Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What do you make of ‘No Trouser Tube Ride’?

189 replies

Proaky · 12/01/2026 21:35

Saw the spectacle for myself. As a woman in my late 20s I have absolutely no desire to participate in this. Seems like an outdated 2013 “quirky” trend that won’t die. I’m always surprised at the diversity in those who participate - old/young, thin/bigger etc.

Maybe I’m getting older but I really just thought “put it away”

Saw the paps at the St I got off and would be mortified being photographed in my knickers.

Some of the hairy, Casper legs were quite frankly gross!

metro.co.uk/2026/01/09/london-underground-tradition-say-messed-up-returning-26173711/amp/

OP posts:
BriefEncountersOfTheThirdKind · 13/01/2026 11:22

A one off, bit of fun, event which has been running for 10 years + now is hardly lowering the standards

They don't even travel to the Tube in their underwear, they strip off once they get there. Showing they don't think it's appropriate everywhere...

ByWisePanda · 13/01/2026 11:22

"Participants said the idea was simple. Do something different, break the winter routine and share a laugh with strangers. The event has no political aim and no organisers on the ground. It follows a tradition that started in New York more than twenty years ago and has since spread to other cities."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Pants_Subway_Ride#:~:text=The%20No%20Pants%20Subway%20Ride,trains%20while%20not%20wearing%20trousers.

No Pants Subway Ride - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Pants_Subway_Ride#:~:text=The%20No%20Pants%20Subway%20Ride,trains%20while%20not%20wearing%20trousers.

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:20

ladyofshertonabbas · 13/01/2026 11:13

There is no way I would sit on a tube seat with only some thin knickers as a barrier. Ughh.

I wouldn’t do it any more than I’d go to Tesco like it or a dental appointment or walk the dog. Why it’s deemed ok on a tube is anyone’s guess.

People who say it’s fine, do you think it’s fine to dress in just your knickers for every aspect of public life? Would you be ok with your kids attending work or university in just their underwear? Would you be ok with them
popping to the shops in just their undies? Why are you ok with undies on public transport?

BriefEncountersOfTheThirdKind · 13/01/2026 11:19

quantumbutterfly · 13/01/2026 10:58

1950's? I'm sure I've seen a vicar in the wild since then. Are they as rare as hedgehogs now?

I think they're stuck in the 1950s if they think most vicars still live in their parishes and don't have to travel around on a Sunday to visit the 5 churches they have under their ministry

PandorasSockBox · 13/01/2026 11:18

I get the impression that a lot of people have difficulty with the concept of dressing appropriately for certain situations. Call me a grumpy old lady, but going without trousers on the tube does not seem particularly appropriate or is this for charity, like a rag week event?

ladyofshertonabbas · 13/01/2026 11:13

There is no way I would sit on a tube seat with only some thin knickers as a barrier. Ughh.

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:13

5foot5 · 13/01/2026 11:03

I am saying I don't want to expose my bits in a public place but I really wouldn't be offended by anybody else's. Young, old, hairy or whatever.

Because of your age you said.

It’s not a question of being offended, it’s more can we please not keep lowering standards and we can we not keep nurturing attention seeking nobodies who want to feel special for their fifteen minutes of ‘fame’. If my 20 something sons said they were doing this I’d tell them to stop being so moronic. Thankfully they never would.

GlomOfNit · 13/01/2026 11:10

sigh.... It's always the Men, isn't it? The naked bike rides are the same. A sprinkling of handmaiden women but mostly guys who just want the attention and to insert themselves into women's gaze and space. It's not pleasant to be sitting on the Tube, crammed full of people, at the best of times, so why would you want to be pressed up against someone in their pants?

No, it's not the same as wearing shorts, or being on the beach... You know it's not!

BriefEncountersOfTheThirdKind · 13/01/2026 11:09

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 13/01/2026 10:44

Really? Wearing commonly recognised outer clothing doesn't cover any more than underwear does? If that's the case, why have a special day for people to be out in public in their pants; why not just make underwear as outerwear the everyday norm?

People are always complaining on here about shorts and skirts that are little more than underwear 🤣

Waitingforthesunnydays · 13/01/2026 11:08

It would all be a bit of harmless fun if we didn’t live in a society where over a third of women have been sexually assaulted on the tube. Sadly I think it’s just another opportunity for those predatory fucks to get their cocks even closer to women on the tube. There’s no way I’d be riding the tube in a busy carriage with men in their gross y-fronts anywhere near me 🤮

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:07

CrapNewYear · 13/01/2026 11:05

First time I've heard of it but then I don't live in London. It's hardly surprising given the TikTok generations but I can't help feeling that someone will spoil it by behaving badly as people always do.

We can only hope 🤞

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:06

BIossomtoes · 13/01/2026 09:47

How about not introducing irrelevant comparisons and sticking to what’s under discussion? It’s a tube train on a Sunday and nobody’s doing the job they’re paid for.

Does the world stop on Sundays then?

CrapNewYear · 13/01/2026 11:05

First time I've heard of it but then I don't live in London. It's hardly surprising given the TikTok generations but I can't help feeling that someone will spoil it by behaving badly as people always do.

AllTheChaos · 13/01/2026 11:05

@quantumbutterfly yes, definitely, it’s all those cruel people running them over 😂 (I love your analogy by the way! I will
henceforth consider vicars to be like hedgehogs!)

5foot5 · 13/01/2026 11:03

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:01

So you’re saying people want to see young and attractive people in their underwear in public places?

I am saying I don't want to expose my bits in a public place but I really wouldn't be offended by anybody else's. Young, old, hairy or whatever.

Laiste · 13/01/2026 11:03

If it's all so cool and perfectly normal to be out in the town in your pants, why have they all come out to do it laughing and giggling ?

You can't have it both ways - it's either controversial (which is exactly what's making it fun) or it's nothing special. In which case the 20 somethings wouldn't be bothering to take part.

wishingonastar101 · 13/01/2026 11:03

It's just attention seeking twats - like the naked bike ride (which is predominantly older men... surprise...)

AllTheChaos · 13/01/2026 11:02

MooFroo · 12/01/2026 22:38

Ridiculous and should be banned.
Simple - put clothes on in public, why encourage people to walk around in knickers?!

Why? They are wearing clothes. I mean, I personally think it’s daft and wouldn’t do it, but why do you think it should be banned? As long as people’s genitalia are covered (and - personal prejudice - secondary sexual characteristics- but that’s a personal thing and I don’t think should be enshrined in law!) I see no issue with it. If bodies were covered less all the time maybe people would get less het up about seeing them.

Waitingforthesunnydays · 13/01/2026 11:01

LighthouseLED · 12/01/2026 21:47

Skin colour is not a choice. Completely wrong to make fun of any skin tone.

Oh come on 🙄

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 11:01

5foot5 · 13/01/2026 10:51

I am a bit shocked at all the negative comments TBH.

I mean, I certainly wouldn't take part. Nobody wants to see my 60+ year old nether regions. However, I wouldn't be in the least bit offended by this. It just looks like light hearted fun.

So you’re saying people want to see young and attractive people in their underwear in public places?

BunnyLake · 13/01/2026 10:58

Thirdchildjoy · 13/01/2026 10:26

No legs are gross. It takes a special snowflake to be offended by legs that are a little different to their own.

What about packages? Should we have these in our face when sitting on the tube, in all their y-fronted or budgie smuggler glory?

quantumbutterfly · 13/01/2026 10:58

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 13/01/2026 10:49

Is that you, the 1950s?!

Public transport drivers, conductors, guards, admin staff... people on their way to or from one of the very many workplaces that is open/operational on a Sunday, and maybe trying to work on their commute?

Ironically, vicars often live locally in their parishes, and so are probably less likely to need to use public transport to get there - unlike people who work in city centre shops but could never hope to afford to live in walking distance!

Edited

1950's? I'm sure I've seen a vicar in the wild since then. Are they as rare as hedgehogs now?

ThreeSixtyTwo · 13/01/2026 10:57

Yes, they are different ages and shapes and some have hairy leg, how daring.
When I see how much outrage it causes, maybe it needs to happen more often...

tartyflette · 13/01/2026 10:56

Any event or occasion involving public nudity or partial nudity will attract perverts and exhibitionists.
And those will be overwhelmingly male.
So, no thanks.

5foot5 · 13/01/2026 10:51

I am a bit shocked at all the negative comments TBH.

I mean, I certainly wouldn't take part. Nobody wants to see my 60+ year old nether regions. However, I wouldn't be in the least bit offended by this. It just looks like light hearted fun.

Swipe left for the next trending thread