Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Epstein Files

194 replies

HosierLanez · 21/12/2025 17:40

so there’s a huge dump of data from Epstein files but apparently “nothing newsworthy” apart from a pic of bill clinton in a tub and Andy formerly known as Prince lying on girls knees all with faces blocked out… who is holding these people to account? Where is the citizen oversight of this case and the data- who is looking at the data and what is the rationale for the blacked out faces?

YABU this is a court process and it will come good in time, it is normal to have redactions like this

YANBU this is not as transparent as a normal process and it is less clear and open than the norm

OP posts:
FOJN · 31/01/2026 17:59

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:38

The reason the files are now publicly available is because Trump signed off on the Epstein transparency act. If there's so much incriminating evidence about Trump do you not think Biden administration would have made it a priority to Pressure the DOJ to release the files?
If Trump didn't want the files out there they wouldn't be.

Biden didn't make it a priority because there are as many Democrats as Republicans implicated. Release by either side would damage both sides.

I'm starting to think Trump campaigned on it to make the Dems look like they had something to hide whilst he felt confident he would be able to block release or mitigate the damage to him if he was in office and in control. Let's not pretend he didn't try to delay the release or limit how much was released. They have only been released now because "are we still talking about Epstein?" caused a lot of damage to the MAGA movement and his approval rating plummeted.

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:48

@HopSpringsEternal They've been heavily redacted for a number of reasons the most important of which is to protect victims who. Do you really think if something solid was actually known CNN, ABC or NBC would have kept quiet?. It's easy to go down these anti Trump rabbit holes but at some point you have to apply logic and reason not just spout out unproven allegations

Ihateboris · 31/01/2026 17:46

SerendipityJane · 31/01/2026 17:33

There is no doubt that our supine media has failed to do its job in the past few years in so many instances and this is one of the darkest examples.

A nasty suspicious mind may well assume they are also involved. I mean there is no law of nature that says newspaper editors aren't massive sleazes. In fact I rather assumed it was an essential.

How many media folk are mentioned in these files ? Asking for a friend.

I was wondering this too 🤔

WiddlinDiddlin · 31/01/2026 17:46

EasternStandard · 22/12/2025 08:54

Are people interested in Clinton and Bill Gates being in the files, it seems not going by pp below. It’s wanting the person they don’t like in them isn’t it. Bizarre.

I can't speak for everyone but I want everyone guilty, to be held to account.

But - Bill Clinton, Bill Gates etc - are not President of the United States. Do you see how that makes things a bit different? They're not a world leader liable to wreck the world, they're not making decisions that affect people around the world, they did not campaign to be President by using these files as a device to put them in power!

Trump did all that and much much more, and it is looking (from the files I have seen) very much like he wasn't simply participating but organising and in control of much of what happened, as much as Epstein was or maybe more!

RedTagAlan · 31/01/2026 17:45

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:38

The reason the files are now publicly available is because Trump signed off on the Epstein transparency act. If there's so much incriminating evidence about Trump do you not think Biden administration would have made it a priority to Pressure the DOJ to release the files?
If Trump didn't want the files out there they wouldn't be.

Biden never campaigned on it. That was Trump. He promised "bombshells", then refused to release them.

why didn't the democrats release the Epstein files whe... (factually.co)

HopSpringsEternal · 31/01/2026 17:41

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:38

The reason the files are now publicly available is because Trump signed off on the Epstein transparency act. If there's so much incriminating evidence about Trump do you not think Biden administration would have made it a priority to Pressure the DOJ to release the files?
If Trump didn't want the files out there they wouldn't be.

They've also been heavily redacted. Keeping Trump out of most of it. There probably was a load of Democrats incriminated too.

Hungrycaterpillarsmummy · 31/01/2026 17:40

The pics of Andrew are hardly damning. It's really a stretch to be hauling him over the coals for so long.
I'm not saying these people pinnacle of morals and ethics but yeh...I think this is all so OTT

user675895 · 31/01/2026 17:39

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:38

The reason the files are now publicly available is because Trump signed off on the Epstein transparency act. If there's so much incriminating evidence about Trump do you not think Biden administration would have made it a priority to Pressure the DOJ to release the files?
If Trump didn't want the files out there they wouldn't be.

lol

Foggybottomblues · 31/01/2026 17:38

The reason the files are now publicly available is because Trump signed off on the Epstein transparency act. If there's so much incriminating evidence about Trump do you not think Biden administration would have made it a priority to Pressure the DOJ to release the files?
If Trump didn't want the files out there they wouldn't be.

FOJN · 31/01/2026 17:33

RichardOnslowRoper · 31/01/2026 11:33

Expect Trump to bomb Iran any moment, for distraction.

100%. It's why the files have been released now.

The DOJ removed some of the files they initially released yesterday but not before screenshots were obtained. It's pretty damning for Trump and a whole load of other people. Some questions need to be answered about why there hasn't been more prosecutions and the person who claimed there were no co-conspirators needs to explain themselves.

Kim Iversen read some of the allegations on her show. She seems like a credible non-partisan journalist. The video is about 20 mins.

TW there are some graphic descriptions (victims own words) of sexual abuse of minors.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/EvCITtijGBk?si=LRB1BRQb1A7LpoSo

SerendipityJane · 31/01/2026 17:33

There is no doubt that our supine media has failed to do its job in the past few years in so many instances and this is one of the darkest examples.

A nasty suspicious mind may well assume they are also involved. I mean there is no law of nature that says newspaper editors aren't massive sleazes. In fact I rather assumed it was an essential.

How many media folk are mentioned in these files ? Asking for a friend.

oscilla · 31/01/2026 17:32

Maybe I am totally naive and I probably am, but I'm baffled that mega rich and connected men actually needed an intermediary to source girls. Surely with all their wealth and power they could do that without Epstein's web of procurement?

OK, is it that they liked group sex, or underrage sex was easier to get via Epstein (not buying that), or was it because they wanted to be "in with the IN crowd" ? Baffled, when you think of the possibility of blackmail and foreign governments possibly behind the procurer.

OK I am missing something, and probably hopelessly naive. But still....

Theonlywayicanloveyou · 31/01/2026 17:29

It’s only just gone live! Even with the help of AI you’ve got to give the world’s news orgs some time to actually go through it all. Keep watching all weekend

Craftysue · 31/01/2026 17:07

I'm disgusted that they've released the names of some of the victims. According to their lawyers they're absolutely devastated. There also seems to be a lot of British men named but not many Americans for some reason - they deserve all they get but it seems to be very one sided.

Ihateboris · 31/01/2026 17:07

MissMoneyFairy · 31/01/2026 16:58

Fake news

Not according to the FT, The Telegraph and various other news sources

Epstein Files
Ihateboris · 31/01/2026 17:06

pinkypoo8 · 31/01/2026 17:02

Why do you go for Trump immediately? How about Bill Gates getting a STD from a Russian woman who was sex trafficked? Do you find that worthy of comment?

Exactly...but apparently that's fake news 🙄

pinkypoo8 · 31/01/2026 17:02

Why do you go for Trump immediately? How about Bill Gates getting a STD from a Russian woman who was sex trafficked? Do you find that worthy of comment?

MissMoneyFairy · 31/01/2026 16:58

Ihateboris · 31/01/2026 15:37

Apparently Bill Gates caught an STD from a Russian woman and then passed it onto his then wife. Ewwwww!!

Fake news

SidekickSylvia · 31/01/2026 16:34

There are also allegations against President Bush Snr. on X, and Jay-Z, Bill Gates and others, but they say they're not verified. I'm trying to avoid it on X because a lot of it so horrific that you can only hope it's not true. But then you wonder if that's why the victims kept quiet or weren't believed, it just seems too unbelievable. But what if it is true? What if a huge percentage of 'the elite' - politicians, celebrities, billionaires etc. are so seriously depraved that a blackmailer can easily coax them into horrific acts, worse than you'd find in a Stephen King novel. And the next day they're standing in front of a camera, smiling with their arms round their wife and children.

Greenwitchart · 31/01/2026 16:24

ItsDarkNow · 31/01/2026 16:13

It’s the headlines on the independent.co.uk @Greenwitchart

I am looking at their website and the headline/top story is about Andrew.

ItsDarkNow · 31/01/2026 16:17

There are multiple reports about Richard Branson and Donald Trump.

letsallchant · 31/01/2026 16:15

Greenwitchart · 31/01/2026 16:11

I am shocked and disgusted at how little there is in the UK media about what came out yesterday while the files and comments about their content are all over social media platform like X and being widely shared and read by the general public.

They only seem to focus on Andrew who we already know is a vile individual but fail to mention the allegations about Trump, Bill Gates, Jay Z, Elon Musk and many more.

There is no doubt that our supine media has failed to do its job in the past few years in so many instances and this is one of the darkest examples.

Exactly this. All I've heard on our news is Andrew. Not to minimise his wrongdoing but we all know he's sleazy as hell. It just looks like a convenient distraction from the bigger more powerful names.

ItsDarkNow · 31/01/2026 16:13

It’s the headlines on the independent.co.uk @Greenwitchart

Greenwitchart · 31/01/2026 16:11

I am shocked and disgusted at how little there is in the UK media about what came out yesterday while the files and comments about their content are all over social media platform like X and being widely shared and read by the general public.

They only seem to focus on Andrew who we already know is a vile individual but fail to mention the allegations about Trump, Bill Gates, Jay Z, Elon Musk and many more.

There is no doubt that our supine media has failed to do its job in the past few years in so many instances and this is one of the darkest examples.

ItsDarkNow · 31/01/2026 16:06

Richard Branson asked Epstein to bring his harem next time he visited.

Swipe left for the next trending thread