Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that some women care more about their careers than their families and that this isn’t always a good thing?

238 replies

ThatRedBeaker · 21/12/2025 14:14

Not trying to start a war but I’ve noticed a growing trend where some women (not all!) seem to put their career above everything, including their partner or kids. Obviously, everyone has the right to pursue success but I do wonder if there’s a point where it becomes too much. Like… is it unreasonable to think that some people might be prioritising the wrong things?

Genuinely curious what others think.

OP posts:
PithyTaupeWriter · 21/12/2025 21:04

SouthLondonMum22 · 21/12/2025 20:28

Exactly. I think some people don't understand this.

The only reason why I can be so flexible now is because I didn't go part time or stop working completely which means I have a big say over my schedule and by the time they are in school? I won't need to use wraparound care at all due to the flexibility I only have by working full time and my senior role.

Edited

100%, this is me too. I climbed to quite a senior level before having kids, which means I do get to have more flexibility than most because not many people can do my job.

PithyTaupeWriter · 21/12/2025 21:01

Comedycook · 21/12/2025 20:24

"help out" is such a strange phrase to use in relation to your own home and family. Reminds me of when men are described as hands on parents

This is exactly my point! Men think nothing of describing themselves as family men, I’ve started describing myself as a family
woman as an act of micro feminism. If it makes anyone think twice, I’ve made my point

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 21:01

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:55

Given my children are now in their 30s and live independently your point is mute.

Well no but if they were privately educated, so in school all day, and your husband worked away a lot - it seems a fair stretch to claim anyone was with them full time.

neveragainonebay · 21/12/2025 20:57

I think there are some parents who use their work as a means of avoiding spending more time with their children than they can cope with, yes. I see men like this everywhere. I do see women like this too (though to a lesser extent). Especially people on the autistic spectrum actually - they need the routine of a job and don't understand how to get through a day with kids on your own, when nobody is structuring the day for you and you have to just make it up as you go. They don't even see the point of spending more time with their kids. They think seeing them in the evenings is "doing it all."

They know they can't cope with more than a few hours a day,, so they overly identify with the importance of their work to justify this, rather than just admitting, "you know what, I find long stints with my kids too boring or overwhelming."

Men have been able to do this since living memory. Women do this too, though it's harder for them to admit.

Too many people desperately overestimate the importance of what are, in essence, fairly mundane jobs in the scheme of things. Some people make their work role their whole identity, even though nobody really has a clue or cares what it is they actually do. It's usually men, and it's very tedious. But there are women like this too.

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:55

SouthLondonMum22 · 21/12/2025 19:56

Surely more time than what your DH spends with his children since he regularly works away?

Given my children are now in their 30s and live independently your point is mute.

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:49

Parker231 · 21/12/2025 20:18

Working parents are still there for their DC’s. Do you think working parents are not 100% making decisions about their DC’s lives and there for them?
It’s teamwork - DH’s and I have always both worked full time and have very successful careers. DC’s have benefited hugely from that - in role models and in the best nursery, schooling and university that money can provide. They have travelled around the world and had a huge range of experiences.

Of course it’s teamwork. My children too were privately educated from prep school then to University. I did go back to work part time when they were 11/12.

Sartre · 21/12/2025 20:41

More women work part time or find hours around school time or WFH and subsequently have to work around their children a lot than men do. They’re also still generally paid less than men.

More women also still pick up most of the slack with their children and the household whilst working than men. I think there are still huge disparities here between the sexes by and large and you would find far more men prioritising work over their family than women.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 20:40

SouthLondonMum22 · 21/12/2025 20:38

Absolutely.

My personal favourite was when a male employee informed me he wouldn’t take instruction from his mother.

Cool. This isn’t your house, and I’m not your mother.

SouthLondonMum22 · 21/12/2025 20:38

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 20:37

That would be because he’s a man. Because as a female leader, trust me, they push back.

Absolutely.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 20:37

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:34

Sorry, it was your comment “What century am I in” made me think you thought that flexible working was the norm. The clue is in non-operational roles. I’m also ex-civil service. Where my husband works there is a degree of flexibility. His team predominately WFH and he does allow parents to do school pick up as long as the work gets done. Sad to say he does have female staff who are reluctant to travel overseas who don’t want to leave their children for 1-2 weeks at a time especially if the children are pre-school and he’s had to be firm and insist they go. He’s never got such pushback from male staff.

but he never faces any pushback from male staff.

That would be because he’s a man. Because as a female leader, trust me, they push back.

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:34

pahhdgaa · 21/12/2025 20:12

Why are you assuming I am naive? I’m in the civil service which hires half a million people and my set up is pretty standard in non operational roles. It’s pretty standard across my profession outside of the public sector also. I haven’t said anywhere that everyone has flexible working. But it’s not that rare. Heck even my police staff family members WFH!

Sorry, it was your comment “What century am I in” made me think you thought that flexible working was the norm. The clue is in non-operational roles. I’m also ex-civil service. Where my husband works there is a degree of flexibility. His team predominately WFH and he does allow parents to do school pick up as long as the work gets done. Sad to say he does have female staff who are reluctant to travel overseas who don’t want to leave their children for 1-2 weeks at a time especially if the children are pre-school and he’s had to be firm and insist they go. He’s never got such pushback from male staff.

but he never faces any pushback from male staff.

SouthLondonMum22 · 21/12/2025 20:28

Comedycook · 21/12/2025 20:22

In some ways, the more successful you are, the more flexibility you can negotiate. I was a sahm for years...now I work full time but I don't have a successful career...just a job. I don't get much flexibility because lots of people could do my job. The higher your worth, the more you can negotiate I think.

Exactly. I think some people don't understand this.

The only reason why I can be so flexible now is because I didn't go part time or stop working completely which means I have a big say over my schedule and by the time they are in school? I won't need to use wraparound care at all due to the flexibility I only have by working full time and my senior role.

Marrbles · 21/12/2025 20:28

pahhdgaa · 21/12/2025 19:53

What decade are you in? Never heard of flexible working? I’ve worked full time the entirety of my kids school lives (despite my DH being the one who works away, shock horror, I out earn my husband significantly…because I didn’t sideline myself) I’ve never had to put my kids in full time wraparound care.

I disagree with the OP, in that I think every woman I know prioritises their children in their own way (whether by working FT++ with oodles of paid help, or by being a SAHP, or anything in between). Whatever they have to do and choose to do to work things as best as possible for their individual families and circumstances.

My partner and I personally feel that it is important for our children to have some time with us during the week. We wouldn’t feel comfortable with the children having to be taken to school and put to bed by a nanny most days. In our field, flexible working and WFH is not really possible. As such, I’ve made the choice to move sideways in my career to something similar that enables me to stay and finish at more reasonable times. Partner could have done similar - but one of us needed to in order to get a balance we were comfortable with.

I’m thrilled that I get to be a rubbish feminist as I’ve allowed my kids to impact my career, whilst also being a rubbish mum as my children still need wraparound care most days.

Comedycook · 21/12/2025 20:24

PithyTaupeWriter · 21/12/2025 18:28

As a woman, I find this incredibly insulting. Yes I have a great career, but I provide very well for my family. I am a real family woman, and I help out a lot at home. Some of us can indeed do it all.

"help out" is such a strange phrase to use in relation to your own home and family. Reminds me of when men are described as hands on parents

Thepeopleversuswork · 21/12/2025 20:23

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:16

I agree there are instances where women have no choice. I’ve never said it’s damaging. All I said was my children benefited from having me not working when they were younger.

How can you know that though? You can’t, because you didn’t go out to work so there’s no counterfactual. I could happily claim that my child benefited from me working but again I can’t know that. Its my prejudice against yours.

The difference is you had a choice and I didn’t.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 20:23

Cherrytree86 · 21/12/2025 20:19

@Scottishlassie10

Right…so what do you think should happen then….mum goes on benefits or puts herself in the VERY precarious position of being dependant on a man??! Sounds pretty shit to me…

I’d assume, she believes women should rely on men financially.

Couldn’t be me. Ever.

Punkerplus · 21/12/2025 20:23

Stable childhoods don't come as well from parents being around 24/7. They come from children knowing their parents love them, care for them, nurture them and keep them safe. Working parents provide this just as much as stay at home parents.

Both my parents worked and I could not have asked for more better loving parents or a happier childhood. And I'm immensely proud of my everything my mum achieved in her career, she was a fantastic role model for me growing up.

Comedycook · 21/12/2025 20:22

In some ways, the more successful you are, the more flexibility you can negotiate. I was a sahm for years...now I work full time but I don't have a successful career...just a job. I don't get much flexibility because lots of people could do my job. The higher your worth, the more you can negotiate I think.

Cherrytree86 · 21/12/2025 20:19

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 19:40

Yes but how much? I doubt if they are in wraparound care for 40/50 hrs per week they don’t get much time Monday-Friday.

Edited

@Scottishlassie10

Right…so what do you think should happen then….mum goes on benefits or puts herself in the VERY precarious position of being dependant on a man??! Sounds pretty shit to me…

Thepeopleversuswork · 21/12/2025 20:18

Dontlletmedownbruce · 21/12/2025 19:49

Honesty I have not seen this trend. I know many women who are very career focused and do it for their own ambition, not just to support children financially, but they are excellent mothers. One does not need to trump the other. I genuinely don't know of anyone that I feel has let the child's importance slip due to work.

What I have noticed however is career oriented women who are critical and sometimes really bitchy towards mothers who do not work, or work PT. This is only a minority but I see it here an awful lot and in my life a few times. I have not seem the same level of nastiness from SAHMs towards career mothers, there seems to be much more acceptance of their life choices.

Some women are indeed snippy and judgemental about SAHMs. I have seen some really nasty posts.

But as @SouthLondonMum22 says it works both ways. The classic of the genre is “Why did you bother having children to farm them out to childcare?”

And lets not forget this thread was started by someone claiming that working mums “prioritise careers over their families”.

Parker231 · 21/12/2025 20:18

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 19:37

Exactly. Children do need the stability of at least one parent being there for them. My husband regularly worked away when my children were growing up (and still does). I’ll be honest I sacrificed my career so he could pursue his as his earning potential was far greater than mine which I was happy to do. We really believe that our children benefited from one parent being around. I was a STAHM.

Working parents are still there for their DC’s. Do you think working parents are not 100% making decisions about their DC’s lives and there for them?
It’s teamwork - DH’s and I have always both worked full time and have very successful careers. DC’s have benefited hugely from that - in role models and in the best nursery, schooling and university that money can provide. They have travelled around the world and had a huge range of experiences.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 20:16

Punkerplus · 21/12/2025 20:05

I never understand this argument as well about being parents being on stand by in case their ill.

So I'll give up my career and earning potential and the financial benefits it brings to our family just to hang about the house all day on the off chance my child might become ill from school/nursery and need picked up. Right.

Or I can do which is what both my parents did and what most parents do, is go to work and if they are ill, either my or my husband will go pick them up and take them home.

It’s a ridiculous argument. Like anyone is sat at home like “I wonder if they’ll throw up today!”

That’s some very anxious parenting if they are.

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:16

Thepeopleversuswork · 21/12/2025 19:57

For the sake of argument let’s say they are in childcare from 8am to 6pm, which is what I did (not through choice). I did it to put food on the table because my husband was an abusive alcoholic and I had to leave him but needed to pay the mortgage and support my child.

My daughter still had a couple of hours quality time with me; and it was quality time, every evening and all weekends. Did she have a good relationship with her childminder? Yes. Did she ever think her childminder was more important than me? Absolutely not. I was the one she wanted to be with and we are still incredibly close now, she’s nearly 15. By the time she was four she was at school she wouldn’t have had the chance of being with me anyway.

So we are effectively talking about a period of three years in which she saw me for a truncated number of hours per day.

My daughter is thriving: doing well at school, happy and with good friends. I am as sure as I can be that sacrificing a good career that sustained me a single mother and supported her would not have been worth a few extra hours of hanging around with her at home.

I’m not going to feel guilty about what I did, partly because I had no choice and also because she was very clearly unharmed by it. But leaving my personal feelings aside, I am not sure what evidence you are relying on to assert that the way I raised my daughter was inferior or inappropriate? I’m prepared to bet my house you don’t have any data to back up the idea that this is damaging.

So in fact all you are doing is bullying and guilt tripping women who have done what they need to do to support their children with half-baked, unsupported and highly emotive theories about what you think in the abstract is better for children.

So you’ll hopefully forgive me if I tell you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Edited

I agree there are instances where women have no choice. I’ve never said it’s damaging. All I said was my children benefited from having me not working when they were younger.

pahhdgaa · 21/12/2025 20:12

Scottishlassie10 · 21/12/2025 20:05

That’s good you haven’t had to, but I think you’re naive to think that flexible working is the norm. There are still employers for operational reasons cannot offer flexible working or even condensed hours.

Why are you assuming I am naive? I’m in the civil service which hires half a million people and my set up is pretty standard in non operational roles. It’s pretty standard across my profession outside of the public sector also. I haven’t said anywhere that everyone has flexible working. But it’s not that rare. Heck even my police staff family members WFH!

Punkerplus · 21/12/2025 20:05

SleeplessInWherever · 21/12/2025 19:46

Our son threw up all over his desk a few weeks ago, if only I’d know I could have just told them to keep him.

I was in a meeting at the time, could have saved myself the afternoon of vomit cleaning!

I never understand this argument as well about being parents being on stand by in case their ill.

So I'll give up my career and earning potential and the financial benefits it brings to our family just to hang about the house all day on the off chance my child might become ill from school/nursery and need picked up. Right.

Or I can do which is what both my parents did and what most parents do, is go to work and if they are ill, either my or my husband will go pick them up and take them home.