Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Military conscription

662 replies

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Natsku · 09/01/2026 14:24

TessSaysYes · 09/01/2026 14:11

Places like Finland and Poland are preparing for war. And paradoxically, it makes war less likely.

"If you want peace, prepare for war"

In regards to conscripting immigrants - male immigrants in Finland that take Finnish citizenship have to do national service just like other Finnish males (unless over 30 when they get citizenship).

TheFairyCaravan · 09/01/2026 14:24

WhatIsTheCharge · 09/01/2026 12:21

Chew us up and shit us out when they’re done is the simple answer.

The “resettlement packages” when you’re getting out are a joke….and I was mentally well when I got out.
But it is very much sign the paperwork, and “bye 👋🏻 our obligation to on to you is over now, rely on charities if you need help”

My husband is a veteran and I wholeheartedly disagree.

His resettlement package was generous and he used it wisely. He used every single one of his learning credits, because you get one opportunity and one opportunity only. His resettlement period was through Covid, so not all the courses he initially wanted to do were available so he sat with his resettlement advisor, went through everything with a fine tooth comb and found courses as close as possible to what he needed.

His resettlement advisor helped him every step of the way. She helped him with his CV and he checked in with him regularly. She was the one who contacted him because she heard about a vacancy that she thought would suit him down to the ground. It did, he got the job and was quickly promoted once he joined that company.

Upon leaving he was given an incredibly generous lump sum, his pension is more than a lot of people’s salaries.

Resettlement is like everything, it’s there to be used if you want to but as the saying goes “you can take a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink…”

DS1 is currently serving, the army are going to pay for his degree. Education is there if you want it.

Butchyrestingface · 09/01/2026 14:23

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 14:19

Can you please confirm that you personally and your children will step up for active front line duty?

Before you criticise others you must be ready yourself

Can you confirm that you’d rather you, your children and everyone else in the UK do nothing in a WWIII scenario and then get killed by an enemy bomb on home turf or invaded by said enemy?

ExitPursuedByABare · 09/01/2026 14:21

I hope my child would but I don’t control her.

I am very much too old but would be happy to do whatever I was capable of.

MrsTerryPratchett · 09/01/2026 14:20

notimagain · 09/01/2026 14:13

I wouldn't put that past some politicians.

However in reasonably informed discussion elsewhere on that idea one worry often expressed, especially by some have seen active service fairly recently, is where would those conscripts' loyalties actually lie?

The Americans already do. But then they sometimes deport them afterwards. Like twats. And typically the people who get citizenship for service are loyal soldiers.

Some countries do it for people who are specifically qualified. For example Spain with Latin Americans. I suppose we could do it for former colonies/commonwealth (who haven’t read their history and don’t despise us).

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 14:19

ExitPursuedByABare · 09/01/2026 14:09

If there comes a time when we have to step up to defend ourselves, I very much hope there will be many, many people who are ready, willing and able, unlike the OP who sounds like a real milquetoast.

Can you please confirm that you personally and your children will step up for active front line duty?

Before you criticise others you must be ready yourself

OP posts:
CrapNewYear · 09/01/2026 14:17

So if the US decides to annex Greenland your expectations are that everyone else ie not you or yours, has to sort it out.

Just keep your fingers crossed that the orange idiot is only sabre rattling.

HoorayHattie · 09/01/2026 14:16

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 14:09

I'm thinking something similar for the people who think conscription is a good idea

Family battalions

Husbands and wives (equal rights)

With their children (boys and girls)

Charging the Russian drones together

Fighting for freedom 💪🏻

Sorry, I didn't realise you were being facetious otherwise I wouldn't have posted something so poignant

There's a saying similar to "They who ignore history are doomed to repeat it"

Please have a thought for those families I posted about . . .

notimagain · 09/01/2026 14:13

Bobbinog · 09/01/2026 14:01

I'm surprised no political parties have suggested that in order for young, male asylum seekers to get leave to remain then they have to do 5-10 years compulsory conscription into the army.

I wouldn't put that past some politicians.

However in reasonably informed discussion elsewhere on that idea one worry often expressed, especially by some have seen active service fairly recently, is where would those conscripts' loyalties actually lie?

MidSurreyNightsDream · 09/01/2026 14:11

@BobbinogProbably because the government are well aware that the said new arrivals intrinsically hate this country, its people and our values. That’s why many would argue that we are already being ‘invaded’.

TessSaysYes · 09/01/2026 14:11

Places like Finland and Poland are preparing for war. And paradoxically, it makes war less likely.

ExitPursuedByABare · 09/01/2026 14:09

If there comes a time when we have to step up to defend ourselves, I very much hope there will be many, many people who are ready, willing and able, unlike the OP who sounds like a real milquetoast.

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 14:09

HoorayHattie · 09/01/2026 13:50

Have you ever heard the history of the Pals Regiments during WW1?

"Pals Battalions in WW1 were volunteer units where friends, family, and workmates enlisted together, encouraged by patriotic fervour to serve side-by-side, with early examples forming from London stockbrokers and later in northern cities like Liverpool, Manchester, and Hull, creating strong local ties but leading to devastating losses when entire battalions were wiped out, famously on the first day of the Somme"

I'm thinking something similar for the people who think conscription is a good idea

Family battalions

Husbands and wives (equal rights)

With their children (boys and girls)

Charging the Russian drones together

Fighting for freedom 💪🏻

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 09/01/2026 14:06

Haven’t RTFT but there are very good reasons women are typically not conscripted.

First, someone has to do the work at home. It may as well be women.

Second, the most important, is that you can repopulate a country with fewer men but you need as many women as you can get. Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. It’s a horrible thing. Mother Nature doesn’t care. The UK lost about 15% of its young men in WWI. Plus injuries and disabilities. Some countries like Serbia and France lost a much higher proportion. You can’t rebuild without the women.

Third, women are great for many tasks. We eat less, can starve for longer, can do a lot of endurance things well. Just as intelligent., great at many tasks. But when strength is a factor, whether that’s coal mining or front line infantry, men are better. Of course if people are flying drones, doing intelligence, whatever, great, ask women.

Another thing, when thinking about Russia in particular, is rape. As a weapon of war, and as a means of genocide. Russia is famous for it. Whole battalions of women coming back pregnant from being in POW camps? What would that do to society?

I don’t want conscription, for anyone. But war may be coming so I hope you have a plan for your family if you want the UK to roll over and give up.

Butchyrestingface · 09/01/2026 14:04

user1471538275 · 09/01/2026 13:50

War is a ridiculous thing, used by politicians to gain more power at the cost of young people.

That young people from Russia and Ukraine, who have so much in common in terms of culture, language and even family are killing each other and killing both of their countries' futures is a tragedy to both.

I'm fairly sure they'd all rather by gaming.

Am sure they would be too. But since Russian young people ultimately acquiesced and joined the attack on Ukraine, how do you think Ukrainian young people should have responded - ignore the invasion and keep gaming?

Bobbinog · 09/01/2026 14:01

charliehungerford · 09/01/2026 13:50

Can you imagine a situation where our young men, children, husbands are conscripted and sent off to fight somewhere in Europe while tens of thousands of fit healthy young male asylum seekers remain in their hotels, far away from danger. There would be a civil war!

I'm surprised no political parties have suggested that in order for young, male asylum seekers to get leave to remain then they have to do 5-10 years compulsory conscription into the army.

ThreeSixtyTwo · 09/01/2026 13:57

usedtobeaylis · 09/01/2026 13:45

Absolutely nobody should be compelled to give their mind and body to war. The fact that in 2025 we are still accepting of war as a default state for the world to be in and debating the finer points of who would be conscripted is appalling.

What is the alternative? War isn't consensual, it's ultimately one sided act.

You can react - defend, counter attack or surrender.
And you can try to prevent it, or not.

Saying "we won't fight" is effectively issuing an invitation to be invaded, because there won't be any resistance.

AmIthatSpringy · 09/01/2026 13:55

Who is saying children would be conscripted, OP?

charliehungerford · 09/01/2026 13:50

MidSurreyNightsDream · 09/01/2026 13:30

This in spades. There is an entire army arriving on a daily basis from across the channel. Hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, languishing in hotels. There’s your conscripted army sorted.

Can you imagine a situation where our young men, children, husbands are conscripted and sent off to fight somewhere in Europe while tens of thousands of fit healthy young male asylum seekers remain in their hotels, far away from danger. There would be a civil war!

user1471538275 · 09/01/2026 13:50

War is a ridiculous thing, used by politicians to gain more power at the cost of young people.

That young people from Russia and Ukraine, who have so much in common in terms of culture, language and even family are killing each other and killing both of their countries' futures is a tragedy to both.

I'm fairly sure they'd all rather by gaming.

HoorayHattie · 09/01/2026 13:50

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 13:42

No I'm asking what everyone thinks

I assume from you response that you and your family would happily join up when the army conscription officer turns up

I am glad that you are happy to fight for this country in some far off land

Can I ask how many children you have to help fight the noble fight?

I assume you will all get in the same regiment so you could fight together as a family

Have you ever heard the history of the Pals Regiments during WW1?

"Pals Battalions in WW1 were volunteer units where friends, family, and workmates enlisted together, encouraged by patriotic fervour to serve side-by-side, with early examples forming from London stockbrokers and later in northern cities like Liverpool, Manchester, and Hull, creating strong local ties but leading to devastating losses when entire battalions were wiped out, famously on the first day of the Somme"

usedtobeaylis · 09/01/2026 13:45

Absolutely nobody should be compelled to give their mind and body to war. The fact that in 2025 we are still accepting of war as a default state for the world to be in and debating the finer points of who would be conscripted is appalling.

littlebilliie · 09/01/2026 13:44

Ablondiebutagoody · 09/01/2026 11:35

There is no way in Hell that I'm fighting for Starmer.

I’m curious, is it fighting for your country as governments will change.

Nobody wants a war.

first thing that will happen is that supply chains will vanish

next thing is that that medication will become restricted and essential only

state benefits will be disrupted

But go ahead and accept who ever wants to invade us.

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 13:42

surreygirly · 09/01/2026 13:27

What do you want to happen ?
Just let Russia stroll in?
You just sit back and let everyone fight for you then
As it happens I think a dose of national service would teach some independence and toughen them up and realise that being called a name on social media is not anxiety inducing

No I'm asking what everyone thinks

I assume from you response that you and your family would happily join up when the army conscription officer turns up

I am glad that you are happy to fight for this country in some far off land

Can I ask how many children you have to help fight the noble fight?

I assume you will all get in the same regiment so you could fight together as a family

OP posts:
user1471538275 · 09/01/2026 13:41

I'll go happily before I send my children

I'd probably be more useful anyway.

I don't think they'll use conscription. Russia has used financial incentives as well as media propoganda quite effectively.

If we consider how quickly behavioural change was created due to fear and scaremongering in covid I think we can see how it could done again in a war situation, targeted through social media to convince young people that they should once again sacrifice themselves for the safety and protection of their 'elders and betters'.

What a great idea! Our younger generations once again damaged and harmed for the benefit of other generations, who pay nothing for what they have taken and do everything they can to take further from the younger generation.