Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Sister in law asking we don’t do Christmas meal as dinner

316 replies

Cartaz · 17/12/2025 12:41

DH’s family have always had a fry up/homemade pastries for breakfast. Proper posh, homemade canapés for lunch with cocktails. Think prawn and lobster vol au vents, mini Brie and cranberry puffs, arancini etc - so properly substantial. And then the Christmas meal as dinner.

They are amazing cooks so it’s indulgent. But the thing I like about this is you are eating when you are hungry. My family did the more typical eat a bit later at around 2pm. But I always found after picky bits/breakfast just general grazing eating a full roast was too much. And you obviously want all the nice extra bits.

This new way I feel like the time pressure is off and everyone gets stuck in more. Just more relaxed (for us).

I’ve adopted what dh’s family do. But SIL who is staying with us this year as we are hosting has asked that we bring to forward as it more traditional.

I just don’t get doing something one way cause everyone else is doing it that way.

To me it’s just more relaxed and who doesn’t love a candlelight dinner. I can’t believe the cheek of SIL

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Harry12345 · 19/12/2025 22:32

Nochoiceofuser · 18/12/2025 11:49

Spaghetti bolognaise is a lot easier to digest than a 3 course Christmas roast dinner

I suppose, I have a small salad for starter and no dessert ever so I’m never too full

Mothership4two · 19/12/2025 07:38

sunnieday · 18/12/2025 22:11

I think you're not getting it MumsTheWorldYouKnow....
Imagine living your life thinking people are being sly, but they're just asking a question. People like you scare me, you hide in plain sight don't you?

Imagine living your life thinking people are being sly

I don't know about sly, but passive aggressiveness seems to be a national sport. MIL is a past master at it. I prefer people to be upfront with me, but I would think anyone asking if we could change our traditional Christmas day timetable just for them was plain rude (and potentially having a PA dig). Although I'm not great at handling PA and I'm sure a lot goes over my head!

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 19/12/2025 06:31

Brokentramulator · 18/12/2025 23:11

i think asking is taking quite a risk, some people find it rude, some don’t. Given you don’t know which side the host is on you risk being seen as rude - this is rarely a good outcome, even if they change their times - they will have you pinned as rude and imposing and likely you won’t be invited back.

Exactly, assuming no tensions and everyone is nice: even if someone asks nicely, because they have asked the host will feel obliged to consider it because they are also nice. The fact the host has planned things down to a T for particular reasons and someone comes along saying why not do it this other way, will lead to friction. Believe me. Don’t forget this is not the sister but SIL, so not really ever going to be close enough to say that. Even a sister is at risk asking this. The host could feel criticised. Read the OP!

Brokentramulator · 18/12/2025 23:11

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 22:09

No, I just disagree with what you consider the subtext of an inquiry. The inquiry could be made rudely of course but not necessarily. The act of asking, if done politely, if plans could be changed to accommodate something else is not rude in and of itself.

It is also not rude for the person asked to say no. The asking does not create an obligation on the person being asked to acquiesce.

i think asking is taking quite a risk, some people find it rude, some don’t. Given you don’t know which side the host is on you risk being seen as rude - this is rarely a good outcome, even if they change their times - they will have you pinned as rude and imposing and likely you won’t be invited back.

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 23:02

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 22:39

What exactly does she need to accommodate. There’s no medical reason or small children to consider. It’s therefore unreasonable. She’s not serving dinner at 9pm lol.

I have no idea what she might wish to consider accommodating because I don't know the details of the request. I never said she needs to accommodate anything, she doesn't need to even consider accommodating anything. Doesn't make the the request rude or the refusal.

Why would what someone else thinks the timings should be trump the actual host’s? Nobody said they do. That's the point. Making a request is not requiring the request to take precedence over the original plan and certainly isn't a suggestion that the requested change trumps the original.

You choose to see a request as putting an imposition on the person being asked to do something. It isn't. You can just as easily take it at face value as an open request and decline it or even decline to consider it.

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 22:44

sunnieday · 18/12/2025 22:11

I think you're not getting it MumsTheWorldYouKnow....
Imagine living your life thinking people are being sly, but they're just asking a question. People like you scare me, you hide in plain sight don't you?

Well you’re really missing the point. Where did you get sly from exactly? Why would what someone else thinks the timings should be trump the actual host’s? Unless there’s an actual reason, like medical, or the time genuinely being completely unreasonable, you go along with the plans of the host. Certainly what I would do. I can’t see any justification here for asking.

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 22:39

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 22:09

No, I just disagree with what you consider the subtext of an inquiry. The inquiry could be made rudely of course but not necessarily. The act of asking, if done politely, if plans could be changed to accommodate something else is not rude in and of itself.

It is also not rude for the person asked to say no. The asking does not create an obligation on the person being asked to acquiesce.

What exactly does she need to accommodate. There’s no medical reason or small children to consider. It’s therefore unreasonable. She’s not serving dinner at 9pm lol.

sunnieday · 18/12/2025 22:11

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 21:53

You’re simply not getting it…

I think you're not getting it MumsTheWorldYouKnow....
Imagine living your life thinking people are being sly, but they're just asking a question. People like you scare me, you hide in plain sight don't you?

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 22:09

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 21:53

You’re simply not getting it…

No, I just disagree with what you consider the subtext of an inquiry. The inquiry could be made rudely of course but not necessarily. The act of asking, if done politely, if plans could be changed to accommodate something else is not rude in and of itself.

It is also not rude for the person asked to say no. The asking does not create an obligation on the person being asked to acquiesce.

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 21:53

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 21:37

No, I'm saying believing there is a subtlety to it that insults you is a choice.

You’re simply not getting it…

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 21:37

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 21:24

As I say, you’re not understanding the subtlety…

No, I'm saying believing there is a subtlety to it that insults you is a choice.

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 21:24

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 21:17

I choose to take questions at face value and not ascribe rudeness to them unnecessarily. Therefore if it was asked of me I wouldn't consider it rude at all and I'm not convinced at all that politely asking a question is ever rude. It certainly isn't dictating.

As I say, you’re not understanding the subtlety…

DappledThings · 18/12/2025 21:17

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 20:59

You don’t understand the subtlety then. Asking someone to change THEIR plans for hosting meals they are making for others, unless there are very young children involved, is rude and entitled.

I choose to take questions at face value and not ascribe rudeness to them unnecessarily. Therefore if it was asked of me I wouldn't consider it rude at all and I'm not convinced at all that politely asking a question is ever rude. It certainly isn't dictating.

MumsTheWordYouKnow · 18/12/2025 20:59

BringBackCatsEyes · 18/12/2025 08:56

Since when did asking become dictating?

You don’t understand the subtlety then. Asking someone to change THEIR plans for hosting meals they are making for others, unless there are very young children involved, is rude and entitled.

SailingYachty · 18/12/2025 20:29

I wouldn’t be happy if I had to eat Christmas dinner in the evening, I’d be trying not to eat too much all day, and then would have horrid indigestion later when trying to sleep! Yes we often have a main meal in the evening, but Christmas dinner is much bigger and richer. If I was close to my SIL I’d suggest earlier, but no I wouldn’t demand to change it if that’s what they prefer. I’d try to host next year!

hypnovic · 18/12/2025 19:13

When she hosts she decides

Dorsetlucky · 18/12/2025 16:47

tipsyraven · 17/12/2025 12:57

I don’t like having Christmas dinner in the evening. Firstly because the cook is then spending most of the day cooking and I like to relax once it is done for the day. Secondly, I can’t digest a large meal in the evening, it gives me indigestion. I’m with your SiL.

I prefer to eat at lunchtime too (about 2pm), but I would never ask someone else to do it my way - when in Rome and all that!

PluckyChancer · 18/12/2025 16:38

TEAM SIL depending…

Sadly, your plan wouldn’t work for me OP as I prefer to eat my main meal around lunchtime/early afternoon. If I eat my main meal later in the evening, I end up feeling very ill with digestion problems.

I cook a meal for DS and myself and eat mine late afternoon. DS eats around 7pm and DH eats a separate meal he sorts himself around 9pm every day. It is a pain that we never eat together but at least I don’t inconvenience anyone else.

As you’re a decent host, I think it’s worth finding out why she wants to eat earlier. If it’s just because they’ve always done it that way, then you should stand firm, with your planed day as it’s perfectly reasonable. 🤷🏻‍♀️

However, if she suffers from a digestive issue like me, I think you should discuss it further and try to find a solution that she can cope with. If I was your SIL, I’d eat more food around lunch time then probably have a tiny side plate of vegetables at dinner just to be sociable.

Do people still bother watching live TV these days? I haven’t done that at Christmas since the 80’s and Morecombe and Wise Xmas specials. 😂

Emmz1510 · 18/12/2025 15:35

Tell her to jog on. I also enjoy having a nice breakfast (although nothing as fancy/indulgent your in laws do!) and snacking on other treats so usually none of us are ready for dinner until 4/5pm. I can’t imagine having to rush to produce a dinner for 2pm! Maybe that works for some families and that’s fine, but you are hosting so you do what suits you.

SwingTheMonkey · 18/12/2025 14:29

MyMiniMetro · 18/12/2025 13:30

That’s why you talk about it in advance. I’m not a TV person either and encourage games and conversation but a lot of people do plan their day by the TV. As long as I know I can account for it. I agree, if you’re hosting a few people for Christmas it IS hard work making sure everyone’s needs are met as much as possible. That’s why it’s a task worthy of gratitude and not a task to be taken-on lightly. Inviting others to sit-in on what you are definitely going to do your way come-hell-or-high-water, isn’t really hosting.

If there are a few different people wanting different times then there will need to be a compromise finding a time that works for most, and maybe someone will be disappointed. There is sometimes not a perfect answer. Nonetheless, the hosts preference is immaterial.

I’ve had to push things back to allow for guests travel, bring things forward to allow for children’s bed times and serve in a very precise window because of diabetes and I’m glad my loved ones feel close enough to let me know what they need.

If it makes no material difference to the OP, I can’t see why the main Christmas roast can’t be switched with the lunch and a lighter breakfast consumed (probably sensible anyway).

Sure, the ideal guest is easygoing, but if they aren’t, it’s usually for a reason important to them. Maybe it’s a me thing, but if I care enough to invite them to Christmas dinner, I also care enough to do it in a way they will enjoy. I mean, I’m sure there are limits to my goodwill, I’m not a saint, but I think the time of the main meal is totally negotiable.

In this case, it’s because the SIL thinks a Christmas lunch is more traditional. I’d be very embarrassed to suggest to my host that they alter the day, simply because I thought it more traditional to eat at 12.
As a host, I’d accommodate children needing to eat at certain times, people needing to eat for medical reasons and of course, dietary restrictions. I absolutely wouldn’t accommodate someone’s asinine whims and I don’t think that makes me a bad host. It’s my Christmas too.

MyMiniMetro · 18/12/2025 13:30

SwingTheMonkey · 18/12/2025 12:52

Gosh that sounds exhausting for the person who has offered to pay for and cook a Christmas dinner. What if several of your guests had different opinions on what they wanted Xmas day to look like? How would you be the gracious host you like to be, catering to a number of different requirements? For example Aunty Carol wants dinner at 7pm but Grandma wants hers at midday? How would you accommodate every individual whim?
Where do we draw the line when it comes to guest requests? Does one person’s request trump everyone else who are in agreement with each other?

I personally think that a good guest
is easygoing and accepts the host’s schedule, because they are the ones providing the hospitality.

ETA - we’d never watch tv on Christmas Day, we’re too busy chatting and playing games. An early evening dinner works perfectly for us. Just goes to show, you can’t possibly say what most people like to do on Xmas day because everyone is different.

Edited

That’s why you talk about it in advance. I’m not a TV person either and encourage games and conversation but a lot of people do plan their day by the TV. As long as I know I can account for it. I agree, if you’re hosting a few people for Christmas it IS hard work making sure everyone’s needs are met as much as possible. That’s why it’s a task worthy of gratitude and not a task to be taken-on lightly. Inviting others to sit-in on what you are definitely going to do your way come-hell-or-high-water, isn’t really hosting.

If there are a few different people wanting different times then there will need to be a compromise finding a time that works for most, and maybe someone will be disappointed. There is sometimes not a perfect answer. Nonetheless, the hosts preference is immaterial.

I’ve had to push things back to allow for guests travel, bring things forward to allow for children’s bed times and serve in a very precise window because of diabetes and I’m glad my loved ones feel close enough to let me know what they need.

If it makes no material difference to the OP, I can’t see why the main Christmas roast can’t be switched with the lunch and a lighter breakfast consumed (probably sensible anyway).

Sure, the ideal guest is easygoing, but if they aren’t, it’s usually for a reason important to them. Maybe it’s a me thing, but if I care enough to invite them to Christmas dinner, I also care enough to do it in a way they will enjoy. I mean, I’m sure there are limits to my goodwill, I’m not a saint, but I think the time of the main meal is totally negotiable.

Lollypop701 · 18/12/2025 13:02

Is there a reason for sail request? does Sil have younger kids?

SwingTheMonkey · 18/12/2025 12:52

MyMiniMetro · 18/12/2025 09:32

Wow - no issue with a later dinner as such but that is a LOT of food in one day. No way I’d be eating a roast in the evening after all that. That is also a lot of pressure on guests to eat. I mean seriously, a person would need to be the size of a house for all that not to make them ill. And I would worry about seeming ungrateful if I didn’t eat something from everything you’ve provided.

When we did Christmas Lunch as an early dinner I found that in reality, a lot of people really like to watch Christmas TV and the schedule is set-up best for a Christmas lunch rather than dinner. So religious TV shows in the morning. Family-friendly cultural stuff like the ballet in the afternoon where lunch is fitted over the top of. Then family films from 3.30pm until 7ish when the big hitting Christmas specials start.

I know ‘live’ TV isn’t so important anymore but lots of people do like all the food and family obligations to be done by 7pm so they can settle into elasticated waistbands and enjoy a cosy evening.

Before children we would go for a long walk after a generous brunch of pastries and hot chocolate. Then we’d have an afternoon trip to the pub and then start cooking dinner 4.30 ish for a 6pm ish start. I learnt pretty quickly that everybody hated it and wanted to be watching Wallace and Gromit at 5pm with a full belly like the rest of the country.

Frankly, unless you have an east wing and a west wing in your home, your Christmas actually sounds pretty pretentious and too food-heavy. Don’t be surprised if some silently hate it.

We’ve moved into an earlier Christmas lunch model - although not so early that we are done by the kings speech. Everyone is much happier. I think that we have become so narcissistic as a society we’ve forgotten that being a gracious host means putting the guest’s needs first and ensuring they are having a good time - this means to your own detriment at times.

With this in mind, I’d urge you to reconsider the timings of your Christmas Day.

as a PS. I’ve just read some more of other people’s comments on here. I am genuinely shocked at what ungracious hosts everyone seems to be. ‘My house, my rules’ type attitude is for managing unpleasant things like smoking or swearing. If you’re hosting people for lunch or dinner, the polite thing to do is to find out if the timing and the dishes provided are likely to cause guests a problem. If it is likely to cause a problem, you adjust things accordingly. Why on earth would you host someone entirely in your preferred way knowing they absolutely hate it? That’s weird.

Edited

Gosh that sounds exhausting for the person who has offered to pay for and cook a Christmas dinner. What if several of your guests had different opinions on what they wanted Xmas day to look like? How would you be the gracious host you like to be, catering to a number of different requirements? For example Aunty Carol wants dinner at 7pm but Grandma wants hers at midday? How would you accommodate every individual whim?
Where do we draw the line when it comes to guest requests? Does one person’s request trump everyone else who are in agreement with each other?

I personally think that a good guest
is easygoing and accepts the host’s schedule, because they are the ones providing the hospitality.

ETA - we’d never watch tv on Christmas Day, we’re too busy chatting and playing games. An early evening dinner works perfectly for us. Just goes to show, you can’t possibly say what most people like to do on Xmas day because everyone is different.

Comefromaway · 18/12/2025 12:30

CoubousAndTourmaIet · 18/12/2025 12:12

Ummmm. No. Christmas dinner would be 6pm-7pm and I'm from up north, where we supposedly say tea. I don't know anybody who ever said Christmas Tea 😂

On Sundays we call it having Sunday Dinner at teatime.

Comefromaway · 18/12/2025 12:29

It wouldn't work for us due to evening commitments but if you are hosting, you get the say.

We generally eat breakfast around 9am then have Christmas dinner about 3pm. In the past we have then gone to either my parent's or my brothers house for tea which is usually a buffet & eaten around 8pm. This year we have an early start on Boxing Day so will probably still do the same but be back home a bit earlier.