Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be confused by the two working parent set up

540 replies

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 11:26

As I return to work from my Christmas break I return to the same conundrum I've been having since kids were born...
...that is confusion at how to handle my multiple roles in life.

I can't help but think that in my mother's generation they had to do the same stuff as us, but with no work. And, there was more of a community to fall back on too - she could get the neighbours to watch us if needed, relatives had more time to visit and play with us, etc. But she had time, to keep herself healthy and to keep us healthy.

Now it feels like a lot of us work in careers which are not conducive to taking long career breaks or going part time. Or, we can't afford to. So we end up juggling everything that comes with having a family with work. My partner does lots but it feels like two people splitting three jobs between them (work, children, house) is more of a stretch and a juggle and I wish every day that I could just focus on the house and kids.

I feel resentful that if I hire a nanny or a baby sitter or get family to help, they'd just play with the kids, feed them lunch, and maybe wash up after lunch wheeras I'd be doing all of that plus the food shop, house cleaning, admin, cooking dinner, washing, homework etc etc simultaneously, and if I wanted to hire someone to truly replace my roles it would take 2-3 people just to do the home stuff let alone work.

But this could just be how I'm handling life! I have a chronic condition so potentially have less energy than the general population, I do handle it a lot better when I'm not flaring.

OP posts:
Peridoteage · 03/01/2026 08:43

The window of time in which it was common for working class women to not work was extremely brief in the context of mankind.

Women have always worked! In the past women were in service, in agriculture, they were bakers, cleaners, seamstresses, brewers.

What has really changed is how much effort/attention we expect children to be given, and the segregation between home & the workplace.

In the past women often had children with them while working - babies strapped on backs while in the field etc, or fitted work like spinning or weaving around family life.

Children were also "let loose" at younger ages. 3 or 4 year olds out and about minded by older kids, none with anything like the helicopter parenting we have today. Older children were starting to learn trades from 12 and childhood was short.

Also - even my grandmother worked part time in a shop and she had far fewer labour saving inventions:

  • no fridge or freezer, so shopped more often as food didn't keep
  • no huge supermarkets delivering food, she went to the butcher, fishmonger, grocer, greengrocer, all separate.
  • fewer affordable ready made clothes so she made a lot of clothes for herself & kids.
  • no good vacuum cleaner (and certainly no robot hoover!)
  • clothes washing & drying took far more time
  • no convenient appliances like microwaves, air fryers etc

That said, you didnt need to go to the gym to stay slim because you walked everywhere and did more physical work.

I think social media often gives us the impression we are supposed to have vast amounts of leisure time spent on beauty regimes, extensive exercise, holidaying, socialising. I don't think this has been the case for most (apart from a very tiny wealthy minority) for most of mankind's history.

Katypp · 03/01/2026 06:24

IDontHateRainbows · 03/01/2026 00:09

I was actually alive in the 70s/80s so know what it was like in my family/ community at least and the standard of living wasn't that different to now in my experience.

Maybe my parents were ahead of their time or had a bit more money than average, but I'm posting from experience not conjecture.

Really? I was alive in the 70s and 80s too - as I said in my post - and my childhood bore no relation to today at all.
Eating out has massively expanded compared to then, when it really only existed in restaurants and cafes. My grandmother had a pub until 1976 and was considered ahead of her time because she offered sandwiches!
Takeaways were unusual too -McD's didn't come to the UK until 1974 and it was definately the 80s before it expanded to my city.
Beyond swimming and Brownies, activities weren't a thing either - i remember my friend going to gymnastics and ballet too but I remember her mum had to really track them down and had to drive her to the next town (she was the only one in my group whose mother could drive AND had her own car. Her family was pretty wealthy compared to the rest of us). 'Incidental' activities such as soft play, farms, role-playing cafes etc were only really beginning to be a thing when I had my first child in 1993.
Even my wealthier friend's family holidayed in the UK and her mum made all her clothes. Foreign travel did exist of course, but it wasn't normalised the xray it is now.
If you honestly think your 70s childhood was the same as a 2020s childhood you must either know no young families or the ones you do know are unusual.
Or you must have been brought up in a region massively ahead of its time!

IDontHateRainbows · 03/01/2026 00:09

Katypp · 02/01/2026 14:16

A good standard of living in the 1970s or 80s was nothing at all like what is considered a good standard of living now. It's like comparing apples with pears.
As I said upthread (and I think my family was fairly typical of the time) my mum was very much a housewife who looked after my sister and I at the same time. Others have said they played out and went to other's houses - we all did, because that was pretty much all there was to do in our village. My mother (and all my friends were the same) felt no obligation to entertain us or arrange trips out, soft play, parks, lunches out, visits, after-school activities, swimming, playdates or any of the other things expected for today's children.
My sister and I shared a room and my mum did not drive (both frowned upon today).
School holidays, except for the two weeks summer family holiday in a caravan in the UK, would have cost my parents nothing at all, as we were expected to entertain ourselves and our parents were not interested in us being bored because that was regarded as just one of those things.
Unless today's working parents are prepared to go back to a similar life, where we were warn, fed, clean and cared for but not entertained, moaning that they can't afford to have a SAHP parent today is a false comparison. Expectations are a LOT higher now, so anyone considering giving up work to SAH is having to find cash to cover a much higher base cost than our parents did.

I was actually alive in the 70s/80s so know what it was like in my family/ community at least and the standard of living wasn't that different to now in my experience.

Maybe my parents were ahead of their time or had a bit more money than average, but I'm posting from experience not conjecture.

Logisticalqueen · 02/01/2026 23:53

RecordBreakers · 02/01/2026 17:04

Maybe in the 1950s or some of the 60s, but the OP's mother is only in her 60s herself ! My generation. Trust me, house prices shot up when me and my peers were trying to buy. Those who had tried to buy on their own, took in lodgers to keep afloat. People needed two salaries to pay their way when we were young adults too.

Absolutely not ignoring the fact this is a difficult and exhausting time of life for young parents, but I AM disputing that this is a new thing for people with young children in 2025 (well 26 now).

What age were you when you bought your first house? In the UK, house prices crashed / slumped by 37% between 1989 - 1995.

CelestialCandyfloss · 02/01/2026 23:29

Try being a single parent. And my mum also went out to work as well.

TheignT · 02/01/2026 22:37

Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:29

Ah that must have been hard!
Washing my hair I manage. It's longer stuff I should be doing to manage my condition such as working out, having massages etc that I'm not sure how to fit in.

I didn't feel like I needed to work out, no car, dashing for the bus to work after taking kids to nursery or school, carrying the weekly shop home, no washing machine with first two so hand washing, helping to run beavers and cubs. Life was a workout.

Never thought about massages, back in the 70s I don't think I knew anyone who had massages. I dont know how I had the energy. Managed a part-time degree amidst that lot. I honestly dont know how.

reluctantbrit · 02/01/2026 22:37

Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:00

Sounds like it's working wonderfully :)
Yeh that's what I miss about the village, not so much childcare but other families being out and about to hang out with

That's strange. When I was on maternity leave in 2007/2008 most of the mums I met went back part-time.

When DD started primary school in another part of our town most of the mums were SAHMs and were constantly out for playdates, coffees, meeting in the playground.

I actually felt a lot more lonely then. During nursery times I had a big group of other p/t mums to meet for playdates at weekends or if our days off were the same.

About teens needing you: I found that school involvment decreased. Maybe the odd play or a concert if your child is musical and one parent evening per year. But emotionally they are a lot less stable. DD needed plenty of parental support to navigate teen-angst and friendship issues.

Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:29

SixtySomething · 02/01/2026 22:25

I'm a similar age to your Mum. I did have a job, but I didn't know anyone else who did. Older women were quite happy to tell me I should be at home with my children.

I would have hated that too! It feels like it should be a choice either way.

OP posts:
Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:29

TheignT · 02/01/2026 22:23

I worked full-time with four kids, when the youngest was a baby DH became disabled so I was his carer as well. Still managed to wash my hair most mornings.

Ah that must have been hard!
Washing my hair I manage. It's longer stuff I should be doing to manage my condition such as working out, having massages etc that I'm not sure how to fit in.

OP posts:
Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:27

Inthewrongtimezone · 02/01/2026 22:17

It's interesting that you say that, as it hasn't been my experience.

My mother gave up work when she had her first child at the age of 28. She never had another paid job for the rest of her life.

I gave up work when I had my first baby in my early 20s. I didn't work outside the home for the next six years. After that I worked part-time in the evenings, after DH got home from work so he could take over with the children. I had various other part-time jobs over the following 15 years, and finally returned to full-time work when my youngest child left home for university.

When my children were young, there were other children living nearby and their mums didn't work either. We did help each other out from time to time with babysitting, play dates etc.
There was very little childcare provision available. There were a few childminders but very few had vacancies. There was a private nursery school, but that was only for children over the age of 3 and only for 6 hours a day during term-time (and very expensive). There were a couple of playgroups, for children aged 2.5 up to school age, but we mothers had to work there on a rotor basis as volunteers. There was a toddler group, for babies aged 9 months up to 2.5 years, which was held one afternoon a week but mothers had to attend with their children.

Almost all of the mums that I knew in the late 1970s and early 1980s didn't consider going back to work until their youngest child started junior school. It just wasn't possible before then because of the lack of available childcare. Many children were looked after by older siblings until mum got home from work.

Yeh this has been closer to my experience than most of the replies on this thread. Even now, more than half of my peers are SAHMs and quite a lot homeschool. Must just be the sort of area I live in

OP posts:
SixtySomething · 02/01/2026 22:25

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 11:58

Mum is in her late 60s. I dunno, it was quite normal for her, my aunt, MIL, other in laws, not to be working when their kids were young

I'm a similar age to your Mum. I did have a job, but I didn't know anyone else who did. Older women were quite happy to tell me I should be at home with my children.

TheignT · 02/01/2026 22:23

I worked full-time with four kids, when the youngest was a baby DH became disabled so I was his carer as well. Still managed to wash my hair most mornings.

Tammygirl12 · 02/01/2026 22:22

You’re not wrong OP. We found it incredibly challenging to have neither of us focused on the children or house (cooking, cleaning, admin). It was stressful. It’s smoother since he earns and I am sahm (to 3 small children).

when I was a working parent to 1 DC, I would finish meetings at 5:30, be last parent to collect from nursery at 6:10 (closed at 6). Rushed home found all the food was out of date in the fridge, beans on toast, bath and toddler to bed. Barely saw them and felt like I was on the verge of collapse

Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:18

cinnamongirl123 · 02/01/2026 13:59

Fully agree OP. Our mothers’ generation where one parent didn’t work outside the home had it so much easier. The current set-up where both need to work is utter shite. It is destroying my life. Even with a supportive partner who carries his weight, it’s all too much. The only people it works for are those with lots of free help from family, or who have enough money to buy in help (cleaners, nannies, ready meals, takeaways etc). For those of us without family help or money, the amount of tasks is just ridiculous: full-time work + commute, children (a monumentally huge category), housework/chores/shopping/cooking/cleaning/pets/etc, life admin (again, huge category - finances, medical etc). Then there are things like Christmas and birthdays which are just huge additional tasks. Then maintaining a relationship with partner, never mind friends. Never mind looking after myself (hair gets washed every 3 weeks if im lucky), no time for fitness, reading etc. Then my retired mum and mil tell me I look stressed and should make sure to have regular “me-time”. Me-time!!?? When??!! ARGHH

Exactly this!!!

OP posts:
Inthewrongtimezone · 02/01/2026 22:17

IllAdvised · 30/12/2025 12:03

Yes. The vast majority of women with children have always worked. Mn seems to have a weird sociological blind spot where a disproportionate number of posters think women were rosy-cheeked SAHMs with not a thought in their heads outside Kinder, Küche, Kirche because of the Stalwart Providers they’d married, until nasty old feminism ruined the idyll.

It's interesting that you say that, as it hasn't been my experience.

My mother gave up work when she had her first child at the age of 28. She never had another paid job for the rest of her life.

I gave up work when I had my first baby in my early 20s. I didn't work outside the home for the next six years. After that I worked part-time in the evenings, after DH got home from work so he could take over with the children. I had various other part-time jobs over the following 15 years, and finally returned to full-time work when my youngest child left home for university.

When my children were young, there were other children living nearby and their mums didn't work either. We did help each other out from time to time with babysitting, play dates etc.
There was very little childcare provision available. There were a few childminders but very few had vacancies. There was a private nursery school, but that was only for children over the age of 3 and only for 6 hours a day during term-time (and very expensive). There were a couple of playgroups, for children aged 2.5 up to school age, but we mothers had to work there on a rotor basis as volunteers. There was a toddler group, for babies aged 9 months up to 2.5 years, which was held one afternoon a week but mothers had to attend with their children.

Almost all of the mums that I knew in the late 1970s and early 1980s didn't consider going back to work until their youngest child started junior school. It just wasn't possible before then because of the lack of available childcare. Many children were looked after by older siblings until mum got home from work.

Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:08

Blizzardofleaves · 02/01/2026 07:02

Op I am white British and I grew up exactly the same as you. So your life definitely is not cultural or unusual, we had exactly the same experience. And the stats reflect that.

Not a single mother in our whole area worked until the children were at least 10/11 at the earliest. My grandmother worked part time. My mother spent her days shiopping for food (1970s) so having to go to individual shops, cooking, washing and seeing neighbours. She would garden and sew our clothes, and bake bread and did not stop!

My grandmother was the same, and everyone around us was the same. We played in each others houses and in the fields. There were so many neighbours and parents around, we were very safe.

I totally understand where you are coming from. Many parents are doing all of above plus 40 hours of paid work!! It’s bloody impossible tbh, and the burn out comes later.

In our case, we found having teens required much more hands on, present parenting than at any time when they were younger. It also coincides with the menopause, parental decline etc.

Op, I think I share your condition from what you have said and you need to do less. Male a plan for the future that allows time for you to manage your condition. You are not the same as everyone else and shouldn’t be expected to try and do the same as them.

You need time to swim, stretch and care for yourself and this needs to built into your future life, as an essential, not as an after thought.

Find ways to reduce your work load to something manageable, even if this means changing your lifestyle.

I think most women are doing way, way too much and only we can say enough is enough. And mean it.

Edited

Thank you for this, I was beginning to wonder whether I'd imagined my childhood!
There were so many neighbours and parents around, we were very safe.

Exactly this! And it wasn't so insular so our overall mental health seemed better.

Interesting re teen years needing more. I've been working under the assumption I'll be needed less!

You're totally right, I really need time to look after my body if I'm going to get on top of my condition and I just don't know where to fit it all in.

OP posts:
Angels1111 · 02/01/2026 22:00

Cienna · 01/01/2026 19:07

I’m a working mum with 2 primary aged children and a 1 year old, although only part time (I have been full time) it wouldn’t be worth our while financially for me to be full time really and I wouldn’t want to be. Financially it can be a struggle at times and we don’t have the holidays and days out most people seem to have but it’s preferable. Our children go to nursery/childminders when I’m working so they are in effect taking a big chunk of the workload off me so I never quite understand when people say as working mothers do work on top of everything a stay at home mother does. I’ve been at home over the Christmas holidays as have hardly had change to do anything what with the one year old as she’s been very grizzly unless distracted whereas when she’s at nursery she’s very happy as plenty of distractions all day long and then tonight when she’s asleep I’ve got all the work created by having the kids at home all day to clean up too. I think working part time I get more of a break as when I’m on annual leave our 1 year old still does usual days at nursery which gives me chance to clean the whole house. Before I went back to work I never got that opportunity.
As for the village, it’s something I miss hugely but not for the childcare, but just to be able to hang out together with other people with the kids (as I did years ago when our oldest was little) to have a relative cook you a nice meal once in a while or an uncle show your child how to play the guitar. We don’t seem to have any of that anymore due to illness, relocations etc. I do think people who are wanting a village to provide the regular childcare for when they are working are rather entitled, not everyone wants to look after other people’s children and there are plenty of commercial options out there

Edited

Sounds like it's working wonderfully :)
Yeh that's what I miss about the village, not so much childcare but other families being out and about to hang out with

OP posts:
TheignT · 02/01/2026 17:30

Butchyrestingface · 02/01/2026 17:18

It was my dad who did the lone walks in the post the PP was responding to. My first thought when he told me was that the level of traffic in the late 1940s would have been significantly lower too than present day.

Just as well, otherwise there would have been no me!

Generally the traffic would have been lower but not for me as I lived on a very busy road so I walked with heavier traffic than my kids did in the 90s just because of where we lived. Some local 11 year olds who lived nearby would walk me to school when I was 4 or 5. My mother would give them some money for the sweet shop on Fridays. I'm not sure if that was a plan or just sort of happened. After reception I would just be part of a pack of kids larking about on a busy road. Probably a miracle we survived.

My sibling was born the week I started school, I think my dad took me the first day but I don't really remember the details, just remember ferling very scared and alone.

Butchyrestingface · 02/01/2026 17:18

TheignT · 02/01/2026 15:40

I think the difference was most of us did it, most kids went to the local school so you generally weren't alone. Even if you didn't really know the other kids they were there all around you. I think there were also lots more crossing patrols than we have now so more interested adults around.

It was my dad who did the lone walks in the post the PP was responding to. My first thought when he told me was that the level of traffic in the late 1940s would have been significantly lower too than present day.

Just as well, otherwise there would have been no me!

RecordBreakers · 02/01/2026 17:04

IDontHateRainbows · 02/01/2026 07:12

I think it was a lot easier for some women to not work, as a single income from a professional job by the man enabled the standard of living you need 2 incomes for these days. But not all women or those in poorer income families.

Maybe in the 1950s or some of the 60s, but the OP's mother is only in her 60s herself ! My generation. Trust me, house prices shot up when me and my peers were trying to buy. Those who had tried to buy on their own, took in lodgers to keep afloat. People needed two salaries to pay their way when we were young adults too.

Absolutely not ignoring the fact this is a difficult and exhausting time of life for young parents, but I AM disputing that this is a new thing for people with young children in 2025 (well 26 now).

dynamiccactus · 02/01/2026 16:40

I am in my early 50s and my mum worked part-time from when I was 6. She didn't care for having to ask my dad for money to buy a pair of tights.

If mums have their own money, dads can't be nearly as abusive or irresponsible.

AndSoitComesAroundAgain · 02/01/2026 16:34

Logisticalqueen · 02/01/2026 16:14

Okay, I’ve done neither of these. Authoritative Parenting al the way for me!

Me too. I did notice dh and I were swaying a bit into permissive however, so had to steer it back again. I also reminded him of the best likely foundation to nurture the most successful adults.

Logisticalqueen · 02/01/2026 16:14

Logisticalqueen · 02/01/2026 15:54

This!

Although I have no idea what permissive or gentle parenting is. I’ll chatGPT. I have two great kids and worked full time throughout so maybe I fall into one of these brackets.

Okay, I’ve done neither of these. Authoritative Parenting al the way for me!

Logisticalqueen · 02/01/2026 16:02

I believe this all began when women fought for equality. Now my kids are older (17, 14) I’m so glad they did, but when my kids were in primary years I hated those women 😂.

Equality gave us females freedom to work in fields desired, rather than be housebound with kids. This led to more income for each couple, which led to couples being able to buy more expensive houses (as wages combined), which led to both adults having to work full time to keep up the repayments, then chuck the kids in. Nightmare!

ChersHandbag · 02/01/2026 15:55

Interesting thread. I was married until my kids were 5 & 7, jigged my career around picking them up etc. Now as a lone parent (with them a few years older) I still do this. I cook from scratch and take them outside a lot. No family, but a whole village of helpful mums nearby who I reciprocally help. The house is a bit of a tip, we have very basic stuff, kids share a room, no car, but are healthy and happy. I am a lecturer. The village who stepped in when I got divorced have been my salvation, really. That and leaning back a little on my career, turning it more into 'work'. I'm doing well, look young for my years and have a spring in my step. The kids are happy and healthy. I guess we live a kind of 80s standard life #geriatricmillennialrepresent

What I'm saying is I think the solution is prioritising the bits that matter to you and make you happy.

Sorry, edited to say: yes it is very, very hard.