Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How can it be right that you can get so much money on benefits?!?!

193 replies

TerrazzoChips · 27/12/2025 21:17

How on earth can this be right? Link

it doesn’t include disability benefits but does include housing allowance and childcare costs. But a single earner will also have those?

I despair and could honestly cry. I am genuinely considering having another child and dropping my hours. I would be better off. I hate this so much.

Forget working, how you could be better off on benefits under Labour!

Benefit-claiming parents who work as little as a day a week are set for bumper pay packets worth the equivalent of £140,000 next year - and it's all thanks to Labour's 'Benefit Street Budget'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15388599/better-benefits-labour-analysis-graphic.html

OP posts:
Fryth · 28/12/2025 14:49

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 13:01

People on UC can apply for up to 100% council tax support.
Regarding commuting - ppl on UC that I know have Freedom passes so I assumed anyone on UC has them. Turns out it's the case only if they are disabled. But they save a lot of money by just not going to work anyway, while commuting is not optional for working peoole and eats up a lot of their taxable income.
Saving for deposit and getting a mortgage free home takes decades if you don't get "help" from the family and you can't stop working during that period, and waiting for social housing takes just a few years. So I'm not surprised by the current situation.

Edited

This is completely dependent on the council. Most don’t do up to 100%.

youalright · 28/12/2025 14:48

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 13:01

People on UC can apply for up to 100% council tax support.
Regarding commuting - ppl on UC that I know have Freedom passes so I assumed anyone on UC has them. Turns out it's the case only if they are disabled. But they save a lot of money by just not going to work anyway, while commuting is not optional for working peoole and eats up a lot of their taxable income.
Saving for deposit and getting a mortgage free home takes decades if you don't get "help" from the family and you can't stop working during that period, and waiting for social housing takes just a few years. So I'm not surprised by the current situation.

Edited

This is completely local council dependant ours doesn't offer this i pay full council tax

Fryth · 28/12/2025 14:47

Peridoteage · 28/12/2025 14:42

You see people getting £2k or so a month. But a lot of of that is rent and /or childcare.

This is true.

But its important to recognise that someone earning £50k may also have to pay rent & childcare out of their post-tax pay, and may be left with less disposable income from working full time, than the benefit claimant working only a couple of days a week.

Of course this feels grossly unfair. The big issue is that wages are too low, while housing and childcare costs are too high.

What figures make this work? It is rubbish.

Fryth · 28/12/2025 14:45

You have a £1500pm mortgage. Who exactly is going to pay that when you go onto benefits?

Peridoteage · 28/12/2025 14:42

You see people getting £2k or so a month. But a lot of of that is rent and /or childcare.

This is true.

But its important to recognise that someone earning £50k may also have to pay rent & childcare out of their post-tax pay, and may be left with less disposable income from working full time, than the benefit claimant working only a couple of days a week.

Of course this feels grossly unfair. The big issue is that wages are too low, while housing and childcare costs are too high.

Coffeeandbooks88 · 28/12/2025 14:34

We have to pay council tax and claim UC. If only we didn't have to!

oldFoolMe · 28/12/2025 13:30

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 13:01

People on UC can apply for up to 100% council tax support.
Regarding commuting - ppl on UC that I know have Freedom passes so I assumed anyone on UC has them. Turns out it's the case only if they are disabled. But they save a lot of money by just not going to work anyway, while commuting is not optional for working peoole and eats up a lot of their taxable income.
Saving for deposit and getting a mortgage free home takes decades if you don't get "help" from the family and you can't stop working during that period, and waiting for social housing takes just a few years. So I'm not surprised by the current situation.

Edited

But if not working then they are benefit capped, so rely on the food banks i help run. Up to 100% is only for those on the breadline. The only people substantially better off on benefits is if you have a severely disabled child but I wouldn’t wish that on anyone. Your then stuck looking after a disabled child without the choice of work, and no pension at the end. I think at one point the benefit system was a lot more generous than is it now and with the cost of living I’m seeing more and more ordinary people needing help at the food banks .

TigerRag · 28/12/2025 13:15

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 13:01

People on UC can apply for up to 100% council tax support.
Regarding commuting - ppl on UC that I know have Freedom passes so I assumed anyone on UC has them. Turns out it's the case only if they are disabled. But they save a lot of money by just not going to work anyway, while commuting is not optional for working peoole and eats up a lot of their taxable income.
Saving for deposit and getting a mortgage free home takes decades if you don't get "help" from the family and you can't stop working during that period, and waiting for social housing takes just a few years. So I'm not surprised by the current situation.

Edited

Many of us have to pay CT regardless of income. I paid £21 a month on ESA. I now have to find another £60 now that I've changed to UC

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 13:01

oldFoolMe · 28/12/2025 10:08

But the uc claimant still has to pay CT, commuting and pension out if the take home, so if that is included its not comparable, where as the working person has the income, a pension and hopefully a mortgage free home in the long term. I would always choose to work and have a pension and mortgage, thinking of the future.

People on UC can apply for up to 100% council tax support.
Regarding commuting - ppl on UC that I know have Freedom passes so I assumed anyone on UC has them. Turns out it's the case only if they are disabled. But they save a lot of money by just not going to work anyway, while commuting is not optional for working peoole and eats up a lot of their taxable income.
Saving for deposit and getting a mortgage free home takes decades if you don't get "help" from the family and you can't stop working during that period, and waiting for social housing takes just a few years. So I'm not surprised by the current situation.

aCatCalledFawkes · 28/12/2025 12:46

TigerRag · 28/12/2025 11:41

You don't need to work 30 hours a week to claim UC. Some of us don't need to work and qualify

Obviously there are exceptions but lots of working people who are entitled to UC and are earning more than 10k a year.

TigerRag · 28/12/2025 12:10

TulipLavender · 28/12/2025 11:50

They found the scenario where the most possible money was given out on universal credit and it amounts to a disposable monthly income of £239 per person per month to cover food, utilities, clothes, travel and all essentials after childcare and housing - does anyone think that is overly generous?!!

Exactly. I'm on Facebook groups for universal credit. You see people getting £2k or so a month. But a lot of of that is rent and /or childcare.

Ifeellikechickentonightchickentonight · 28/12/2025 12:04

Well if this thread was started by a right wing grifter, it's backfired pretty spectacularly hasn't it.

JohnofWessex · 28/12/2025 11:50

A more obvious question might be

  1. Why isnt it possible to support a family on an average full time wage, and
  2. Given that houses cost no more to build in real terms than they did 90 odd years ago why are they now so expensive? Which is part of course to the answer for 1.
TulipLavender · 28/12/2025 11:50

TulipLavender · 28/12/2025 11:40

I cant believe that the Daily Mail are able to print such misinformation.

This fictional couple are earning the equivalent of 7.8 hours a week on minimum wage each, yet have 3 children in full-time childcare of which universal credit pays 85% so they are paying £4,650 a year to childcare on top of the £31,000 paid by UC.
Once all the housing amount goes to rent in the most expensive area in the country and the 31,000 plus the £4.6k they have to put in themselves to pay childcare they have a total of £14,350k (after the 15% cost of childcare has been paid for)a year or £1,195 a month to pay for food, council tax, water, electricity and gas, internet, clothes, travel, medicine etc for a family of 5 - they are scraping by and would unlikely be able to afford holidays, to run a car, days out, soft play - not a life i think many would be envious of.

Edited

They found the scenario where the most possible money was given out on universal credit and it amounts to a disposable monthly income of £239 per person per month to cover food, utilities, clothes, travel and all essentials after childcare and housing - does anyone think that is overly generous?!!

TigerRag · 28/12/2025 11:41

aCatCalledFawkes · 28/12/2025 10:57

I don't understand where that article gets it numbers from.
How can you only been earning 10k a year when to qualify for UC you have to be working 30hrs a week - which would be 30hrs a week at minimum wage. The more you earn the more benefits taper off. I have been on benefits are have worked my way up to being a high rate tax payer. I had very little when I was on benefits and was working pretty much full time.

You don't need to work 30 hours a week to claim UC. Some of us don't need to work and qualify

TulipLavender · 28/12/2025 11:40

I cant believe that the Daily Mail are able to print such misinformation.

This fictional couple are earning the equivalent of 7.8 hours a week on minimum wage each, yet have 3 children in full-time childcare of which universal credit pays 85% so they are paying £4,650 a year to childcare on top of the £31,000 paid by UC.
Once all the housing amount goes to rent in the most expensive area in the country and the 31,000 plus the £4.6k they have to put in themselves to pay childcare they have a total of £14,350k (after the 15% cost of childcare has been paid for)a year or £1,195 a month to pay for food, council tax, water, electricity and gas, internet, clothes, travel, medicine etc for a family of 5 - they are scraping by and would unlikely be able to afford holidays, to run a car, days out, soft play - not a life i think many would be envious of.

vodkaredbullgirl · 28/12/2025 11:01

Nice to see OP has come back.

Oh wait, no dumped and pissed off.

daisychain01 · 28/12/2025 11:00

BeforeSigourneyWeaverTheyWoveTheirOwnSigourneys · 27/12/2025 21:25

Why just have one more child?

Life is so super easy on benefits you could have quite a few kids.

If you stick around MN long enough you'll see everyone on benefits has fancy cars, multiple long haul holidays, all the latest tech....

You, too, could be living the dream.

Don't forget the infamous flat screen TV! Yay, what's not to like.

pointless trying to reason with someone whose source of information is the Daily Fail 🙄

Greenwitchart · 28/12/2025 11:00

You believe what the Daily Mail prints?

How sad.

aCatCalledFawkes · 28/12/2025 10:57

I don't understand where that article gets it numbers from.
How can you only been earning 10k a year when to qualify for UC you have to be working 30hrs a week - which would be 30hrs a week at minimum wage. The more you earn the more benefits taper off. I have been on benefits are have worked my way up to being a high rate tax payer. I had very little when I was on benefits and was working pretty much full time.

TheGrimSmile · 28/12/2025 10:51

Do it then, OP.

AllThePickledOnes · 28/12/2025 10:41

Ragebait by the DM.

All this shows is the cost of childcare and rent are too high.

Everyone needs a place to live, and not enough kids are being born in the UK... What is the DM's solution? Stop people having children and make them all homeless?

oldFoolMe · 28/12/2025 10:15

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 09:37

We have been asked to move out of rental twice in 3 years. Privately renting doesn't give you housing security either. And your friend will get her own home from council after a while and will live there stress-free.
Without having to work, saving for deposit for 10 years and then paying mortgage for 30 more years withought opportunity to stop doing so.

Edited

5 year waiting list for 3 bed house round near me, and they don’t do lifetime tenancy either so will be reassessed every 5 years.
What eventually comes available is Either a new build at £2000 a month affordable rent, or if your lucky and get an older house the rent may be half, but will have no flooring, riddled with issues and not usually in a nice area. However most UC claimant would not be able to rent a house at 2k a month as they ‘don’t earn enough’ to rent privately.

oldFoolMe · 28/12/2025 10:08

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 08:17

That's how much take home will have a working family on 70K combined after proudly paying their own way:
-25K rent
-14K income tax and pensions
-2K council tax
-1.5K commuting each

26K take home left with 2 parents working full time.The whole 2.5K a year more than 2 ppl having all their time to themselves.
And if it's a single parent earning 70K - it's even less - more like 21K due to higher income tax band.
That's why people are motivated to not work.

Edited

But the uc claimant still has to pay CT, commuting and pension out if the take home, so if that is included its not comparable, where as the working person has the income, a pension and hopefully a mortgage free home in the long term. I would always choose to work and have a pension and mortgage, thinking of the future.

JustAlice · 28/12/2025 09:37

YorkshirePuddingsGreatestFan · 28/12/2025 08:54

My friend rents and claims UC towards her rent. She doesn't earn enough to get a mortgage.

She was settled in a house as the owner was working abroad long term. He retired and wanted move back into his house, so she was given notice to leave.

She couldn't find anything else to rent locally and ended up moving to a less desirable area a few miles away as that's all she could find. She didn't feel as safe there and had the hassle of driving her children to school rather than walking. She didn't want to move schools and disrupt their education.

Another house came up locally and she was happy to move back here. She's been settled in that one for a couple of years now, but the owners told her earlier this month that they want to sell the house with vacant possession at some point next year and have given her notice of their intentions to give her time to find something else.

She's now frantically looking for something else and at the moment, there's nothing suitable for rent in our village. She's hoping new properties might come onto the market in the new year.

While you see all the posts about how great it is having your rent paid, she's struggling with the upheaval and cost following all her moves and the uncertainty of taking on a new tenancy next year and wondering how long she will actually live there.

We have been asked to move out of rental twice in 3 years. Privately renting doesn't give you housing security either. And your friend will get her own home from council after a while and will live there stress-free.
Without having to work, saving for deposit for 10 years and then paying mortgage for 30 more years withought opportunity to stop doing so.

Swipe left for the next trending thread