Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Modern life doesn’t work

358 replies

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:16

I say this reading thread after thread of people trying to work around nigh impossible situations.
I am sitting here with chronic IBS from stress, trying to get the kids out of the door, to a school which can’t meet their need, to go to a job where I’m firefighting as nothing is fit for purpose anymore. Finding care homes for younger and younger people. People who want to work but can’t as they have learning disabilities. Yet in the 20th century an estimated 40-70% of people with LD were employed.
I have 38p in my bank account and all my money goes on paying for a big house that we’re in from 6.30pm 7 the next morning, with a huge garden which none of us have time to do anything in. That I sit in on my own when the kids go to see their father in a bedsit at weekends. Yet there are families down the road with three kids and two parents in one room.

The whole thing is crazy. If you were going to arrive here from another planet and looked at late stage capitalism you would say why do you live like this? Getting in debt to spend two weeks abroad rather than making changes to make the other 50 weeks off the year more bearable.

OP posts:
Tabitha005 · 21/01/2026 08:42

@sugarandcyanide has absolutely hit the spot.

DeftWasp · 21/01/2026 08:41

ThejoyofNC · 21/01/2026 08:35

I'm a gypsy and we get so much criticism from others for our traditional lifestyles. We always say we don't want to do anything differently, we are happy with our lifestyle. Then it's people living like the OP who refuse to believe we could be happy and try to convince us we MUST live the "modern way" and "get out of the 1950s". No thanks. I'll keep my single income, nuclear family 100% of the time.

Sounds like hell OP, you have my sympathies, you were sold a lie.

I'm in the building trade and have a couple of gypsy mates who are respectively a bricky and a groundworker - I think there is much to be admired in your lifestyle, you look after each other, stick together as families, always seem pretty happy and to some extent stick two fingers up to modern officialdom - good for you!

Ginmonkeyagain · 21/01/2026 08:41

Life has always been a struggle but in different ways. Things that were relentless hard, expensive tasks for our ancestors are easy for us, but they have been replaced by stuff that is hard in a different eay.

This morning I completed some very mundane thing easily, quickly and cheaply - had a hot shower, made some porridge for breakfast, heated my home to an acceptable temperature, washed up and sorted out some minor banking jobs.

A hundred or so years ago all of those things would have been more difficult, time consuming and expensive. Lucky families would have had domestic servants to get up in the cold before dawn to lay the fires, light the stove and heat the water. The rest of us would be doing it ourselves or more likely leaving for work at the crack of dawn after a quick wipe with cold water, a bit of bread and feeling freezing cold.

Augustus40 · 21/01/2026 08:40

I work part time at home mortgage free. Left the ratrace years ago. Modest income but worth it

SumTingWongwithme · 21/01/2026 08:38

Jellycatspyjamas · 21/01/2026 07:46

How much of that is choice though? It’s a choice to buy a big house with a big garden, to buy tonnes of stuff that ends up in landfill, and if the house were smaller, and the stuff didn’t get bought there would be less pressure on finances and possibly different choices about work.

Too often we sleep walk into a high pressure, high cost lifestyle because that’s what people do, rather than questioning the big house and the tonnes of stuff. It’s madness, but some of it we do to ourselves.

Have you seen the price of housing? How is my 22 year old newly graduated DD meant to buy a house in central London where she has to work right now because of her job role? Many folk don't have control over where they live, expensive houses are not always big houses either in the SE. A high cost lifestyle is now the norm just trying to eat, pay bills and a mortgage.

I totally agree on consumerism though and the constant need / drive to own things, I think social media is very much to blame for fuelling this.

MsMcCoo · 21/01/2026 08:37

GarlicSound · 21/01/2026 08:21

Agreed. Mind you, I also agree (ish) that we had it very, very good in the last decades of the 20th and the first of this century. It spoiled us - collectively, in the UK - and people's expectations of 'normal' are way higher. Much higher than they were in my youth (born 1955) and unimaginable in my parents'.

We can live comfortably with less, and most of us will probably have to remember how to, starting around now.

I've got another gripe, though - things just not damn well working! Appliances genuinely do break down sooner, and the fix is rarely something you can do yourself with some instructions and a screwdriver. New-type appliances like LED lights are fab, but have to go in the bin when they conk out. New cars are computers, Practical Mechanics can't help you there. Systems & processes are rushed into operation with insufficient troubleshooting, they don't join up with the previous & next process, and there are no humans trained to assist with the failures. Let's ignore the robot assistants that are only able to tell you what's already on the goddamn website.

I shall go & calm down now 😬

They do!!!! No way can see my washing machine living happy life for 20 years....
Imho it's too much technology in one thimg and lower quality parts.
The more technology stuffed into one thing, the more likely it is to break

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 08:37

Children are a choice

And so many are choosing not to have them which makes certain public services unaffordable.

CantBreathe90 · 21/01/2026 08:37

Augarden · 21/01/2026 08:03

The way we live now is so far away with how we evolved to live that it's actually amazing we're coping as well as we are.

One of the reasons humans have been so successful as a species, is that we are very adaptable, and have very "plastic" (maleable) brains, especially through infancy and childhood.

Still though, we are SO, SO removed from hunter gatherers (as we've still spent the vast majority of our evolution being), I have to agree with you. We're almost victims of our own success in a way. Capable of surviving, but not necessarily thriving, in the world we have created.

HeartyBlueRobin · 21/01/2026 08:36

Why not downsize if the home is too big and your children's father is living in a bedsit? The lower outgoings could mean you could work fewer hours allowing some quality time with your children. I'm not suggesting it will be easy but you seem keen for things to change.

As for more people with learning disabilities working in the 20th century than today they were mostly working in servitude and/or exploited toiling for very long hours on a very low wage.

ThejoyofNC · 21/01/2026 08:35

I'm a gypsy and we get so much criticism from others for our traditional lifestyles. We always say we don't want to do anything differently, we are happy with our lifestyle. Then it's people living like the OP who refuse to believe we could be happy and try to convince us we MUST live the "modern way" and "get out of the 1950s". No thanks. I'll keep my single income, nuclear family 100% of the time.

Sounds like hell OP, you have my sympathies, you were sold a lie.

Peridoteage · 21/01/2026 08:34

I think a huge part of it is awareness. There have always been loads of poorer people ekeing out an existence, hand to mouth, but they were surrounded by others like them and it was perceived as the norm. Ordinary folk saw the rich from a distance, understood them to be a tiny proportion of people & didn't really know a great deal about how they lived

Social media bombards us constantly with media focussed on the wealthiest minority and we are given a huge amount of detail about a lifestyle few of us can afford.

Switch it off. Get offline, stop following all this crap. You will be happier.

Kimura · 21/01/2026 08:33

OonaStubbs · 21/01/2026 08:16

Honestly I think the answer is to abolish computers. Worldwide. And go back to basics. It would make things so more simpler and more people would be employed doing tangible work.

Which jobs involving computers do you think aren't 'tangible'?

bathsmat · 21/01/2026 08:32

Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food.

But you can’t look at in a vacuum. What are people in other countries spending on housing? childcare? utilities? what are their wages like?

DeftWasp · 21/01/2026 08:32

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:16

I say this reading thread after thread of people trying to work around nigh impossible situations.
I am sitting here with chronic IBS from stress, trying to get the kids out of the door, to a school which can’t meet their need, to go to a job where I’m firefighting as nothing is fit for purpose anymore. Finding care homes for younger and younger people. People who want to work but can’t as they have learning disabilities. Yet in the 20th century an estimated 40-70% of people with LD were employed.
I have 38p in my bank account and all my money goes on paying for a big house that we’re in from 6.30pm 7 the next morning, with a huge garden which none of us have time to do anything in. That I sit in on my own when the kids go to see their father in a bedsit at weekends. Yet there are families down the road with three kids and two parents in one room.

The whole thing is crazy. If you were going to arrive here from another planet and looked at late stage capitalism you would say why do you live like this? Getting in debt to spend two weeks abroad rather than making changes to make the other 50 weeks off the year more bearable.

There used to be a big Remploy factory in our town that made electric heaters ,library furniture and school furniture and employed mainly disabled people, it was a fantastic place, all adapted for them.

It was government owned and supplied state schools and libraries.

Sadly gone

MsMcCoo · 21/01/2026 08:32

Bargepole45 · 21/01/2026 08:04

The idea that this is the 'norm' though is completely wrong. It has always been very difficult for people earning the lowest wages to even survive, let alone have fun money. I just think our expectations as a country are rooted in a relatively short time period that was never going to be sustainable in the long term.

A good example is food. We have largely got to a point where we expect food to be roughly 10% of our expenditure but there is absolutely no real reason why this should remain the case. Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food. If food becomes more scarce and our economy continues to falter then we will have less buying power as a country. Food will become more more expensive. There are also ethical questions about whether it should ever be such a low proportion of our spending in the first place anyway.

Lots of us immigrants started on nmw somewhere in gut of hospitality beast. So we are aware of low wage life. That's what I was describing on personal level. We had good lives😕
Yes, food is cheap in uk but other bills are more than for example where my family lives, let alone DHs.
I remember how often we used eat in nandos 😭

LadyLapsang · 21/01/2026 08:30

In the 20th Century many women were economically inactive or underemployed and divorce was rare for much of the century unless you were very wealthy. Wealth and class, as now, would have been key to your experiences. However, both my DPs lost a elder sibling in the war and most of us in the UK have not experienced that in our lifetime.

StandFirm · 21/01/2026 08:28

The reality is that completely deregulated capitalism rigs the game so much that it ends up eating itself as entrepreneurship and competition disappear. That's why anti-trust laws were introduced in the US a century ago. Today's reality though is that transnational big corporations (enabled by globalisation) have killed local businesses, communities and bankrupted states (not enough tax intake to maintain services) without offering viable alternatives. AI disruption is the latest iteration of this and will be the nail in the coffin. We are heading for a post-employment (and terrifyingly) post-human world in which we won't be able to justify our economic value anymore while still being trapped in a system that mercilessly rests on economic value. I'm worried for kids and my old age.

Ihateboris · 21/01/2026 08:27

QuiltyAsCharged · 21/01/2026 08:27

Children are a choice.

I don't have children and still struggle.

QuiltyAsCharged · 21/01/2026 08:27

Children are a choice.

Quine0nline · 21/01/2026 08:26

I find myself humming "rocking the suburbs" from "Over the hedge" as I read these posts.

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 21/01/2026 08:24

Thanks for posting this. I've been feeling very despondent about the rat race and not progressing in my career but actually my job is very flexible and allows me to be there after school more days than not. That's something to be valued.

On social care, what happens if you have a joint asset eg house but only one partner needs the care? Do they still force you to sell?

Jellycatspyjamas · 21/01/2026 08:23

DeluluTaylor · 21/01/2026 07:56

@Jellycatspyjamaswell some of it is choice, some of it isn’t. I have two children of different genders so they need their own room as they are nearly teens. Most three beds are houses where I am, haven’t seen many three bed flats. Of course I could share with my daughter but society/ media has showed her that she needs her own room. We don’t particularly buy a lot of stuff. I have to work full time to prove affordability to the bank that lent me the money to buy the house that I can no longer afford. And ironically because I’m living paycheque to paycheque I can’t afford to move. I can’t afford to live here and I can’t afford to move.
I can’t work part time and I can’t afford the petrol to work full time.
I follow a lot of ‘I left the rat race’ type accounts on SM, can’t help but feel their lives are propped up by others who can’t leave. If their children get ill, they will be treated by people who can’t live in a gypsy caravan. If they need a loan to buy a new camper, those bank staff are still tied to the capitalist system. We can’t all ‘opt out’

That’s the thing though, I think when parents split there’s an understandable desire to keep things consistent for the kids by either staying in the family home (at crippling cost to the woman) or to buy something as similar as possible. If all you could afford is a 2 bed home then your DD would need to share. It’s not ideal but neither is being down to your last penny.

We’ve been sold this story of what an acceptable life is, from homes to hobbies to clothes even down to how often we do our laundry and we don’t stop to think how sustainable it is until we’re trapped in it. Social media has so much to answer for - the living off grid, lentil weaving life style is no more sustainable (how many of those influencers fund their life style through content creation) than the affluent life styles sold at the other end of the spectrum. It’s all aspirational - but not realistic for most people.

GarlicSound · 21/01/2026 08:21

Bargepole45 · 21/01/2026 08:04

The idea that this is the 'norm' though is completely wrong. It has always been very difficult for people earning the lowest wages to even survive, let alone have fun money. I just think our expectations as a country are rooted in a relatively short time period that was never going to be sustainable in the long term.

A good example is food. We have largely got to a point where we expect food to be roughly 10% of our expenditure but there is absolutely no real reason why this should remain the case. Other people in other countries routinely have to spend 50% of their income on food. If food becomes more scarce and our economy continues to falter then we will have less buying power as a country. Food will become more more expensive. There are also ethical questions about whether it should ever be such a low proportion of our spending in the first place anyway.

Agreed. Mind you, I also agree (ish) that we had it very, very good in the last decades of the 20th and the first of this century. It spoiled us - collectively, in the UK - and people's expectations of 'normal' are way higher. Much higher than they were in my youth (born 1955) and unimaginable in my parents'.

We can live comfortably with less, and most of us will probably have to remember how to, starting around now.

I've got another gripe, though - things just not damn well working! Appliances genuinely do break down sooner, and the fix is rarely something you can do yourself with some instructions and a screwdriver. New-type appliances like LED lights are fab, but have to go in the bin when they conk out. New cars are computers, Practical Mechanics can't help you there. Systems & processes are rushed into operation with insufficient troubleshooting, they don't join up with the previous & next process, and there are no humans trained to assist with the failures. Let's ignore the robot assistants that are only able to tell you what's already on the goddamn website.

I shall go & calm down now 😬

frozendaisy · 21/01/2026 08:21

It is about making the most of the time you are in.

Summerhillsquare · 21/01/2026 08:21

sugarandcyanide · 21/01/2026 07:34

I agree. Life has got so expensive that we live to pay bills and buy food. Disposable income gets lower every year.

Families need two parents working to afford to live and they end up paying the equivalent of a second mortgage to someone else to look after their children. Then everyone is scratching their heads wondering why people aren't having children any more!

People will have to work till they're 70 and give up all of their healthy years. Social care is a disaster in this country and relatives can't help like they used to because they're at work, so those houses families had to give up their lives to buy will eventually end up being sold off to pay £6k a month in care fees.

But it's still the better of two evils to own the house as the alternative is to have no assets and be at the mercy of a state that has no money and even less inclination to look after their elderly.

send this to the Prime Minister. Serioulsy, they need to understand, and too many MPs are remote from this struggle.