Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it’s not always right to just prioritise your immediate family at Christmas

141 replies

MyDearOliveOP · 26/12/2025 18:06

I see so many people saying that Christmas is just about their partner and children. I get some people have complex/toxic relationships with their wider family members but putting those situations to one side, do people leave parents, grandparents, siblings, etc alone on Christmas Day? I understand that some people don’t want to rush around visiting lots of people on Christmas Day - fair enough - but why would you not extend an invitation for people to come to you so they are not alone? I wonder how those same people would feel if their own children took that same approach as adults.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
blowthedoorsoff · 30/12/2025 20:27

HaveaVeryMerryBerryChristmas · 30/12/2025 13:30

I was just about to say this @calamarisandwich. It isn't anybody's place to judge is it, without the full context. It is just another day to a lot of people, and as long as they have a couple of social events over the festive period they aren't bothered. Not everybody wants a big family Christmas.

Well said.

I'd far rather a family that thought of me all year round than one who made a huge fuss on one single day of the year and couldn't be bothered the rest of it.

Because let's face it- making a hoopla on one day in Dec doesn't automatically make you a wonderful caring relative. Many people in this thread are doing it because they feel guilted and obliged. I literally cannot think of any worse than people feeling they must invite me round - just awful

BlueJuniper94 · 30/12/2025 20:25

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 30/12/2025 11:04

The noise of young children - so often over-excited and/or fractious - can be too much for a good many older people.

I’ve heard of more than one older person (as in late 70s/80s) who’s been pressured into joining neighbours for the day (‘You can’t be all alone on Christmas Day!’) - but who would honestly prefer P and Q at home, eating and drinking what they want, when they want it, and watching what they want on TV - or just listening to the radio/reading a book/nodding off on the sofa.

If it was that bad, they'd find the way to say "no" and spend the remaining 364 days of the year eating and drinking what they want when they want. For those who don't say "no" (they can) I'd far rather 1000 of those for every soul who has no choice but to spend this day alone.

BruFord · 30/12/2025 16:41

Aside from the issue of people refusing to travel, I also find it weird that some relatives
( specifically one of my BIL by marriage :-) say that they’d like a big extended family Christmas but have never offered to host themselves!

What they really mean is that they’d like their elderly widowed Mum to host like she used to- but understandably, she’s not up for it anymore. If that’s what you want, you’ve got to organize and host yourself, you’re in your 50’s after all. 🤣

BiddyPopthe2nd · 30/12/2025 14:44

It was almost always just immediate family for Christmas when I was growing up.

Nowadays, it depends if we are willing/able to travel the 2.5 hrs (3 in Christmas traffic) to sleep badly, eat very regimented, have very limited quiet time and be cold for 2-3 days and navigate tricky family dynamics.

Or if we stay in our own home for some much needed downtime and enjoying good food that we enjoy preparing together. DD has always tended to prefer years we stay home as well.

As a family with 2 FT working adults in high powered jobs, a DD with SEN and a very active sportslife, the 2.5 days from leaving the office on 24th at lunchtime to the end of 26th are a much needed oasis of calm for us.

And we do visit family after Christmas.

HaveaVeryMerryBerryChristmas · 30/12/2025 13:30

calamarisandwich · 30/12/2025 13:07

Before you start judging your "friend" - how do you know her elderly MIL didnt prefer a Christmas Eve brunch to the stress of a full on Christmas Day with young kids?

Some elderly people find over excited children exhausting to be around and they might actually prefer a quieter Christmas at home. As long as their family is seeing them regularly then it's not a big deal to see them on xmas eve instead of xmas day. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean everyone is the same as you or must do things exactly as you do.

I was just about to say this @calamarisandwich. It isn't anybody's place to judge is it, without the full context. It is just another day to a lot of people, and as long as they have a couple of social events over the festive period they aren't bothered. Not everybody wants a big family Christmas.

calamarisandwich · 30/12/2025 13:07

PlaygroundSusie · 30/12/2025 05:10

OP, I totally get what you mean. I've noticed it's becoming a growing trend - eschewing Christmas Day with extended family and friends in favour of one's own immediate family.

And I'm talking here about situations where everyone lives locally (no travel involved) and there's no toxicity or estrangement. Instead, I've heard people give vague reasons like "I just want to focus on our little family" and "It's just less hassle not seeing other people."

All well and good, but it often results in extended family being left on their own during Christmas Day. For example, a friend of mine this year decided to "ban" all visitors from her house and just have Christmas Day with her DH and their two young kids. It was fine for her side of the family, as she has parents and two siblings who could still get together. But her MIL is an elderly widow, and her DH is an only child - which meant her MIL basically was all by herself on Christmas Day. Granted, they did see her on Christmas Eve for brunch, but I don't think it's quite the same thing.

One final thing. As a child I loved seeing my grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins on Christmas Day. If my parents had announced that Christmas Day was only for our immediate family, my sibling and I would have been devastated! We did plenty together as a family of four, and not seeing anyone else on Christmas Day would have just felt like any other regular day.

Before you start judging your "friend" - how do you know her elderly MIL didnt prefer a Christmas Eve brunch to the stress of a full on Christmas Day with young kids?

Some elderly people find over excited children exhausting to be around and they might actually prefer a quieter Christmas at home. As long as their family is seeing them regularly then it's not a big deal to see them on xmas eve instead of xmas day. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean everyone is the same as you or must do things exactly as you do.

HaveaVeryMerryBerryChristmas · 30/12/2025 12:09

I think it's fine honestly. People have to do what is right for them, and their families. I suppose as well that it can be largely dependent on the relationship with outer family, and the toll it takes.

In my own situation I have cooked for 20 years, dh, and I have had maybe 2 Christmases to ourselves in the whole of our 20s, where we didn't host. Now we have kids who are 8 and 6, we have hosted possibly 4, and had 4 just us. It is difficult when they are young, and I know dm expects an invitation because she knows I'm cooking regardless, despite having multiple options who live around the corner from her. She also gets extremely annoyed if she doesn't get an invitation for new year from the sibling that does not have her for Christmas, again she has other options who live around the corner to her.

I have finally stopped hosting dm; she isn't on her own. Shushing my AuADHD dc and my excited NT dc all day is no fun, not to mention that I don't need ND dc to have to mask all day, or sit im another room in her own home when overwhelmed; this splits us up. Dm stays all day and honestly drains the hell out of me; I also have adhd. I am 39, and the last time I was hosted, I was 18. Dm stopped cooking at 51, and has been hosted ever since. She preaches she has done her dues and cooked enough Christmas dinners (with no help).

Anyway, sorry for the rant, think I'll create my own thread on the matter.

But yes, it is more than okay to prioritise immediate family.

Goldenbear · 30/12/2025 11:22

We have big family Christmases, DH and I wouldn't leave our parents, one a widow the others divorced, alone. The way I see it is they certainly have flaws but so do I, I'm not referring to abuse but human flaws. I think I just channel my kindness and my DC are teens and feel the same about their grandparents, us and their cousins, they think it important to see them.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 30/12/2025 11:04

BlueJuniper94 · 26/12/2025 18:09

I don't think this thread will go well for you OP but I know what you mean. Young children is a large part of it I suppose. Often older people not used to children are a bit incompatible with them.

The noise of young children - so often over-excited and/or fractious - can be too much for a good many older people.

I’ve heard of more than one older person (as in late 70s/80s) who’s been pressured into joining neighbours for the day (‘You can’t be all alone on Christmas Day!’) - but who would honestly prefer P and Q at home, eating and drinking what they want, when they want it, and watching what they want on TV - or just listening to the radio/reading a book/nodding off on the sofa.

redskydelight · 30/12/2025 10:47

PlaygroundSusie · 30/12/2025 05:10

OP, I totally get what you mean. I've noticed it's becoming a growing trend - eschewing Christmas Day with extended family and friends in favour of one's own immediate family.

And I'm talking here about situations where everyone lives locally (no travel involved) and there's no toxicity or estrangement. Instead, I've heard people give vague reasons like "I just want to focus on our little family" and "It's just less hassle not seeing other people."

All well and good, but it often results in extended family being left on their own during Christmas Day. For example, a friend of mine this year decided to "ban" all visitors from her house and just have Christmas Day with her DH and their two young kids. It was fine for her side of the family, as she has parents and two siblings who could still get together. But her MIL is an elderly widow, and her DH is an only child - which meant her MIL basically was all by herself on Christmas Day. Granted, they did see her on Christmas Eve for brunch, but I don't think it's quite the same thing.

One final thing. As a child I loved seeing my grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins on Christmas Day. If my parents had announced that Christmas Day was only for our immediate family, my sibling and I would have been devastated! We did plenty together as a family of four, and not seeing anyone else on Christmas Day would have just felt like any other regular day.

Why is it a big deal that in families where everyone lives close by, they see each other regularly and they have healthy relationships, that someone is on their own on Christmas Day? Why is this worse than leaving them on their own on (say) March 17th?

I think my view about Christmas visiting boils down to

  1. you either have a close family, everyone gets on, you see each other a lot - no big deal not to meet up on Christmas Day, if you have good relationships everyone will be fine with this anyway, allocate another day to a big family get together if you want to. (actually that's what a lot of close-knit families I know do, especially where people are travelling - it's often easier and/or cheaper not to do this at Christmas)

  2. you don't particularly get on with family members and would rather not spend a lot of time with them. So why ruin Christmas for others, by inflicting it on yourself then? Why not meet them on any other day instead?

Either way, see people if you want to, don't if you don't, and it's not wrong to prioritise your own immediate family in either scenario.

Punkerplus · 30/12/2025 09:50

I never understand the "just like another day" comments. I only ever spent Christmas day with my immediate family as my cousins all lived about 3 hours away and we saw them afterwards. Christmas was anything but another day. We would have presents, Christmas music, Christmas Dinner etc. It always felt special, I never felt I was missing out on anything and I have great memories of them.

I'm not saying people should letting close relatives that live close by be on their own if they normally choose to spend it together. But people are entitled to spend Christmas how they want. Christmas can be very busy and overwhelming especially with young children. There's nothing wrong or less special about small Christmas's!

SoftBalletShoes · 30/12/2025 05:34

LowkeyLoco · 27/12/2025 09:10

What does my age have to do with anything? The fact of the matter is that most people on this thread are saying the same thing-they refuse to spend time with horrible people regardless of the time of year. And I suspect that those who have an issue with that approach are perhaps the horrible people in their own families and are unhappy about not receiving any invitations.

My point is that you're evidently still young enough not to have been disillusioned by the way people behave when you experience truly awful life events, like the deaths of your parents, or divorce. You said that good people and bad people get their just desserts. I hope this illusion continues for you for a long time yet.

PlaygroundSusie · 30/12/2025 05:10

OP, I totally get what you mean. I've noticed it's becoming a growing trend - eschewing Christmas Day with extended family and friends in favour of one's own immediate family.

And I'm talking here about situations where everyone lives locally (no travel involved) and there's no toxicity or estrangement. Instead, I've heard people give vague reasons like "I just want to focus on our little family" and "It's just less hassle not seeing other people."

All well and good, but it often results in extended family being left on their own during Christmas Day. For example, a friend of mine this year decided to "ban" all visitors from her house and just have Christmas Day with her DH and their two young kids. It was fine for her side of the family, as she has parents and two siblings who could still get together. But her MIL is an elderly widow, and her DH is an only child - which meant her MIL basically was all by herself on Christmas Day. Granted, they did see her on Christmas Eve for brunch, but I don't think it's quite the same thing.

One final thing. As a child I loved seeing my grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins on Christmas Day. If my parents had announced that Christmas Day was only for our immediate family, my sibling and I would have been devastated! We did plenty together as a family of four, and not seeing anyone else on Christmas Day would have just felt like any other regular day.

Closesesame · 29/12/2025 20:30

And btw I’m all for going NC and LC with toxic family.I appreciate some people are awful and you don’t want to spend any day with them let alone Christmas but that’s not what we are talking about here. Well not what I’m talking about here anyway.

so yeah to be clear I’m not of the grin and bear it with family members you dislike because it’s the 25th. I’m referring to family members /close friends you have healthy relationships with.

Closesesame · 29/12/2025 20:19

SoftBalletShoes · 26/12/2025 21:19

Oh, you sweet summer child. You still think that life is fair and that good people get rewarded. Oh dear.

lol exactly! So naive.

Ever watch true crime? Some of the worst people in the world are sociable always supporter and surrounded by friends and family. In some cases even after they’re convicted of heinous crimes - and some of the best people in this world can die alone in a house and no one discover their body for weeks.

A childhood friend of mine who consistently borrowed money( basically gifted as I always said she didn’t have to pay it back and she never did) ,and was always happy to have me at her kids birthday giving presents, attending their concerts with her (as her partner/father of kids can’t be bothered) and babysitting etc has said many times she considers me one of her children’s best aunty. This same friend has never once invited me to her family Christmas even when she thought I was going to be alone. She won’t even text me on the 25th. She revels in being with her “wee family” and bangs on about it on social media.

If I was this bad person why did she happily have me take her kids out and spoil them etc? No she obviously knew I was decent and good to her and the kids, but she still didn’t give a shit if I was alone.

Not bitter about it and I’d never want to be somewhere I wasn’t wanted, but my main point is to agree with you that you don’t always get an invite just by being “good”.

Ironically the ones who have invited me for Christmas are the friends who have demanded very little if anything of me!

ThoughtsOnLife · 27/12/2025 16:43

I don't think there is anything wrong with proritising immediate family at Christmas (or any other time) If I had children at home they would rightly be my priority too.

That said we have MIL over every Christmas day, boxing day & New years day for lunch and cook her favourite meals but she is very close by so pick up/drop off is easy and it's only a few hours for us so we try to ignore her negative comments about our beloved cat during the visit.

MargaretThursday · 27/12/2025 16:21

Problem is that what you're assuming is that everyone wants to have a Christmas surrounded by loads of family all joining in together and having a lovely time.

But some people genuinely like a quieter Christmas, just their family.

Why shouldn't they have their choice too?

And it may be that the reason why they want a quiet Christmas is because they spend the rest of the year running themselves ragged round other people.

Or they know that if they invite Uncle Tom and Sister Pip then they will end up arguing over the best way to carve the turkey, to pull the crackers, to play snap.. and cumulate in Uncle Tom walking out and Sister Pip drinking too much...

Why do people assume that what they think is best, is best for all?

bluebella79 · 27/12/2025 16:09

I spent every Christmas as a child pressing my hands in to my eyes so hard I could see stars, as my pissed up parents belted two tonnes of shit into each other. Then I was sent to live with my grandparents. Neither parent wanted me. Excuse me if they're not priority in your ever loving world

Daughter1234 · 27/12/2025 15:57

I agree OP. We are fortunate to see our close family very regularly anyway,we don’t wait for xmas to get together
But I wouldn’t leave anyone on their own at Xmas, I’d always invite them be it family ,friend or work mate . It’s the whole point of xmas. That said some people like to spend the day quietly and I can see myself feeling like that when I’m elderly.

Fupoffyagrasshole · 27/12/2025 15:47

every other year we go on a holiday cus It’s 2 weeks away with very little annual leave needed. I hate Christmas Day once the present part is over with the kids - it’s just a meal and sitting around

holidays are a way better use of the time

if the same relatives live alone all year what diff does one day make - you should be better all year round at making sure people aren't lonely and spending time with them.

I visit my family loads and have so many nice dinners and holidays and fun family time all year round just not really at Christmas

WhatNoRaisins · 27/12/2025 10:01

There are a lot of traditions that worked better for families that lived locally. Sadly they are much harder to pull off when longer distances have to be travelled.

PositiveCat · 27/12/2025 09:30

Surely it’s about your individual circumstances. Christmas can be very busy and very expensive; for hosts and for travellers it can be really stressful rather than a lovely holiday.

If you live near to your family and you get on ok then it seems reasonable to share at least part of the day, or do a big Boxing Day gathering or something. However if your family is more widely scattered, it’s a lot more work to achieve the wider family celebration and therefore more stress and probably more chance of rows or drama. In previous years maybe families stayed more local to each other and that might be why the expectation is there for everyone to have a big family gathering, but if people have moved away that might not be possible for them to either host or join in (it’s certainly true for my family).

If you’re on your knees from work, on your last pennies by New Year’s, or you’re an introvert, you may not be willing or able to meet other people’s expectations of the season. Should you knacker yourself in order to satisfy other people?

Youcanbuymeflowers · 27/12/2025 09:18

BruFord · 26/12/2025 18:21

I understand what you’re saying @MyDearOliveOP but what we’ve come up against is relatives refusing to travel (not just elderly ones, younger single people, for example). The only alternative is for our family of four to travel to them, which is too expensive to do every year. So we’re at an impasse!

What will you do going forward? This is us!

Youcanbuymeflowers · 27/12/2025 09:17

calamarisandwich · 26/12/2025 18:24

Well, this is a bit reductionist and silly isn't it?

What if your relatives REFUSE to come to you despite your invitation and then play the part of burning martyr expecting you to do a 4 hour round trip. What then?

Are we expected to run ourselves ragged and them not to lift a finger even though they are more than capable of travelling? curious what your answer is to this.

What do you do in this circumstance? We are in this situation (except 8 hour round trip + delays if bad traffic, so must involve an overnight stay) and frankly I never want to visit again with the kids after this year!!??

ToffeePennie · 27/12/2025 09:15

I have an autistic 11 year old and an autistic husband. They both hate the noise and mess from a “family” Christmas. This year we have come on holiday to get away from our families and I must admit, it’s the nicest Christmas we’ve ever had!

Swipe left for the next trending thread