.

People say it’s only a game but in reality all your friends, family and work colleagues would be watching and what would they think of you

Edited

I think that’s the bit that would have stopped me from taking the money even more - the fact that I’d then have to stand in front of someone who thought they’d made the right decision and had now won (Jack in this case), and say “I’m a traitor”. I’d really hate that.
But would I hate it so much I’d lose £50k over it… who knows.

CraftySeal · 25/01/2026 13:18

You've got to consider also what he wants to get out of his time on the show in the long term, and how his personal branding plays into that. If he's looking to build any kind of media/influencer career, it makes much more sense for him to lean into the image of the "nice guy" that he essentially seems to be, rather than a ruthless cutthroat, which I don't think fits him and he can't do as much with IMO. He's very different to Harry.

I think this is why he made the right decision - not really based on whether he could do it to Rachel, but based on making a statement about the kind of person he is, when the whole country is watching.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/01/2026 13:18

I would have shared the money in his situation. My image of myself as a fair and decent person is worth more to me than £50k!

Traitors is a game, and traitors deceiving the faithful is an integral part of that game. Any single one of the contestants would have done that, if they had been tapped on the shoulder as a traitor. It's already factored in when you sign up to play the game.

Betraying your own team mate isn't a requirement of the game, though... it's just pure greed. I don't think I could have lived with myself in that scenario.

MMAMPWGHAP · 25/01/2026 13:16

I’d have taken the money. Mostly because I can’t stand Rachel. But for him he’ll earn far more than that 50K in media opportunities.

He’ll get more media basking in the glory of not shafting Rachel. So right decision for him.

hollytheheroic · 25/01/2026 13:16

No I wouldn't. I think Stephen will do better afterwards by not taking it all too, so it was a pragmatic choice.

Createausername1970 · 25/01/2026 13:15

I was hiding behind a cushion when it was down to the last 3. I was so glad he voted to keep Rachel in and share.

TheChosenTwo · 25/01/2026 13:14

I think he made the right decision, he only made it to the end game because of Rachel’s strategy play.
I would have been totally tempted
to have taken it all, he could have had her bumped off several times towards the very end but chose not to even though he said he had been tempted himself.
I think standing there at the end with his fellow traitor who had helped him get there was a good ending even though I didn’t like Rachel’s tactics. They promised each other to look out for one another and they didn’t back down.

Wonderknicks · 25/01/2026 13:14

I think he did the right thing.
In an interview Jack said he was absolutely furious when he was voted out & the production team had to calm him down. I imagine that's why they didn't show them all together at the end.

TiredofLDN · 25/01/2026 13:11

I’d have taken the money.

saveforthat · 25/01/2026 13:08

Ticktockwatchclock · 24/01/2026 21:39

Stephen would have gone down in my estimation of him if he had broken the promise. Integrity stands for a lot in my world and I would have done exactly the same as Stephen and stuck to the promise. Money isn’t everything.

I'm sure he wouldn't have been that bothered about going down in your estimation. The whole game is about breaking promises.

Allswellthatendswelll · 25/01/2026 01:26

ScarletLipstick · 24/01/2026 22:00

I would have done as Stephen did. But you’ve got your figures wrong. He could have had nearly £100000 if he’d voted Rachel out as he would have been the sole traitor left and got all the money. He got nearly £50000 by sharing with Rachel. I just couldn’t have voted Rachel out then stood there with Jack, who would think I was a faithful and was going to share the money with him then have to tell him I was a Traitor and actually would be taking all the money.

He'd have got around 50k more is what I meant. As he was always going go get 50k once they were down to two traitors.

OP posts:
ScarletLipstick · 24/01/2026 22:00

I would have done as Stephen did. But you’ve got your figures wrong. He could have had nearly £100000 if he’d voted Rachel out as he would have been the sole traitor left and got all the money. He got nearly £50000 by sharing with Rachel. I just couldn’t have voted Rachel out then stood there with Jack, who would think I was a faithful and was going to share the money with him then have to tell him I was a Traitor and actually would be taking all the money.

MasterBeth · 24/01/2026 21:55

Toomuchleopard · 24/01/2026 21:47

If he’d voted for Rachel, not only would he have gone against Rachel but Jack would have thought that he had won along with Stephen the faithful. Then he would have had to reveal to Jack he was a traitor despite promising he wasn’t.

People say it’s only a game but in reality all your friends, family and work colleagues would be watching and what would they think of you

Edited

They'd think you'd done brilliantly to be the sole 90k+ winner on a GAMESHOW.

It's a GAME!

He told lie after lie after lie in the game. "I am 100% faithful."

Perfectly OK to lie to Rachel too, his adversary in the GAMESHOW.

saveforthat · 24/01/2026 21:52

Allswellthatendswelll · 24/01/2026 21:49

It would have been a super awkward uncloaked though and ruined his media brand!

I haven't got a media brand (whatever that may be) so I wouldn't have to worry about that.

forestaremagic · 24/01/2026 21:52

If he took all the money, everyone would know. How would his friends, public treat him? They both deserved the money and glad they won, the faithfuls were rubbish.

Runningismyhappyplace50 · 24/01/2026 21:52

I would have done the same as Stephen (who I thought was fab!).

21ZIGGY · 24/01/2026 21:50

Yes, I would have voted rachel out if I were him at the earliest opportunity.Ie when james actually went. Rachel would have done it to him in a heartbeat.

Allswellthatendswelll · 24/01/2026 21:49

saveforthat · 24/01/2026 21:35

I would have voted Rachel out and was very disappointed when he didn't. That's the game and they are not friends just strangers also playing the game. He would never have to see Rachel, Jack or any of them again (except for uncloaked).

It would have been a super awkward uncloaked though and ruined his media brand!

OP posts:
u3ername · 24/01/2026 21:48

He deserved the money because he made good friends, won the players’ trust, and luck was on his side. He did not lie about other people, patronise or manipulate them. Yes, he lied about not being a traitor, but no choice there. Ideally, he should not have made a promise. However, if the roles were reversed, I imagine Rachel would have conveniently forgotten about the promise during the final round.

Saying that, Stephen chose correctly because that choice has made him more popular and likeable. He will probably get booked more for tv appearances etc and that might pay off better in the end. That is the choice I would have made as well (if able to be rational at that moment).

writingsonthewall · 24/01/2026 21:48

I absolutely loved that they kept their word to each other. I would have been so disappointed if he’d stitched her up at the end.

i also loved the ending so much more when neither had to tell someone who thought they’d won that they were a traitor

GoodVibesHere · 24/01/2026 21:48

Rachel so would've taken the money for herself if she'd been the one in his position.

If he had taken the money I wouldn't have blamed him. They'd only known each other for 2 weeks.

Toomuchleopard · 24/01/2026 21:47

If he’d voted for Rachel, not only would he have gone against Rachel but Jack would have thought that he had won along with Stephen the faithful. Then he would have had to reveal to Jack he was a traitor despite promising he wasn’t.

People say it’s only a game but in reality all your friends, family and work colleagues would be watching and what would they think of you

jazzybelle · 24/01/2026 21:46

SchnizelVonKrumm · 24/01/2026 21:34

I love that they both stuck to their promise throughout, even at the final moment where he knew Jack was going to vote for Rachel. They wouldn't have made it that far without sticking together and worked as a great team.

Exactly. When it looked like Stephen was under suspicion, Rachel always had his back. They did work well together and if Stephen had gone for all the money he would have looked really bad.