Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Liverpool attacker sentenced

343 replies

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 18:48

Paul Doyle, the Liverpool parade attacker, has been sentenced to twenty one years and six months in prison for his attack that injured 134 people.

That’s 258 months, or less than two months per person injured. He’ll be out in half, so 129 months served. Less than one month per person. Reading the victim impact statements was awful. One from a little boy, who is completely traumatised, stuck with me.

AIBU to think this is a farce?!

OP posts:
NotMyKidsThough · 16/12/2025 19:56

If you think anyone coming out of a 21 year sentence is going to have "a nice long retirement" then you're just plain wrong. Living on a state pension alone is going to be only the half of it. The alternative is the nonsense of American 100+ year sentences.

5foot5 · 16/12/2025 19:54

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:17

I’ve read enough to know this vile, evil man attacked one of the largest cities in the UK and a lot of people seem to think it was perfectly okay

Oh come on, what a ridiculous thing to say!

Point me at any post where anybody has said anything even remotely like they think it was OK. You can't, because nobody has.

He did an utterly awful thing, apparently because he lost control of his temper, and many people were injured and traumatised and it is just very fortunate nobody was killed. I expect we agree on that. I also, though, think he has received an appropriately stiff sentence. We apparently disagree on that. But if your interpretation of that is that I think what he did was "perfectly OK" then you are being irrational and unreasonable

bittertwisted · 16/12/2025 19:53

Zanatdy · 16/12/2025 18:56

I thought it was quite a stiff sentence as no-one was killed given the poor sentencing we see in the UK.

All 3 of my sons were at that parade
one works on castle street
the fear I felt, what could have happened
he got what he deserved, he chose not to stop and admit he was wrong

Gloriia · 16/12/2025 19:50

Awful crime, he deserves the sentence. It is a miracle there weren't any deaths. Tbh the police need to sort out their crowd control as it is just pure luck it wasn't worse. How on earth was he even able to access such crowded areas in a vehicle??

GCAcademic · 16/12/2025 19:49

Vivi0 · 16/12/2025 18:55

Road rage.

I wish I was joking.

Angry people should not be allowed to drive, honestly.

I know someone who has always refused to learn to drive because he has a short fuse. It’s a shame more people don’t have that kind of self-awareness.

sashh · 16/12/2025 19:46

Ebok1990 · 16/12/2025 18:57

I was confounded that he'd be able to drive again. Banned for an additional 3 years after his sentence ends. He'll be knocking on a bit by then but it doesn't seem right that he can be trusted behind the wheel again.

He has to pass an extended test before he can apply for his licence.

Also he has not been sentenced for everyone he hurt. The judge explained that a selection of crimes were chosen as they were preparing for a jury trial and for a jury it is difficult to keep track of too many victims.

PodMom · 16/12/2025 19:46

I thought it was a significant sentence to be honest. He’ll be old when he comes out, I imagine his wife will divorce him. He will come out having not worked for over a decade, shit pension, no home, no wife, for a lonely old age. He has to take an extended driving test before being able to drive and I doubt anyone will pass him.

JohnofWessex · 16/12/2025 19:46

It would be interesting to see a proper report on his history and likley reasons for behaving as he did.

Firstly I suggest that we do not hand out enough driving bans and allow licences to be returned far to easily. Certainly a case like this should attract a lifetime ban with very severe penalties for a breach.

Secondly what about what they do in the Netherlands for many serious offenders and instead of imprisoning them detain them in secure hospitals which means that their behaviour is addressed and if they dont or wont change then they stay inside?

Snooks1971 · 16/12/2025 19:44

NuffSaidSam · 16/12/2025 19:22

To suggest that his family, his children, are not innocent because they 'looked past his clear anger issues' is disgraceful.

Shame on you.

100%

nocoolnamesleft · 16/12/2025 19:44

Sentence is much more appropriate than I thought it would be, given eg what short sentences drunk drivers who kill get. Though he should be banned from driving for life.

CallMeEvelyn · 16/12/2025 19:43

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:32

And in what, thirty years, she never thought to speak out?

That's a very unpleasant and unfair comment from you, OP.

This is a discussion forum - you asked for opinions and people shared theirs. Many don't agree with you, I am one of them too.

I think you are extremely emotional about this. It's ok to be affected. It's ok to say the sentencing guidelines are too lenient. It's ok to say we should have more prisons to accomodate prisoners and harsher sentences in respect of many crimes. Overall, we should be nicer people as a society and maybe then things would be much better.

But that's not the reality. You coming here shouting about classism (which I don't agree with) and being angry at many sensible posters not agreeing with you is unnecessary and this level of anger from you isn't reasonable.

Skybluepinky · 16/12/2025 19:43

I was expecting him to get 5 years so the sentence was much better.

Zov · 16/12/2025 19:42

YANBU. Why didn't the rancid twisted bastard get life, with no parole? Hmm

Disgusting shitty sentence!

TomatoSandwiches · 16/12/2025 19:42

Remember that he didn't stop of his own accord, someone had to do that, if not he would have continued.
He is an entitled male that has anger issues which hopefully will be addressed and treated successfully, he's got 14yrs to sort himself out.

Lalgarh · 16/12/2025 19:41

Someone upthread said GBH carries a life sentence.

Did him changing his plea to guilty mean it got reduced?

silverwrath · 16/12/2025 19:39

MintTwirl · 16/12/2025 19:38

It is a longer sentence than I expected tbh but I am shocked he isn’t banned from driving for life. I feel for everyone impacted by this including his wife and children.

Has she stayed with him?

MintTwirl · 16/12/2025 19:38

It is a longer sentence than I expected tbh but I am shocked he isn’t banned from driving for life. I feel for everyone impacted by this including his wife and children.

silverwrath · 16/12/2025 19:37

I hate sentencing in this country. It's a joke.

'Tough on crime' (no you're not), tough on the causes of crime (oh please).

Nothing changes. Doesn't matter which party is in power.

NightDreamer · 16/12/2025 19:36

And for those questioning why he got such a long sentence you are forgetting that he also had previous criminal and military convictions for violence, assault and GBH and served prison time for GBH, so that will have been taken into account when sentencing as he is not a first-time offender.

NightDreamer · 16/12/2025 19:35

Daytimetellyqueen · 16/12/2025 18:53

Why did he do it? I still don’t understand!

He was in a blind rage. He had previous criminal convictions for violence, was discharged from the military for assault, and he also went to prison for GBH for biting a man's ear off in a fight. His military colleagues said he had short fuse and was prone to flying off the handle and beating people up on nights out for nothing. Hardly the mild mannered family man the press made him out to be. He sounds like a fucking animal and I'm glad he's got a long sentence.

As someone from Liverpool too (me), this man was an Evertonian and the hatred they can have for Liverpool supporters can be insane sometimes. I say this as someone who has EFC fans in their family. I'm not saying that was the sole reason he did it but the fact that he ended up getting stuck in the LFC parade might have been a factor that set him off in a rage considering he was already prone to violent outbursts.

OverlyFragrant · 16/12/2025 19:34

Can you imagine living under the same roof as him when he's in a mood.
I bet his family are breathing a sigh of relief.

VikaOlson · 16/12/2025 19:34

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:32

And in what, thirty years, she never thought to speak out?

You're getting silly now.

sittingonabeach · 16/12/2025 19:33

You get the two sides story when a man kills his family, and the neighbours all say he seemed a nice family man.

I thought it was a high sentence (compared to other crimes).

Even life imprisonment doesn't usually mean life in prison

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:32

unsevered67 · 16/12/2025 19:32

It was an absolutely horrific crime and one that’s very hard to comprehend.
I listened to the Judge sentencing him and thought he was very good. He talked about all the trauma caused to multiple people. He explained why he had given this sentence in full. He does have to make this judgement within the legal guidelines laid down for the crime. He can’t just pick a number according to how heinous he thought this man’s actions were.

17 of his offences carried life sentences.

OP posts:
ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:32

Needspaceforlego · 16/12/2025 19:32

Might just be me, but somehow I doubt he was always a gentle soul at home. I bet his wife walked on eggshells, was controlled by him even if she doesn't really recognise it.

And in what, thirty years, she never thought to speak out?

OP posts: