People like this should be deborted

You find the rape of children boring?

How to say you're a reform farag lacky with ough saying you're a reform farag lacky 🙄

They look 17 to me. I want them here, in a proper jail for all of these years. I don’t want them deported as rape is not treated as seriously in the country they come from.

they’ll have a SHIT time in jail, I want them here to enjoy it.

Don't be facetious.

This thread isn't about the poor victim.

This thread is about OPs lack of reading comprehension / trying to manufacture outrage by claiming that these awful people won't be deported when things are already in motion to deport them.

Its cheap clickbait at the victims expense. And more than yawn-worthy.

Obviously they shouldn't be expected to take British rapists, maybe we need to move to a situation where we apply that logic to our country, why should we take rapists from other countries?

I took the Yawn to be because so many posters were having the temerity to be critical of 2 asylum seekers.

Do you not think the “yawn” was reductive and inflammatory?
what else would be the reason for posting a “yawn” on a thread about a young girl who has been raped?

Yeap. Why should another country have to take British rapists?

You certainly read a lot into a yawn. They have already been sentenced to prison and will mostly certainly be deported when they are released from prison. Who is saying that should not happen?

We can’t deport British citizens, as much as we might like to sometimes. We’re stuck with them. No choice. But when rapists happen to not be British citizens, there’s nothing wrong with saying they should be deported.

Because that poster wants to show how much cooler and right on they are than boring feminists…

And the British men who do this? Do we welcome them back to society because "they have served their sentence?". Or do we deport them too? If so, to where? If not, why?

the problem is not what you think. It's not immigration, it's some men in general. It's some men, and some men only.

But how does anyone differentiate dangerous men from non dangerous men? Beats me

Thing is, questioning them sounds like an even less reliable method of determining age.

Correct, they don't. Age assessments are done by social workers (with specific training) and are based on interviews. It's not an exact science obviously, but testing of physical features isn't reliable at all, especially as build, weight, facial hair etc vary across races and in relation to upbringing (nutrition etc)

Its a shame we can't deport people who rage bait and can't/won't read though...

Why would you yawn at this crime against a young girl?

I don't believe they do tests like bone density or teeth examinations to determine age, or has this changed? Or I'm wrong. I heard age was determined by some sort of social worker just questioning them.

Totally agree with all this.

That poor, poor young victim. 😢

I wouldn’t be surprised if they were older. They arrived with out documentation and had their age assessed. Bone age assessments are not very reliable. My older son had his checked at age 7 because the Dr was concerned about his growth and it showed him being 5. We haven’t had it checked again, but I’d guess if he was assessed now at almost 17 it would show 14 or 15.

I am sure most will agree with you

but turn the subject around two young British men caught selling drugs in Vietnam should they faces the consequences in Vietnam (much tougher jails and many would feel that is what they deserve) or here in the UK (far from comfortable but certainly better conditions than Vietnam )

and shouldn’t Shamima Begum be able to serve her sentence here in the UK

Yawn? You don’t think rapists should be subject to criminal law?
would you tell the woman they raped that you’re bored by her rapists receiving justice?

Get your facts right OP.

One has been served with deportation papers.

The other has been recommended for deportation but due to age it was outside the judges remit to issue this and thus it has to be recommended to the govt.

Rancid little creatures not because of their ethnicity but for the ordeal they put that young girl through.
Serve their time then straight out of the country with them and definitely no legal wrangles for them to stay.

They are both 17?

They got 10 and 9 years detention, which is a substantial amou t of time. I'd rather they were locked up then deported. I don't want them free, regardless of where they are.