Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OP posts:
LizzieW1969 · 07/12/2025 21:01

OchonAgusOchonOh · 07/12/2025 19:48

Or they, as one of the posters up thread stated, think it's acceptable to have some innocents executed.

But juries will be wary of sending an innocent person to their death and will be more likely to acquit. Therefore you could find that there are fewer convictions overall.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 07/12/2025 20:50

Bathingnow · 07/12/2025 20:36

Is it acceptable to you to have some innocents jailed for decades? Are you okay with that? Or is it that you accept it's a very unfortunate byproduct of a free society with a legal system?

Imprisonment for decades is the same as execution in all but the name.

I am completely opposed to the death penalty. I am completely opposed to police corruption, ineptitude and mistakes that result in innocent people being imprisoned for long periods of time. I am completely opposed to the system that protects the system rather than objectively examining evidence that a mistake was made as soon as it is presented.

However, at least if the individual is still alive, they have a chance at some restitution being made.

Bathingnow · 07/12/2025 20:36

OchonAgusOchonOh · 07/12/2025 19:48

Or they, as one of the posters up thread stated, think it's acceptable to have some innocents executed.

Is it acceptable to you to have some innocents jailed for decades? Are you okay with that? Or is it that you accept it's a very unfortunate byproduct of a free society with a legal system?

Imprisonment for decades is the same as execution in all but the name.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 07/12/2025 19:48

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2025 15:07

People advocating for the death penalty either don't care about mistaken executions, or can't imagine them happening. Or both.

Once you have reached that nadir of rational thought, then it's all about the preformative vengeance dressed up in a faux concern for victims (who, let's be frank, nobody gave a shit about when they were alive) and topped with a generous dose of "If not this then that" aimed at criticism in an attempt to whip up mob rule.

Or they, as one of the posters up thread stated, think it's acceptable to have some innocents executed.

whiteroseredrose · 07/12/2025 16:03

According to Google, keeping a man in maximum security prison costs £40-50k a year. There are better things to spend the money on.

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2025 15:26

Bathingnow · 07/12/2025 15:12

I don't see the death penalty as unique in the sense we absolutely have to avoid it ever being inadvertently misused.

In a healthy society we have both liberties and restrictions that come at a human cost. Doctors sometimes make mistakes and kill patients, people die in car accidents, innocent people sometimes lose many years of their lives in prison for crimes they didn't commit. All the above, and more, are tragic occurrences, but we accept that is the cost of a free and functioning society.

Fair enough. If you consider the end of a few innocent people being killed a justifiable means to imperfect justice, then that's your view. I don't agree, but at least you are honest. Respect.

Zero respect to those that try and pretend we have somehow managed to perfect a justice system while no one was looking. Because that is bollocks.

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2025 15:24

climbintheback · 07/12/2025 15:11

I wonder what the stats are re people killed mistakenly against those that have been released after doing their time and gone on to kill again.

You "forgot" to include those people killed by the murders who go free when someone innocent is hanged in their place. Which is very much an unknown unknown in this foursquare you tried to draw.

No one remembers the four people John Christie was able to kill precisely because an innocent man was hanged. They are very inconvenient, as they will never ever go away and allow the hang 'em high brigade a clear run at barbarism.

It is astonishing that in a month when the mistaken release of prisoners has been a feature, that some people still have enough faith in the justice system to allow it to kill people. They are either dim beyond belief, or very much the sort of people who pull the wings off flies.

Bathingnow · 07/12/2025 15:12

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2025 15:07

People advocating for the death penalty either don't care about mistaken executions, or can't imagine them happening. Or both.

Once you have reached that nadir of rational thought, then it's all about the preformative vengeance dressed up in a faux concern for victims (who, let's be frank, nobody gave a shit about when they were alive) and topped with a generous dose of "If not this then that" aimed at criticism in an attempt to whip up mob rule.

I don't see the death penalty as unique in the sense we absolutely have to avoid it ever being inadvertently misused.

In a healthy society we have both liberties and restrictions that come at a human cost. Doctors sometimes make mistakes and kill patients, people die in car accidents, innocent people sometimes lose many years of their lives in prison for crimes they didn't commit. All the above, and more, are tragic occurrences, but we accept that is the cost of a free and functioning society.

climbintheback · 07/12/2025 15:11

I wonder what the stats are re people killed mistakenly against those that have been released after doing their time and gone on to kill again.

SerendipityJane · 07/12/2025 15:07

People advocating for the death penalty either don't care about mistaken executions, or can't imagine them happening. Or both.

Once you have reached that nadir of rational thought, then it's all about the preformative vengeance dressed up in a faux concern for victims (who, let's be frank, nobody gave a shit about when they were alive) and topped with a generous dose of "If not this then that" aimed at criticism in an attempt to whip up mob rule.

DrCoconut · 07/12/2025 00:07

We must never ever give the government the right to kill us. Not under any circumstances. The potential for it to end badly is huge.

Bathingnow · 06/12/2025 20:59

Personally I think that looking at actual harm done, as opposed to how vile the crime is, this one ranks pretty low. Lower in fact than house burglars - whom I do think should be hanged.

Catladywithoutacat · 06/12/2025 20:54

WalkDontWalk · 04/12/2025 19:56

Albert Pierrepoint, the last hangman, said that he didn't believe that the threat of hanging has deterred even one murderer.

Yeh but everyone has to pay for these creatures food and care in prison the point in putting them down is so they are no longer a burden on the earth

Catladywithoutacat · 06/12/2025 20:52

When these types of crimes are proven without doubt I don’t disagree with these Tudor methods of punishment,
how sad for the parents of this school

DancingNotDrowning · 06/12/2025 20:44

MyThreeWords · 04/12/2025 12:47

No one is 'scum', no matter how terrible their crime.

Regarding hanging, I can't be all that unusual in thinking that spending years in our barbaric chaos-ridden prisons is a worse punishment than being executed.

Oh give me a break!

it’s ok to call people scum when they are. People that abuse babies are absolutely scum. Why would you even bother trying to defend them?! It’s such a fucking weird reaction 🤢🤢

QuantoDevoPagare · 04/12/2025 21:21

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/12/2025 21:12

He’s not “extremely likely”. He’s 100% guilty.

He filmed himself sexually abusing toddlers.

There is no “likelihood”

What are you even arguing about at this point? You seem far more interested in being “right” than what the babies and toddlers, 100%, without any doubt AT ALL endured and what their parents will have to live with.

Edited

I thought we were discussing whether or not we should bring back the death penalty?

I was just pointing out that videos can very easily be faked, so having a video of someone doing something is not incontravertible evidence of guilt.

It's not a debating tatic I have much sympathy with, pretending that if someone doesn't agree with you it must be beacuse they lack empathy for the victims of child sexual abuse.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/12/2025 21:15

Do you know what? Pontifications about baby rapists make me feel physically sick.
Good luck to you all. I can’t stomach this any more.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/12/2025 21:12

QuantoDevoPagare · 04/12/2025 18:45

But all convictions are supposed to be beyond all reasonable doubt. Lucy Letby was sentenced to 8 whole life orders I think. This is as severe as you can get under the present system. So she definitely would have been hung if we had the death penalty.

I am not saying this man is innocent. In fact he seems extremely likely to be guilty, his crime is abhorrent and I am very pleased he is in jail.

However it is worth considering that digital video is nothing but a large number of zeros and ones. With current advances in technology, it would be perfectly possible to create very realistic video footage of people commiting crimes when they had done nothing of the sort.

He’s not “extremely likely”. He’s 100% guilty.

He filmed himself sexually abusing toddlers.

There is no “likelihood”

What are you even arguing about at this point? You seem far more interested in being “right” than what the babies and toddlers, 100%, without any doubt AT ALL endured and what their parents will have to live with.

SerendipityJane · 04/12/2025 20:46

What do you think other paedophiles in active society will do if a paedophile gets hanged?

See no point in not killing their victims.

WalkDontWalk · 04/12/2025 19:56

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 04/12/2025 18:35

What do you think other paedophiles in active society will do if a paedophile gets hanged? Sometimes it's not about the punishment, it's about how a message can be put across to anyone thinking of carrying out the same heinous crime.

Prison isn't really the powerful "don't do this or else" that it used to be to criminals because it doesn't think in the same way a criminal does.

Albert Pierrepoint, the last hangman, said that he didn't believe that the threat of hanging has deterred even one murderer.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 04/12/2025 18:56

OonaStubbs · 04/12/2025 18:12

It should come down to statistics. How many innocent people would die due to miscarriage of justice, versus how many innocent people die at the moment due to murder as criminals have no fear of prison but would fear execution. Or by murderers who are released from prison and go on to kill again.

If they death penalty worked as a deterrent, there would have been no murders while it was on the books. So no, it doesn't act as a deterrent.

QuantoDevoPagare · 04/12/2025 18:45

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/12/2025 18:36

There was video evidence of this man abusing babies.

This isn’t a “beyond reasonable doubt” situation

But all convictions are supposed to be beyond all reasonable doubt. Lucy Letby was sentenced to 8 whole life orders I think. This is as severe as you can get under the present system. So she definitely would have been hung if we had the death penalty.

I am not saying this man is innocent. In fact he seems extremely likely to be guilty, his crime is abhorrent and I am very pleased he is in jail.

However it is worth considering that digital video is nothing but a large number of zeros and ones. With current advances in technology, it would be perfectly possible to create very realistic video footage of people commiting crimes when they had done nothing of the sort.

ClareBlue · 04/12/2025 18:45

surreygirly · 03/12/2025 16:52

He is getting 3 meals a day in a warm cell with TV
Access to gym .library study
That is better than being hung

As long his avoids the burning sugar poored over him or the shit in his shepherd pie or the piss in his coffee, he will be OK isolated and locked up 33 hours a day. Of course he is just waiting for the blade into the eye. Never knowing when, but knowing even a lostprophet is found by them eventually. There are worse things than death.

Thedevilhasfinallycaughtupwithhim · 04/12/2025 18:36

QuantoDevoPagare · 04/12/2025 18:32

Well take Lucy Letby for example. Everyone was baying for her blood after her conviction.

However now a group of eminent experts have studied the evidence and concluded that no babies were murdered at all

Given the numerous NHS hospitals in which many babies have died as the result of inadequate care this is no real surprise.

I am not saying that Lucy Letby will ever be released. The UK justice system hates admiting its mistakes. Their motto should probably be better a thousand innocent people rot in jail than one judge is made to look silly.

But at least as she hasn't been hung there's a chance.

There was video evidence of this man abusing babies.

This isn’t a “beyond reasonable doubt” situation

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 04/12/2025 18:35

SerendipityJane · 04/12/2025 18:28

Neither would hanging him, if that's your argument.

What do you think other paedophiles in active society will do if a paedophile gets hanged? Sometimes it's not about the punishment, it's about how a message can be put across to anyone thinking of carrying out the same heinous crime.

Prison isn't really the powerful "don't do this or else" that it used to be to criminals because it doesn't think in the same way a criminal does.