Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Military conscription

662 replies

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Paulrn · 09/01/2026 12:38

As my user name suggests I have some experience 37 years worth to be exact. And reading this I am wondering why I bothered. Any one who wouldn’t defend the country should have a close look at Russia and its controlled states. Can you imagine moaning about the government on MN and the door knocks and that’s the last your family ever sees of you. Or I’m on benefits well no you can work in this factory or work camp. You really don’t understand your privilege or the cost of that privilege in terms of being ready to defend it. And for what it’s worth I would go back because I still consider our freedoms are important even if it means that we have to pit up with people running the country down rather than getting off their arse to make it a better place. Rant over.

HoorayHattie · 09/01/2026 12:37

MO0N · 09/01/2026 12:35

Most people in the UK are so unfit they get out of breath if they have to get out of the chair.

Have you ever tried to cross a park whilst a Park Run is in progress? 😂

EasternStandard · 09/01/2026 12:37

MO0N · 09/01/2026 12:35

Most people in the UK are so unfit they get out of breath if they have to get out of the chair.

Really the depressing part is that wouldn’t matter. People who are unfit but want to send younger, fitter people could still step up instead.

Damnloginpopup · 09/01/2026 12:37

nomoreforks · 09/01/2026 12:01

What happens if the US invade Greenland? Interesting times OP. War is never the answer though. I think the having nuclear weapons is the best defence. I bet Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if they hadn't given them up.

This is what I'm worrying about currently. It's the death of NATO regardless. And is our American-supplied software-based kit going to function?

Damnloginpopup · 09/01/2026 12:35

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 11:52

I’m ex-military and I don’t think anyone in their right mind ever WANTS conscription…..

But the shit has to have really hit the fan for it to become a thing here….as in a sophisticated, armed force has actively mobilised to invade.

Then we are left with 2 options:

  • conscript soldiers and fight a war
  • don’t conscript soldiers and surrender to an invading force
Neither are nice options, but one is better than the other. Without conscription in WW2, German forces would have absolutely invaded mainland Britain. We are a small nation with a small military (even smaller now because of the genius idea that was the “Army 2020” restructuring and redundancy plan 🫠 which those of us serving at the time said was a fucking moronic idea) the numbers simply don’t work if we were to go to war imminently.

Army 2020? I was in during 'Options for Change" in the 1990's! Governments do love a nice bit of military emasculation.

MO0N · 09/01/2026 12:35

Most people in the UK are so unfit they get out of breath if they have to get out of the chair.

Mauhea · 09/01/2026 12:34

Hand me a gun and I'll gladly defend my doorstep but like fuck are me and mine going to another land to be drone fodder.

Iceshine · 09/01/2026 12:33

War is war if it happens it happens, but right now it's not happening, so let's just get on with life as usual.

I mean some make me laugh with oh I will have as stock pile of food, batteries etc.
Well its not gonna do you any good if bombs are being dropped, and you have to run and leave it.

All the scare tactics are getting boring now.

Glitchymn1 · 09/01/2026 12:32

There are so many ‘get outs’ for a start we may as well surrender now.

Stompythedinosaur · 09/01/2026 12:30

EasternStandard · 09/01/2026 12:26

Why? Ukraine is a modern war.

Because there hasn't been? Unless you can show me where anyone in a position of power has suggestion we would consider conscription? I follow the news pretty closely, and every statement I've seen is that we wouldn't.

Damnloginpopup · 09/01/2026 12:30

BlueJuniper94 · 09/01/2026 11:30

A few months ago a veteran on breakfast TV said it wasn't worth it. Let that sink in

Yet I knew many, sadly all now departed, who said that it very much was worth it.

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 12:30

acorncrush · 09/01/2026 12:27

We wouldn’t go to war, obviously, because it could be suicidal. The USA would destroy us, we have to be their ally.

On the conscription front, a conscripted army is a terrible idea, surrender is a worse one.

Impossible situation isn’t it 🤷🏻‍♀️

Nobody wins here. There is no palatable solution to any of it.

acorncrush · 09/01/2026 12:27

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 12:03

Denmark is a NATO member, so normally I’d say that another country invading Danish territory would immediately invoke NATO’s Article 5 (attack on one is an attack on all)……but fuck if I know how that works when it’s one NATO member invading another 🫠🫠🫠🫠

We wouldn’t go to war, obviously, because it could be suicidal. The USA would destroy us, we have to be their ally.

On the conscription front, a conscripted army is a terrible idea, surrender is a worse one.

EasternStandard · 09/01/2026 12:26

Stompythedinosaur · 09/01/2026 12:25

There's no suggestion that we would use conscription in a modern war, so this really isn't a subject to get your knickers in a twist about.

Why? Ukraine is a modern war.

Stompythedinosaur · 09/01/2026 12:25

There's no suggestion that we would use conscription in a modern war, so this really isn't a subject to get your knickers in a twist about.

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 12:21

AmIthatSpringy · 09/01/2026 12:17

How do they treat them?

Chew us up and shit us out when they’re done is the simple answer.

The “resettlement packages” when you’re getting out are a joke….and I was mentally well when I got out.
But it is very much sign the paperwork, and “bye 👋🏻 our obligation to on to you is over now, rely on charities if you need help”

ghostofchristmaspasta · 09/01/2026 12:19

MaineRedneck · 09/01/2026 12:06

Given the situation outlined in my post above, prisons would be full.

it's safe to assume that the government would start using the plan written for how to deal with people in the aftermath of an nuclear attack.

you would be forcibly conscripted to provide labor at home for the war effort (ammo factory, NHS body dragger, infrastructure repair)

Unless the government went full on Nazi Germany and started shooting those that didn’t comply they would struggle to do that.

AmIthatSpringy · 09/01/2026 12:17

moonlitmeadow · 09/01/2026 11:33

I wouldn’t fight for this government, I’ve seen how they treat war veterans.

How do they treat them?

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 12:15

charliehungerford · 09/01/2026 12:08

But do you think NATO is going to survive the next few years, will NATO countries still be able to meet their obligations under ARTICLE 5 without the support of the USA? Trump has made his feelings very clear. We live in dangerous times.

You’re right.
Its terrifying times.
Last I heard, the US military budget is bigger than the next 7 countries combined….so even if every other NATO member had a whip round, there’s probably not enough money/firepower/manpower to make much difference.

PensionMention · 09/01/2026 12:14

If there was an invasion then I think many would feel differently. Genuine conscientious objectors like Desmond Dawes who refused to handle a gun in WW2 that Hacksaw Ridge was based on can do vital roles that do not involve fighting. In any invasion women and children are the most vulnerable, rapes occur in every theatre of war. Very few people actually want to fight. But if the enemy was actually at the door and would summarily execute people for not fitting in with whatever their ideals were and your sisters were forced to work as Comfort women which also happened in WW2 isn’t that worth fighting for. Look at history, we fool ourselves if we think we are anymore civilised than our ancestors.

ThreeSixtyTwo · 09/01/2026 12:12

War isn't started by mutual consent of two parties, it is started by hostility of one party.

Why Ukraine should matter? Because if Russia would manage to get Ukraine, they wouldn't stop there. They would conscript the Ukrainians and use them as the attack force at Poland, Slovakia, Baltic countries, Bulgaria and Romania. And those are NATO members. (This isn't a conspiracy theory, this is what Russia is doing right now with people from the occupied parts of Ukraine).

Peace works only when it is better than alternative - for everyone. Which means it works only when the potential aggressor fears that costs of starting the war are too big to make it profitable for them.

The UK would be deciding whether you care about setting the price tag for starting a waror whether you are ok with the price going down. And boots in the ground war isn't the only war.

charliehungerford · 09/01/2026 12:08

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 11:56

But that’s where NATO obligations come into play.
Most of those countries you mention are NATO members…..”an attack on one is an attack on all”.
If Putin invaded Poland for example, the U.K. (and every other NATO member nation) are obligated to come to their aid.

But do you think NATO is going to survive the next few years, will NATO countries still be able to meet their obligations under ARTICLE 5 without the support of the USA? Trump has made his feelings very clear. We live in dangerous times.

MaineRedneck · 09/01/2026 12:06

ghostofchristmaspasta · 09/01/2026 12:02

I wouldn’t go, my husband wouldn’t go and I can only think of one friend that would possibly rather fight than be punished.

Conscientious objectors would probably be much more common now.

Given the situation outlined in my post above, prisons would be full.

it's safe to assume that the government would start using the plan written for how to deal with people in the aftermath of an nuclear attack.

you would be forcibly conscripted to provide labor at home for the war effort (ammo factory, NHS body dragger, infrastructure repair)

ElBandito · 09/01/2026 12:04

We can't even fund our current army properly let alone add in a load of conscripts. Conscription can't happen unless a lot more money is put into the armed forces and Labour is currently willing to do that.

EasternStandard · 09/01/2026 12:03

ghostofchristmaspasta · 09/01/2026 12:02

I wouldn’t go, my husband wouldn’t go and I can only think of one friend that would possibly rather fight than be punished.

Conscientious objectors would probably be much more common now.

Probably. Whoever is asking for others to go can step up first.