Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Son dumped by gf -update

865 replies

OneGreenPoster · 16/12/2025 17:06

Some posters said I should update with what happened, That thread is now full.
Things have escalated a bit and it looks like he'll have to move a lot sooner.
Not much else to say on the matter.
I didn't think the last thread would get so much interest, thanks for all the advice though

OP posts:
bissom · 17/12/2025 09:38

After 3 years in the relationship she asked him about marriage and got a luke warm response - my heart would shrivel too 😧

Thatsalineallright · 17/12/2025 09:36

DeftWasp · 17/12/2025 09:15

I think the concept of a "timeline" is silly, but she had clearly indicated to him she wanted to marry sooner rather than later, and he failed to act on that.

However, I think he will long term have done well to swerve her, she's not long term relationship material if she can do a 180 and end it just like that - sure, he's been silly in his reaction to her discussing a timeline - but just quitting like she has at a bump in the road means any marriage would likely be very short lived.

He's better off out of it.

Interesting. I've always viewed dating as the phase when you're checking to see if you're compatible - re worldview, long-term goals, wanting children etc. When dating I never hesitated to break up with someone once I realised we weren't aligned.

Marriage is very different. I saw marrying my DH as fully committing to him, dedicating our lives to each other long-term. It would take an awful lot to get me to walk away (e.g. abuse or maybe infidelity).

So dating is the trial period where you break up if you realise you're not suited while marriage is a promise that you're in it for the long haul. The gf and OP's son weren't married, so to me it makes perfect sense that the gf walked away after realising they weren't at all on the same page.

Isekaied · 17/12/2025 09:36

VaxMerstappen · 17/12/2025 07:54

Anyone rushing a partner to commit to a timeline they're not comfortable with isn't the right person for them.

Three years might seem a long time for some people, but if it was your son's first long-term relationship, it probably felt nowhere near as long. In contrast to most, I can totally empathise with his position. People reach different life stages at different times, and quite clearly the thought of marriage at this point of his life was something daunting that he just wasn't ready for.

And that is completely fine. We live in a society where most people always seem in such a rush to do everything, have kids, get married, whatever, and then only find out afterwards that they're not really compatible. Rather than just take the time to enjoy each other's company and life naturally, rather than always be wondering what's next.

There's probably more to the story, though. For her to act so cold and indifferent to someone only a few months ago she was putting pressure on to propose to her, there's surely a good chance that her head has been turned.

Ultimately it's the best outcome for both of them, even if you son struggles to see it now.

Haha

Of course she must have found someone else rather than being sick of waiting for him after more than 3 years.

bombastix · 17/12/2025 09:35

Tbh it was probably not a good idea to give the ability to stay in the flat. It was too generous and he got the wrong idea. He seems very slow, this ex boyfriend, and didn’t seem to realise his ex girlfriend has her own agency.

If she owns a flat at 27, she is probably a very good catch. That is someone tenacious and driven. They do not sound like a good match

Brefugee · 17/12/2025 09:30

Saladbrains · 16/12/2025 22:17

I agree with you if her self worth is waiting around from age 27 to age 30 and then running away in a tantrum: she couldn’t even stay to look him in the eye when she wanted him to pack his bags.

Spineless and worthless.

bloody hell, get your head out of your arse.

He pestered her - even though she ended it, and kindly said he could stay in HER house for a while - and so she told him to be gone when she got back.

Her self worth is spot on and i applaud her.

StepAwayFromMyCrutches · 17/12/2025 09:29

Saladbrains · 17/12/2025 08:49

Flip the genders and no doubt the story would be very different.

Patronising.

Not at all. You see it all the time on here. Women who have left themselves completely financially screwed by cohabiting with men for years, having kids without marriage. They get called foolish and naive all the time. It doesn't matter which way round it is.

Isekaied · 17/12/2025 09:29

Saladbrains · 17/12/2025 07:35

It’s his home too.
He’s lived there for three years.

Did you think he didn’t contribute it’s to rent/mortgage, utilities, insurances etc.?

Had she financed everything or did he contribute to the household… either way it is his home as well and he has rights.

Unless he's on the mortgage/ rental agreement it isn't his home. And it doesn't sound like he is.

RainbowBagels · 17/12/2025 09:28

DeftWasp · 17/12/2025 09:15

I think the concept of a "timeline" is silly, but she had clearly indicated to him she wanted to marry sooner rather than later, and he failed to act on that.

However, I think he will long term have done well to swerve her, she's not long term relationship material if she can do a 180 and end it just like that - sure, he's been silly in his reaction to her discussing a timeline - but just quitting like she has at a bump in the road means any marriage would likely be very short lived.

He's better off out of it.

Eh? She's the one who wanted to commit and get married! The son was the one who isn't 'long term relationship ' material, as he was the one prepared to string her along- and when men do this it is invariably because they think they will be 'off the market' in the fantasy land in their head and they want to leave if someone better comes along. I hope you don't teach your daughters to wait around for a man forever while they dangle them on a string! Or for that matter teach your sons that they can do what they like because women are desperate !

Isekaied · 17/12/2025 09:28

Anuta77 · 16/12/2025 20:51

I agree. If she loved him and it wasn't just so she can tell people that she's married, she could have given him another chance. People make mistakes and this wasn't a huge one. And I agree that the timelines are silly, some people need more time.

Why's all the blame.going on the poor woman?

She waited and waited.
And even sat down and talked to him about how important this was to her- and she got a dumb reply back- I'll do it on my terms.

Then she waited some more.

She's rightly had enough and doesn't want an engagement only because he's been pushed into it.

I can see her point.

She tried to help him out by letting him stay for a few weeks but he kept harassing her.

He needs to realise what he's done so he doesn't make the same mistake next time.

If he really likes someone next time don't wait 3 years.

RainbowBagels · 17/12/2025 09:25

OneGreenPoster · 16/12/2025 21:31

He is a brilliant dad, but he is very blunt at times.
Telling your son "you should've got your arse into gear if you wanted her that much" Isn't great when he's newly heartbroken
I think he needs some sympathy.

Your sympathy and 'Oh she's not going to find a man now she's dumped you and she'll (presumably) come running back cos you're such a catch' attitude is going to do him no good. Some home truths from his dad is exactly what he needs.

Brefugee · 17/12/2025 09:25

OneGreenPoster · 16/12/2025 21:31

He is a brilliant dad, but he is very blunt at times.
Telling your son "you should've got your arse into gear if you wanted her that much" Isn't great when he's newly heartbroken
I think he needs some sympathy.

he also needs straight talking. And i'm another who thinks that DH is right here.

You can do all the tea and sympathy if you want, but the person who is really helping your DS here is his dad.

TheaBrandt1 · 17/12/2025 09:25

I rather think my analysis is the right one seeing how devastated op and her son are at losing her!

TheaBrandt1 · 17/12/2025 09:24

She’s totally long term relationship material. Values herself highly and doesn’t let herself be taken for a mug. She will likely make someone a great wife and will be a good strong mum who role models not being a wet lettuce hanging about for a man to her daughters.

DeftWasp · 17/12/2025 09:15

HisNotHes · 17/12/2025 09:05

I see you’ve ignored the rest of my point and focused instead on one word.

Besides it’s not the word itself it’s what it represents - by calling her wishes to establish a timeline for planning a life together “silly”, he was dismissing her concerns and the things that mattered to her. Swap it for whatever word you like, it’s the same underlying principle of not taking her seriously.
And now he’s repenting at leisure.

I think the concept of a "timeline" is silly, but she had clearly indicated to him she wanted to marry sooner rather than later, and he failed to act on that.

However, I think he will long term have done well to swerve her, she's not long term relationship material if she can do a 180 and end it just like that - sure, he's been silly in his reaction to her discussing a timeline - but just quitting like she has at a bump in the road means any marriage would likely be very short lived.

He's better off out of it.

ShawnaMacallister · 17/12/2025 09:15

OneGreenPoster · 16/12/2025 21:31

He is a brilliant dad, but he is very blunt at times.
Telling your son "you should've got your arse into gear if you wanted her that much" Isn't great when he's newly heartbroken
I think he needs some sympathy.

No, that's exactly what he should have been told. Sounds like your son realised his dad was right, though too late

TheaBrandt1 · 17/12/2025 09:12

If anything the women are the straight forward ones. Clearly stated her terms. Walked away calmly when not met. There’s someone playing games here but it’s not the GF

PithyTaupeWriter · 17/12/2025 09:09

A certain type of man likes to say that women are 'playing games' when the woman in question has a mind of her own and doesn't do exactly what a man wants her to do.

phoenixrosehere · 17/12/2025 09:08

HisNotHes · 17/12/2025 08:58

“The conversation could have been the starting point of a beautiful dialogue of understanding each other’s needs, triggers, desires and vulnerabilities.”

But instead HE dismissed her, he called her desire to discuss timelines “silly” and he let her know that it was up to HIM when the marriage conversation would happen and she had no say in. He shut down the “beautiful dialogue” before it could even start.

Then harassed her afterwards to the point he got himself kicked out and blocked and was still trying to prolong leaving until his father told him they were going to get his stuff before she gets back instead of waiting for the weekend.

Plus, if the girlfriend was really playing games (very heavily doubt it) then son is better off anyway.

His dad seems to be the only reasonable parent here; probably thinking, he wouldn’t want his own daughter to deal with someone acting like his son if she ended things with a man.

HisNotHes · 17/12/2025 09:05

Saladbrains · 17/12/2025 08:52

As crimes go does calling her “silly” rank up there with aggravated burglary or grievous bodily harm?

Hardly.

Like Ricki Gervais said, humans evolved over millennia to make their environment relatively safe and free from predators only to become fearful of words.

Get a grip.

I see you’ve ignored the rest of my point and focused instead on one word.

Besides it’s not the word itself it’s what it represents - by calling her wishes to establish a timeline for planning a life together “silly”, he was dismissing her concerns and the things that mattered to her. Swap it for whatever word you like, it’s the same underlying principle of not taking her seriously.
And now he’s repenting at leisure.

sueelleker · 17/12/2025 09:02

InterIgnis · 16/12/2025 21:36

Ah, love as an incurable affliction. A bit like tertiary syphilis then, or rabies.

Love is not inherently unconditional, and why should it be? That the roots may be deep does not mean that it cannot be swiftly excised, or that the person that feels it must accept being ruled by it. No one is required to prove their love by way of suffering for and being a doormat to it, thankfully. If you like that for you then by all
means carry on, but I’ll pass.

Shakespeare has a lot to answer for "love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds," He was talking about physical beauty, but people interpret it to mean that you should love someone whatever they do.

PithyTaupeWriter · 17/12/2025 09:01

The misogyny in some posts is unbelievable. There still seems to be a lot of people who think that women are supposed to be grateful because some Very Important Man gives her the time of day. She's supposed to be grateful for whatever crumbs he throws her way. Those days are thankfully behind us. Men need to shape up or ship out.

Icantsaythis · 17/12/2025 09:00

I posted on your other thread.

She has had a lucky escape. Her attempt to be an equal in a relationship and have a say on time scales such as engagement, marriage, having children etc meant his true misogynist colours were outed when he reply …
ha ha ha little girl you silly thing, we will get married when I decide could be a year, ten years or twenty. It’s when I am ready and not about you.

Women take huge risks in relationships particularly in relation to having maternity leave and the impact even that has on childcare. Pregnancy has a toll on the body and impact that a man rarely appreciates.
Some men do step up during pregnancy and when the baby and child is born. Not financially but the mental, physical and emotional load - but many don’t appreciate it and don’t. Men need to do more than 50/50. Same with finances.

It’s 2025, not 1950.

My husband had more money than me, when we got together. We decided to get married together and he on paper had so much more to lose than me. He sees everything as ours. Joint. We both have our own bank accounts but when he earnt more he put much much more in the pot. I didn’t have to ask he just did. I’m on holiday today, my husband has just done the getting our teenager up and ready, done the dogs and horses, done the bins, made me a cup of tea and taken him to school. My son left something so he came back and retrieved it with good humour (son is normally pretty good at remembering stuff!) . My husband I know feels lucky to have me and us (our children), I know we are lucky to have him.

Does your son own his own house at 30? What assets does he have? What contribution is he making to the pot? because he sure as hell wasn’t being equal in decision making with his ex girlfriend. And it isn’t just money - my husband talks about mental load. He does his own families presents and I will think the compost bin needs cleaning - go to clean it and he’s done it as he noticed it too. He keeps lists if something gets mentioned he puts it on his list. I don’t ask- he just does.

To hound her and try to coerce her back into a relationship when she finished it - shows his lack of respect for her. It’s over -she finished it. He should have accepted that - that’s the law and if he keeps on contacting her he is stalking and harassing her. He needs to start having respect for women and their thoughts and feelings.
No means no. We are finished means we are finished. Move out of my house / means move out. Etc

You aren’t helping. Neither is having him home. Neither is telling him she’s wrong and he’s a great catch - he isn’t.

I bite my tongue on here a lot as these are real people but we see women in particular treated as second class citizens time and time again. A recent thread a woman on holiday with her partner and he was so moody and grumpy. It’s her holiday. Her time.
He doesn’t want to go out and do anything. Why are women settling for partners that don’t add joy to their lives and encourage them and help them to enrich themselves.

The best thing you can do with your son is get him to read books like ‘ invisible women ‘ and listen to some podcasts and educate yourself about equality. He’s not treating women as equals.

DonicaLewinsky · 17/12/2025 08:58

Saladbrains · 17/12/2025 08:49

Flip the genders and no doubt the story would be very different.

Patronising.

Lmao tell us you've never been on the MN relationships board without telling us you've never been on the MN relationships board.

HisNotHes · 17/12/2025 08:58

Saladbrains · 16/12/2025 20:13

I’m team son.

He’s completely allowed to feel the way he felt when she asked him if he wanted to marry her.

He felt the gf putting pressure on him and he sounds like he did not want to feel under pressure.

If the genders were reversed no-one would support a man applying pressure to a woman to get married.

The many posters supporting team gf because she knows what she wants are prime hypocrites.

If the gf wanted marriage she could have:
a) started the conversation a second and a third time.
b) proposed an engagement to him
c) proposed marriage to him.

It sounds like the gf stewed on one conversation and without a series of conversations or distress flares she went ahead and ended everything giving him very little notice.

That’s not marriage and partnership material behaviour. That’s not kindness in action.
And that certainly was not love in action.
The now ex-gf had only her needs in mind and clearly didn’t care about his feelings/wants and needs.

The conversation could have been the starting point of a beautiful dialogue of understanding each other’s needs, triggers, desires and vulnerabilities.

But no, the gf had to pull the trigger.

There’s another man somewhere, and she’s interested, I guarantee it.

The 30 year old son is well away from such petulant and childish behaviour.

“The conversation could have been the starting point of a beautiful dialogue of understanding each other’s needs, triggers, desires and vulnerabilities.”

But instead HE dismissed her, he called her desire to discuss timelines “silly” and he let her know that it was up to HIM when the marriage conversation would happen and she had no say in. He shut down the “beautiful dialogue” before it could even start.

Saladbrains · 17/12/2025 08:52

HisNotHes · 17/12/2025 08:12

I don’t think anyone’s tearing him apart for not wanting to get married. It’s the fact that he refused to discuss it and then is devastated when she ends it because she wants someone who IS prepared to get married. Now suddenly he’s ready to buy a ring after calling her wishes to know where she stands “silly” - that’s what people are criticising.

As crimes go does calling her “silly” rank up there with aggravated burglary or grievous bodily harm?

Hardly.

Like Ricki Gervais said, humans evolved over millennia to make their environment relatively safe and free from predators only to become fearful of words.

Get a grip.

Swipe left for the next trending thread