Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if anyone has or is considering moving to a country that's less likely to be involved if Putin attacks a NATO country. (title edited by MNHQ at request of OP)

393 replies

Carla786 · 17/01/2026 00:02

I hope that if WW3 happened, I'd be brave enough to stay and fight. I love Britain & I'd hate to leave it or see it invaded by Putin.

However, at the same time I'm wondering about the recent rush of articles suggesting conflict with Russia is inevitable by around 2030 and that civilians need to prepare to be conscripted to fight if NATO is attacked. I'd always thought Britain being land-invaded was fairly unlikely, but being called up to fight in a NATO war widens the options of what might happen.

Countries that are less likely to be involved include Austria, Switzerland, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland. I don't particularly want to move to any of these. If call-ups are likely to be imminent in about 4 years, I don't know..

The country I've always thought I'd move to if I did move is Poland (where I have family ties)- but of course that's far more likely to be involved in a potential war!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
JHound · 17/01/2026 19:00

Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:55

This is about potential possibilities if they do win Ukraine. Of course we hope against hope they won't, and the Ukranians are nothing if not brave. But we have to remember it's no foregone conclusion that the Russia will lose.

Not something I think about. I have another passport but I would be more likely to need to flee a Reform government than a Russian invasion.

Carla786 · 17/01/2026 19:00

UnhappyHobbit · 17/01/2026 09:30

I’m interested in the European countries you listed as potentially safe in the event of WW3. Ireland, for example. Given the level of American influence there, it’s hard to imagine them refusing U.S. pressure? Especially under someone like Trump. Add to that Ireland’s close proximity to the UK and the fact that Northern Ireland is part of the UK, it’s unclear what real protection Ireland would offer if it escalates.

Austria is another questionable one. I mean, historically, it was annexed first it by Germany before World War II. While neutral perhaps now, in reality it could make Austria an easy target to be used or occupied again. The same concern applies to much of Europe.

Realistically, New Zealand seems like the safest option. Geographically isolated, far removed from NATO.

I agree re Austria, NZ too.

Another option is Uruguay. They are historically very stable. Obviously South America in general is not , though.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:57

hopefullyme · 17/01/2026 08:53

Nowhere would have me even if I wanted to go. All the neutral countries also have different problems to deal with, even if it isn’t war. Climate change, authoritarianism, violence.

That isn't necessarily true in terms of severity but I agree everywhere has problems.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:55

swissrollisntswiss · 17/01/2026 18:54

We’re in Switzerland. Whilst my day to day life feels safer (eg walking in the city alone at night doesn’t bother me) I honestly don’t think it will be safer if WW3 breaks out. The nature of attacks will be very different to WW1/2 and won’t be contained by borders. For sure somewhere like NZ would be better. Aside from that, it’s very hard to move here post-Brexit anyway.

Thank you. Yes, I was thinking that Switzerland is sadly not necessarily going to be free of war if it breaks out

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:55

JHound · 17/01/2026 16:00

It’s so unlikely to me that I don’t even think about it. Russia is struggling with Ukraine. Why would they think of attacking another country?

Makes no sense.

This is about potential possibilities if they do win Ukraine. Of course we hope against hope they won't, and the Ukranians are nothing if not brave. But we have to remember it's no foregone conclusion that the Russia will lose.

OP posts:
swissrollisntswiss · 17/01/2026 18:54

We’re in Switzerland. Whilst my day to day life feels safer (eg walking in the city alone at night doesn’t bother me) I honestly don’t think it will be safer if WW3 breaks out. The nature of attacks will be very different to WW1/2 and won’t be contained by borders. For sure somewhere like NZ would be better. Aside from that, it’s very hard to move here post-Brexit anyway.

Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:53

MangaKanga · 17/01/2026 13:46

Sigh.

It's just all so meaningless and predictable. You all follow the same script and repeat the same "facts."

Of course Russia is behind everything wrong with the unimpeachable and beautifully-run UK run by honest to goodness non-thieves who don't just point the finger at the great Eastern bogeyman every time their inadequacies and failures are exposed.

Are you working for the disinformation unit? 🤣

Seriously though, playing down Russia is silly.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:52

TomeletteswithGreggs · 17/01/2026 13:15

Oh I am quite aware of those things.
What do you think we should do beyond stockpiling and being cyberaware?
Hard for most of us to up sticks and move to Europe or NZ. Doubt OP will either.

I am seriously considering this move for when possible.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:50

Ilovecheeseyah · 17/01/2026 11:47

I moved to Austria and will move my fam there if something happens. It is an awesome place to live -
go and check it out and no you are not overreacting.

Thank you but sadly I wonder if Austria could be more likely to get involved in a potential conflict than one might think...

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:49

ThisRedZebra · 17/01/2026 17:04

I think about this a lot with my 3 sons (all babies/young children at the moment). I have zero intention of letting them fight, kill or die for this country. It was my main motivation for chasing my Irish citizenship when I was pregnant with number 1 to make sure they had options other than here. I would and will move in a heartbeat if we decide it's in their best interest. I will do whatever I can to dissuade them from voluntarily joining the army when they're old enough too.

I totally get that.

In a funny way, I think I would be happier to fight of need be if I had a choice of somewhere else I could go, and make the decision myself.

I certainly don't like the idea of my potential kids (which I definitely want) being born in a war zone... Nor my mother being in one, for that matter.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 17/01/2026 18:46

Teajenny7 · 17/01/2026 03:35

OP, what skills would you bring to the country that you choose to move to?

Hoping to train as a criminal barrister after I finish my degree (which is history not law)

OP posts:
Hazlenuts2016 · 17/01/2026 18:44

"Although Keir Starmer insisted that “nobody is talking about conscription” during an appearance on the News Agents podcast, it wasn’t that long ago that Rishi Sunak was proposing national service for all 18-year-olds."

Rishi sunak didn't have a serious strategy and it wasn't proper national service. It was a vote grab for a certain target group.

GaIadriel · 17/01/2026 17:17

Lemondessert · 17/01/2026 08:57

I don’t think planning ahead is the answer. Trump is possibly trying for that now. No other country can stand up to him and he knows it. I also don’t think any country will necessarily be safe. Many countries won’t just let you move there.

He wouldn't necessarily win against the rest of NATO. They have more personnel, a higher combined GDP, and their combined military equipment is not too far off the US.

The rest of NATO has focused more on things like public healthcare and removing wealth inequality as they've historically had the backing of the US. However, any war would likely be drawn out and preceded by much political posturing, giving the rest of NATO time to produce more munitions/equipment.

In theory Russia should've steamrolled Ukraine and the US should've streamrolled the Taliban but the former has been going on for years and the latter was a couple of decades after which the US gave up. No way could they just take Europe.

There have been a lot of military simulations and the US often doesn't come out very well. Like when the Swedish ultraquiet sub 'The Gotland' faced off against an entire US carrier group and 'sank' the USS Ronald Reagan carrier ship despite it being surrounded by many ships/submarines/anti-sub aircraft.

It was only a training exercise but the Gotland was able to send photos of the Reagen in its crosshairs whilst still being undetected by the entire US fleet so 100% it could've sank it. A £100m submarine (now succeeded by newer designs) facing off against an entire US carrier group and sinking a £6bn ship worth 60x it's own value! And it managed to do this repeatedly over multiple reenactments to the point the US requested to borrow it for two years to study it.

Given the US navy is one of their biggest assets it's not great that a tiny cheap sub bested an entire carrier group and sank one of their biggest nuclear carriers undetected. And in the Sandhurst Military Skills Competition the UK has beaten the US 15 times and only lost twice.

Hopefully, it nevers comes to that but I don't think the rest of NATO would be a pushover by any stretch. The US are far more reliant on Europe for imports than we are on them, and logistically they'd likely face more difficulty importing resources than most of Europe would due to being surrounded by water.

BlackCatDiscoClub · 17/01/2026 17:09

Usou · 17/01/2026 01:27

Russia doesn't have the capability to invade the UK.

Missile attacks, possibly. If they decided to go down the nuclear route, that would be over fairly quickly.

Sadly they do have long range missile abilities. If anyone would like to find out how this could look, theres a great Sky podcast called The War Game where they have former MPs, military leaders and other specialists run through what an attack on the UK might be like. But its stark listening, as military funding has been cut to the bare bones ofter decades of peace time.

ThisRedZebra · 17/01/2026 17:04

I think about this a lot with my 3 sons (all babies/young children at the moment). I have zero intention of letting them fight, kill or die for this country. It was my main motivation for chasing my Irish citizenship when I was pregnant with number 1 to make sure they had options other than here. I would and will move in a heartbeat if we decide it's in their best interest. I will do whatever I can to dissuade them from voluntarily joining the army when they're old enough too.

feellikeanalien · 17/01/2026 17:04

There is no doubt that the world is a dangerous place at the moment but it has always been that way. I was a child in the 60s/70s. I remember my Dad going to his civil defence meetings. Not sure what they actually did as I was quite small but he was just an ordinary person. He was almost called up for the Korean War as he did his national service in the late 40s/early 50s.

I also remember the invasion of Cyprus.

The Cuban Missile Crisis saw Russia and America facing off in the 60s and the world seemed to be on the brink of nuclear war.

I think things seem worse nowadays because we have so much access to news 24 hours a day. When I was growing up there were a set number of news programmes on TV/radio and newspapers. There were probably many conflicts going on which we never even heard of.

People forget about the Bosnian war which was only in the 90s.

Awful things happen everywhere and I think that because in Western Europe we have lived in relative peace since 1945 we can't imagine war. My grandparents lived through the first and second world wars but there are fewer and fewer people left who even lived through the second world war.

I think what I'm trying to say is that , yes the world is a dangerous place but it always has been. We certainly shouldn't bury our heads in the sand but I don't think moving countries is any guarantee.

Itiswhysofew · 17/01/2026 17:01

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 17/01/2026 00:05

No never think about it.

Don’t even think about Russia much. More interested in the little coal tit that landed on my bird feeder.

Edited

A coal tit! How lovely. I never see them.

GaIadriel · 17/01/2026 16:58

DLAtoPIP · 17/01/2026 08:34

In theory yes it’s good to help in reality there’s no way Russia won’t get exactly what they want. It would be better to just evacuate all civilians and accept the loss. Rather than spending ££££££ on military assistance to fight a war that’ll be lost get the people out to supporting countries and use that money to resettle them. Sometimes there’s a bigger picture.

Edited

You wouldn't say that it the UK was invaded though!

Ionlymakejokestodistractmyself · 17/01/2026 16:42

I might consider moving to Ireland if I and my family wanted to. I doubt my DC would though. Not because of Putin though.

IPoopRainblows · 17/01/2026 16:37

UnhappyHobbit · 17/01/2026 09:30

I’m interested in the European countries you listed as potentially safe in the event of WW3. Ireland, for example. Given the level of American influence there, it’s hard to imagine them refusing U.S. pressure? Especially under someone like Trump. Add to that Ireland’s close proximity to the UK and the fact that Northern Ireland is part of the UK, it’s unclear what real protection Ireland would offer if it escalates.

Austria is another questionable one. I mean, historically, it was annexed first it by Germany before World War II. While neutral perhaps now, in reality it could make Austria an easy target to be used or occupied again. The same concern applies to much of Europe.

Realistically, New Zealand seems like the safest option. Geographically isolated, far removed from NATO.

Agree re Ireland. Whilst we hold a neutral status and are not members of NATO we are very much allies of UK and USA. Reliant on UK to protect our airspace and the US airforce using Shannon airport our neutrality won’t hold in the event of WW3.

Hufflemuff · 17/01/2026 16:07

TomeletteswithGreggs · 17/01/2026 07:54

India? Just narrowly escaped nuclear war last May.
China? Likely to start the next war.
USA. Internal ICE war!

OP, what skills do you have?

Edited

Clearly no geo-political skills 🤣🤣🤣

JHound · 17/01/2026 16:00

It’s so unlikely to me that I don’t even think about it. Russia is struggling with Ukraine. Why would they think of attacking another country?

Makes no sense.

ChurchWindows · 17/01/2026 15:38

VaccineSticker · 17/01/2026 11:33

That’s attitude that many had before lockdown happened. Oh it won’t happen here, not in the uk, not in the west. ha ha!

To trivialise the possibility of a major conflict is not exactly clever, nor is catasrophising it.

Anything is possible.

Not trivialising anything.

Mithering about the subject of potential war on opinion forums achieves nothing except instilling an ongoing level of anxiety.

All the blabbing about lockdown before it happened changed nothing.

Much better to get on with real life, try to take real world action to improve things and then relax and enjoy the moment - because it's all we really have.

EasternStandard · 17/01/2026 15:19

Maddy70 · 17/01/2026 14:32

And how so you think you will move there? Brexit has scuppered most of those chances

If there’s an issue a lot of the EU is closer anyway.

CheerfulYank · 17/01/2026 14:52

I live in Minnesota so it feels like civil war is going to break out any minute any way. For my state’s people who aren’t white, it probably feels like it already has.

I love this state but I don’t love this country anymore. But I don’t want to leave because then “they” win, plus who would take a non-wealthy low skilled American right now anyway?

Swipe left for the next trending thread