Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Sticky job hunting situation. Advice needed

38 replies

Quaver213 · 24/01/2026 12:32

Not sure I’ve posted in the right place, but I’d appreciate some advice.

I recently took up a role as Finance Director at a company (started six weeks ago). In doing so, I accepted a slight pay cut (c. 5%). Unfortunately, I feel I was materially mis-sold the role during the interview process in several ways:

  1. I knowingly joined as the number two in the team, but was told there would be a transition plan for the current lead over 3–6 months, as they were moving into another internal role. That internal move has since fallen through, meaning I will remain number two for significantly longer than I would be willing to.
  2. The team I am inheriting is materially different from what was described. Between accepting the role and starting, two members of my UK team (1/3 of the team) were made redundant, with the work offshored to India. I had no involvement in this decision. I am also being told that I need to make further cuts.
  3. There is a culture of bullying within the team, which has resulted in the lowest employee satisfaction scores in the company.
  4. I was told I would be eligible for a pro-rata bonus and pay rise. In reality, there have been no pay rises at my seniority level for three years, and the pro-rata bonus is not guaranteed. Given that I took a pay cut and forfeited my bonus at my previous employer by handing in my notice, I feel particularly misled by this.

I became aware of a couple of these issues before even starting. By that point, my replacement had already been hired and it was too late to reverse my decision, so I started submitting job applications immediately.

My dilemma is this. I have been interviewing with another company and the process is now at an advanced stage. When I applied, I had not yet started at my current employer, so this role does not appear on my CV or application. Someone I know that works in HR advised me to keep quiet about my current situation until the opportunity had real traction, on the basis that there was nothing to disclose unless it progressed.

Now that all interviews have been completed, is this the point at which I should inform the company I am interviewing with about my current role, before a decision is made, or should I wait until a formal offer is received?

In any case, it will come to light during employment verification checks, so I assume I will need to disclose it at some stage. I’d welcome views on the timing and best approach.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Quaver213 · 22/02/2026 16:08

pocketpairs · 12/02/2026 17:58

Ignore previous msg, but I really don't understand why you were acting like a finance assistant rather than FD! In the future, perhaps just own decision..lead with front foot.

Because this is the internet which affords me the anonymity and vulnerability to say “this is a new situation for me and I genuinely do not know what to do.”

OP posts:
LittlePetitePsychopath · 12/02/2026 18:04

It's not helpful now, but I'd have told them that your current project had changed when it did.

Omitting it would have ruled you out of all three companies I work closely with.

I don't disagree with the previous post that said, would a man even have thought about this... I don't think most would have given it much thought at all, but most men I know would have sent a brief, "I'm now working as an FD in a different role but still interested in this position" type email, which would have covered this situation off.

It's an employers' market; and most are nervous about making good hires.

pocketpairs · 12/02/2026 17:58

Ignore previous msg, but I really don't understand why you were acting like a finance assistant rather than FD! In the future, perhaps just own decision..lead with front foot.

pocketpairs · 12/02/2026 17:54

If you're really FD (not sure if you've changed role to hide true identity) relax! This level of seniority allows you to have an honest conversation, and I imagine won't be an issue at all.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 12/02/2026 17:45

I would’ve told them before they found out. Looks like you were too late in telling and they just asked around. Bad luck.

Quaver213 · 12/02/2026 17:41

KatsPJs · 12/02/2026 15:44

Hmm it makes me wonder if there is some unconscious bias on their part OP. Would they have even questioned a man’s “integrity” like this? Would a man have even tied himself up in knots worrying about this or would he have just fronted it out? It’s perfectly legitimate for a new job to not quite be the right fit and to move on quickly - it happens all the time. So why do they care so much? Perhaps it’s happened to them a few times as their organisation is a shitshow? Don’t give it any more thought. I would continue your job search, include the new role on your CV and be honest: your expectations were not met and you are moving on.

Ah. My error, I didn’t state upfront, I’m a bloke.

OP posts:
KatsPJs · 12/02/2026 15:44

Hmm it makes me wonder if there is some unconscious bias on their part OP. Would they have even questioned a man’s “integrity” like this? Would a man have even tied himself up in knots worrying about this or would he have just fronted it out? It’s perfectly legitimate for a new job to not quite be the right fit and to move on quickly - it happens all the time. So why do they care so much? Perhaps it’s happened to them a few times as their organisation is a shitshow? Don’t give it any more thought. I would continue your job search, include the new role on your CV and be honest: your expectations were not met and you are moving on.

Quaver213 · 12/02/2026 15:26

KatsPJs · 12/02/2026 13:06

I agree with this, it sounds like this new company wouldn’t be the right fit for you anyway OP. I continue to be utterly baffled by companies that introduce so much emotionality to their processes: they need to pay someone to perform a function - that is it. You are under no obligation to provide any details that are not intrinsically linked to the role you are applying for. They need to calm down. It sounds like you missed another bullet to me.

The disappointment for me especially is that up to this latest twist, I got such a good vibe. The people I spoke to seemed very personable and I genuinely thought there would be more understanding.

If some guy outlined this to me, especially given the tenures I have done, I would have enough sense to not see a guy looking to move shortly after making a move, as a red flag. Nor the very legitimate reasons for not over divulging with nothing concrete emerging.

Clearly my judgement is impaired, as I got sold the snake oil with my current place also.

What I think makes it worse, is they enquired about me through a Big 4 partner the hiring manager knows and that partner happened to have worked with my previous employers in the past, which is how they came to know. As said partner must have spoken to contacts at my previous company. If I was still there it would have set alarm bells off. Which I think vindicates my decision to hold off on disclosing and proved my concerns to be valid.

OP posts:
KatsPJs · 12/02/2026 13:06

Whyherewego · 11/02/2026 09:14

I think it's a bit ott of them. It was correct at the time of application and you didn't want anything getting back to your new employers which is fair enough

I agree with this, it sounds like this new company wouldn’t be the right fit for you anyway OP. I continue to be utterly baffled by companies that introduce so much emotionality to their processes: they need to pay someone to perform a function - that is it. You are under no obligation to provide any details that are not intrinsically linked to the role you are applying for. They need to calm down. It sounds like you missed another bullet to me.

Quaver213 · 12/02/2026 07:37

Whyherewego · 11/02/2026 09:14

I think it's a bit ott of them. It was correct at the time of application and you didn't want anything getting back to your new employers which is fair enough

The gross over reaction doesn’t make sense, so I reckon there was probably another reason to reject my candidacy that they aren’t saying and this was just convenient (getting conspiratorial). But either way, nothing I can do. My loss, their loss even more so.

OP posts:
Whyherewego · 11/02/2026 09:14

I think it's a bit ott of them. It was correct at the time of application and you didn't want anything getting back to your new employers which is fair enough

Quaver213 · 11/02/2026 08:54

It was the “integrity” impugning they alluded to that got to me more than anything.

I told them, that surely they can understand being in my position and within a probationary period, disclosing my change in circumstances during a process where nothing has come to fruition invites a level of risk if it ever made its way back to my current employers and I wasn’t already moving on to something.

I said I own the decision but they were not misled on my experience, what I have done or even my motivations. I only omitted that past 6 week and a change in circumstances not reflected in my CV, which was correct at the time of initial application.

in the end, you win some and lose some but it’s a red flag for the organisation.

OP posts:
FlowerFlour · 10/02/2026 20:07

Oh no, I'm so sorry to hear that. It was a bit of a sticky situation - you were damned if you did, and damned if you didn't.

I'm sorry it didnt work out. What could they possibly think you were hiding from them though? The facts were correct at the time you applied!

I hope something else comes up for you soon.

Quaver213 · 09/02/2026 23:58

Well, i have an update.

through their wider network, they came to know that i left my previous company before i could tell them. The hiring manager has apparently questioned my integrity for witholding this information and despite being the front runner for the position there are major doubts this will continue further.

I tried to reassure the internal recruiter that this wasnt a deliberate ploy to deceive but rather, my intent was to wait until the end of the process and there was something concrete before disclosing the full circumstances. As over-divulging to potentially unsuccessful/non starter opportunities would increase the risk of my active job search making its way back to my current employer (whilst I am in a probation period) and that i knew at the very least employment checks would pick up the discrepancy, so I always intended to tell them, if it materialised in to something.

Ultimately, rather than skirt accountability I owned my decision with them and said given the circumstances (rightly of wrongly) I elected to not discuss what was a very recent move and instead basing my experience and suitability for the role on what I had done at my previous company only some weeks earlier. Further, that whilst I appreciate the feelings on the matter and am sorry for the impact, the circumstances around my departure from my previous company were normal - serving a full notice period, my CV at the time of application was accurate (before I had started the current role) and rightly or wrongly I thought was the best way to handle the situation, given the reasons above.

But, more than likely this process is cooked for me, unfortunately. Awaiting formal decision on whether the final round will proceed but given the vibe of the conversation and concerns, I think this is done. Shame really, I think I would have been really successful in the role but c’est la vis.

OP posts:
LeedsLoiner · 03/02/2026 16:15

Tell the truth and explain the circumstances - when you are offered the job - if they want you they won't care about how you get there.

Swiftie1878 · 03/02/2026 16:11

I would tell them now. It’ll be awkward raising it when an offer is made and references are being checked etc.
Raise it, but have the whole story ready, including the explanation for not mentioning it earlier in the process.

Good luck! x

Quaver213 · 03/02/2026 16:01

The key question which I am still wrestling with is. Should I tell them now or wait for an offer.
I don’t know if worth telling the prospective them now, as final rounds are done and it might give me an edge over the other person given the smaller notice period. Conversely if they have any concerns with the circumstance, it might rule me out before an offer.

Given the above thinking, would your view still be to hold fire and wait for an offer?

OP posts:
Quaver213 · 24/01/2026 20:20

chunkyBoo · 24/01/2026 15:25

Does your current job even need you in this post considering the other person didn’t move? If not get may accept you leaving without notice?
did your application form for hopeful new job require a current employer reference?
the reference from your previous role would have a leaving date in 2025, so that may flag up to HR so as PP said it may be best to say to HR that you’d been offered a new post during your application process which quickly turned out to be miss-sold hence continuing with this application

I think they do. The person in question is rubbish. So much so that in a matter of weeks I have become the de facto leader and the one everyone looks to for answers.

I just think, the person in question won’t be forced out. I think I was brought in as succession planning but misled on the timeline effectively (whether it was knowingly or otherwise, I don’t know).

OP posts:
Whyherewego · 24/01/2026 17:36

Quaver213 · 24/01/2026 16:59

No outright fibs. But my prior company is well known and I was asked “is there no further opportunity there and why I am looking to move” to which I answered “I don’t believe so, hence why I am looking”. This was/is absolutely the case, I just omitted the fact that I had already accepted and started a position because of those reasons. Everything else about my experience, the relevance to the role etc… were all truthful.

So this is all OK. You were looking for good reasons. You have accepted a role but this other company is your no1 preference . You want to have a job with them but this other, where you are working, is your no2 preference. They will understand that

Quaver213 · 24/01/2026 16:59

edwinbear · 24/01/2026 14:55

Have you told outright fibs about how you’re spending your time at the moment, or just not offered the information that you’ve started a new job? Any outright lies would be a red flag in an FD job (as I’m sure you know), if you’ve just omitted to update them on a change in circumstances, if they offer you the job, you just need to say their recruitment process has taken a little while and you’ve now started a new job in the meantime.

No outright fibs. But my prior company is well known and I was asked “is there no further opportunity there and why I am looking to move” to which I answered “I don’t believe so, hence why I am looking”. This was/is absolutely the case, I just omitted the fact that I had already accepted and started a position because of those reasons. Everything else about my experience, the relevance to the role etc… were all truthful.

OP posts:
Whyherewego · 24/01/2026 15:34

I'd simply leave it until such point as you are offered the role. You haven't got to update your CV between applying and interview. So you can always position it as I applied to you and the other company. You were my preference but the other company process was far quicker. But I'd rather work for you.

gototogo · 24/01/2026 15:32

If you get offered the job just be truthful, that you took the role not knowing you would be offered this one and the new role you took is materially different from that advertised. That wish to take the job they are offering and that you are not looking elsewhere, you are committing to them

EdgyUmberCrab · 24/01/2026 15:27

I joined an awful company last year. Knew it was a huge mistake on the first day. Started job hunting the next day. I was just honest at interviews and said it wasn’t what I thought it was. If you don’t have a history of job hopping I’m sure they will understand.

chunkyBoo · 24/01/2026 15:25

Does your current job even need you in this post considering the other person didn’t move? If not get may accept you leaving without notice?
did your application form for hopeful new job require a current employer reference?
the reference from your previous role would have a leaving date in 2025, so that may flag up to HR so as PP said it may be best to say to HR that you’d been offered a new post during your application process which quickly turned out to be miss-sold hence continuing with this application

JanuaryJasmine · 24/01/2026 15:22

juls1888 · 24/01/2026 14:23

I'd wait for a formal offer and then disclose your current situation. If they ask what the story is then simply explain that you applied for the role and immediately number 2 (the redundancies) happened, which made you lose confidence and want out. Anyone with half a brain would understand that, everyone craves stability. Then play on the one-month notice period being a huge benefit. The shit sandwich approach, if you like.

I'd go for this option, also adding about the no1 person no longer moving on & the other things you mentioned.

i definitely wouldn't 'not mention it' it's lying whichever way you look at it & not the way to start at a bew ljj lk ace, especially not in finance!!

best of luck!