Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dads using female communal changing room

712 replies

Strawberrryfields · 23/01/2026 15:50

Not sure how I feel about this so looking for opinions and whether I should do anything.

A couple of times recently I’ve been changing my child after swimming and a dad has come in to change his child in the communal female changing room. It’s after lessons so only children changing. There are communal female, communal male and a number of individual cubicles. It gets very busy at peak times so at times you may need to wait for an individual cubicle.

It feels weird to me a grown man being in there and my instinct is that he should use the private cubicles, though he is clearly there with his child helping them get ready. I also understand him not wanting to take his child into the men’s communal changing rooms with random men in there but to me, he is a random man.

Should I say something? Would you? Chances are it’s just a normal dad changing his kid but I don’t feel entirely comfortable with it but not sure if IABU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 11:26

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 11:18

You claimed superior legal knowledge, claimed it was illegal for a man simply to be present in a single sex space - but are unable to cite the relevant law?

Mate. I have proven all I need to prove to a sufficient standard.

TheNightingalesStarling · 25/01/2026 11:25

Technically its legal for me to give my 5yo child a gin and tonic.

Doesn't mean its sensible for me to do it... and I'm pretty sure would trigger a safeguarding referral if my 5yo told someone I did it. (Please note... I don't have a 5yo and I have never given one alcohol)

It may not be Technically illegal for a man to enter, but it doesn't mean they can't get o trouble for doing so. (Such as being banned from the venue).

Taztoy · 25/01/2026 11:22

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 11:14

You still haven't been able to point to the law that you claimed exists.

Equality act 2010.

the onus is on the provider but the law as clarified by FWS 2025 makes it clear that men are not allowed in women’s single sex spaces.

I don’t how else to explain it to you.

the SC judges didn’t say “he’s allowed if he’s a nice man”. “He’s allowed in if he didn’t know”. “It’s ok if he’s changing his daughter”

they said. Sex means sex.

single sex spaces must be single sex.

which means. No men in the women’s and no women in the men’s. Where those spaces are exempt spaces, as changing rooms are.

Livamber · 25/01/2026 11:20

If you don’t want to speak to him directly I would speak to a worker and get them to chat with him!

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 11:18

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 11:16

I don't have to.

I've illustrated my point.

Thank you.

You claimed superior legal knowledge, claimed it was illegal for a man simply to be present in a single sex space - but are unable to cite the relevant law?

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 11:16

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 11:14

You still haven't been able to point to the law that you claimed exists.

I don't have to.

I've illustrated my point.

Thank you.

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 11:14

Taztoy · 25/01/2026 10:56

But it’s ok @RedToothBrush never mind the law if the man was a nice man and didn’t mean it.

You still haven't been able to point to the law that you claimed exists.

Namechange6578 · 25/01/2026 11:06

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 25/01/2026 10:56

Well no, but in theory yes. A young girl will be safe in the men's changing room because she's being accompanied by her father, a 9yo girl getting changed unaccompanied in the female changing rooms is unsafe if random men are allowed in there.

This is exactly the argument I had to make when there were people questioning the rules at my DDs swim school.

Their rule is we go in the changing room of the sex of the adult obviously. But people were still disagreeing, even when I said if my DH takes DD9 and she wants to go in the ladies on her own then there should not be the risk of a male adult in there! This is a basic right surely. I couldn't believe people didn't get this

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 25/01/2026 11:00

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 10:13

Your approach to safeguarding puts children at risk - because you simply focus on the obvious problems. Safeguarding 101 is really: "It could happen here."

It's very easy to find those who behave oddly - but those who genuinely cause harm are very often clever enough to conceal their intend. They celebrate people like you who help to draw attention away from them.

That makes absolutely no sense in relation to the comment you're replying to.

TakeALookAtTheseSwatches · 25/01/2026 10:56

Maisey1991 · 25/01/2026 01:37

But it’s okay for his potentially 11 year old child to be in the men’s changing room??

Well no, but in theory yes. A young girl will be safe in the men's changing room because she's being accompanied by her father, a 9yo girl getting changed unaccompanied in the female changing rooms is unsafe if random men are allowed in there.

Taztoy · 25/01/2026 10:56

But it’s ok @RedToothBrush never mind the law if the man was a nice man and didn’t mean it.

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 10:50

You have just become a man arguing about what safeguarding is and isn't on a thread about men in women's changing rooms in the presence of children.

Congratulations.

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 10:49

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 10:13

Your approach to safeguarding puts children at risk - because you simply focus on the obvious problems. Safeguarding 101 is really: "It could happen here."

It's very easy to find those who behave oddly - but those who genuinely cause harm are very often clever enough to conceal their intend. They celebrate people like you who help to draw attention away from them.

It's not MY approach to safeguarding.

It IS safeguarding.

HTH.

spannasaurus · 25/01/2026 10:20

If you keep all men out of female single sex spaces then you keep out those who can genuinely cause harm but are clever enough to conceal their intent as well as the obvious creeps who can cause harm

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 10:13

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 09:47

Safeguarding 101

You treat everyone who engaged in behaviour that's problematic as a safeguarding risk and treat them as having failed to meet safeguarding standards.

There is no 'giving the benefit of the doubt'

Why?

Because that behaviour puts children at risk and you can't tell the intent of an individual.

Anyone engaging in behaviour that breaks safeguarding puts ALL children at risk of you start making exceptions and going "well I know Joe, he's a good guy, just feckless". Because you then set a precedent for others to exploit this logic and your good will.

Anyone who behaves in a manner that a creep would has to be treated like a creep to stop creeps.

Your approach to safeguarding puts children at risk - because you simply focus on the obvious problems. Safeguarding 101 is really: "It could happen here."

It's very easy to find those who behave oddly - but those who genuinely cause harm are very often clever enough to conceal their intend. They celebrate people like you who help to draw attention away from them.

JediNinja · 25/01/2026 09:56

cottoncandy260 · 24/01/2026 21:51

It’s not boys up to 11, it’s up to 8 years. In every single swimming pool changing room I’ve gone into it’s been 8.

A 7 year old girl changing in front of a 7 year old boy is not a problem. A 13 year old girl changing in front of a man is. It’s really not that difficult to work out.

OP has said that in this slot there are only primary school children, 3-11yo and that the only options are women's changing rooms, men's changing rooms or a few cubicles that are always busy.

She hasn't said about age limit for either changing room, even when others have mentioned this, which suggests it might not apply in this slot, when only children are changing with the help of their parents or carers.

Presumably, this is a little girl, as otherwise she could change by herself. So the option would be to take her to the men's, where there are mostly boys up to 11yo and adult men supervising these, or take her to the women's, where most are girls and their mums. If I had sent my DH to the swimming pool with my then 6yo DD (for example), I'm not sure I'd be happy knowing he changed her in the men's communal area in front of all the dads and 3-11yo boys. But for that reason I might have suggested to wait for the cubicle or put a robe and get back home, if that's a choice. I think the complaint in the pool has to be about not enough cubicles.

RedToothBrush · 25/01/2026 09:47

Safeguarding 101

You treat everyone who engaged in behaviour that's problematic as a safeguarding risk and treat them as having failed to meet safeguarding standards.

There is no 'giving the benefit of the doubt'

Why?

Because that behaviour puts children at risk and you can't tell the intent of an individual.

Anyone engaging in behaviour that breaks safeguarding puts ALL children at risk of you start making exceptions and going "well I know Joe, he's a good guy, just feckless". Because you then set a precedent for others to exploit this logic and your good will.

Anyone who behaves in a manner that a creep would has to be treated like a creep to stop creeps.

Strawberrryfields · 25/01/2026 09:39

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 08:37

You're both not completely wrong. It affects probability. More people drink tea than coffee, so if I meet a stranger, I can expect that they would prefer tea - it doesn't mean they do.

The same would apply to the example by @Liquoriceallsortsmadear:
if A is a random person unknown to the child and B a random person known to the child, statistically it is more likely that B would cause harm. As it is overall not likely that either causes harm, it's very unlikely on an individual level - but that doesn't change the relationship.

Ok but where you’re both wrong - as I mentioned in both replies to @Liquoriceallsortsmadear, is that we’re not talking about an unknown individual. We’re talking about me, a known individual. Who knows they are not a risk. So the statistics and probability mean squat in this situation.

I also know that I prefer coffee, the fact most people prefer tea doesn’t change what I know is my own preference.

I don’t need to use guesses or statistics in relation to my own behaviour. We do this with strangers as we don’t know them so might use probability to weigh up what’s likely. Sometimes that will be right, sometimes that will be wrong.

In a roundabout way that’s brought us back to my original uncertainty about the men being in there. Most men aren’t creeps but some are. And while likeliness and probability can be useful tools decision making with unknown people, you also need to consider the stakes. The tea and coffee example is low stakes, if you bring a coffee drinker a tea it’s not the end of the world.

A situation involving children and potential safeguarding is higher stakes. In this case the ‘but some men are’ holds more weight as the potential harm to others needs to be factored in e.g. older girls who are not comfortable with his presence.

OP posts:
Moonnstarz · 25/01/2026 08:42

When mine did swimming lessons the swim school sent out a message that children over 8 needed to use the correct changing room without an adult.
Children under 8 needed to go to the changing room that matched the sex of the parent changing them, so if I took my children they would come to the women's but if my husband took them they would have to go to the men's (I have a boy and girl).

Alex122022 · 25/01/2026 08:37

Strawberrryfields · 25/01/2026 02:27

You’re wrong. Parents aren’t a risk simply because they’re parents. You can’t apply group statistics to known individuals in that way.

Statistically, more people prefer drinking tea than coffee. Does that mean that you as an individual must prefer tea? No it does not. Population patterns or trends don’t determine individual behaviours or preferences.

You're both not completely wrong. It affects probability. More people drink tea than coffee, so if I meet a stranger, I can expect that they would prefer tea - it doesn't mean they do.

The same would apply to the example by @Liquoriceallsortsmadear:
if A is a random person unknown to the child and B a random person known to the child, statistically it is more likely that B would cause harm. As it is overall not likely that either causes harm, it's very unlikely on an individual level - but that doesn't change the relationship.

shuffleofftobuffalo · 25/01/2026 08:14

There is no reason a man should be in the women’s changing room. If there are cubicles he should use those if he doesn’t want to use the men’s. And the same with women going in the men’s. The gender of the adult dictates which room they use.

liveforsummer · 25/01/2026 08:05

eastegg · 24/01/2026 23:39

I can’t understand the posters who are talking as if all the young children in the women’s communal would be girls. Why would they be? They’ll be a mixture, in there on the basis that their parent is female. Equally children being taken into the men’s with a male adult carer could be male or female. So those citing that the reason he shouldn’t be there is because he’ll be around young girls are illogical.

He shouldn’t be there because it’s set aside for women. But I think no child should be getting undressed in a communal area with unrelated adults. The communality is the problem here.

If there are boys in the ladies they presumably will be young. An 11 yo girl is far less likely to be bothered by a 5 yo boy being changed by their mum presence than an adult man

liveforsummer · 25/01/2026 08:01

Maisey1991 · 25/01/2026 01:37

But it’s okay for his potentially 11 year old child to be in the men’s changing room??

Why on earth would a dad be changing an 11 year old girl or any 11 yo for that matter? Outside of asn where disabled facilities would be more appropriate. Most dc by age 6 can manage this independently

liveforsummer · 25/01/2026 07:58

Of course it’s not ok. The older girls could be in there without an adult who could feel very uncomfortable . Parents having sent them in in good faith to a female changing room. No man should be in there for any reason outside of a staff member who may need to enter if no female available, in which case they would knock and announce

SweetBaklava · 25/01/2026 06:52

NRTFT, but at our swimming lessons boys over the age of eight are not allowed in the ladies changing room and vice versa, anyone who has an issue with it is given shirt shrift by the organisers.

Swipe left for the next trending thread