Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I just got pulled over for doing 32 in a 30

680 replies

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 13:02

I’m shaking as I write this. I just drove out to walk the dogs and on my way back a police car pulled me over. I was doing 32 in a 30 and he said I was “lucky” that he’s not choosing to prosecute me over this.

AIBU or is this total overkill? It’s a dry sunny day, the roads are relatively quiet and I wasn’t driving erratically.

OP posts:
LlynTegid · 17/01/2026 15:11

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 17/01/2026 14:51

The posters saying that doing 32mph is x% more likely to kill in a collision than at 30mph, and there’s y% more kinetic energy etc are no doubt right. But it’s all beside the point.

Speed limits are arbitrary in the sense that they’re chosen to be round numbers and applied with wide degrees of latitude.

Why not fix the limit at 28mph or 37mph? Going at 30 or 40mph would then bring statistical higher risk than the lower speeds. You could just go down until you get to, say, 5mph and eradicate all appreciable risk.

The latitude is that councils fix speed limits without any real knowledge of whether they’re justified or not. The usual decision is between 20 or 30mph. There’s no science in it, just choice.

The reality is that it’s a balance between practicality and safety. And that slight breaches of a speed limit happen everywhere, all the time. A 2mph excess is so small that it brings the system
into disrepute to act on it.

Whilst agreeing there is a balance between practicality and safety, there is some science in it. I think there should be the option of more graduated (so for example 25mph), and also in some cases a lower speed limit in one direction than the other (say when entering a town or village as there is more chance of a pedestrian ahead).

I also think the lower speed limits especially 20mph should not just be a sign by the road, but some other measure to lower speed (speed hump or cushion perhaps).

saraclara · 17/01/2026 15:10

If he had time when travelling behind you, to spot you going too fast and pull you over, I'm going to suggest that the 32 that you were doing at the point that you noticed him, was less than you were doing when he first spotted you and made the decision.

Femalemachinest · 17/01/2026 15:07

I had to go on speed awareness course. The guy doing it told me that the speed they prosecute at can vary. If its a known hot-spot they are more strict.

vitahelp · 17/01/2026 15:06

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 17/01/2026 14:51

The posters saying that doing 32mph is x% more likely to kill in a collision than at 30mph, and there’s y% more kinetic energy etc are no doubt right. But it’s all beside the point.

Speed limits are arbitrary in the sense that they’re chosen to be round numbers and applied with wide degrees of latitude.

Why not fix the limit at 28mph or 37mph? Going at 30 or 40mph would then bring statistical higher risk than the lower speeds. You could just go down until you get to, say, 5mph and eradicate all appreciable risk.

The latitude is that councils fix speed limits without any real knowledge of whether they’re justified or not. The usual decision is between 20 or 30mph. There’s no science in it, just choice.

The reality is that it’s a balance between practicality and safety. And that slight breaches of a speed limit happen everywhere, all the time. A 2mph excess is so small that it brings the system
into disrepute to act on it.

Finally a sensible response

Didimum · 17/01/2026 15:05

You can either speed and face the consequences or not speed and don't. Up to you, love.

Ewock · 17/01/2026 15:03

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 14:30

I tend to pay attention to the road ahead of me, which is what you’re taught to do.

So you pay attention to the road but not your speed as well 🤣 Hopefully you know you should do both.
You were speeding you were given a verbal warning, not sure why you feel you should be exempt for this. Yes it was only 2 miles over the limit, but it was over the limit. Do you believe that you shouldn't be stopped until you were 3,4 5 or more miles over the limit?

ZoomerBoomer · 17/01/2026 15:03

Shaking? Really? You need some form of resilience training because that’s not normal.

saraclara · 17/01/2026 15:03

OswaldCobblepot · 17/01/2026 13:06

I'm surprised they've got time to pull someone for doing 2 mph over the limit. No officers available to deal with burglaries, robberies etc but happy to allocate resources to this?

The same police officer will be pulling people over who are doing 40 or 50. It's not like he's been sent out specifically to catch people who are doing 32, FFS.

ginasevern · 17/01/2026 14:58

Coulddowithanap · 17/01/2026 14:20

Can everyone honestly tell if the driver of the car in front is male or female? How would they have known until after op was pulled over?

Yes they can. I was pulled over by two male coppers because my license plate was allegedly "dirty". I've got natural long blonde hair and I think they were hoping to oggle a nice bit of totty. Once they'd pulled up alongside (lights on and siren going), they realised I'm an old biddy in her 60's. One turned to the other and said "you lose mate". They then told me to clean my license plate whilst smirking their heads off. The whole thing shook me up to be honest as it wasn't long after Sarah Everard. For the record, my license plate wasn't dirty at all.

SoScarletItWas · 17/01/2026 14:57

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 13:20

This is exactly it. He’s a man on his own, seen a lone woman doing 32 and decided to exercise a power trip.

I was speed-van caught at 32 in a downhill dip in a 30 stretch. Got a letter, attended the speed awareness course online.

Because I was speeding according to the limit. Not because anyone was on a power trip 🙄

purplehair1 · 17/01/2026 14:56

I thought there was a 10% margin of error allowance? Think the police officer must have been having a dull day.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 17/01/2026 14:51

The posters saying that doing 32mph is x% more likely to kill in a collision than at 30mph, and there’s y% more kinetic energy etc are no doubt right. But it’s all beside the point.

Speed limits are arbitrary in the sense that they’re chosen to be round numbers and applied with wide degrees of latitude.

Why not fix the limit at 28mph or 37mph? Going at 30 or 40mph would then bring statistical higher risk than the lower speeds. You could just go down until you get to, say, 5mph and eradicate all appreciable risk.

The latitude is that councils fix speed limits without any real knowledge of whether they’re justified or not. The usual decision is between 20 or 30mph. There’s no science in it, just choice.

The reality is that it’s a balance between practicality and safety. And that slight breaches of a speed limit happen everywhere, all the time. A 2mph excess is so small that it brings the system
into disrepute to act on it.

jamandcustard · 17/01/2026 14:51

PerksOfNotBeingAWallflower · 17/01/2026 14:47

I don’t believe this at all, speedometers are designed so that they will not display a lower speed than you are travelling so if your car was showing 32 you would be travelling slower than that.

Or her speedo is accurate and she was actually going 32.

NemesisInferior · 17/01/2026 14:51

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 14:30

I tend to pay attention to the road ahead of me, which is what you’re taught to do.

I would hope you were taught to occasionally look in your mirrors and at your instruments as well.

venus7 · 17/01/2026 14:50

30 is the limit, not the minimum.

Coulddowithanap · 17/01/2026 14:49

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 14:30

I tend to pay attention to the road ahead of me, which is what you’re taught to do.

😂 you get taught to be aware of what's behind you and at the sides of you too.

PerksOfNotBeingAWallflower · 17/01/2026 14:47

I don’t believe this at all, speedometers are designed so that they will not display a lower speed than you are travelling so if your car was showing 32 you would be travelling slower than that.

FlyingApple · 17/01/2026 14:47

He was enjoying watching you squirm.

Imdunfer · 17/01/2026 14:44

LaurieFairyCake · 17/01/2026 13:05

Do remember that your speed dial would have been showing 35+. It’s just the speed trap recorded you at 32.

Not true. Most new and recent cars show exactly 2 miles over the speed the car is actually doing on the speedo.

MasterBeth · 17/01/2026 14:43

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 13:08

oh give over. If I was doing 35 I’d understand but a couple of MPH on a clear road with a slight downhill isn’t speeding.

Well, it is.

Womaninhouse17 · 17/01/2026 14:43

dialdrunkforyou · 17/01/2026 14:30

I tend to pay attention to the road ahead of me, which is what you’re taught to do.

You should also be aware of what's behind you and around you. We are taught enough to pass our test, but there is far more to safe driving than that. It's interesting to keep learning how to improve your driving e.g. by having advanced lessons.

grumpygrape · 17/01/2026 14:40

THisbackwithavengeance · 17/01/2026 14:37

Of course it’s total overkill. What a twat.

I don’t think it’s kind to call the OP a twat. However, I think she must have stopped ‘shaking’ now, having posted so many responses.

ginasevern · 17/01/2026 14:40

PatThePenguin · 17/01/2026 13:57

Anyway, much easier box to tick than tackling the drug dealers and their snarling pit bulls in town.

Since when has this been the job of the traffic police?

Was it Traffic Police? The OP doesn't state that at all. Regular police pull motorists over quite frequently. Most Traffic Police operate on the motorways or major trunk roads and as this was a 30mph zone, it obviously wasn't either.

Womaninhouse17 · 17/01/2026 14:39

Did the police officer say you were doing 32? I just wonder if you were doing more than that. Or perhaps they saw something else suspect? It does seem a bit drastic to pull you over, but I guess they had every right to do so.

THisbackwithavengeance · 17/01/2026 14:37

Of course it’s total overkill. What a twat.