Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I’ve never had a smear test and I don’t want one either

958 replies

Seventeenstars · 13/01/2026 18:18

Controversial I guess, I’m 36.
I don’t think it’s necessary, as I’ve read about my risk factors and I don’t meet the criteria. All the men I’ve slept with (without protection) were virgins and yes I know they were for sure.
I also have no family history of any cancer.
My partner has prostate cancer in both sides of his family, his dad has it currently and he’s not even been offered a screening test for this.
I find this so frustrating and contradictory when women and men are treated so differently and if you refuse smear or breast screening you’re seen as an awful person, and those who do are morally superior.
Men aren’t coerced into invasive internal examinations.
I have an aversion to having things inserted in me internally and feel I have a right to that decision regarding my body.
There are home tests for HPV available, which I have done myself in the past - all clear.
My question is why do they persist with this archaic procedure when there are other options available?

I keep getting phone calls from my GP surgery trying to persuade me to book a test. I don’t understand why they’re always pushing it, but just totally dismiss other medical issues, which has been my experience several times.
Do they get extra commission for this or something?
There are even pop up ‘clinics’ and drop in sessions going ahead near me.

Of course I know I’ll be bombarded with replies saying I’m selfish, stupid and uneducated. I’ve even read other women saying that those who refuse should be denied any medical care!
But I have done my research and I am more than aware of the implications.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 10:52

MigralevePink · 15/01/2026 10:43

The sort of extended gynaecological procedure you describe is not a normal part of the smear test in the UK. For one, the practitioner is commonly a nurse who is not qualified to carry out what you describe. For two, most GP surgeries are not equipped with a suitable bed and/or don’t have room to access the bed from all angles plus don’t have the lighting required.

You see, this false ‘added value’ narrative irks me as much as the erroneous Jade Goody one… it’s simply not true, it’s used to manipulate and persuade, and is not a justification for women to have a smear as opposed to a self administered HPV test.

I suspect that part of the delay in the NHS reducing access to a smear and replacing with HPV self administered testing is that they have done such a good job on women over the years cajoling, emotionally manipulating them into smears, encouraging women to influence other women, that it’s going to be bloody hard to reeducate. This thread is a case in point of women misunderstanding the diagnostic and being happy to say some
frankly quite awful things to other women who have made different choices to themselves.

Am not in the UK. HTH.

Mama2many73 · 15/01/2026 10:49

Ormally · 13/01/2026 18:28

Your choice.
Missed mine in recent months because of unpredictable bleeding.

Got told I was on a 2 week pathway for possible endo cancer on my birthday, because of findings from an abdomen scan for something different.

Hearing 'looks all clear' from a specialist responsible for other internal examinations within the 2 weeks was not really something I could put a price on. And was told to go and schedule one, as the smear couldn't be done concurrently. Before long, I should know whether this is picking anything up.

I do agree with you, though, that with all the advances in medicine, this procedure does not seem to have been blessed with much change, or appetite for change, in 20/30/XX years.

I was on the 2 week cancer path after unexpected bleeding post menopause.
Had an internal scan and then back to see the consultant following who did a physical exam and also did my smear which was due.
Thankfully everything came back clear..

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 10:49

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 09:32

Oh, I've had pelvic exams over the years, just not as part of my cervical smear.

Outside of the over-medicalised US, I've never seen a cervical smear described as the GP inserting his or her fingers into the vagina and palpating the vaginal walls and the abdomen prior to inserting the speculum. As this NHS information makes clear, it's not standard, although I suppose some GPs may offer it anyway.

If it was a standard part of a cervical smear, I think you'd see even more non-compliance than there already is!

It is a standard part of getting a pap test and now a cervical smear where I am in Australia, whether it is by my gynecologist, or at the women's health centre where I have had most of my tests done over the last couple of decades.

MigralevePink · 15/01/2026 10:43

midnightbluelobelia · 14/01/2026 22:12

The UK has had selftesting available long before Australia. It was available privately, apparently. I first read about it being a possibility on MN around 2020, so it has been possible to self-test in the UK for quite a few years. It is apparently being rolled out on the NHS, starting this month? How long it will take to become widely available is debatable.

It is a good option for patients who fear speculums, etc. But it is not a replacement for a five yearly cervical smear for most women, who don't - as that exam offers so much more. Are you going to palpate your own abdomen and check for ovarian cysts or masses? Are you going to stick a speculum up yourself and rig up mirrors and torches to check for any other abnormalities? Obviously not. Even skin changes that might occur during the perimenopause early years and go unnoticed or misunderstood, leading to painful problems, can be picked up during a proper in-office cervical smear done by an up to date doctor.

The sort of extended gynaecological procedure you describe is not a normal part of the smear test in the UK. For one, the practitioner is commonly a nurse who is not qualified to carry out what you describe. For two, most GP surgeries are not equipped with a suitable bed and/or don’t have room to access the bed from all angles plus don’t have the lighting required.

You see, this false ‘added value’ narrative irks me as much as the erroneous Jade Goody one… it’s simply not true, it’s used to manipulate and persuade, and is not a justification for women to have a smear as opposed to a self administered HPV test.

I suspect that part of the delay in the NHS reducing access to a smear and replacing with HPV self administered testing is that they have done such a good job on women over the years cajoling, emotionally manipulating them into smears, encouraging women to influence other women, that it’s going to be bloody hard to reeducate. This thread is a case in point of women misunderstanding the diagnostic and being happy to say some
frankly quite awful things to other women who have made different choices to themselves.

Thechaseison71 · 15/01/2026 10:35

mondaytosunday · 15/01/2026 01:50

You can get HPV from deep kissing and even more likely from oral sex. Those virgins may still have HPV.
But no one is forcing you
to have a test you don’t want.
But I hope you will get mammograms when the time comes.

Why do you consider mammograms more essential?

Thechaseison71 · 15/01/2026 10:34

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/01/2026 10:29

I see I always thought it was any abnormal cells (whether caused by HPV or not). Whenever I've been to one they've not said "we are checking for HPV" they've said "we are checking for any abnormal cells" that's me that's been misinformed, thank you for the correction.

Used to be the case. They've stopped doing that ( probably to save money) but it's a bit shit for those who develop non hpv cervical cancer as they aren't being caught early

Thechaseison71 · 15/01/2026 10:32

It's automatic. I don't even have a cervix to smear ( which they are well aware of) yet the "invitation" keep coming. Despite asking them to stop on numerous occasions

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/01/2026 10:29

LimeGoose · 15/01/2026 10:04

You’re no longer being screened for cancer though, you’re being screened for HPV (and then cancer if you’re positive for HPV). If you are not positive for HPV you won’t be screened for cancerous or pre cancerous cells.

I see I always thought it was any abnormal cells (whether caused by HPV or not). Whenever I've been to one they've not said "we are checking for HPV" they've said "we are checking for any abnormal cells" that's me that's been misinformed, thank you for the correction.

Henriella · 15/01/2026 10:25

I'm a 62 year old lifelong non smoker: I have an 8% chance of dying of lung cancer.

Really?
That can’t be right 🤔

Spittykityy · 15/01/2026 10:10

To those wondering about the impact or benefits of the visual inspection of the cervix and how many anomalies are spotted; I don't know. But according to CRUK your lifetime risk of cervical cancer, smeared or unsmeared, jabbed or unjabbed, is 0.65%, meaning 99% no cancer. And I don't overlook those who do lose their lives from this cancer. Around 900 women a year die of cervical cancer in the UK from a population of 30 million women. It's not a rampant cancer. I'm a 62 year old lifelong non smoker: I have an 8% chance of dying of lung cancer. I've seen several women say on here the nurses spotted a polyp or growth, most then say it went on to be benign. Hope this helps

LimeGoose · 15/01/2026 10:04

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/01/2026 08:59

Nobody thinks you are an awful person because you have refused to be screened for cancer, stupid maybe but not awful (and yes I think men who don't go to cancer screenings when they are offered are stupid too). Just know HPV isn't the only cause of cervical cancer and so a non invasive test for HPV or indeed having the HPV vaccine wouldn't do what the cervical smear does.

If you don't want to be screened then that's ultimately your choice.

You’re no longer being screened for cancer though, you’re being screened for HPV (and then cancer if you’re positive for HPV). If you are not positive for HPV you won’t be screened for cancerous or pre cancerous cells.

Iloveeverycat · 15/01/2026 09:56

KitTea3 · 15/01/2026 00:17

You're absolutely correct it's not always caused by HPV

Unfortunately that doesn't change anything for the OP. Because if it was caused by something other than HPV she wouldn't be aware as zero further testing is done when the HPV test that is now the smear test comes back negative 🤔

This.
The thing I don't get is before they used to just check the cells for changes that would pick up all cervical cancers. Now all they do is test for HPV and if negative they throw the sample away. So I am sure some will get missed as they aren't all caused by HPV.

goldenlockets · 15/01/2026 09:50

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 08:51

Well, they don't announce it. It's just part of the procedure. Have had countless smear tests in my time. It only takes a few seconds to feel around the ovaries, and then when they're down there anyway peer in and check for any abnormalities that are visible!

Not always. If a nurse takes the smear test they are not qualified to assess ovaries etc.

My smears have been done privately for years by my gynaecologist as the NHS doesn't do them often enough for women my age.

I've known too many friends where if they have waited 5 years would have had serious issues as they had pre cancerous changes.

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 09:32

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 09:23

It's done before the speculum is inserted. Sorry it's not been offered to you.

Oh, I've had pelvic exams over the years, just not as part of my cervical smear.

Outside of the over-medicalised US, I've never seen a cervical smear described as the GP inserting his or her fingers into the vagina and palpating the vaginal walls and the abdomen prior to inserting the speculum. As this NHS information makes clear, it's not standard, although I suppose some GPs may offer it anyway.

If it was a standard part of a cervical smear, I think you'd see even more non-compliance than there already is!

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 09:23

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 09:01

In order to examine your ovaries etc, they'd have to take out the speculum, and insert two fingers while pressing down with their other hand, so I think you'd notice! 😅

It's done before the speculum is inserted. Sorry it's not been offered to you.

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 09:22

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 08:58

@midnightbluelobelia
Self-testing is now standard in NZ, although perhaps some GP offices are a bit behind the times. But the recommendations here and here make it clear that HPV testing via vaginal swab (self tested or taken by a GP or nurse) is generally the primary option offered, depending on the patient's medical history of course.

So I don't see why the OP is doing something terrible, silly, or dangerous.

In NZ, it is not standard to palpate the abdomen or examine the genitals at a cervical screen - although obviously they see the cervix and vagina. And from everything I've heard and read, a visual examination, along with abdominal palpation by pressing a hand on the lower abdomen and feeling with two fingers inside the vagina, is not standard as part of cervical screening in the UK. (A cervical screen is not the same thing as a pelvic examination.)

I haven't made a single comment about the OP doing something "terrible, silly, or dangerous". My only comment about the OP was:

But if she's self-testing for HPV at home, why can't she just tell her GP this so they stop sending her reminders for smear tests? The mind boggles.

Henriella · 15/01/2026 09:15

And yes, every pap smear (and now cervical smear) test I have had has involved examination of the lower abdomen and of the genitals.

Mine have definitely not involved examination of the lower abdomen 🤔

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 09:02

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/01/2026 08:59

Nobody thinks you are an awful person because you have refused to be screened for cancer, stupid maybe but not awful (and yes I think men who don't go to cancer screenings when they are offered are stupid too). Just know HPV isn't the only cause of cervical cancer and so a non invasive test for HPV or indeed having the HPV vaccine wouldn't do what the cervical smear does.

If you don't want to be screened then that's ultimately your choice.

What do you think a cervical smear does?
(Aside from, yes, potentially pick up the rare cancer that has grown enough to form a tumour or inflammation visible to the naked eye, and yet hasn't caused any physical symptoms.)

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 09:01

Mithral · 15/01/2026 08:45

I've had all my smear tests done at a sexual health clinic (I found they were loads better at it than GPs) and I don't recall them examining my abdomen but they're very fast and efficient I definitely may not have noticed.

In order to examine your ovaries etc, they'd have to take out the speculum, and insert two fingers while pressing down with their other hand, so I think you'd notice! 😅

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/01/2026 08:59

Nobody thinks you are an awful person because you have refused to be screened for cancer, stupid maybe but not awful (and yes I think men who don't go to cancer screenings when they are offered are stupid too). Just know HPV isn't the only cause of cervical cancer and so a non invasive test for HPV or indeed having the HPV vaccine wouldn't do what the cervical smear does.

If you don't want to be screened then that's ultimately your choice.

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 08:58

@midnightbluelobelia
Self-testing is now standard in NZ, although perhaps some GP offices are a bit behind the times. But the recommendations here and here make it clear that HPV testing via vaginal swab (self tested or taken by a GP or nurse) is generally the primary option offered, depending on the patient's medical history of course.

So I don't see why the OP is doing something terrible, silly, or dangerous.

In NZ, it is not standard to palpate the abdomen or examine the genitals at a cervical screen - although obviously they see the cervix and vagina. And from everything I've heard and read, a visual examination, along with abdominal palpation by pressing a hand on the lower abdomen and feeling with two fingers inside the vagina, is not standard as part of cervical screening in the UK. (A cervical screen is not the same thing as a pelvic examination.)

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 08:51

Well, they don't announce it. It's just part of the procedure. Have had countless smear tests in my time. It only takes a few seconds to feel around the ovaries, and then when they're down there anyway peer in and check for any abnormalities that are visible!

Mithral · 15/01/2026 08:45

I've had all my smear tests done at a sexual health clinic (I found they were loads better at it than GPs) and I don't recall them examining my abdomen but they're very fast and efficient I definitely may not have noticed.

goldenlockets · 15/01/2026 08:40

And yes, every pap smear (and now cervical smear) test I have had has involved examination of the lower abdomen and of the genitals.

Really? They look all around your labia and palpate your tummy?

Mine haven't ever, done by a consultant.

Obviously they can see the cervix when they take the smear.

midnightbluelobelia · 15/01/2026 08:35

OtterlyAstounding · 15/01/2026 04:44

I'm not ‘insisting’ on anything. I’m talking about the fact that the UK appears to be moving in the same direction as The Netherlands, NZ, Australia, and other countries, where self-swabs are either a standard alternative option for those who prefer to avoid smear tests, or the norm for everyone. I’m also talking about my experiences in NZ, and relaying the facts of what cervical smears look for.

In addition, I asked if abdominal palpation and thorough visual vaginal examination is the norm that other women have experienced, because throughout my life at different GPs, it hasn’t been what I’ve encountered.

And yes, all my GPs have been very ignorant 🙄 As is the rest of the NZ health system. Terribly ignorant. That must be why I’m aware of what cervical smears actually test for, unlike the majority of people on this thread.

The fact your GP didn't point out to you the obvious advantages of doing an in- office screening by her suggests she is ignorant, inexperienced at smear tests, or just lazy. You have repeatedly posted this notion self-testing is "standard":

Anyway these days where I live smear tests are no longer standard, and the GP just gives you a swab kit to use on yourself to test for HPV

...until they changed to self-swabs being the standard.

I must say, I do find it amusing that people think OP is arrogant, awful, stupid, scaremongering, or bound to die, for essentially doing herself what Australia and New Zealand's health systems now do as standard for national cervical screening.

I pointed out it is only an option, and often an unavailable option, in Australia.

Well, in NZ at least it's standard now, according to my GP, who when I asked about whether I should have the smear anyway, told me I didn't need it as all they do is test for HPV, so I may as well just do the self-swab in her office.

If self-swabs will increase compliance in achieving that goal, then shifting to a primarily self-swab model makes sense.

It seems it is only in your particular GP's office that the self-swab model is primary or standard. And yes, every pap smear (and now cervical smear) test I have had has involved examination of the lower abdomen and of the genitals.