Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

My doctor was late to my appointment because he had been at the local country hotel full of asylum seekers...

706 replies

doodiethewonderdog · 17/01/2026 10:59

When was the last time you had a home visit? Is this a way of managing the " problem" by them taking clinics there? Is it a way of hiding this issue? I understood they did not have access to the NHS yet I see massive bags of medicine labelled for this hotel too at the dispensary. We wait about 6-7 weeks for a routine appointment.

My doctor was late to my appointment because he had been at the local country hotel full of asylum seekers...
OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Blakeley · 18/01/2026 11:39

I haven’t read it all so apologies if I’m repeating.

complaining they don’t work like “all the immigrants you knew did”. They are not allowed to. I work in healthcare I’ve treated many, one man was qualified in something like accounting or law ( can’t remember what but along those lines). He wasn’t allowed to work, there will be many who have valuable skills they just can’t use them.

when I see them their stories of what have happened to them are horrific, utterly shocking and tragic. They end up with awful physical deformities from torture and not being able to access healthcare when they are fleeing. They unsurprisingly usually have ptsd and other mental health issues.
prevention is better than cure, you are complaining people don’t work hard then you are complaining they access healthcare. So would you rather they sit accessing welfare due to ill health if they end up getting granted asylum.

I don’t disagree that the NHS need reform, it is a 1940s system and it’s scope has crept, we are keeping people alive longer with more complex health issues as a result, and everything is very reactive not proactive. However that’s a whole other discussion, and actually i don’t think that’s why to are here, I think you are just using the NHS as a scapegoat for to belittle asylum seekers tbh

Kingscallops · 18/01/2026 11:34

Nospringchix · 18/01/2026 11:28

I would suggest that the government took on plenty of caseworkers so that their cases were carefully and fairly considered without them being left in limbo in hotels for long periods of time.
On the issue of healthcare, they are human beings, and I don't know about you, but I feel every human being should receive healthcare as required in this humane country.

The roll out of Jess' law across GPs surgeries lends weight to your last point. The pressure that's on GPs and the implications for patients is a talking point of concern. So long as the debate remains within respectful boundaries, the OP has every right to express her concerns. My second point is not directed at you.

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 11:33

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 11:11

You used the terms “perhaps” and “think” hardly, yes I would without a second thought. That’s what I was relating too.

Well yes, obviously 'perhaps' and 'think', because I've never been in that situation! It would depend on a multitude of different factors, and it'd be silly of me to pretend certainty.

Nospringchix · 18/01/2026 11:28

doodiethewonderdog · 17/01/2026 11:29

You can all come on with your personal attacks and insinuating you are a bigger person but there needs to be a longer term plan than this. What would you all suggest happens to these men in the long term ?

I would suggest that the government took on plenty of caseworkers so that their cases were carefully and fairly considered without them being left in limbo in hotels for long periods of time.
On the issue of healthcare, they are human beings, and I don't know about you, but I feel every human being should receive healthcare as required in this humane country.

DuncinToffee · 18/01/2026 11:25

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 01:45

Then it's an opportunity to validate her feelings, while correcting misinformation or incorrect beliefs. Personally, I just don't think that accusing people of racism (especially if it's xenophobia, often born out of understandable concerns), and dismissing them wholesale as angry racists, actually helps your argument.

Do you think the OP would have started a thread if their appointment was delayed because the GP visited a care home instead of an asylum seekers home?

And what are these understandable xenophobic concerns?

Kingscallops · 18/01/2026 11:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Who are you referring to in your personal attack?

Ukefluke · 18/01/2026 11:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Kingscallops · 18/01/2026 11:22

GrannyOog · 18/01/2026 11:19

People are saying would you put a child in a dinghy to make the dangerous journey across the channel. I don’t understand why anyone who had gone through many safe countries including France would choose to put themselves in such a dangerous position, just to get to Britain. I’m sure many other countries offer as many opportunities as we do (and with better weather). Why would you leave your loved ones in a desperate situation when you could all travel together to a closer safe country?.

Because as you can see from the posts on this thread, the UK is a soft touch.

Kingscallops · 18/01/2026 11:21

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 10:48

You think? But until you’re in that situation you don’t know. These people have lived this experience and this is what they decided is best. But of course that misconstrued by people who then intimate it’s because they don’t love their children and families like “we” do. They’re bad people only looking after themselves etc.

When in fact they’re just people trying to do their best in an absolutely shit situation.

They’re being dehumanised, if you get the opportunity visit Auschwitz it’ll show you how dehumanising others leads to dreadful awful things.

You're mentioning a concentration camp? I suspect you don't even see the irony in this given situation. The dehumanisation of Jews was on an unprecedented and immeasurable scale.

GrannyOog · 18/01/2026 11:19

People are saying would you put a child in a dinghy to make the dangerous journey across the channel. I don’t understand why anyone who had gone through many safe countries including France would choose to put themselves in such a dangerous position, just to get to Britain. I’m sure many other countries offer as many opportunities as we do (and with better weather). Why would you leave your loved ones in a desperate situation when you could all travel together to a closer safe country?.

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 11:11

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 10:59

You asked a question, "Would you want your husband to take you and your children to an unknown place, where you don’t know how it’s going to be?" and I answered yes to that particular question, framed in that way.

I also feel that I would rather brave a frightening, hard journey with my husband if my children weren't toddlers/babies, than remain behind alone. I'm speaking about my personal feelings, not making a judgement on those who choose differently.

(I'll also never be able to afford to visit Auschwitz. But I don't think that precludes me being well informed.)

You used the terms “perhaps” and “think” hardly, yes I would without a second thought. That’s what I was relating too.

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 10:59

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 10:48

You think? But until you’re in that situation you don’t know. These people have lived this experience and this is what they decided is best. But of course that misconstrued by people who then intimate it’s because they don’t love their children and families like “we” do. They’re bad people only looking after themselves etc.

When in fact they’re just people trying to do their best in an absolutely shit situation.

They’re being dehumanised, if you get the opportunity visit Auschwitz it’ll show you how dehumanising others leads to dreadful awful things.

You asked a question, "Would you want your husband to take you and your children to an unknown place, where you don’t know how it’s going to be?" and I answered yes to that particular question, framed in that way.

I also feel that I would rather brave a frightening, hard journey with my husband if my children weren't toddlers/babies, than remain behind alone. I'm speaking about my personal feelings, not making a judgement on those who choose differently.

(I'll also never be able to afford to visit Auschwitz. But I don't think that precludes me being well informed.)

Sharptonguedwoman · 18/01/2026 10:52

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 10:51

Now what on earth makes you think it’s a Daily Mail type article 🤔

Can't think.....😂

CunningLinguist2 · 18/01/2026 10:52

doodiethewonderdog · 17/01/2026 13:10

I'm actually learning some things on here eg the doctors' contracts. Isn't that the point of discussion as opposed to just flinging insults?

Erhmmm “these men” & badly veiled racism… I think you’re getting the replies you deserve

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 10:51

Sharptonguedwoman · 18/01/2026 10:50

I can't see the original article. Is there one? If it's the Mail, don't bother.

Now what on earth makes you think it’s a Daily Mail type article 🤔

Sharptonguedwoman · 18/01/2026 10:50

doodiethewonderdog · 17/01/2026 11:23

The question is why is an NHS doctor out doing home visits at this place when NHS funds are not supposed to be used?

I can't see the original article. Is there one? If it's the Mail, don't bother.

BlanketyBlankBlank · 18/01/2026 10:48

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 10:37

Perhaps for those with very young children or babies, yes. But older children (5 and up)? I'd prefer to risk it, I think.

You think? But until you’re in that situation you don’t know. These people have lived this experience and this is what they decided is best. But of course that misconstrued by people who then intimate it’s because they don’t love their children and families like “we” do. They’re bad people only looking after themselves etc.

When in fact they’re just people trying to do their best in an absolutely shit situation.

They’re being dehumanised, if you get the opportunity visit Auschwitz it’ll show you how dehumanising others leads to dreadful awful things.

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 10:37

Nevermind17 · 18/01/2026 10:24

They often don’t leave the women at home, they’ll get to a refugee camp where the women and children will stay while waiting to be brought over. They’re still risky places, with rapes and theft but I’m guessing most mothers would rather risk that than trek over mountains for weeks, sleeping out in freezing temperatures then cross the channel in a paddling pool with a 6 month old and two toddlers.

Perhaps for those with very young children or babies, yes. But older children (5 and up)? I'd prefer to risk it, I think.

IndyGestion · 18/01/2026 10:33

I recommend reading first-hand accounts of people’s journeys to the UK from places like Afghanistan. Really brings it to life.

Many are desperate, but also many do not really understand the horrors of the journey they are about to undertake. Like many things, you can convince yourself it will be ok, worth it etc. and then the reality is so different.

IndyGestion · 18/01/2026 10:31

ShowMeTheSea · 17/01/2026 22:25

Ok
Where do you even start with this rant?
You've posted a random photo of a hotel presumably in England. No link, no nothing.
What's your source? Your friend's best neighbour's Dad's dog?
Where are you seeing "massive bags of medicine?"
If you work at a dispensary and this is true, is there not some kind of patient confidentiality you should be adhering to?

I am getting images of big cartoon sacks of medication, but instead of ‘swag’, they say ‘TABLETS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS’.

Nevermind17 · 18/01/2026 10:24

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 01:48

Yes. If my country is in a bad enough state that my family want to flee it and seek asylum, then staying put without my husband to be blown up, raped, go through deprivations, or other such things, doesn't sound better than braving the unknown together in order to get to Britain.

They often don’t leave the women at home, they’ll get to a refugee camp where the women and children will stay while waiting to be brought over. They’re still risky places, with rapes and theft but I’m guessing most mothers would rather risk that than trek over mountains for weeks, sleeping out in freezing temperatures then cross the channel in a paddling pool with a 6 month old and two toddlers.

Nevermind17 · 18/01/2026 10:19

shuggles · 17/01/2026 23:25

Do asylum seekers only come from countries in which people are specifically targetted for their political allegiance? Or do asylum seekers also come from countries in which bombs are dropped?

Edited

Both, obviously. Or from countries where they’re persecuted for their sexuality, or their religious beliefs or a host of other reasons.

Ginmonkeyagain · 18/01/2026 10:15

@LittleMi55Nobody so your husband is retired but pays £79 per week NI. Aye right.

If he is over state pension age he is exempt from paying NI if he still works. If he is under state pension age but living off a private pension or savings/investments then he does not pay NI as it is not levied on pensions or savings. If he is "retired", under state pension age but still working and is paid enough to pay nearly £300 month iin NI then he is not exactly retired is he?

echt · 18/01/2026 02:11

Kingscallops · 17/01/2026 22:47

Well you played to the goad, food and drink.

Not sure what your point is, as it doesn’t address mine.

OtterlyAstounding · 18/01/2026 01:48

BlanketyBlankBlank · 17/01/2026 16:23

Really a long and arduous journey, involving god knows what!

Yes. If my country is in a bad enough state that my family want to flee it and seek asylum, then staying put without my husband to be blown up, raped, go through deprivations, or other such things, doesn't sound better than braving the unknown together in order to get to Britain.