Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think the UK should have a National Food Service again? (Like we basically had in WW2)

215 replies

Staybymw · 05/12/2025 05:49

During WW2 and for years after, the UK did have a kind of National Food Service.
The government controlled prices, ran bakeries, managed rationing, guaranteed flour/milk supplies, and kept basic staples affordable so people didn’t starve. It wasn’t fancy, but it worked.

So with the cost of living crisis now, rising food prices, food banks everywhere, and benefits going up because families literally can’t afford groceries… why don’t we bring back a modern version?

I’m not talking about anything complicated.
I mean basic, no-frills staples produced not for profit:

  • bread
  • rice
  • pasta
  • tinned tomatoes
  • flour
  • oats
  • basic cooking oil
  • tinned veg / beans

All stuff we can grow or easily manufacture in the UK.

If the government owned the land, the factories, and the distribution, they could:

  • create thousands of jobs ( more people paying tax)
  • stabilise food prices
  • make sure no one goes hungry
  • massively reduce the need for benefits to keep rising
  • put pressure on supermarkets to stop hiking prices

Other countries already do versions of this:

France controls wheat prices
Japan buys rice from farmers and sells it back at stable prices
Egypt subsidises bread for millions
India has state-run ration shops
Brazil provides government food baskets
Saudi Arabia subsidises milk, flour, staples through state industry

It’s not a wild idea lots of countries see food as a strategic, essential service.

A National Food Service would mean:

  • no shareholders to pay
  • no profit margin
  • steady UK jobs
  • cheaper food
  • more secure supply chains
  • less reliance on private companies
  • more tax revenue from the workers it employs

It could help families massively.
Especially those who are working but still struggling, or whose benefits are swallowed by food prices.

Given everything going on, food inflation, child poverty, constant arguments about increasing benefits, would a simple, not-for-profit national food range actually save money in the long run?

OP posts:
FalseSpring · 05/12/2025 12:43

Driftingawaynow · 05/12/2025 08:23

Loads of really good information in here, but politely, as I’ve just commented on another post, the Chinese communist party has actually lifted 800 million people out of poverty, when you say communism never works how do you square this?

I'm not convinced that the Chinese have really done any such thing as their poverty level is set extremely low. Some of their methods are not ones that would be acceptable here, such as forced relocation and employment. The so called 'success' is not as a result of agricultural policies, but more about raising literacy levels, modernisation of infrastructure and job creation. They have spent enormous sums of money to raise the incomes of some of the most impoverished sections of society, and I am not saying this is a bad thing, but it is nothing to do with agricultural policy.

TreeDudette · 05/12/2025 12:42

My Dad was arround during post war rationing and austerity. He reports being HUNGRY. The fight over one piece of sliced bread at dinner. The little boy in his class who always asked to eat his mates apple core because that was as close to an apple as he was likely to get. They were also cold. Dinner was a slice of bread with dripping and a hot cup of tea. People were not plump and well fed on Government rations!

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 12:34

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:30

But if there is a national food service and they don’t account for that, then it’s effectively a reduction in their benefits.

the scheme won’t work without taking this into account.

It wouldn't work in any world. People who can afford it will buy higher grade food and more varied food. This would then leave a basic level for people on benefits. Imagine the outrange and comparisons to work houses this type of system would lead to.

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 12:34

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:26

And again. How are you going to mitigate for the disabled or those with food intolerances and allergies? Because unless you do that, you’re effectively making their food more expensive. So their benefits would have to be increased?

although I don’t agree with the idea of government food I think this is a moot point- no one would be forced into buying government food I presume, it would just be available amongst others.

people with allergies to flour carrots rice apples etc would just do whatever they do now to avoid them

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 12:32

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 12:26

Because they are the ones that are moaning?

No they’re not?! The only ones moaning are the busybodies obsessed with what other people may or may not be eating. Which is none of their business

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:30

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 12:29

We already give people with disabilities higher levels of benefits to account for this.

But if there is a national food service and they don’t account for that, then it’s effectively a reduction in their benefits.

the scheme won’t work without taking this into account.

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 12:29

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:26

And again. How are you going to mitigate for the disabled or those with food intolerances and allergies? Because unless you do that, you’re effectively making their food more expensive. So their benefits would have to be increased?

We already give people with disabilities higher levels of benefits to account for this.

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:27

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 12:24

It's beggars' belief that people can't cook. Presumably we've all had Home Economics/Food Technology lessons at school.

I know it must be harder if your own mother/carer did not have confidence in cooking, but there are so many resources available. It's pretty easy to follow a recipe in a book or BBC Good Food or YouTube. It doesn't have to be great first time, but you learn by doing.

If you don't have pots and pans, or utensils, may these could go on the Christmas list. I'm not sure if you can easily get these at charity shops, but you certainly can from organisations such as Besom.

As for time, there are loads of recipe books for meals in under 30 minutes. Surely even a very busy person has 30 minutes? An Iceland special probably takes longer than this.

I can’t cook because I’m disabled.

how are you going to mitigate that?

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 12:26

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 12:24

But then you’re eliminating the competition that made them so cheap in the first place. So today a bag of carrots at 60p might be great but in 10 years time theylll have increased by cpi every year of something and be 70p whereas a competitive market could’ve held them at 60p. You’re basically killing competition which drives down prices, not up.

And again. How are you going to mitigate for the disabled or those with food intolerances and allergies? Because unless you do that, you’re effectively making their food more expensive. So their benefits would have to be increased?

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 12:26

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 11:46

Why do you need them to cook?

why is feckless not to cook?

Because they are the ones that are moaning?

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 12:24

gogomomo2 · 05/12/2025 11:31

These basics are not being sold for much in the way of profit, once manufacture and distribution has happened there isn’t much from a basic loaf of bread, the supermarket profits come from the premium ranges and ready meals etc. basic pasta can be bought very cheaply yet you can spend 10x as much in the same supermarket. Tinned tomatoes are mostly from Italy for good reason, climate. If you want to help people, free cooking lessons and a scheme to donate used but not ruined cooking pots is the best way. I used to teach a class (before the last government closed down children’s centres) and the amount of parents who couldn’t prepare a simple meal was astonishing, I used to teach them to cook 4 meals plus they received some basic pans and some store cupboard ingredients but we lost funding in the cuts.

It's beggars' belief that people can't cook. Presumably we've all had Home Economics/Food Technology lessons at school.

I know it must be harder if your own mother/carer did not have confidence in cooking, but there are so many resources available. It's pretty easy to follow a recipe in a book or BBC Good Food or YouTube. It doesn't have to be great first time, but you learn by doing.

If you don't have pots and pans, or utensils, may these could go on the Christmas list. I'm not sure if you can easily get these at charity shops, but you certainly can from organisations such as Besom.

As for time, there are loads of recipe books for meals in under 30 minutes. Surely even a very busy person has 30 minutes? An Iceland special probably takes longer than this.

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 12:24

Florencesndzebedee · 05/12/2025 12:19

I think it’d be a good idea. Set prices across all supermarkets or govt run stores for all basics.

But then you’re eliminating the competition that made them so cheap in the first place. So today a bag of carrots at 60p might be great but in 10 years time theylll have increased by cpi every year of something and be 70p whereas a competitive market could’ve held them at 60p. You’re basically killing competition which drives down prices, not up.

Florencesndzebedee · 05/12/2025 12:19

I think it’d be a good idea. Set prices across all supermarkets or govt run stores for all basics.

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 12:17

Greggsit · 05/12/2025 12:15

69p for a bag of carrots is really cheap though. I'm struggling to work out how a farmer could grow them for much cheaper. Part of the problem is that people are so removed from how food is actually produced that they think carrots just magically appear in the ground.There are production costs, transportation costs, inspection costs, packaging costs etc. To then think that a bago of carrots is expensive at 69p is insane! The only way I can think of making them cheaper is to sell them in unwashed bunches, but I guarantee that nobody would buy them like that.

Yes I’m a bit miffed at 69p for a bag of carrots really expensive too.

Greggsit · 05/12/2025 12:15

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 10:16

What country do you live in ? Food is very expensive in the UK . A tin of pulses costs around a pound and if you are talking of boiling dried ones then add in the gas/electricity to that. You can't eat lentils every day. Fruit and vegetables are vastly overpriced. Carrots are now 69p a bag in Tesco - my nearest shop. I do not have the time ,nor a car to go and shop cheaper.

69p for a bag of carrots is really cheap though. I'm struggling to work out how a farmer could grow them for much cheaper. Part of the problem is that people are so removed from how food is actually produced that they think carrots just magically appear in the ground.There are production costs, transportation costs, inspection costs, packaging costs etc. To then think that a bago of carrots is expensive at 69p is insane! The only way I can think of making them cheaper is to sell them in unwashed bunches, but I guarantee that nobody would buy them like that.

Overthebow · 05/12/2025 11:58

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 11:26

Apples are around £2.50 a bag . Oranges around the same. Bananas about £1.50. The most basic fruit. Cheese around £4.00 for a pound /400g of that red crap. More for the taster stuff. I am talking about food for families not single people or couples. My family are grown up amd I honestly do not know how parents on basic wages /benefits do it. It must be so tough. It is disgraceful when others have so much in this country.
.

You must have the one really expensive supermarket in the country then, at supermarkets round my area apples and bananas are £1 a bag, cheese is £3 for a big block. You don’t need to just eat lentils, but they are very useful to bulk out meals, as are cheap veg like carrots. I make a batch of spaghetti bolognese for under £8 using mince and then lentils, carrots, mushrooms and peas to bulk it out and it feeds a family of 4 for 3 meals, that’s almost half a week of dinners for less than £8, with 5 vegetables included and filling. If you cook from scratch using the cheaper food available then decent meals really aren’t expensive.

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 11:57

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:44

Please point to where I said it was your scheme? Thanks.

You really need that? In your previous post you asked me how it would be adapted for disabled and people with allergies. I responded to say it is not my scheme I think it is a bad idea. Daytime mumsnetting is hard work.

surreygirly · 05/12/2025 11:51

No
I do not want to pay more tax thanks

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 11:49

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 11:47

Well, you could if you wanted to. But I didn't say you should...

Sorry I had to edit as the site crashed having only posted half my response!

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 11:47

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 11:43

You can’t eat a tin of pulses for every meal either?!

eta- that response was to the poster who can apparently produce a meal of carbs protein and veg for under £1.

Edited

Well, you could if you wanted to. But I didn't say you should...

Tana433 · 05/12/2025 11:46

The idea of the government being able to 'control' food supply to the people chills me to the bone. They are already trying to get far more control than they need (digital id, carbon allowance etc) I am in charge of my family's budget and i dont need anyone else telling me what or how much of something i can buy. The very idea should terrify you, never give someone else that kind of control, it is totally open to abuse.

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 11:46

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 11:14

We don't need additional food. We are overproducing which leads to food waste. Even community pantries/fridges can't get rid of all the excess food.

What we need is those who can't cook/won't cook to start cooking.

Those that say they don't have the time - we all have the same 24 hours a day.

The feckless have plenty of spare time.

Why do you need them to cook?

why is feckless not to cook?

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:44

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 11:42

It's not my scheme. I think it is a ridiculous item for the government to control food when the system is so efficient. And to refer to the war - there is a reason that people were very thin in the 1940s food was very limited.

The current system works.

Please point to where I said it was your scheme? Thanks.

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 11:43

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 11:00

Baked beans, kidney beans, botlotti beans, pinto beans, cannelleni beans, haricot beans, black eyed beans, black beans, green lentils, chickpeas. All under a £ at Tesco. No you don't have to eat lentils every day, but pulses are cheap, balanced and versatile - nothing wrong with eating them regularly.

You can’t eat a tin of pulses for every meal either?!

eta- that response was to the poster who can apparently produce a meal of carbs protein and veg for under £1.

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 11:42

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:38

How is the scheme going to be mitigated to level up for those who are disabled and / or have food allergies?

It's not my scheme. I think it is a ridiculous item for the government to control food when the system is so efficient. And to refer to the war - there is a reason that people were very thin in the 1940s food was very limited.

The current system works.

Swipe left for the next trending thread