Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Modern life doesn’t work

358 replies

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:16

I say this reading thread after thread of people trying to work around nigh impossible situations.
I am sitting here with chronic IBS from stress, trying to get the kids out of the door, to a school which can’t meet their need, to go to a job where I’m firefighting as nothing is fit for purpose anymore. Finding care homes for younger and younger people. People who want to work but can’t as they have learning disabilities. Yet in the 20th century an estimated 40-70% of people with LD were employed.
I have 38p in my bank account and all my money goes on paying for a big house that we’re in from 6.30pm 7 the next morning, with a huge garden which none of us have time to do anything in. That I sit in on my own when the kids go to see their father in a bedsit at weekends. Yet there are families down the road with three kids and two parents in one room.

The whole thing is crazy. If you were going to arrive here from another planet and looked at late stage capitalism you would say why do you live like this? Getting in debt to spend two weeks abroad rather than making changes to make the other 50 weeks off the year more bearable.

OP posts:
LighthouseLED · 21/01/2026 10:43

Jellycatspyjamas · 21/01/2026 09:22

You mean money from the tax payer, who isn’t working the minimum needed and whose taxes pay for you to work the minimum. Which is part of the problem, a loss of productivity caused by people making a choice to work fewer hours subsidised by taxpayers.

This.

If everyone made the same choices, where do you think the money to subsidise you comes from?

I have no problem with taxes supporting people who can’t work, or where all adults work full time and still can’t pay the bills (although I do think that 2x minimum wage ought to be enough - it isn’t in a lot of places and that is an issue), but if you can support yourself and your family then you should.

InveterateWineDrinker · 21/01/2026 10:42

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:19

The unaffordability of housing is absolutely at the heart of the problem

its also feeds into the productivity issue. Too much income is eaten up by housing.

The figures are a few years old, but last time I checked there was £23 spent on residential housing for every £1 spent on productive investment in the UK. That's a major factor (alongside literacy, numeracy, crap infrastructure, and bone idleness) in why productivity is so poor here.

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:39

@Smoosha Im not disagreeing with you, just was making the point p/t workers are not a tiny % & they aren’t all mothers.

lifeonmars100 · 21/01/2026 10:39

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 08:01

I think ‘we all buy too much stuff’ is a cop out. Most people I know aren’t in debt because they go mad in Next. They are in debt because they put utility bills, kids school shoes, work clothes and petrol on their credit cards.

Agree with you OP. I retired just before the cost of living crisis hit and for about one year I had quite a nice life, a life which after over 40 years oc going out to work and struggling as a single parent paying for everything I felt I deserved. Nothing extravagant, just lunches out every now and then, trips to the theatre and cinema, visits to family in London. Then the bills rocketed and the other day out of inrerest I calculated how much my essential outgoings (gas, elec, council tax, water, broadband, insurance etc) have increased by, it was 129% ! God only knows how families and young people just starting out are managing. The cost of everything is insane. The state of the area, in fact the whole city I live in is so run down and depressing due to swingeing cuts as the council is broke. Guess we just have to hope that it will get better but as to how this will happen I have no idea.

dottiehens · 21/01/2026 10:38

I will be battered for this but the obsession of some to have kids at all costs. May be this is the answer of some SEN and other issues so prevalent in modern world today. Oldest fathers and mothers. Having one kid with problems and carrying on having more. I know people are having less kids but this is the younger mainly. These situations make life very difficult for parents and society. It will have consequences as well for the future.

MsCactus · 21/01/2026 10:36

I agree - I'm beginning to wonder if minimalism is the answer, because clearing out my house has made it SO much nicer. And with minimalism you basically don't buy anything other than essentials, so you accumulate more wealth too

Smoosha · 21/01/2026 10:34

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:08

@Smoosha I actually love my job & prefer p/t to not working. My point was a high % of mothers do work p/t, it’s not a tiny minority.

Right but it’s not just mothers who want a decent work life balance is it? If EVERYONE started working part time there wouldn’t be enough people to fill all the jobs. If everyone wanted nice family friendly hours who is doing the horrible shifts? My point is, that the people often doing the part time jobs are supported and enabled by those doing full time jobs.

Womaninhouse17 · 21/01/2026 10:32

LilWoosmum82 · 21/01/2026 10:17

I'm off sick with stress/anxiety and depression at the moment. I'm a single mum on good money, i feel like i just imploded after christmas and couldn't keep going anymore. But at somepoint i will have to go back to work. It's ridiculous the amount of expectations there are to keep going and i don't know how this can continue

Forget those 'expectations'. Do what you can that suits you and doesn't stress you. That's far more important.

RollOnSpring26 · 21/01/2026 10:29

Totally agree op, people also buying crazy expensive cars two of them, on car payment plans etc

all these humans locking themselves into prison of debt

the answer though is to live more modestly

PeachPandy · 21/01/2026 10:27

I have a cousin who literally gave up “modern life” in the West and is thriving. At the time we thought she was having a mental breakdown!

Shes 34 now. But when she was 28 she went to Punjab in India to shop for her wedding clothes. She was engaged to a white, English guy. But she ended up falling in love with a cousin’s friend and moved out there to a rural farm in the mountains.

Of all people you would not think she would ever live in such simple ways. She modelled as a teen, went to one of the best UK universities, partied, was constantly on holiday, dated etc.

She said she couldn’t spend another day staring at a spreadsheet! And then going home to cook then sleep.

Her life is so different now but she has never been happier. And when she came to visit this Summer she looked so glowy and healthy.

She spends her days volunteering at her local Sikh temple (in the free kitchen), teaching at a girls school, riding her horses and looking after her farm animals/street dogs. At the weekend her husband and her sons camp, fish etc. She has become much more religious and spiritual - now meditates. Shes got into a Sikh form of martial arts which keeps her in shape. she credits all the above for having cured her chronic anxiety.

She takes an afternoon nap on a hammock! They have a computer and TV. The tv is only watched at the weekends and the computer is used for school and video calling family.

And her sons. My gosh, they are just so well behaved and well adjusted. The 6 yo was teaching dh when we went fishing this Summer!

It’s taught me a lot. Progress and modernity is good but we need to not chase complexity and change just for the sake of it.

It’s funny how we all thought she needed to see a psychiatrist initially

Bargepole45 · 21/01/2026 10:26

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:15

France and Germany have worse wealth inequality than the UK

Again nuance, poorer families in France & Germany tend to be better off than poorer families in the UK

I don't know why you are determined to interpret my posts in such a strange way. First you seen to be adamant that I have implied that the UK is comparable to Kenya when I have explicitly stated the opposite numerous times. Now you imply I don't understand nuance. There is always nuance. Wealth inequality is factually higher in the two countries you wanted to compare us to. Does that mean that this inequality is experienced consistently across all demographics across all measures? Of course it doesn't but if the overall measure suggests that wealth inequality is higher then these countries clearly have deep rooted issues with inequality too. Germany in particular is far more problematic than the UK when it comes to the distribution of assets.

I also can't believe you don't think economic inactivity isn't a major driver of poor productivity. This flies in the face of accepted economic theory.

fruitfly3 · 21/01/2026 10:25

It’s completely broken OP. I live a life of relative comfort (money-wise). But I have a chronic condition, a child with needs (and another child) and work full time. It makes me even more poorly. I hate it all and it’s so hard to change for women with the general shitshow of male support on offer.

TheChicDreamer · 21/01/2026 10:25

ChicoryChina · 21/01/2026 07:31

Goodness me. People think all this stuff is normal because they are used to it. Kids who hardly see their parents as they eat breakfast at breakfast club, go to school, play at after school club and eat tea late that their parents have raced home to prepare, homework and bed later than anyone who like. Nice houses that are bigger than we need rammed full of stuff the end up in the landfill ruining the environment but costs us so much money we had to keep working long hours as we feel we need this stuff. We could all live simpler and slower lives if we all forgo a lot of the material things but society had told us that is what we need and what is normal. I could go on but nobody agrees and partly that because it’s hard to admit that your lifestyle isn’t ideal when you are told by everyone it is just the way it is and by the time you are deep in it’s impossible to change. And how do you make meaningful change on your own? It’s not a criticism of individuals but of our society. What a waste. A previous post was talking about how a mother should work longer hours because her husband wanted her to. It’s not always that’s simple and there is value in being physically and emotionally available for your children because you have done household jobs when they are at school. Just because others do doesn’t mean it is the only way.

Agree with all of this.
That thread is a reflection of the times; no value placed on SAHM / even PT parents anymore.
There’s been a huge swing on MN towards both parents working FT and 8-6 childcare being the norm. 20 years ago on here, it was unusual and there were regular debates where both ‘sides’ were argued equally.
Far more burned out parents these days.
Heinous house prices and COL have pushed us backwards it seems. There are no winners here. I feel for this generation of young parents and I fear for my (gen Z) daughters.

Dragonfly97 · 21/01/2026 10:23

OonaStubbs · 21/01/2026 08:16

Honestly I think the answer is to abolish computers. Worldwide. And go back to basics. It would make things so more simpler and more people would be employed doing tangible work.

I have a spinal condition that means traditional work in a physical workplace is no longer possible. I worked in retail and factories for years; the Internet has been a godsend for me. I can work on my laptop, selling my designs on Etsy and other online platforms. The Internet has opened doors as a market place for many artists who wouldn't have got their work out there otherwise.

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:21

That's why I think comparisons to the past like that just don't work. We're not in the 50's. That's like people who actually did live in the 50s comparing their lives to the 1870's!! I don't think they did that somehow!

Quite!

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:20

I just bought a 2nd wardrobe off Ikea, I really am not a unicorn!

DancingLions · 21/01/2026 10:20

Rainydayinlondon · 21/01/2026 10:09

But say 70 years ago (1950s), people often lived with parents when they first got married, lived in a couple of rooms if they didn’t, only had a couple of weeks’ holiday per year, didn’t go abroad regularly if at all, certainly most didn’t have a car, rarely went out to restaurants ( other than tea shops/Lyons corner house/fish and chips), had hand me down furniture when first married.
Men ( especially those who worked manually) often died in their early 70s after only a few years’ retirement
I think we demand far more out of our salaries and in fact could live MUCH more simply

But a lot of things that are cheap now weren't cheap or available back then, and that is why.

Take going abroad. In the 70s my grandparents would fly over from mainland Europe, collect me and fly back with me to their house for the summer, then bring me back at the end. It was hideously expensive! I can fly to their country now for £30 with a cheap airline.

Clothes were expensive but now you can get a whole wardrobe cheaply online. (taking aside ethical considerations).

Furniture, again was expensive, but now we have places like Ikea, abundant second hand options where you can get stuff almost as good as new.

So yes of course people expect to be able to afford those things because they have never been as cheap or readily available. There's no reason people shouldn't be able to afford them.

That's why I think comparisons to the past like that just don't work. We're not in the 50's. That's like people who actually did live in the 50s comparing their lives to the 1870's!! I don't think they did that somehow!

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:20

Why do some posters think people today don’t also have 2nd hand furniture or hand me downs?

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:19

The unaffordability of housing is absolutely at the heart of the problem

its also feeds into the productivity issue. Too much income is eaten up by housing.

PerkingFaintly · 21/01/2026 10:17

I think it was "Britain's Housing Crisis", but I saw a programme where with a recent study of the economics of housing. The academics doing the study were so shocked at the graph of how house-builders' profits had gone up that they went back and checked their figures because they were certain they must have made a mistake. Nope, no mistake: the profits of the house-builders had shot up stratospherically, and over a comparatively short time.

Turns out the house-builders have been prioritising profit over quantity. Even if they have everything available – land, planning permission, materials, labour – they choose not to actually build until house-prices in the area reach a level which will yield a massive profit.

They're not trying to cover their costs and make a modest profit: they're deliberately choking supply to raise prices to increase profit per unit.

Britain’s Housing Crisis: What Went Wrong?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001rkn5

BBC Two - Britain’s Housing Crisis: What Went Wrong?

Britain’s housing market is broken. How did we get here - and what could happen next?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001rkn5

LilWoosmum82 · 21/01/2026 10:17

I'm off sick with stress/anxiety and depression at the moment. I'm a single mum on good money, i feel like i just imploded after christmas and couldn't keep going anymore. But at somepoint i will have to go back to work. It's ridiculous the amount of expectations there are to keep going and i don't know how this can continue

PerkingFaintly · 21/01/2026 10:17

aLFIESMA · 21/01/2026 08:54

When the 'Right To Buy' council house stock and 'Buy To Let' mortgages became commonplace things slowly began to change. Not for the better IMO.
I see young people struggling & families blown apart with stress and feel bitter at the few who made life so hard for so many at the stroke of a pen on some legislation. Housing, with decent affordable housing so much else, finances, mental health and solid family life will prosper for the good of the individual and society.

The unaffordability of housing is absolutely at the heart of the problem.

It knocks on to everything.

For example, it's all very well telling the OP she individually should downsize, but the wages of the carers for the people with Learning Difficulties need to cover said carers' housing costs.

And if the wages don't, the carers need top ups from the taxpayer in order to rent... costing themselves and the OP again.

Goldwren1923 · 21/01/2026 10:17

If you can’t afford a big house and don’t need a big house why did you buy it?? This has nothing to do with modern life

LittlePetitePsychopath · 21/01/2026 10:16

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 10:08

@Smoosha I actually love my job & prefer p/t to not working. My point was a high % of mothers do work p/t, it’s not a tiny minority.

Agreed. I don't know any single woman who has gone back to work F/T after having kids. Most do two or three days a week.

Womaninhouse17 · 21/01/2026 10:16

Rainydayinlondon · 21/01/2026 10:09

But say 70 years ago (1950s), people often lived with parents when they first got married, lived in a couple of rooms if they didn’t, only had a couple of weeks’ holiday per year, didn’t go abroad regularly if at all, certainly most didn’t have a car, rarely went out to restaurants ( other than tea shops/Lyons corner house/fish and chips), had hand me down furniture when first married.
Men ( especially those who worked manually) often died in their early 70s after only a few years’ retirement
I think we demand far more out of our salaries and in fact could live MUCH more simply

This is so true. Even when I married in 1977, we had a hand-me-down cooker, no washing machine or fridge and Grandma's old sofa. New furniture wasn't even a consideration and neither was buying things on credit. I've already said that it is really difficult to go against the grain, but it is possible to do without many of the unnecessary things which seem to be considered essential nowadays. Stressing yourself out and damaging your health is a big price to pay for 'keeping up'.

Swipe left for the next trending thread