Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think some children are just wired to need / want screen time

158 replies

Gagamama2 · 10/01/2026 09:48

All my children’s childhood we have limited screen time. They are generally not allowed any on school weekdays (my partner put this in place years ago and gets angry if I relent). They are allowed it on Saturday and Sunday mornings, and holiday mornings, although partner is always unhappy about this and would like to restrict furthur.

Kids are 10, 8 and 6.

It often causes a lot of grief / anger / upset for 10 and 6 who are both boys undergoing assessment for adhd. They often get upset after school that they aren’t allowed any, and when they are allowed they find it hard to come off. This means they regularly have much too much screen time at the weekend as the fall out of them having to come off the screens is big.

My daughter who is 8 is different. She will happily choose other things to do, even if it is a screen time “time”. What prompted my post is that she has spent this morning reading a graphic novel about dragons, and is now singing along at top volume to the greatest showman soundtrack on Alexa, all of her own accord while her brothers are on screens. She just isn’t that bothered. I was the same compared to my brother who spent most of his childhood playing on either our Amiga or his best friends Amiga 😂.

my brother is now a functional adult - much more functional than me, in fact. He has a very good job, although I do look at him sometimes and wonder if he is ND. My point is the screen time didn’t hold him back.

are we unreasonable limiting children’s screen times (as long as it’s not impacting on school work and friendships etc)? Maybe it’s not actually helpful for some children

OP posts:
Idontknowhatnametochoose · 11/01/2026 20:23

GreenHuia · 11/01/2026 20:17

Yep, that was my childhood (90's). I definitely spent most, though not all, of my time playing in the garden or reading and remember it as a very happy childhood.

My childhood wasn't the best but I also spent most of my time either reading (especially Enid Blyton!) or playing down a local field. That's all I did and I was never bored.

GreenHuia · 11/01/2026 20:17

GMCquestions · 10/01/2026 10:16

Ha ha ha

do you honestly think prior to the turn of the century children were sitting reading most of the time - when they weren’t playing outside in wholesome surroundings that is?

Cone on!

Yep, that was my childhood (90's). I definitely spent most, though not all, of my time playing in the garden or reading and remember it as a very happy childhood.

Lauzg90 · 11/01/2026 15:52

We try (not always successfully) to limit screen time. No screens before school, only probably 30 mins after school (mainly due to activities). Weekends we have them turn them off at certain points.
Anyways I now feel that schools are not helping with this. My 5 year olds homework is numbots which she has to do on her tablet. School has asked for her to go on at least 5 days a week.

Laserwho · 11/01/2026 15:24

No they are not wired to need screens. My grandparents generation didn't even know what screens where. No TV and went to the cinemas about twice a year. In the grand scheme of things that wasn't that long ago. It's learnt behaviour

Lauralou19 · 11/01/2026 15:19

Gagamama2 · 10/01/2026 09:52

But why then is my daughter so different from my boys? And I was so different from my brother? It’s affect was almost opposite what you would expect when you look at me and my brother from a long term perspective

Girls are very different to boys. My boys never had the slightest bit of interest in colouring, crafts, singing (they do love reading and they love a screen). We balance out screens by being out and about at the weekend, long walks, lots of fresh air. Do you get outside lots at the weekend?

For us, i’d rather the kids chilled out on screens or tv after school as they’ve had a really busy day (neither child has access to phones etc in school hours so they are only on screens at school if its part of the lesson) and get them out at the weekend more.

LostInTheDream · 11/01/2026 14:31

My DS is a shy kid, likely ND and has always been hooked on screens. If it's not you tube it's Minecraft or Roblox etc. He does have a few other interests but none so much as screens. I hate the you tube but fine with the games. The restrictions become trickier as they enter high school as we have found that a lot of homework requires access to a computer, the internet, email etc. It is the way of the modern world and it has it's pros and cons, but on balance, it is a transition that I think they need gearing up towards work and FE.

The issue with coming off them is likely an issue with transitions. It doesn't mean they are spoilt, it just means you and they need to have a better understanding of how to manage the transition eg can you come off at the end of that video, or I need you to come off in the next 10 mins are things that have worked for us. My kids are now pretty good at realising that is not a good time to start another and it's fair. The other way you can do it is have the tech to be able to turn the internet off on the device after a certain period of time or at a certain time and have them know that this will happen. Now my DS is older he has a little more flexibility, but my advisory to him is regulate yourself or I will need to regulate it for you.

My DD flip flops between a million different activities. She likes screens and can spend a while enjoying a bit of downtime on them, but I think she genuinely seeks variety for her dopamine and doesn't need that sameness. She's crafting, singing, role playing, playing with toys. Multiple hobbies and interests and a need to move, very different from my DS. I don't really restrict her screen time now because it is honestly never been an issue.

When I was a kid, I quite liked computer games but it was really limited because gaming was quite different. But I could easily read book after book. Till 2am with a torch if I thought I'd get away with it. Me and my DS are quite similar people in many ways, it just looks different

Whyherewego · 11/01/2026 13:47

I am a firm believer in it's less about the scrren time but more about what the screen time consists of.
myo older DS loves playing very complex games in his computer. He is currently playing a game that is set in space and is having to do research into physics to calculate landing trajctories for spacecraft (he's a humanities student!). He also likes playing very complex WWII games online, these are so complex he doesn't seem to have any local friends who do them but connects with people over the world, including a very senior guy in the Canadian army who's given him some great career advice !
my point is that my nerdy son has always loved this kind of thing and I have honestly encouraged it because it's the sort of stuff that is hard to do locally or on a piece of paper. He is a confident chatty sporty kid outside of this and I never let him play late in the evening etc but I also didn't see it as all bad.
When my DS were both younger we used to play together Wii or Minecraft or whatnot, and it was a fun bonding experience for us all.
I don't personally think screens are the enemy. It can be positive, but, as with everything there is a balance. If your DS are doing plenty of other stuff off screen then I wouldn't worry too much

Bitsandbobs2 · 11/01/2026 13:34

Idontknowhatnametochoose · 10/01/2026 09:59

They don't need screens; they want them. If the Internet disappeared tomorrow your kids would survive (and probably be happier!).

This! And the amount of screen time kids have these days is bloody insane. My son is in year2 - half of the boys in his class are like zombies, only talking about Roblox or Minecraft. They don't want to play, they don't want go to the park. It's very sad.

I know mum who takes her laptop to the park that her son could play as it's the only way to take 8 year old outside.

BufferingAgain · 11/01/2026 13:20

My kids have limited screen time. However, your partner should not be getting ‘angry’ with you. Is he helping to look after them while they’re bored after school or are you the one trying to cook dinner on your own while they’re unoccupied

Applejack22 · 11/01/2026 13:11

My 9 and 7 year old both have ADHD, my 9 year old in particular just cannot amuse himself without support from us. He has plenty of other interests - he plays the drums, loves to draw, read, play on his skateboard etc. however it takes a lot for him to be able to turn off the tv and go and do one of the other activities. Once we say enough tv time he will complain he is bored, we often have to sit with him and start the activity and he will then get interested but he is definitely more drawn to a screen.
My 7 and 4 year old will play together, they play imaginative games and when I turn off the tv they are less bothered. I do think for some kids they are just much more easily addicted!

DustyMaiden · 11/01/2026 13:07

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I do in my case I never took my head out of the book it was escapism. My DS who has Asperger’s and wants to know everything uses a computer.Never had a tantrum in his life.

Poppasocks · 10/01/2026 19:39

Mine are ND and we (usually!) impose limits and try to lean towards educational stuff rather than Youtube crap. We don't always get it right but we do try! I am mindful that ND minds are more prone to dopamine seeking.

I can guarantee if tablets were a thing in the 80's/90's the boomers would have handed them out like sweets.

X123x321X · 10/01/2026 19:08

Gagamama2 · 10/01/2026 09:52

But why then is my daughter so different from my boys? And I was so different from my brother? It’s affect was almost opposite what you would expect when you look at me and my brother from a long term perspective

Some children can entertain themselves, and in different ways. Others prefer passive entertainment.

Springtimehere · 10/01/2026 19:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

canklesmctacotits · 10/01/2026 18:51

Children aren’t wired to want screen time.

Screen time is wired to be addictive to children (and adolescents and lastly adults).

popcornandpotatoes · 10/01/2026 18:50

Ponoka7 · 10/01/2026 11:31

Why is watching TV better? You are only learning what is shown. My youngest got into Manga and Studio Ghibli because of being online. It was then driven into popular culture. Apart from Attenborough's wildlife documentaries, TV would have taught her nothing. Being online opened her up to different cultures and non mainstream media. I read world news on my phone for the same reason. I thought that it was charming that thanks to an online presence, "Pretty little baby" (1962) hit the charts just before Connie Fancis's death. Likewise Kate Bush being played everywhere.

I'm not talking about online in general, my DD is 7 so imo far to young to be 'online' and discovering manga etc. maybe when she's a teen. That can also be done on.computers, not necessarily tablets.

TV is better than tablets for young children because of the addictive nature, being able to choose, constantly advertised too, parents unaware of content, chopping and changing videos, etc. Tv also isn't so close to your face or available anywhere you go

RessicaJabbit · 10/01/2026 18:44

Jimminychristmass · 10/01/2026 17:26

I've never limited it so as not to turn it into some forbidden exciting thing.
It means they chose to do other things themselves and there are no meltdowns at times when I do have to ask them to stop. An abundance of something leads to that thing becoming boring which is definitely what has happened in our house. Maybe I am lucky though - I know I'll get replies to this saying "My child wouldn't ever stop if I let them" but I'm guessing it's because they've never been given a real chance to get bored of it.

Nope. My child was given unlimited access to an iPad at 4, in. An effort to make it "just another toy" within weeks all she wanted to do was iPad, above other previous favourite activities. Dre the line when she refused to see her granny (her most favourite person aside from me and dad) and when I said it was time to go and see granny, and went to take the iPad, she screamed, shouted she wanted to go on the iPad and tried to hit me....

She was only allowed in cbeebies and a colouring in game....

So yea...no it's not your perfect parenting I'm afraid.

WinterWooliesBaa · 10/01/2026 18:26

JohnTheRevelator · 10/01/2026 17:11

No ,it's a learned behaviour. Kids,or indeed anyone, didn't desire screen time before mobile phones were a thing.

One of my Goddaughters had unrestricted access to her (online) iPad, but she could take it or leave it, really didn't use it, but later when she got her bloody phone, she was never off it! Friends I guess.

WinterWooliesBaa · 10/01/2026 18:20

NeverDropYourMooncup · 10/01/2026 16:54

You didn't do three books a day and knacker the entire budget for the summer by halfway through the last week of July, then? Or read all night because you literally couldn't stop to sleep, not because it was particularly good but because you were wide awake and couldn't stop as long as there was another page?

I know I did. And I'm pretty sure the neighbours weren't particularly enthusiastic about the tennis ball starting at 7am and continuing until 9pm.

Sometimes, but as well as having a lot of my own books as presents, we went to the library a lot! 3 books a day? I don't remember exactly (the book was important to me,not how many and is irrelevant).

I read a lot, was often told by the old couple who looked after us in the school holidays to go outside & play. so I'd roller skate & take my book & sit on the grass verge & read. Read with a torch under the covers after lights out.

im bloody sure, though it may feel like it now, you did not hit a tennis ball against a wall from 7am to 9 pm

No idea what you're on about the budget? We didn't bloody have one! We played with our toys, read our books and yes sometimes we'd go to the swimming baths or when I was older the roller rink. But only very occasionally. What point were you trying to make?

my point is I had things I loved. But they all involved using my brain or my body or both, not getting a huge dopamine hit just sitting there watching a screen.

Jimminychristmass · 10/01/2026 17:26

I've never limited it so as not to turn it into some forbidden exciting thing.
It means they chose to do other things themselves and there are no meltdowns at times when I do have to ask them to stop. An abundance of something leads to that thing becoming boring which is definitely what has happened in our house. Maybe I am lucky though - I know I'll get replies to this saying "My child wouldn't ever stop if I let them" but I'm guessing it's because they've never been given a real chance to get bored of it.

ruethewhirl · 10/01/2026 17:15

Mulledjuice · 10/01/2026 09:50

No, because screens aren't a natural phenonemon.

We are wired for dopamine and some people's brains struggle with it more. Screens are an easy way to get a dopamine hit.

Came on to say exactly the same thing.

JohnTheRevelator · 10/01/2026 17:11

No ,it's a learned behaviour. Kids,or indeed anyone, didn't desire screen time before mobile phones were a thing.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 10/01/2026 16:54

WinterWooliesBaa · 10/01/2026 15:02

that's my age bracket too.

its nothing like the same!

yes all of those things & more were the main 'thing' at one time or another, but nowhere near as exclusively. Not even the hand held consoles (single game).

nor were things like bike riding, playing out, skipping, swimming excluded, they were as well as reading & Lego.

screentime US the issue because it's a mindless dopamine hit, a huge dopamine hit with no effort & there's NO incentive to get a dopamine hit in other ways. It's doesn't offer anything like reading, Lego, hitting a tennis ball did.

Personally lived on moving things (bike, roller skates, skateboard, if not up a tree or swimming & never once did I end up in A&E ' I'd much rather kids had the same upbringing than sat on screens in case they grazed their knees

You didn't do three books a day and knacker the entire budget for the summer by halfway through the last week of July, then? Or read all night because you literally couldn't stop to sleep, not because it was particularly good but because you were wide awake and couldn't stop as long as there was another page?

I know I did. And I'm pretty sure the neighbours weren't particularly enthusiastic about the tennis ball starting at 7am and continuing until 9pm.

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 10/01/2026 15:33

caramac04 · 10/01/2026 15:28

NRTFT but as a child we didn’t have a tv in the home until I was about 6 years old and it was black and white with limited times - ie not 24/7 like now. Children’s tv was perhaps a couple of bites a week. The tv frequently stopped working as they were pretty unreliable in the 60’s.
Now, as an adult, I love watching tv (and being in mumsnet), I could happily watch tv most of my waking hours.
This can’t be because I’m hard wired to like it.

Ditto. I was born when it was just two channels - we also had no TV until the mid Sixties. I would still rather read books than watch TV.

caramac04 · 10/01/2026 15:29

caramac04 · 10/01/2026 15:28

NRTFT but as a child we didn’t have a tv in the home until I was about 6 years old and it was black and white with limited times - ie not 24/7 like now. Children’s tv was perhaps a couple of bites a week. The tv frequently stopped working as they were pretty unreliable in the 60’s.
Now, as an adult, I love watching tv (and being in mumsnet), I could happily watch tv most of my waking hours.
This can’t be because I’m hard wired to like it.

Although I do seem to have lost the ability to type and/or spell correctly.