Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Military conscription

662 replies

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
LeedsLoiner · 10/01/2026 23:10

Natsku · 09/01/2026 11:31

My son will be conscripted as my country has conscription and has had it for a very long time. I am OK with this because I know the alternative is far far worse. My country borders Russia and has been invaded by it many times, so we know the value of conscription and everyone playing their part to defend the country (everyone, not just the military, it's total defence)

Sisu!

SpiritAdder · 10/01/2026 22:48

Warfare today is very different. It will be mostly sitting in bunkers flying armed drones attacking civilians, remote controlling robot dogs with machine guns or exploding tanks. Or flying fighter jets or bombers. Or pounding cities from ships ten miles out at sea. More civilians have been killed in the wars in Israel, Gaza, Sudan, Lebanon, and Syria than have military personnel.

That should tell you something about the future of warfare. The rule book has been tossed in the garbage. Being a civilian is no protection.

Joining up is probably the safest thing any person can do. It’s just too bad I’m too old, or I’d sign up if there were a WWIII.

ThreeSixtyTwo · 10/01/2026 22:39

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/01/2026 22:03

So maybe we, as a nation, say no to the conscription of under 30s. Say take us instead. We know the population is in decline, so there must be more of us than of our kids. The kids stay here to keep the home fires burning, agriculture and manufacturing, and we fight.

Edited

This is very relevant.

There is a difference between training conscription and war mobilization.

Training conscription like in Scandinavian countries is about making sure that everyone/relevant proportion of the population is trained and ready for potential future threats - not only combat, but emergencies in general. It makes sense to focus on youngest adults to minimise disruption to their personal life and over the time build resilient nation.

Mobilisation for active war is focusing on an immediate threat and doesn't have to target 18yos. Ukraine started their mobilisation with 27-60 age group.

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/01/2026 22:03

So maybe we, as a nation, say no to the conscription of under 30s. Say take us instead. We know the population is in decline, so there must be more of us than of our kids. The kids stay here to keep the home fires burning, agriculture and manufacturing, and we fight.

travailtotravel · 10/01/2026 21:43

I'm 52, childless by choice. I'd gladly do my service so all.your children can have a future.

I would rather I was sent to a front line than a disabled person.

Its what our ancestors did and why we're here now. We have lost sight of the sacrifice they made.

I didn't expect that that we might be in a position where it happened again but we're here - facing USA as the nutters is a surprise. Weakened by Brexit at a time we need to be united with Europe to fight collectively rather than floating around as a little island all on our own.

EasternStandard · 10/01/2026 21:42

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 10/01/2026 21:37

It's not the young ones I'm referring to

I wonder how many middle aged people (men and women) think conscription is a really good idea

But if they were asked to serve on the front lines they would be the first to run off

My point is don't expect of others something you would not do yourself

I think when the debate about conscription comes along people need to say there honest opinions and not just rely on other people

Some people already on this post have said conscription is a good idea

But when I ask if they personally would serve

All of a sudden they have a reason not to

But would happily send someone else in their place to die

Yep this is it for me too

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 10/01/2026 21:37

Bluedenimdoglover · 10/01/2026 19:36

My father fought in WW2, torpedoed by German U boats (twice), injured, friends killed. He was the most gentle man you could meet. Never spoke of it. He went when he was called up, he was 21. You can enjoy the freedoms you have today because of men like my father. I don't think conscription is likely - they kill people remotely these days, but if it comes I am sure many young men and women will step up.

It's not the young ones I'm referring to

I wonder how many middle aged people (men and women) think conscription is a really good idea

But if they were asked to serve on the front lines they would be the first to run off

My point is don't expect of others something you would not do yourself

I think when the debate about conscription comes along people need to say there honest opinions and not just rely on other people

Some people already on this post have said conscription is a good idea

But when I ask if they personally would serve

All of a sudden they have a reason not to

But would happily send someone else in their place to die

OP posts:
notimagain · 10/01/2026 21:04

It's a fact British military leaders discussed bombing the tracks into the main concentration camps but said it wasn't a priority.

..and given where those rail tracks were in terms of distance from the UK, the inaccuracy in allied bombing especially early in the war, especially at range, bombing would probably have been highly ineffective and have resulted in massive losses to very little effect....hence it wasn't a priority.

NotThisAgain1987 · 10/01/2026 20:55

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 16:52

Sadly, if not this, then that.

And I am a little off with this weird narrative that it was really British inaction that somehow made Germany do what Germany did.

There are all sorts of counterfactuals that you can work as an academic exercise if you can't leave the house. But at some point you end up realising that when history moves in tides, using a teaspoon to try and shift an ocean will have no effect. Even if you used a million teaspoons.

And ultimately whatever view you may or may not have or form about various countries behaviours in the past, unless you actually use it to inform the future, along with enough people to make a difference, then it's all rather moot.

Britain didn't make Germany do what it did (and no one said that) but it could have stopped it with the allies but instead, for the reasons mentioned by pp, a policy of appeasement was adopted. Fascists don't stop when you give a little they want it all. He wrote a book on what he wanted.

It's very easy to dismiss this discussion as dreamy academics but it's more than that assesment and reflection on military tactics is how wars "improve", hence why ww2 wasn't fought in the trenches. It's a fact British military leaders discussed bombing the tracks into the main concentration camps but said it wasn't a priority. This is all in the imperial war museum if you wish to factory check. This issue is British kids aren't taught the real gritty truth of the war rather simplistic Germany EVIL and Britain the uncomplicated heros which creates a black and white narrative.

Bluedenimdoglover · 10/01/2026 19:36

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

My father fought in WW2, torpedoed by German U boats (twice), injured, friends killed. He was the most gentle man you could meet. Never spoke of it. He went when he was called up, he was 21. You can enjoy the freedoms you have today because of men like my father. I don't think conscription is likely - they kill people remotely these days, but if it comes I am sure many young men and women will step up.

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 18:34

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:53

Britain joined WW2 in 1939. It wasn't all about us, you know.

I'm agnostic as to whether it could be Japan invading China or the invasion of Czechoslovakia. I would be fascinated to know what someone from those countries or former countries believe.

It's a little like bands, really. I mean you could argue that Deep Purple Mk II were "Deep Purple". However that rather forgets that there was a Deep Purple Mk I in 1967.

If Deep Purple doesn't work, try Fleetwood Mac

It's almost as if I don't take the notion of conscription in the UK seriously ....

Who was fighting a world war already?

It only became a world war when Britain, France and their respective worldwide empires/commonwealths declared war on Germany.

GreyhpundGirl · 10/01/2026 18:25

BlueJuniper94 · 09/01/2026 11:30

A few months ago a veteran on breakfast TV said it wasn't worth it. Let that sink in

Right. Maybe that veteran could read some books. Not worth it in what way? Do they support fascism and the persecution of minorities?.

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 18:20

Do you think it would be easy working with an influx of people who don’t want to be there?

For some of us, that is a daily routine ...

Thank you for your service. I am well aware that it's because of you, I don't have to do it.

E2A: The first step to any conscription would be calling up people on reserve. My friend in the RAF was caught by that when she left in 1989 ....

EasternStandard · 10/01/2026 18:18

JohnTheRevelator · 10/01/2026 17:09

Gender,age and any other reason should not be an excuse? I'm 62 with quite bad mobility and health issues and I know that there is no way that I would be capable of being in the military! I'd be more of a liability than an asset!

With drones it’s different anyway. Depressingly so. Maybe what you list isn’t needed.

Megifer · 10/01/2026 18:10

Dappy777 · 09/01/2026 11:20

Well I don’t know who you think is going to fight. All my life I have heard people running this country down - sneering at its culture, demonising its national heroes and telling us its history is shameful. The left have got complete control of academia, the arts and the publishing industry, and they have used their influence to make us hate ourselves. On top of that we have had mass immigration. Put the two together and you have a new country. The left have got what they wanted. They have imposed a new identity on me, and they can go and fight for it.

I consider myself left leaning generally. I regularly butt heads with people who i feel are being anti-immigration, pro-Trump, GB News watchers etc. I received a disciplinary a few years ago because I called a racist a racist.

This is an excellent post imo that articulates perfectly how I feel about conscription.

Like fuck will my DC be forced to fight for this (now) general shit show of a country or the giant wanker in charge of it.

Salvadoridory · 10/01/2026 17:58

Btowngirl · 09/01/2026 10:45

I am in the armed forces, and though we would obviously all prefer a world where we don’t need conscription, your view is idealistic. It’s giving ‘us and them’ energy to be honest and I find it a bit offensive. Would you prefer no armed forces & we all just surrender to anyone that wants to invade? Or are you ok with my kids loosing their mum, my mum loosing her daughter etc in the interest of your family being safe & free?

As a side note, in peacetime none of us want conscription. Do you think it would be easy working with an influx of people who don’t want to be there? But if it’s a case of ww3, of course it would be necessary.

Great response and thank you 🌻

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:53

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 17:42

That WW2 started in September 1939.

Britain joined WW2 in 1939. It wasn't all about us, you know.

I'm agnostic as to whether it could be Japan invading China or the invasion of Czechoslovakia. I would be fascinated to know what someone from those countries or former countries believe.

It's a little like bands, really. I mean you could argue that Deep Purple Mk II were "Deep Purple". However that rather forgets that there was a Deep Purple Mk I in 1967.

If Deep Purple doesn't work, try Fleetwood Mac

It's almost as if I don't take the notion of conscription in the UK seriously ....

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 17:42

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:42

Your point being ?

That WW2 started in September 1939.

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:42

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 17:41

So, how much of the world was fighting before 1939?

China and Japan. Germany and Czechoslovakia.

Your point being ?

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 17:41

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:20

Op you mentioned WW3 and conscription, I think if we got to WW3

I am mildly amused by the assumption we aren't already there.

Believe it or not, it's not universally recognised that WW2 "began" in 1939. Yes, it did for Britain. But as a world war, we were johnny come latelys (and the US more so).

So, how much of the world was fighting before 1939?

China and Japan. Germany and Czechoslovakia.

SerendipityJane · 10/01/2026 17:20

Op you mentioned WW3 and conscription, I think if we got to WW3

I am mildly amused by the assumption we aren't already there.

Believe it or not, it's not universally recognised that WW2 "began" in 1939. Yes, it did for Britain. But as a world war, we were johnny come latelys (and the US more so).

Smurfette63 · 10/01/2026 17:19

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

I think everyone is missing the point, with quite a large percentage of youngsters these days not identifying as male or female who do you think is going to be man enough to fight.

Elbowpatch · 10/01/2026 17:15

omggggggg · 10/01/2026 17:13

Im sure there could be some jobs you could do. Rather than risking the life of someone who has their whole life ahead of them

Suggestions on a postcard please.

omggggggg · 10/01/2026 17:13

JohnTheRevelator · 10/01/2026 17:09

Gender,age and any other reason should not be an excuse? I'm 62 with quite bad mobility and health issues and I know that there is no way that I would be capable of being in the military! I'd be more of a liability than an asset!

Im sure there could be some jobs you could do. Rather than risking the life of someone who has their whole life ahead of them

JohnTheRevelator · 10/01/2026 17:09

Gender,age and any other reason should not be an excuse? I'm 62 with quite bad mobility and health issues and I know that there is no way that I would be capable of being in the military! I'd be more of a liability than an asset!