Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel protective of my house

159 replies

ThisMintHouse · 04/01/2026 09:07

Early 40s F. Getting married next year to wonderful, kind and generous man also early 40s. We have a child each from previous relationships and an ours baby now 1yo.
I bought a house 7 years ago and have just over 100k left on the mortgage. I've paid off about 50k. He's interested in contributing and making it our home. I'm feeling a bit scared about this as my home is a haven and I don't want to lose it. However, I also want to respect and trust my relationship. He doesn't have any property but he has a decent job and good earning potential.

YANBU: A house is a majorly important asset. Protect what was yours before the marriage.

YABU: Marriage includes combining assets and trusting one another. Jump in and trust in the process.

OP posts:
thepariscrimefiles · 04/01/2026 13:16

ThisMintHouse · 04/01/2026 09:39

I think I'm a bit uneasy about it as the house has been a safe haven for me and my only fixed asset. It's very important to me to have a roof over my head and I love the house. However, I also don't want to be so fixated on it that I send the wrong message to my partner somehow. He's of the opinion that once marriage is entered, everything is shared. He's interested in purchasing another property like an apartment in the future together.

'He's of the opinion that once marriage is entered, everything is shared.'

That would be a reasonable opinion if you both had an equal amount of assets, but you don't. You have a property and he doesn't.

You need to speak to a solicitor to find out what your options are to protect your current assets for your two children.

CheeseFiend40 · 04/01/2026 13:09

When me and my current husband got together I owned my own home, we got pregnant very quickly (not planned) and he moved in. We got married when DS was 18 months old, but I always paid the mortgage as I was the higher earner and it was my house. He never spoke of the house as “ours” or about shared assets etc. His family was considerably wealthier than me/my family, so I never had any concern that the house was anything but mine at that point.

We then moved to a much larger house, I had a good deposit from the sale of my house and he matched that with money from shares, so we went in completely 50:50 and the house is ours and would be split equally if we were to divorce.

I remember though when I bought my first flat, my boyfriend at the time moved in with me but had started talking about some friend of his that supposedly had a claim on a property his partner owned and he had been paying rent towards, even though they weren’t married etc etc. He was an ex within a month, for many reasons, but I wasn’t risking someone taking something that I had worked so hard to achieve, and this was what pushed me to finally end things.

In your situation I would 100% keep the house as your asset, get legal advice to ensure after marriage that this is the case. His talk of everything being shared would worry me, as he isn’t bringing anything to the table to share with you, or matching your contribution to the house to date. You need to protect your family home as you also have a child that is not his, and this is their home. You can have a joint account for bills, but the mortgage is paid by you from your account. Do you have to get married at this point though, given these concerns?

outerspacepotato · 04/01/2026 12:56

If you marry him, your home becomes a marital asset. If you split, there goes half. Add in his attitude that when you marry, everything is shared and that house will no longer be just yours.

You lose half your biggest financial asset if you marry. He gains half a house.

How long have you been together?

Snoken · 04/01/2026 12:42

Why are you getting married? Your home will be a marital asset and unless it turns out to be a short marriage it won't matter who bought the house, it will be split in the event of a divorce and his child will be as entitled as your child will be in the event of death.

A prenup is not a safe bet either as they aren't automatically legally binding.

I think you need to think about this long and hard. Marrying and trying to protect something as only yours won't be possible. Take pensions into consideration too, incase you have a good one.

NotrialNodeal · 04/01/2026 12:27

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 10:49

And the big question has to be WHY the man here hasn't been able to do the same, especially if he earns more than her.

He may be a lovely chap, but is he feckless with money? why has he not got a foothold on financial security where she has?

The OP says he was married before with a home and after the divorce his wife got the better deal..I think his money has been lost in the divorce. I think the OP will be marrying for the first time.

foodlovefood · 04/01/2026 12:11

I get how you feel. You love them, trust them but it’s your house.

DP and me are about to start living together. We both own our homes. He is moving to mine. He wants to sell his and it will pay off my mortgage. we could have a lovely life and holidays.

but I will always see this as my house which is not fair on him. So, I want us to move to a house that’s ours. He is drawn by the mortgage free aspect where I am drawn by it’s my house mentality. For us to live freely I need us to have chosen the house together.

I have the majority deposit and we will do a legal thing saying I own at set % and him the other so if we split up we have financial security. this will still be valid even if we marry. He has a kid and if he dies before me his kid can inherit his pension and savings. I just want the house. He agrees.

He has a much higher salary than me, but once bills are paid we will still have our own money to spend as we wish.

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 11:55

His attitude that everything is for sharing concerns me OP, point is he is't bringing anything to the table, he wants to share what you have - its odd he didn't get anything from the first marriage either, maybe he entered that with nothing too and left fairly soon and so she kept hold of what she had - I'd be wary, very wary.

Elsvieta · 04/01/2026 11:42

The fact is that once you're married, a house becomes a marital asset whether you like it or not. It wouldn't necessarily be split equally in the event of divorce, but he'd have some claim on it. You really need to stop seeking advice here and see a solicitor - alone - for advice on the best way to arrange things. And once you're married you MUST have a will to ensure if you die first your oldest child gets what you want them to. Don't make the will now - marriage invalidates wills - but get it done immediately after. Book your solicitor appointment, pronto.

Commonsenseisnotsocommon · 04/01/2026 11:34

Eyeshadow · 04/01/2026 10:17

The majority of women on MN did not/do not own their own homes before moving in with their DPs.

If you think someone is a cocklodger then you wouldn’t marry them.

Bollocks. Many women have their own homes nowadays and ops situation is unfortunately more common as men are often not bringing as much to the table as they used to.

sharkstale · 04/01/2026 11:12

MadamCholetsbonnet · 04/01/2026 11:05

Why are you marrying him? I definitely wouldn’t.

This

sharkstale · 04/01/2026 11:12

Protect your house

NewYearSameYou · 04/01/2026 11:07

You need legal advice and a good will to protect your son.

billiongulls · 04/01/2026 11:06

Definitely legal advice on this

Bellyblueboy · 04/01/2026 11:06

OP please get legal advice.

I agree with posters that it is odd that someone has reached his stage in life without assets. You say he has good earning potential - does that mean he isn’t earning now? What do you know about his salary and outgoing? Do you live together now and does he contribute?

rc22 · 04/01/2026 11:06

DaisyChain505 · 04/01/2026 09:31

I disagree with previous posters. If this post was written by a male saying they had purchased a house then met a woman and they now had a child together and he was wanting to protect the house against her having claim in the future people would be saying what scum he was and that the mother of his child should be entitled to be legally an equal owner/on the mortage etc.

Also if a woman was on here writing a post saying she’d had a baby with a man who owned a house and he was being cautious about her moving in/being on the mortgage etc people would be saying she was well within her right to have that and her partner was an asshole.

It can’t be double standards just because the OP is a woman in this situation.

You’re either a family and a team or you’re not.

Edited

I do see where you're coming from but it's women who go through pregnancy and give birth then generally sacrifice more of their career, earning potential, time and energy to bring up children. Expecting a man/father to ensure that his wife will have a secure home should the relationship go wrong or the woman/mother defend some of the assets she earned before rearing children isn't necessarily unreasonable.

socks1107 · 04/01/2026 11:06

A house becomes a marital asset. Once you are married and put any length into that marriage it’ll be a an asset that will would be divided upon divorce

MadamCholetsbonnet · 04/01/2026 11:05

Why are you marrying him? I definitely wouldn’t.

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 11:04

RandomUsernameHere · 04/01/2026 11:02

I wouldn’t get married in your situation, but if you do make sure you get a good lawyer to update your will so that your children are protected. This is especially important for your first child. Sorry if this comes across as a bit cynical or over cautious.

I don't think there is anything unhealthy about cynicism in these situations, it's huge sums of money at stake and its so easy for the heart to overtake the head.

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 11:02

BadgernTheGarden · 04/01/2026 10:56

I think you can have unequal ownership of the house, so for instance you could have 3/4 share and him 1/4 share rather than 50:50.

Yes, you can be TIC with unequal shares, however, you would have to accept potentially loosing the house in the case of a split as it may have to be sold, and after costs that could leave you in a smaller home.

RandomUsernameHere · 04/01/2026 11:02

I wouldn’t get married in your situation, but if you do make sure you get a good lawyer to update your will so that your children are protected. This is especially important for your first child. Sorry if this comes across as a bit cynical or over cautious.

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 11:01

sittingonabeach · 04/01/2026 10:52

@DeftWasp maybe OP got more from a previous marriage and her new partner got less. Maybe partner is retraining hence having earning potential.

The could be a dozen good reasons, but as they say in business "due dilligence" is needed to find out the situation ahead of time.

BadgernTheGarden · 04/01/2026 10:56

ThisMintHouse · 04/01/2026 09:32

@Sugarsugarcane thank you. How do I protect the initial investment but also move forward? Do you mean buy a new home together and keep the current one?

I think you can have unequal ownership of the house, so for instance you could have 3/4 share and him 1/4 share rather than 50:50.

sittingonabeach · 04/01/2026 10:52

@DeftWasp maybe OP got more from a previous marriage and her new partner got less. Maybe partner is retraining hence having earning potential.

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 10:49

C152 · 04/01/2026 10:47

Marriage is a business contract. We should be more upfront/clear about that. You wouldn't sign a business contract without doing due diligence and agreeing terms first. I would say the same if it was a man looking to protect his only financial asset, as the OP wishes to do. We're not talking about a billionaire demanding his future wife ask for pin money. We're talking about a previously single parent who has managed to buy her own property, to create a secure home and financial safety net for herself and her children. The OP's partner has not been able to do the same, but now wants to take advantage of her hard work.

YANBU OP. This needs to be sorted out well before you get married. Don't just plough ahead and hope that things will somehow work themselves out. If you can't agree finances now, it's not going to get any better once you're married. Speak to a qualified, independent advisor about your options, take time to think about them and decide what you want, then discuss this with your partner. If you can't reach an agreement, then marriage isn't right for either of you.

And the big question has to be WHY the man here hasn't been able to do the same, especially if he earns more than her.

He may be a lovely chap, but is he feckless with money? why has he not got a foothold on financial security where she has?

DeftWasp · 04/01/2026 10:47

Eyeshadow · 04/01/2026 10:44

But then why get married?

And what will be different with a will that ensures he’s provided for in death - which will likely mean the house has to be sold anyway?

And if she died next year, how would she ensure her new child has a home for the next 18years.

If they didn’t have a shared child then it would be different, but they do.

I think you get married for the sole purpose of sharing assets or you don’t get married and just get life insurance instead.

We would be telling OP to marry her DP to protect herself and child if anything were to happen to him.

That's easy, life insurance to clear mortgage - will trust for partner vesting the the child at a given age.