Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Military conscription

662 replies

Donotpanicoknowpanic · 09/01/2026 10:25

There is lots of talk about if ww3 happens then military conscription will happen

This is basically people who sit in an office safely saying we need to either send ourselves or out children to fight and die in horrible conditions

Am I unreasonable to think that anyone who thinks this is a good idea

They should be the first ones to sign up and to lead by example

Any politicians who think this is a good idea, there children should be the first to go

Russia is literally sending troops in wheel chairs and crunches to the front line

So age, disability and gender will not be a problem for anyone who supports any conscription policy's, they can go first

Also the UK will not be invaded, we are not Ukrainian, If we were more like Ukraine I would be more in favour of this as the country itself is under threat

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
LeedsLoiner · 11/01/2026 15:44

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:35

Oh I thought all those human rights lawyers would be concerned with people being forcibly conscripted into an army. Surely point no.one of the ECHR convention is a "Right to life". Being forced to fight against their will and risk death doesn't sound much like a right to life? Also, perhaps someone needs to tell the UK Government that the ECHR can be ignored.

If you actually understood what the provisions of the ECHR were you would know that plenty of signatories to it also have compulsory military service.

AgnesMcDoo · 11/01/2026 15:42

We have such a british centric island view of this which would changed instantly if we were about to be invaded

Thirdchildjoy · 11/01/2026 15:40

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 15:37

"Starmer" can only do what parliament allows.

Parliament isn't going to introduce conscription without the agreement of the Prime Minister. What a ridiculous thing to post.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 15:37

Thirdchildjoy · 11/01/2026 15:35

Starmer's never going to introduce subscription. He is appeaser.

"Starmer" can only do what parliament allows.

Thirdchildjoy · 11/01/2026 15:35

Starmer's never going to introduce subscription. He is appeaser.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 14:29

Nezukokamado · 11/01/2026 14:24

A lot of this thread just seems unhinged!

I have not heard anyone talking about this at all. I haven't read anything about it.

There are a few media shills who like to generate massive clickbait with various angles of attack that can then be fed (back) into the media machine to "prove" whatever their paymasters have asked for.

The trick is to use keywords that easily fit onto the first line of an SM post on a phone. "Conscription" could have been made for the job.

It's important it's a subject that can be flooded with misinformation - that will ideally keep it going and "hot" so as to remain in trending and most viewed etc etc for as long as possible.

It would be tiresome. But it's a great way to ensure reading, writing and comprehension skills are up to scratch and ready for when it really counts.

(Better ad an 😀just in case) 😀

Nezukokamado · 11/01/2026 14:24

AnnasFangs · 11/01/2026 12:35

Right wing SM seems to have decided that Starmer is going to introduce conscription and everyone on the left is keenly salivating at the prospect etc. So lefties should all be the ones to ,"go first". Or some such bollocks.

It is all rather pathetic.

A lot of this thread just seems unhinged!

I have not heard anyone talking about this at all. I haven't read anything about it.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 13:43

notimagain · 11/01/2026 13:36

TBH with Putin, Trump et al threatening to create havoc I suspect the ECHR would be told to take a hike if it tried to stop any government introducing conscription.

That would free up a few lawyers, allowing them to deploy to the front line.

All human rights are qualified. Even the right to life.

People who know about human rights know this.

People who don't ... well why don't they ? It's hardly rocket science.

notimagain · 11/01/2026 13:36

TBH with Putin, Trump et al threatening to create havoc I suspect the ECHR would be told to take a hike if it tried to stop any government introducing conscription.

That would free up a few lawyers, allowing them to deploy to the front line.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 13:35

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:35

Oh I thought all those human rights lawyers would be concerned with people being forcibly conscripted into an army. Surely point no.one of the ECHR convention is a "Right to life". Being forced to fight against their will and risk death doesn't sound much like a right to life? Also, perhaps someone needs to tell the UK Government that the ECHR can be ignored.

Maybe read up on humans rights ?

Elbowpatch · 11/01/2026 13:23

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:35

Oh I thought all those human rights lawyers would be concerned with people being forcibly conscripted into an army. Surely point no.one of the ECHR convention is a "Right to life". Being forced to fight against their will and risk death doesn't sound much like a right to life? Also, perhaps someone needs to tell the UK Government that the ECHR can be ignored.

I suspect they already know.

Derogation in time of emergency

“the right to derogate can be invoked only in time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation”

www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_derogation_eng

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:35

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 12:15

The ECHR can be ignored by any government.

And it doesn't prohibit compulsory military service anyway. Why would you think it did ?

Oh I thought all those human rights lawyers would be concerned with people being forcibly conscripted into an army. Surely point no.one of the ECHR convention is a "Right to life". Being forced to fight against their will and risk death doesn't sound much like a right to life? Also, perhaps someone needs to tell the UK Government that the ECHR can be ignored.

AnnasFangs · 11/01/2026 12:35

Nezukokamado · 11/01/2026 12:28

Who in real life is really talking about ww3 and conscription?

Right wing SM seems to have decided that Starmer is going to introduce conscription and everyone on the left is keenly salivating at the prospect etc. So lefties should all be the ones to ,"go first". Or some such bollocks.

It is all rather pathetic.

Natsku · 11/01/2026 12:31

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:13

Don't worry OP. There will be loads of human rights lawyers using the ECHR to protect British citizens trying to escape being forcibly drafted into an army.

The ECHR doesn't prevent people being conscripted in any European countries that already have conscription, how would anyone use it to prevent it in the UK?

Nezukokamado · 11/01/2026 12:28

Who in real life is really talking about ww3 and conscription?

LlttledrummergirI · 11/01/2026 12:26

https://jobs.army.mod.uk/how-to-join/can-i-apply/age/

I'm 50+ which definitely puts me outside of their recruitment.

If conscription comes and this changes then it's a different kettle of fish.

EasternStandard · 11/01/2026 12:20

LlttledrummergirI · 11/01/2026 12:05

I'm too old, they won't have me.
Ds2 was ex army, when he tried to rejoin he withdrew his application after 2 years as they were taking so long to process his application.
Until they sort this mess out, they can run all the ads they like.

Being old doesn’t have to be a barrier. I think there’s a few who are keen on this thread who fit that bill.

notimagain · 11/01/2026 12:17

LlttledrummergirI · 11/01/2026 12:05

I'm too old, they won't have me.
Ds2 was ex army, when he tried to rejoin he withdrew his application after 2 years as they were taking so long to process his application.
Until they sort this mess out, they can run all the ads they like.

Ah...another Capita(?) victim...sorry to hear that.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 12:15

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:13

Don't worry OP. There will be loads of human rights lawyers using the ECHR to protect British citizens trying to escape being forcibly drafted into an army.

The ECHR can be ignored by any government.

And it doesn't prohibit compulsory military service anyway. Why would you think it did ?

snoopyscosmicanomaly · 11/01/2026 12:13

Don't worry OP. There will be loads of human rights lawyers using the ECHR to protect British citizens trying to escape being forcibly drafted into an army.

Elbowpatch · 11/01/2026 12:06

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 11:05

The Hundred Years War actually lasted 116 years.

Sometimes names are deceptive.

And straws are sometimes clutched at.

LlttledrummergirI · 11/01/2026 12:05

LeedsLoiner · 11/01/2026 11:49

It should be pointed out that regardless of conscription all the armed forces are currently short of new recruits - judging by the amount of advertising they are doing - so all of you who are saying “I’d be happy to do it” or “I’d happily send my kids off to do it” what’s stopping you from joining the armed forces now?

I'm too old, they won't have me.
Ds2 was ex army, when he tried to rejoin he withdrew his application after 2 years as they were taking so long to process his application.
Until they sort this mess out, they can run all the ads they like.

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 11:58

LeedsLoiner · 11/01/2026 11:49

It should be pointed out that regardless of conscription all the armed forces are currently short of new recruits - judging by the amount of advertising they are doing - so all of you who are saying “I’d be happy to do it” or “I’d happily send my kids off to do it” what’s stopping you from joining the armed forces now?

Plus ca change ....

LeedsLoiner · 11/01/2026 11:49

It should be pointed out that regardless of conscription all the armed forces are currently short of new recruits - judging by the amount of advertising they are doing - so all of you who are saying “I’d be happy to do it” or “I’d happily send my kids off to do it” what’s stopping you from joining the armed forces now?

SerendipityJane · 11/01/2026 11:05

Elbowpatch · 11/01/2026 08:40

Germany invading its neighbours does not make a world war. If one country invading another made a world war, the planet would have been in a constant state of world war since time immemorial, right up to the present day.

Britain could not have joined WW2 late because there no world war already ongoing to join when it (and France) declared war on Germany in 1939.

The Hundred Years War actually lasted 116 years.

Sometimes names are deceptive.

Swipe left for the next trending thread