Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be confused by the two working parent set up

540 replies

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 11:26

As I return to work from my Christmas break I return to the same conundrum I've been having since kids were born...
...that is confusion at how to handle my multiple roles in life.

I can't help but think that in my mother's generation they had to do the same stuff as us, but with no work. And, there was more of a community to fall back on too - she could get the neighbours to watch us if needed, relatives had more time to visit and play with us, etc. But she had time, to keep herself healthy and to keep us healthy.

Now it feels like a lot of us work in careers which are not conducive to taking long career breaks or going part time. Or, we can't afford to. So we end up juggling everything that comes with having a family with work. My partner does lots but it feels like two people splitting three jobs between them (work, children, house) is more of a stretch and a juggle and I wish every day that I could just focus on the house and kids.

I feel resentful that if I hire a nanny or a baby sitter or get family to help, they'd just play with the kids, feed them lunch, and maybe wash up after lunch wheeras I'd be doing all of that plus the food shop, house cleaning, admin, cooking dinner, washing, homework etc etc simultaneously, and if I wanted to hire someone to truly replace my roles it would take 2-3 people just to do the home stuff let alone work.

But this could just be how I'm handling life! I have a chronic condition so potentially have less energy than the general population, I do handle it a lot better when I'm not flaring.

OP posts:
MadinMarch · 30/12/2025 13:39

SuziQuinto · 30/12/2025 13:01

But many did. And had to.
No "golden age" for most women.

'Golden age for women'? What golden age for women??? It really wasn't!
Social mores and values meant women often stayed in unhappy and often abusive relationships; They were severely judged and suffered poverty conditions if they did leave their marriages; men often just stopped seeing their children altogether, and also didn't pay any maintenance at all; women weren't encouraged to go to university/ further education so were stuck in low paid work, often 'cash in hand' like domestic cleaning, delivering leaflets etc; sexism and misogyny was rife; the equal pay act didn't even come in til 1975, and even when it did, wasn't adhered to...
Honestly, I could go on and on, but suffice to say there was no 'Golden Age' for women in the last century.

Badbadbunny · 30/12/2025 13:38

fishtank12345 · 30/12/2025 13:29

Good point. But... the village could have adapted as the years went on naturally.

I think fragmentation of society meant that was never going to happen. Long gone are the days where you could work and shop within walking distance of home. With centralisation, retail revolution, phone/email customer service, etc., jobs and shops are now much further away from where people live, hence long commutes, cars needed in lots of places to do the simplest of things, etc. Add in the drive for 50% to go to Uni which meant that 18year olds now tend to move to different cities for 3 years and then often never return to their home towns, mean the "extended" family simply doesn't exist anymore for lots of people. Organisations re-organising and shutting down means people have had to relocate for work, again, leaving what little "extended family" they had behind.

Even with my son, not a single child from his secondary school lived in the same village as us, so he literally had no one to "walk" to play with or socialise with in his school year group. Everything he wanted to do involved us driving him there/back to his school friends' houses. That just put added workload onto us to ferry him around. (It's not even a small village - 7,000 inhabitants, more of a small town!).

Hankunamatata · 30/12/2025 13:38

Different stages bring different stresses. I had to go pt due to kids needs. We won't have amazing pensions or large house but have had relatively less stress than friends who work ft.

However as kids get older (teens) my work friends full time working is paying off. Bigger pension, more avaliable money, being able to retire earlier. So swings and round abouts

fishtank12345 · 30/12/2025 13:38

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:26

This is something I'm very aware of but am not sure what to do about it . I'm.scared of taking lots of time off sick for it but I think I need to look into how people manage chronic illness with work and figure out a plan, because it's the main squeeze at the moment and that would be the case even if I was totally single with zero commitments

Its a hard life not being eligible for dla when you have an invisible illness like cfs... people just don't understand what its like ... until its them.

Monvelo · 30/12/2025 13:37

My mum was working in the civil service when she got pregnant and was made to leave! As a married woman, then pregnant, she wasn't allowed to work there. This wasn't that long ago either, she's only early 60s.

Personally if I could jettison something off it would be the housework, not my job! I wouldn't want to be a sahm myself. Although I do look forward to retiring!!!

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:36

Brefugee · 30/12/2025 13:33

helpful to include that in the OP?

Honestly didn't realise it was relevant, sorry!

OP posts:
Octavia64 · 30/12/2025 13:35

Badbadbunny · 30/12/2025 13:28

I don't think that's the full picture. The big thing is that both partners working has increased housing costs, which has meant that both partners now NEED to work to afford to buy/rent a house (unless on benefits). So the rich people are the ones who've benefitted, i.e. those with houses or land who've sold at many times higher prices than they bought for. That's basically the older generation who were lucky enough to already own a house (or eligible for huge discount for buying their council house), and the financiers funding housing developments etc.

I'm not actually sure that men have benefitted that much. Most still go to work, as they used to do, and many continue to have little involvement with the drudgery of the house and children, like they never used to too! I don't really think that the life of the average man has changed much at all really. I don't doubt that women have it harder because of juggling childcare with a career (rather than a job), but I don't see that men have benefitted from that change at all really. In fact, I think men are more likely to be more involved with their children these days and maybe more involved with the house work too, as there's societal pressure on them to help out the "working" woman.

Edited

Fifty percent of mothers worked in the 1970s

seventy five percent of mothers work now.

that’s not what has driven the housing boom.

there are a lot of other factors.

my own parents couldn’t afford to buy a house where they grew up and had to move north and both work in order to get a mortgage and that was in 1977.

since then there has been right to buy, very little building, significant immigration and smaller households.

Brefugee · 30/12/2025 13:33

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 12:00

We're Indian, maybe different cultural expectations

helpful to include that in the OP?

Clockyclockz · 30/12/2025 13:33

Yes despite other posters claiming 95% of mothers worked f/t in the past 😆

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:33

Agrumpyknitter · 30/12/2025 13:30

Did you grow up in India? We’re Indian but born in the U.K. My mother had to work, she was 12 when she came over here. My grandmother also had to find a job to support her family when they emigrated over from Malaysia. Relatives on my father’s side who were still in India were doctors who worked but had access to cheap Labour (maids, cook, drivers and had a big house) in India and they lived with grandparents so kids were looked after/supervised by them. But again cheap Labour to do all household things).

We grew up in the UK.

OP posts:
reluctantbrit · 30/12/2025 13:32

Different generations had different lives.

My grandma didn't work so she could babysit my cousin if needed, hardly any female worked when married unless it was a family business.

I do have photos of me in a playpen because my mum cooked/did laundry/cleaned and I was out of the way. She was glad when I was in pre-school and she had less to worry about.

Today most women work and I know plenty who aren't retired and don't have time to do childcare or even ad-hoc helping. With loss of social safety net and high rising costs, you need two incomes.

But - my dad was hardly a hands-on one until I was around 7-8. He taught me a lot of practical things but hardly anthing in day-to-day life or school work or did housework. My aunts had their own lives and families to worry about.

DH on the other hand parents DD since she is born, bedtime, bath, changing, feeding (apart form 6 months breastfeeding). He attended school events, helped with homework, sorted out medical issues, took her out on his own in the school holidays
DH is not helping me, he does housework because we are a family living together.

It's not so much that "the village" is missing, it's that men haven't stepped up enough to do things automatically instead of women telling them they have to help.

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:32

Clockyclockz · 30/12/2025 13:31

@B0bbingalong I know hardly any mums who work f/t, equally know very few who don’t work at all. The vast majority of my friends, family & colleagues work p/t & have done since having dc.

But in recent years more mothers are working f/t

”In 2010-2011, 25% of all mothers were working full-time and by 2022 this had increased to 41%”

Wow that's a huge difference re women working ft

OP posts:
Greencactusgirl · 30/12/2025 13:32

SuziQuinto · 30/12/2025 12:33

Also, nowadays maternity leaves are longer (quite rightly). I only got 6 weeks on full pay, then took another 6 weeks. There was no adjustment at work, or right to reduce hours.
Fortunately, some things have changed for the better.

Yes - i worked in the NHS and when I had my children (1980’s) you had to start maternity leave at 28 weeks pregnant. My first baby was born in April and I had to start back at work in August.

Clockyclockz · 30/12/2025 13:31

@B0bbingalong I know hardly any mums who work f/t, equally know very few who don’t work at all. The vast majority of my friends, family & colleagues work p/t & have done since having dc.

But in recent years more mothers are working f/t

”In 2010-2011, 25% of all mothers were working full-time and by 2022 this had increased to 41%”

Agrumpyknitter · 30/12/2025 13:30

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 12:00

We're Indian, maybe different cultural expectations

Did you grow up in India? We’re Indian but born in the U.K. My mother had to work, she was 12 when she came over here. My grandmother also had to find a job to support her family when they emigrated over from Malaysia. Relatives on my father’s side who were still in India were doctors who worked but had access to cheap Labour (maids, cook, drivers and had a big house) in India and they lived with grandparents so kids were looked after/supervised by them. But again cheap Labour to do all household things).

fishtank12345 · 30/12/2025 13:29

RitaFires · 30/12/2025 12:49

I think that expectations around parenting and actively supervising children have changed so much that the old ideas of the village don't apply. I'm 41 and I would go out and play and walk to and from various friend's houses, our parents didn't necessarily know where we were and what we were doing. I remember going places with other families where children sat on each others laps and some sat in the boot, completely illegal now. My brother used to be sent to the shop several busy streets away to buy cigarettes for my Nana, he was 7, that absolutely wouldn't fly today.

Good point. But... the village could have adapted as the years went on naturally.

B0bbingalong · 30/12/2025 13:29

I think you're rare and not the norm, or certainly in my world. I work full time and know one other mother who does, and in my childhood I didnt know one full time working mum

B0bbingalong · 30/12/2025 13:28

Theeyeballsinthesky · 30/12/2025 11:53

I can't help but think that in my mother's generation they had to do the same stuff as us, but with no work

id love to know when this mythical time was! My mum is in her 70s and worked full time with 3 children. I'm in my 50s and work full time and always have

I think you're rare and not the norm, or certainly in my world. I work full time and know one other mother who does, and in my childhood I didnt know one full time working mum

Badbadbunny · 30/12/2025 13:28

Uptownwalking · 30/12/2025 13:20

Women fought for equal rights but in many cases have just doubled their workload. If you break it down it is men that have benefitted.

I don't think that's the full picture. The big thing is that both partners working has increased housing costs, which has meant that both partners now NEED to work to afford to buy/rent a house (unless on benefits). So the rich people are the ones who've benefitted, i.e. those with houses or land who've sold at many times higher prices than they bought for. That's basically the older generation who were lucky enough to already own a house (or eligible for huge discount for buying their council house), and the financiers funding housing developments etc.

I'm not actually sure that men have benefitted that much. Most still go to work, as they used to do, and many continue to have little involvement with the drudgery of the house and children, like they never used to too! I don't really think that the life of the average man has changed much at all really. I don't doubt that women have it harder because of juggling childcare with a career (rather than a job), but I don't see that men have benefitted from that change at all really. In fact, I think men are more likely to be more involved with their children these days and maybe more involved with the house work too, as there's societal pressure on them to help out the "working" woman.

Brefugee · 30/12/2025 13:27

I can't help but think that in my mother's generation they had to do the same stuff as us, but with no work.

don't know what generation you come from but my mum and all my friend's mums worked. (I'm gen X)

We're all pretty much solidly middle to upper middle class.
However, i know from friends i have now who come from working class backgrounds that most of their mothers worked too, and from my mum's generation with working class roots all their mothers worked too.

There was a brief period where a lot more women could be the stay at home parent and live on one working parent's wage. But it was brief and it is over. Except for the wealthy/rich and people who can't get work or can't work for some reason.

The REAL revolution has been in getting men to step up.

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:26

MrFluffyDogIsMyBestFriend · 30/12/2025 13:23

My mum did work but she would still agree with you. My kids are 21 and 23 and I was a SAHM for a while and then worked 16 hours...which wasn't considered strange at that time although I was in a middle-class area.

I would be very careful you don't make your chronic condition worse. I'm autistic with autistic children so have never had much energy and I've had to put a lot of energy into helping my children. Now I have cfs and currently having PEM (post exertion malaise) to some degree, every afternoon, sometimes all day. I don't mean to make you feel worse but consider how things would be if you couldn't work at all. I know it's hard to make changes unless you're forced to but I would recommend tryingFlowers. This society is making women ill but no-one understands until it happens to them.

This is something I'm very aware of but am not sure what to do about it . I'm.scared of taking lots of time off sick for it but I think I need to look into how people manage chronic illness with work and figure out a plan, because it's the main squeeze at the moment and that would be the case even if I was totally single with zero commitments

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 30/12/2025 13:25

AllTheChaos · 30/12/2025 13:16

Remember that for a lot of women it wasn’t a ‘career break’ though, as most women didn’t get to HAVE careers. They had jobs, sure, but actual careers were much rarer. Going from a low level job, to a few years off being a mum, to back into a low level job, is easier than trying to get back into a professional career where things have moved on. I’m thinking about the kind of work women in my (working class) family did: cleaning, retail, piece work, that sort of thing. My kind of work (lawyer) was utterly unavailable to them.

Not strictly true. My mother was a teacher. I started working in the early 80s in an accountancy practice and we had a couple of qualified chartered accountants working there who were women with families. I was a special constable at the same time and our police station had a couple of female sergeants and a female inspector. I don't deny that there were less women in professional/career roles than today, but you can't say there were none. It was just harder.

Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:24

EnterQueene · 30/12/2025 13:23

I can't help but think that in my mother's generation they had to do the same stuff as us, but with no work

When was this? I am in my 50s & my mum is in her 80s. My mum always worked - admittedly she was more unusual in having a full time profession rather than a part time 'job' but not a complete outlier. Women have pretty much always worked - apart from a small privileged number. When do you think they didn't?

My mum is in her late 60s and her and most of my aunts, and in laws, didn't work until kids were in secondary

OP posts:
Angels1111 · 30/12/2025 13:23

Greencactusgirl · 30/12/2025 13:21

Childcare was definitely no easier for many of the previous generation. Most women, including myself worked. I had young children in the mid 1980’s-90’s and no family nearby to help. There was very little in the way of nursery places and no before/after school clubs. Most relied on childminders. Nobody I knew had a cleaner, so housework had to be done on days off. We made our own ‘village’ by sharing childcare with other women. So on my days off (I worked in NHS,so worked shifts , including nights) , I might be looking after someone else’s child/children as well as my own, which to be honest was often easier as they would entertain each other. Those who were teachers would help out in school holidays. Contrary to popular belief among some of the younger generation, fathers did a lot of childcare too. However, it was easier to afford a decent sized house.

That's really interesting thank you for sharing

OP posts:
MrFluffyDogIsMyBestFriend · 30/12/2025 13:23

My mum did work but she would still agree with you. My kids are 21 and 23 and I was a SAHM for a while and then worked 16 hours...which wasn't considered strange at that time although I was in a middle-class area.

I would be very careful you don't make your chronic condition worse. I'm autistic with autistic children so have never had much energy and I've had to put a lot of energy into helping my children. Now I have cfs and currently having PEM (post exertion malaise) to some degree, every afternoon, sometimes all day. I don't mean to make you feel worse but consider how things would be if you couldn't work at all. I know it's hard to make changes unless you're forced to but I would recommend tryingFlowers. This society is making women ill but no-one understands until it happens to them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread