Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have not lied to DS about trans actor in Last Christmas?

712 replies

DungOnATwig · 24/12/2025 01:10

Watching above with DD17 (lesbian) and DS11 (straight) earlier today. One scene where a female presenting (long hair + fake eyelashes) but clearly biologically male actor plays a doctor (just Dr). DS says "that......lady sounds like a man".

I said yeah it is a man love. A man who identifies as a sex they are not.

DD paused then typed a wee bit more furiously than usual for 30 secs but then was ok. She knows tbf. She's lesbian and not pan.

It was so distilled down to me at the point of his very innocent (and tentative so as not to offend question) that I am not prepared to lie to my kid about the fucking fundamentals of life and tell them that person is a woman. Fuck that.

Merry Christmas 🍷

Also FUCK THAT FILM 😭😭😭😭😭

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
DungOnATwig · 24/12/2025 09:46

For the clearly hard of thinking, the "fuck that film" bit was nothing to do with the shoehorned in booming-voiced man in woman cosplay and was re: us not seeing the ending coming and being distraught 😭

Funny how kids see right through this shite though innit.........

Right, sprouts to score! Merry xmas all!

OP posts:
anniegun · 24/12/2025 09:42

There are plenty of people who would not accept your DD for being gay. Try a bit of tolerence for others just for Christmas

MyLimeGuide · 24/12/2025 09:42

Good for you! Merry Christmas and thanks for the heads up to avoid that film! Xx

Staringintothevoid616 · 24/12/2025 09:39

Ponderingwindow · 24/12/2025 01:34

i prefer a more neutral response that better aligns with my values. That is a man. Men can present themselves however they choose and there is nothing wrong with making non-traditional choices.

If he is confused, follow up with the specifics that men can choose their hair and clothing and even wear makeup.

What they can’t choose is, to be a woman

UneAnneeSansLumiere · 24/12/2025 09:32

TelephoneWires · 24/12/2025 08:01

I think that in the context of this film there is really nothing to criticise about having a trans woman being the doctor. I am ‘gender critical’ and along with many people on Mumsnet believe that people can dress and present as they like but that there are limits such as single sex spaces, medicalisation of children and trans women in women’s sport.

In this particular scenario the person is a cardiologist I think and not making any points about being in women’s spaces or women’s sports or medicalising children. We get accused of wishing that trans people did not exist. This trans person is literally just doing their job in a film. So I really don’t think there should be any objection unless people think that trans people should be shut away and not seen anywhere.

I agree with this. I am GC but some people on our side take it too far, which doesn't help our case at all.

Bromptotoo · 24/12/2025 09:31

It's an actor playing their part in a film.

I don't now the film beyond a plot precis so no idea why the plot featured a Doctor who was apparently trans but they did.

I'm diametrically opposed to the GCF viewpoint and maybe that colours my vision but since you cannot eliminate Trans people you need to rub along.

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 24/12/2025 09:28

marthasmum · 24/12/2025 08:57

Thank you - said it better than me!

She's saying fuck the film because it's sad

She's making too separate points

Kimura · 24/12/2025 09:25

Naunet · 24/12/2025 08:46

Ahh 'bitter', the good old misogynistic motive only ever dished out to actual women.

I only dish it out to bitter people.

If you can't abide by a trans person receiving the most innocuous, throwaway complement without ranting about how the poster clearly meant that trans women are better at 'womening' than actual women, that women never complement other women on their appearance unless they're exceedingly beautiful, that complements are reserved exclusively for trans people...then yes, bitter fits.

JHound · 24/12/2025 09:20

I cannot imagine making this big a deal of an actor in a film who happens to be trans

MarvellousMonsters · 24/12/2025 09:20

This is a really good article, and explains something I’ve been feeling ever since the TRAs started using ‘two spirit’ native Americans as historical confirmation that there have always been trans people.

“In almost none of these societies did two-spirit people born male identify as women. “

This is the most pertinent point, ‘two spirit’ men never claimed to be women, they just felt more comfortable living the way the women of their tribes stereotypically lived/behaved. They are a “third gender”, not ‘a women in a man’s body’

The other really interesting thing this article highlights is that “two spirit” people only exist in the rigidly patriarchal tribes, not the egalitarian ones. The other thing: two spirit people are never born women. Almost all of them, historically, have been men.

I think this expresses my issue with a lot of trans ideology; it cements and defines gender stereotypes, instead of removing them. The whole concept of ‘living as a woman’ relies on the idea that women dress, think and behave differently, but the only reason (most) women do dress/think/behave differently is because they have been socially conditioned from birth* to do so.

So, @DungOnATwig no, you’re not BU to answer your son honestly, although the way you worded it was a little clunky, a simple “they are a man, but they want to look like a woman, so they’ve had cosmetic surgery” is all you need to say.

Baby with toy car

Girl toys vs boy toys: The experiment

Adults who believe they don’t stereotype boys and girls are put to the test.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/magazine-40936719

ErrolTheDragon · 24/12/2025 09:19

lifeinthelastlane · 24/12/2025 09:06

It's good to speak honestly to children in their own home, as they will get a lot of dishonesty elsewhere.
Also, the OP's "also, fuck that film" comment, with loads of crying faces, is clearly about the sadness of the ending not the trans character.

Yeah.

A simple straightforward answer to an accurate observation from her DS - the OP didn’t bring up the subject. And on with the film. Not a big deal.

DH sometimes does similar - it’s not in any way a criticism of a trans actor having a part, it’s more like the ‘isn’t that the actor who played xxxx’ type thing. 🤷‍♀️

TableRunners · 24/12/2025 09:18

LVhandbagsatdawn · 24/12/2025 08:09

Trans people are allowed to be actors.

Trans people are allowed to appear in films.

Deciding a film is shit and "fuck that film" on the sole basis that a trans person appears for what sounds like a very brief background role is just transphobia.

There's no way it can be dressed up as legitimate GC concern.

Try reading the OP's post again. Try and understand it this time.

CameltoeParkerBowles · 24/12/2025 09:18

TooMuchStop · 24/12/2025 01:55

YANBU. He is a man and you were right not to lie to your child. is your son year 6 or year 7? From year 7, he needs to be a bit clued up on trans ideology because it’ll be a topic of conversation in school.

From both of your children’s reactions, I’d be having a chat about trans ideology, how it’s a very separate thing to sexuality, that it’s a homophobic movement, the importance of biology, the harm this is doing to women, children, especially autistic people etc.

This. Forewarned is forearmed.

Kimura · 24/12/2025 09:15

TableRunners · 24/12/2025 08:59

go outside and engage.

Ditto to you, mate.

OP, you were right. I don't see what is "anti trans" in explaining to a child that people cannot magically change sex?

I don't see what is "anti trans" in explaining to a child that people cannot magically change sex?

Nobody in this thread has claimed that it is anti-trans to explain to a child that people cannot magically change sex.

All the child noted was that a 'female' character in a film sounded like a man.

I'm not sure where this claim that someone has magically changed sex that needs to be corrected has come from.

lifeinthelastlane · 24/12/2025 09:06

It's good to speak honestly to children in their own home, as they will get a lot of dishonesty elsewhere.
Also, the OP's "also, fuck that film" comment, with loads of crying faces, is clearly about the sadness of the ending not the trans character.

TableRunners · 24/12/2025 09:05

PlanetJanette · 24/12/2025 09:03

Do you see anything ‘anti-trans’ in saying ‘fuck that film’ for nothing more than casting a trans actor?

Read her post again. Try and understand it this time.

PlanetJanette · 24/12/2025 09:03

TableRunners · 24/12/2025 08:59

go outside and engage.

Ditto to you, mate.

OP, you were right. I don't see what is "anti trans" in explaining to a child that people cannot magically change sex?

Do you see anything ‘anti-trans’ in saying ‘fuck that film’ for nothing more than casting a trans actor?

TableRunners · 24/12/2025 08:59

TesChique · 24/12/2025 08:45

Omg bbz you were sooooo brave and sooooo right!

Its utterly nauseating when bigots come on here already under zero illusion they are BU, to disingenuously "ask" if they were BU just so they can bask in being told how wonderful they are.

Bet you couldn't wait to come and post after that exchange.

Its Christmas eve, instead of seeking validation from a bunch of like minded harridans on the internet like youre 12 years old, go outside and engage.

go outside and engage.

Ditto to you, mate.

OP, you were right. I don't see what is "anti trans" in explaining to a child that people cannot magically change sex?

marthasmum · 24/12/2025 08:57

LVhandbagsatdawn · 24/12/2025 08:09

Trans people are allowed to be actors.

Trans people are allowed to appear in films.

Deciding a film is shit and "fuck that film" on the sole basis that a trans person appears for what sounds like a very brief background role is just transphobia.

There's no way it can be dressed up as legitimate GC concern.

Thank you - said it better than me!

JellySaurus · 24/12/2025 08:54

TesChique · 24/12/2025 08:45

Omg bbz you were sooooo brave and sooooo right!

Its utterly nauseating when bigots come on here already under zero illusion they are BU, to disingenuously "ask" if they were BU just so they can bask in being told how wonderful they are.

Bet you couldn't wait to come and post after that exchange.

Its Christmas eve, instead of seeking validation from a bunch of like minded harridans on the internet like youre 12 years old, go outside and engage.

Hilarious.

As if that isn’t exactly what men who want to present themselves as women crave. As if women aren’t punished for not providing it.

OP you are not only being entirely reasonable to be honest and truthful with your dc, you are also being entirely reasonable to promote honesty and truthfulness about a misogynistic ideology that harms all women, regardless of their beliefs, and destroys safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults.

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 24/12/2025 08:53

TesChique · 24/12/2025 08:45

Omg bbz you were sooooo brave and sooooo right!

Its utterly nauseating when bigots come on here already under zero illusion they are BU, to disingenuously "ask" if they were BU just so they can bask in being told how wonderful they are.

Bet you couldn't wait to come and post after that exchange.

Its Christmas eve, instead of seeking validation from a bunch of like minded harridans on the internet like youre 12 years old, go outside and engage.

Chill

101Alsatians · 24/12/2025 08:53

Surely this has come up in conversation before bearing in mind your daughter is 17? All seems a bit of a fuss over sod all to me.

You said what you think,fine.But there no 'one-time shot' to have perfect conversations...you can discuss as much as your kids want/ask. Later your Dd might disagree,and your son too. But you can,um,talk about it and also remind each other that you're all entitled to your own opinions - and that they often change over time.

Now stop being so serious and get on with Christmas Eve!🎄

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 24/12/2025 08:52

Cleikumstovies · 24/12/2025 08:18

Why should a lesbian get her panties in a bunch over what a trans person is described as or not?

What's with the weird misogynistic 'panties in a bunch'?

NotTerfNorCis · 24/12/2025 08:49

HeddaGarbled · 24/12/2025 02:03

You’re being disingenuous. “Not lying” would be “A man who identifies as a woman” not ”A man who identifies as a sex they are not”.

I agree on your stance, but don’t pretend you weren’t taking one.

But it's true? He is not female?

YogaLite · 24/12/2025 08:48

MummyWillow1 · 24/12/2025 07:57

I’ve watched that film about 3 times and that aspect never even registered.

Nor for me 🤔 must watch again...

Swipe left for the next trending thread