Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

cause he is Jewish

678 replies

Carycach4 · 13/01/2026 10:34

Apologies cant see a thread about this.
Staff at Bristol Brunel academy blocked a visit by Damien Egan, their local MP because he is Jewish. Clear case of antisemitism. AIBU to thinking that headteacher and those driving this decision should be sacked and reported to the Teacher Regulation Agency?
(Apologies thread title isnt correct, but i can't edit it)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
CremeCarmel · 13/01/2026 12:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Livelovebehappy · 13/01/2026 12:13

anotherside · 13/01/2026 12:05

Isn’t he vice chairman of Labour Friends of Israel? He’s basically a supporter of a genoicdal regime, whose president is wanted by the ICC for war crimes.

In your opinion. Not everyone agrees it was genocide. Many believe it was self defence against terrorists harboured by the Palestinians. In which case do you apply the same logic to all Palestinians; ie as they all side with Hamas all Palestinians are terrorists?

MojoMoon · 13/01/2026 12:12

Carycach4 · 13/01/2026 11:15

Yes of course. The HT should have informed the police about the potential for protest. They could have sent resource to disband any protests happening around school kickout time. That would be the standard approach surely, not kowtowing.
Who exactlyvwould be harmingbtge students in a demonstration. The parents, the teachers?

Edited

You think if a head teacher tells the police send whatever resources are required to break up a protest or disruption, they just say "yes Sir/Miss" and guarantee to do it? That is not how policing is resourced.

It's not just parents and teachers involved - a head teacher cannot know who might then up and try and access the site, be that benign protesters seeking to non-violently or violently disrupt the event. I imagine a year 7 might find a bunch of random adults turning up in a school hall or picketing a gate as they try to go through shouting quite scary even if they have no idea or interest in the topic.

If the choice is:
Cancel the event for now and risk bad publicity vs
Hold the event and risk potential physical harm or scaring pupils.

Then the head has made the right call in cancelling the event for now and taking the flack from people whinging on the internet rather than risk their pupils well-being.

If I was a parent at the school, I would not want there to be an elevated risk of potential harm to my child in order to simply make a point about my views on the Middle East crisis or alleged anti semitism.

The people protesting his visit are idiots and it is precisely because they are idiots that it is hard to risk assess what they will do.

EasternStandard · 13/01/2026 12:11

BadgernTheGarden · 13/01/2026 12:09

Why was he invited to speak in the first place if they are antisemitic? What was he going to talk about? Was it to be about some general academic subject, or a political speech in support of Israel?

They obviously knew he was Jewish when he was invited, other events must have caused the cancellation. The fact it was likely to cause trouble in the school would be a good reason, would the school even be insured if they went ahead with it?

It’s below, his role as an MP

Thepeopleversuswork · 13/01/2026 12:11

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 11:36

I think youre mixing up pro- Israel and pro- Netanyahu and current administration.

You definitely wouldn't be anti a whole nation of people because of current policies would you?

Your final paragraph makes it sound like the only acceptable Jew to you is one that is anti- Israel.

In fact, you actually sound pretty problematic.

Hear hear. I loathe the Netanyahu government for what they have done in Gaza but what I loathe more is Jews being required to be performatively anti Israel as the price of admission to the right thinking people’s club.

No other minority group is expected to express disapproval of it’s right to statehood.

Its antisemitism. Of course it is.

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 12:10

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 12:09

Yes, “besides being Jewish”. His Jewishness has nothing to do with the issue. There is also no evidence that pro Palestine teachers at the school had anything to do with it.

According to the school, there was a planned protest that clashed with the end of the school day. They postponed the visit and are looking to reschedule. If you have any actual facts which dispute that statement, I’d be glad to see them.

Do you honestly think an English policewoman who came to talk to the kids a week before would have been cancelled if she was found to have 'pro- Israel' views? Or would no one have even bothered checking?

CremeCarmel · 13/01/2026 12:10

Carycach4 · 13/01/2026 10:38

Its in all the mainstream news, but interesting that is your first thought about a report of antisemitism.

Edited

This is going to sound harsh, but I do not trust your post because you don't sound as though you know what you are talking about. You sound like someone who loves to create "anti-woke" drama, even at the cost of relaying fake news.

Antisemitism is one thing, anti-israeli government is quite another. If this man has been excluded because he is Jewish I will be protesting alongside you.

BadgernTheGarden · 13/01/2026 12:09

Livelovebehappy · 13/01/2026 10:58

What a load of waffling shite. You might try to spin it all you want, but the fact is he is Jewish and has been uninvited due to backing Israel. Had it been a none Jewish person with similar views do you honestly think the decision would be the same?

Why was he invited to speak in the first place if they are antisemitic? What was he going to talk about? Was it to be about some general academic subject, or a political speech in support of Israel?

They obviously knew he was Jewish when he was invited, other events must have caused the cancellation. The fact it was likely to cause trouble in the school would be a good reason, would the school even be insured if they went ahead with it?

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 12:09

HappyFace2025 · 13/01/2026 11:59

But he was being allowed in to the school. It was pro Palestinian teachers who caused the issue because the MP, besides being Jewish, is also pro Israel.

Yes, “besides being Jewish”. His Jewishness has nothing to do with the issue. There is also no evidence that pro Palestine teachers at the school had anything to do with it.

According to the school, there was a planned protest that clashed with the end of the school day. They postponed the visit and are looking to reschedule. If you have any actual facts which dispute that statement, I’d be glad to see them.

HorrorAndHaagenDazs · 13/01/2026 12:07

"Oh its because he's pro Israel, pro Israel, let's all threaten to wear keffiyeh's if someone's coming who's pro Israel"

"It's not antisemitism, its just that the Jews happen to occupy the only state on earth that cannot respond to islamic terrorism without rent-a-mobs in the west lining the streets chanting for its eradication"

BunfightBetty · 13/01/2026 12:07

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 12:04

He was invited to talk about his role as an MP. Important for kids to hear obviously.

Edited to add, visit has been rearranged, so hopefully this can go ahead at another point when the pro Pals take it somewhere more appropriate.

Edited

Well, unless he’s Jewish and has the temerity to hold a different view to some of the teachers. Then he’s not allowed to be seen or speak.

EasternStandard · 13/01/2026 12:06

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 12:00

Alright, I’ll play. If a black person wanted to visit the school, but had political opinions which would lead to a protest and put children at risk of harm, would it be racist to ask that person not to come?

What is the issue with this?

“Mr Egan was due to discuss democracy and the role of an MP, while helping to raise aspirations among students who may have an interest in pursuing similar career paths.”

From the Guardian

anotherside · 13/01/2026 12:05

Isn’t he vice chairman of Labour Friends of Israel? He’s basically a supporter of a genoicdal regime, whose president is wanted by the ICC for war crimes.

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 12:04

Passaggressfedup · 13/01/2026 12:02

So what was he invited to talk about? Surely that's the main issue. Was it appropriate for the concerned public, ie. students.

Frankly, I wouldn't want my kids to be exposed to strong political views when at school, whatever that view is. If he was going to discuss what his role as an MP is, that's totally different. Banning him in this instance would indeed be racist.

He was invited to talk about his role as an MP. Important for kids to hear obviously.

Edited to add, visit has been rearranged, so hopefully this can go ahead at another point when the pro Pals take it somewhere more appropriate.

HappyFace2025 · 13/01/2026 12:03

Passaggressfedup · 13/01/2026 12:02

So what was he invited to talk about? Surely that's the main issue. Was it appropriate for the concerned public, ie. students.

Frankly, I wouldn't want my kids to be exposed to strong political views when at school, whatever that view is. If he was going to discuss what his role as an MP is, that's totally different. Banning him in this instance would indeed be racist.

As he is a local MP I imagine he would be talking about local issues, surely.

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 12:03

EverythingYouLoseIsAStepYouTake · 13/01/2026 11:59

Are you trying to conflate Israel and Israelis? You presumably understand these are not one and the same.

I am against the actions taken by the state of Israel, i.e. the actions of the county as determined by its government. I am in favour of sanctions on the state of Israel, and the prosecution of individuals who themselves commit war crimes. I am not opposed to the existence of Israel itself, but to the actions it has taken in the form of war crimes and genocide.

Criticism of the actions of a country are not condemnation of its citizens. If you criticise Russia for invading Ukraine are you calling Russians unacceptable? Clearly not.

No. Youre the one conflating Israel and Israelis. Youre the one who keeps going on about how you criticize those who are pro Israel.

You either mean to say you are anti - BN, or you are actually anti the whole nation of Israel. Which is it?

Passaggressfedup · 13/01/2026 12:02

So what was he invited to talk about? Surely that's the main issue. Was it appropriate for the concerned public, ie. students.

Frankly, I wouldn't want my kids to be exposed to strong political views when at school, whatever that view is. If he was going to discuss what his role as an MP is, that's totally different. Banning him in this instance would indeed be racist.

Bringemout · 13/01/2026 12:02

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 12:00

Alright, I’ll play. If a black person wanted to visit the school, but had political opinions which would lead to a protest and put children at risk of harm, would it be racist to ask that person not to come?

Was he planning on communicating these political opinions to the children? He’s al elected representative. I think Corbyn is foul but I couldn’t care less if he visited a school in his capacity as an MP.

We have a democracy, people vote for all sorts, people voted for him, he’s committed no crime. I find the idea of cousin marriage revoting, should I be able to ban one of the Gaza MP’s from my local school because they expressed support for it? In a democracy I’m allowed to hold that view.

EverythingYouLoseIsAStepYouTake · 13/01/2026 12:02

HappyFace2025 · 13/01/2026 11:56

'I am critical of anyone who takes a pro Israel stance.' Really says it all. So you don't believe that Israel should exist then? I am pro Israel but that doesn't mean I agree with Netanyahu. I don't agree with Starmer either (for many other reasons) so does that make me anti British?

I didn't say Israel shouldn't exist. I support a two state solution.

mumandmumber · 13/01/2026 12:00

Livelovebehappy · 13/01/2026 10:58

What a load of waffling shite. You might try to spin it all you want, but the fact is he is Jewish and has been uninvited due to backing Israel. Had it been a none Jewish person with similar views do you honestly think the decision would be the same?

Had it been a none Jewish person with similar views do you honestly think the decision would be the same?

This is such an interesting point.

EasternStandard · 13/01/2026 12:00

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 11:57

That’s not how things work though. He hasn’t been banned or cancelled. Anyone can hold any view they like, and any other person can make decisions based on that if they wish. You do not have to allow someone you disagree with into your organisation or place of business if you don’t want to. You can’t exclude someone on the basis of a protected characteristic, but that isn’t what is happening. It is entirely possible to disagree with a Jewish person and not be anti-Semitic.

He’s an elected Jewish MP, who couldn’t speak because it was not safe for him.

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 12:00

Bringemout · 13/01/2026 11:52

It’s grotesque, replace it with “black” and you’ll know if something is racist or not for anyone who’s not clear on it. Just disgusted with these people.

Alright, I’ll play. If a black person wanted to visit the school, but had political opinions which would lead to a protest and put children at risk of harm, would it be racist to ask that person not to come?

EverythingYouLoseIsAStepYouTake · 13/01/2026 11:59

dairydebris · 13/01/2026 11:55

So you're against the whole nation of Israel? I see.

Are you trying to conflate Israel and Israelis? You presumably understand these are not one and the same.

I am against the actions taken by the state of Israel, i.e. the actions of the county as determined by its government. I am in favour of sanctions on the state of Israel, and the prosecution of individuals who themselves commit war crimes. I am not opposed to the existence of Israel itself, but to the actions it has taken in the form of war crimes and genocide.

Criticism of the actions of a country are not condemnation of its citizens. If you criticise Russia for invading Ukraine are you calling Russians unacceptable? Clearly not.

HappyFace2025 · 13/01/2026 11:59

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 11:57

That’s not how things work though. He hasn’t been banned or cancelled. Anyone can hold any view they like, and any other person can make decisions based on that if they wish. You do not have to allow someone you disagree with into your organisation or place of business if you don’t want to. You can’t exclude someone on the basis of a protected characteristic, but that isn’t what is happening. It is entirely possible to disagree with a Jewish person and not be anti-Semitic.

But he was being allowed in to the school. It was pro Palestinian teachers who caused the issue because the MP, besides being Jewish, is also pro Israel.

BoredZelda · 13/01/2026 11:57

InterestQ · 13/01/2026 11:34

He is allowed to support Israel! Jesus. “They don’t hold my views so must be banned / cancelled”.

That’s not how things work though. He hasn’t been banned or cancelled. Anyone can hold any view they like, and any other person can make decisions based on that if they wish. You do not have to allow someone you disagree with into your organisation or place of business if you don’t want to. You can’t exclude someone on the basis of a protected characteristic, but that isn’t what is happening. It is entirely possible to disagree with a Jewish person and not be anti-Semitic.

Swipe left for the next trending thread