Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

...to ask why nobody is talking about the 32 people killed in the raid on Venezuela?

69 replies

QwertyAtThirty · 05/01/2026 20:47

32 people (largely forming Maduro's security team) were killed when the US attacked Venezuela.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj9r0eyw0jno
Why isnt that part of the discussion about whether the US's actions were justified / were an act of warfare / violated international law? Apart from reports such as the one linked above, it's not mentioned in any of the commentary I've seen or heard about the legality of the event. Is it because they died protecting Maduro and are therefore considered the "bad guys" and accepted by the international community as collateral damage in a way they wouldn't be if they were civilians?

I suppose my AIBU is: AIBU to think the fact that lives were lost warrants a place in the discussion?
YABU = they're not worth mentioning
YANBU = their deaths should form part of the conversation

A firefighters passes by a burnt military vehicle at La Carlota air base in Caracas on January 3, 2026, after US forces captured Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro after launching a "large scale strike" on the South American country.

Thirty-two Cubans killed during US attack on Venezuela

Cuba's president said military and intelligence operatives were providing protection to captured leader Nicolás Maduro.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj9r0eyw0jno

OP posts:
GasPanic · 06/01/2026 11:15

notimagain · 06/01/2026 09:56

Yep, not sure of the exact rules that might have applied here but AFAIK were are not talking about 32 janitors or housekeeping staff being caught in the line of fire..

It does look as if Maduro had decided to surround himself with what could be regarded as mercenaries...

If this guy did decide to surround himself with a security team made up of non nationals - it's not normally a good sign.

midsummabreak · 06/01/2026 11:15

Duckyneedsaclean · 06/01/2026 10:18

Have you spoken to anyone from Venezuela about it? All seem to be overjoyed.

That’s a good ploy isn’t it while their oil resources are stolen

VillaDiodati · 06/01/2026 10:30

MangaKanga · 06/01/2026 10:24

Even if they were, why do you think America has the right to murder them without trial?

Drug runners who are flooding a country with deadly substances and killing untold numbers deserve all they get in my eyes.

MangaKanga · 06/01/2026 10:24

VillaDiodati · 06/01/2026 10:11

I thought those 'fishing boats' were drug runners operated by Tren de Aragua? They seemed pretty powerful for mere 'civilian boats' what with their numerous large engines in contrast to fishing boats which have much smaller and usually only one or two engines? It's a mystery for sure...

Even if they were, why do you think America has the right to murder them without trial?

Duckyneedsaclean · 06/01/2026 10:18

Have you spoken to anyone from Venezuela about it? All seem to be overjoyed.

VillaDiodati · 06/01/2026 10:11

MangaKanga · 05/01/2026 23:49

Yep. Though history has shown again and again what a fat lot of good it does cosying up to and depending on America. Remember Prince Sirik Matak in Cambodia? His dying words were something like, "The only mistake I have made was believing in you, the Americans" shortly before he was executed by the Khmer Rouge. That was just over 50 years ago now.

The murderous airstrikes against civilian boats that America boasted about in September, including going back to bomb two survivors clinging to the wreckage? There is no scenario under which this is neither murder nor a war crime. Trump was testing the waters- would anyone have the guts to hold them to account for this? No one did.

I thought those 'fishing boats' were drug runners operated by Tren de Aragua? They seemed pretty powerful for mere 'civilian boats' what with their numerous large engines in contrast to fishing boats which have much smaller and usually only one or two engines? It's a mystery for sure...

notimagain · 06/01/2026 09:56

AirborneElephant · 06/01/2026 09:43

They weren’t civilians, so in the context of an outright act of war it’s not considered a breach of international law. Choosing to be a bodyguard to a violent dictator does come with risk.

Yep, not sure of the exact rules that might have applied here but AFAIK were are not talking about 32 janitors or housekeeping staff being caught in the line of fire..

It does look as if Maduro had decided to surround himself with what could be regarded as mercenaries...

AirborneElephant · 06/01/2026 09:43

They weren’t civilians, so in the context of an outright act of war it’s not considered a breach of international law. Choosing to be a bodyguard to a violent dictator does come with risk.

Ihatetomatoes · 06/01/2026 09:13

America has shown it can do what it likes and it knows it. The same applies to Russia.

Parsleyandthyme · 06/01/2026 06:40

I agree -they are just nobodies in US eyes

QwertyAtThirty · 06/01/2026 06:38

MangaKanga · 05/01/2026 23:49

Yep. Though history has shown again and again what a fat lot of good it does cosying up to and depending on America. Remember Prince Sirik Matak in Cambodia? His dying words were something like, "The only mistake I have made was believing in you, the Americans" shortly before he was executed by the Khmer Rouge. That was just over 50 years ago now.

The murderous airstrikes against civilian boats that America boasted about in September, including going back to bomb two survivors clinging to the wreckage? There is no scenario under which this is neither murder nor a war crime. Trump was testing the waters- would anyone have the guts to hold them to account for this? No one did.

Hm. And if nobody held him to account for that, so he escalated to this, and nobody's holding him to account for this....
The poster who called it "fucking terrifying" is right!

OP posts:
QwertyAtThirty · 06/01/2026 06:35

Jamaicaningmecrazy · 06/01/2026 01:33

They don’t care about babies being snipped. They are not going to care about this.

What does "babies being snipped" mean? Circumcision?

OP posts:
QwertyAtThirty · 06/01/2026 06:34

kirbykirby · 05/01/2026 22:58

Why is no-one/mainstream media talking about the massive protests in Iran for the past nine days and all the protestors who've been murdered by the regime in that time?

Yes, also a good question! I only know about this from Iranian friends' SM posts.

OP posts:
PollyBell · 06/01/2026 02:02

GaIadriel · 06/01/2026 00:59

But tbf you wrote a post to ask why somebody started a thread on a forum to ask why other people are not talking about something they started a thread on? 🙃

True but I did not start a thread on it

Jamaicaningmecrazy · 06/01/2026 01:33

They don’t care about babies being snipped. They are not going to care about this.

GaIadriel · 06/01/2026 00:59

PollyBell · 06/01/2026 00:48

So you started a thread on a forum to ask why other people are not talking about something you started a thread on?

when people wonder why people are not talking about something isnt is usual just to start a thread yourself to talk about it?

But tbf you wrote a post to ask why somebody started a thread on a forum to ask why other people are not talking about something they started a thread on? 🙃

PollyBell · 06/01/2026 00:48

So you started a thread on a forum to ask why other people are not talking about something you started a thread on?

when people wonder why people are not talking about something isnt is usual just to start a thread yourself to talk about it?

GaIadriel · 06/01/2026 00:46

Well, they reckon at least 110 Venezuelans were killed in airstrikes in Nov. These were supposedly against drug trafficking boats but many oil tankers were also seized and Trump stated that US investment in the Venezuelan oil market would be welcomed.

Hard to know the truth but human rights groups have apparently called them war crimes or human rights infringements, something like that.

However, I'm struggling to feel bad for the regime tbh. At least 20,000 Venezuelan citizens were killed in extrajudicial executions in 2019 alone which kinda puts the other figures in perspective.

RecoveringLawyer72 · 06/01/2026 00:33

Robert Wilkie’s interview on the Today programme this morning was revealing!

MangaKanga · 05/01/2026 23:49

Yep. Though history has shown again and again what a fat lot of good it does cosying up to and depending on America. Remember Prince Sirik Matak in Cambodia? His dying words were something like, "The only mistake I have made was believing in you, the Americans" shortly before he was executed by the Khmer Rouge. That was just over 50 years ago now.

The murderous airstrikes against civilian boats that America boasted about in September, including going back to bomb two survivors clinging to the wreckage? There is no scenario under which this is neither murder nor a war crime. Trump was testing the waters- would anyone have the guts to hold them to account for this? No one did.

wonderstuff · 05/01/2026 23:38

MangaKanga · 05/01/2026 23:24

What reputation?

The UK has not covered itself in glory with any of its support for America's illegal wars dating back to Yugoslavia and earlier. Iraq? Afghanistan? Starmer fucking about in safety in Ukraine, dressed in combat fatigues?

Do you think we are feared and admired by anyone?

Not at all, I think they’ve consistently screwed us over and we seem to have little choice but to go along. But this is something different, they aren’t even pretending to be operating on international law. I’m not sure this will pan out as he expects, I can understand Starmer watching and waiting, but I’d like him at some point to speak up. Reality is that at the moment we are very reliant on US military in Europe. I imagine all of western Europe will be increasing military spending, but that takes time.

MangaKanga · 05/01/2026 23:24

wonderstuff · 05/01/2026 23:16

They mentioned it on C4 news this evening. They spoke to a number of people and I thought picked apart the issue well. Fucking terrifying really. I do think being security for a dictator will always carry some risks.

We’re only 11 months into the administration. I think I can only really think about it for so long. I’m glad I’m in the UK and I’m glad I’m not Starmer, if he condemns it he risks the UK economy (although our trade deals seem built on sand with America anyway) if he doesn’t, he risks his and our reputation? Are we now appeasing America? All eyes on Greenland.

What reputation?

The UK has not covered itself in glory with any of its support for America's illegal wars dating back to Yugoslavia and earlier. Iraq? Afghanistan? Starmer fucking about in safety in Ukraine, dressed in combat fatigues?

Do you think we are feared and admired by anyone?

EmeraldShamrock000 · 05/01/2026 23:17

I haven’t paid much attention to the story, so I hadn’t heard that people died. Of course their lives matter.

wonderstuff · 05/01/2026 23:16

They mentioned it on C4 news this evening. They spoke to a number of people and I thought picked apart the issue well. Fucking terrifying really. I do think being security for a dictator will always carry some risks.

We’re only 11 months into the administration. I think I can only really think about it for so long. I’m glad I’m in the UK and I’m glad I’m not Starmer, if he condemns it he risks the UK economy (although our trade deals seem built on sand with America anyway) if he doesn’t, he risks his and our reputation? Are we now appeasing America? All eyes on Greenland.

Ablondiebutagoody · 05/01/2026 23:12

British Government have been responsible for many, many more than that in Iraq etc.

Swipe left for the next trending thread