Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Working families £18k worse off than benefits claimants after budget

587 replies

shoelances · 30/11/2025 23:14

This is madness. Can the last taxpayer in the UK please close the door behind them.

www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/households-on-handouts-to-be-18-000-better-off-than-families-on-modest-wages/ar-AA1RqxlQ

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
7
Kirbert2 · 04/12/2025 21:23

alphabetti · 04/12/2025 19:59

I think many working people are just sick of feeling like working decent jobs just to survive. When have a mortgage (through saving for a deposit and continuing working so can make repayments) get no help but those who don’t work or work the minimum they can and don’t save get housed. Yes not all but with such lack of social housing a worker with no disabilities as to either suck up high rents or get a mortgage. I feel it is better long term for people to own as won’t be needing long term housing benefits but it can be a struggle at times whilst raising children.

We pay our taxes/NI contributions but then hear we may never get a state pension. We pay for prescriptions/dentists and sometimes go without to save on cost. We pay childcare to keep our jobs returning to work whilst our babies still need us and watch some mums staying home for years getting to do activities with their child.

The welfare bill seems to be spinning out of control and we all know someone who admits or boasts about receiving disability money for anxiety, depression, ADHD but working the money on things which are junk or a luxury which some workers cannot afford. No one begrudges a severally disabled person a good quality of life and slreasonable adjustments to continue working but saying too anxious to work or leave house then spending benefit money on holidays/days out is a joke! Need a move to paying for care packages.

I haven’t been abroad since 2016 and cannot afford the luxury even tho would love to take my daughter on holiday but hear of people who get benefits and don’t work due to being anxious and having ADHD children who do go on holidays etc and it becomes frustrating. Not sure this government is working for working families.

In my area, that wouldn't mean you'd get social housing. It would mean temporary accommodation for years which almost always means a hotel in my area.

The only reason we got social housing so quickly is because my private rental property wasn't suitable for my disabled child so went straight to the top. Otherwise I'd still be in my private rental with no hope of social housing.

january1244 · 04/12/2025 20:41

alphabetti · 04/12/2025 19:59

I think many working people are just sick of feeling like working decent jobs just to survive. When have a mortgage (through saving for a deposit and continuing working so can make repayments) get no help but those who don’t work or work the minimum they can and don’t save get housed. Yes not all but with such lack of social housing a worker with no disabilities as to either suck up high rents or get a mortgage. I feel it is better long term for people to own as won’t be needing long term housing benefits but it can be a struggle at times whilst raising children.

We pay our taxes/NI contributions but then hear we may never get a state pension. We pay for prescriptions/dentists and sometimes go without to save on cost. We pay childcare to keep our jobs returning to work whilst our babies still need us and watch some mums staying home for years getting to do activities with their child.

The welfare bill seems to be spinning out of control and we all know someone who admits or boasts about receiving disability money for anxiety, depression, ADHD but working the money on things which are junk or a luxury which some workers cannot afford. No one begrudges a severally disabled person a good quality of life and slreasonable adjustments to continue working but saying too anxious to work or leave house then spending benefit money on holidays/days out is a joke! Need a move to paying for care packages.

I haven’t been abroad since 2016 and cannot afford the luxury even tho would love to take my daughter on holiday but hear of people who get benefits and don’t work due to being anxious and having ADHD children who do go on holidays etc and it becomes frustrating. Not sure this government is working for working families.

I think this does sum up how a lot of people feel. It’s tough working with young family

x2boys · 04/12/2025 20:26

alphabetti · 04/12/2025 19:59

I think many working people are just sick of feeling like working decent jobs just to survive. When have a mortgage (through saving for a deposit and continuing working so can make repayments) get no help but those who don’t work or work the minimum they can and don’t save get housed. Yes not all but with such lack of social housing a worker with no disabilities as to either suck up high rents or get a mortgage. I feel it is better long term for people to own as won’t be needing long term housing benefits but it can be a struggle at times whilst raising children.

We pay our taxes/NI contributions but then hear we may never get a state pension. We pay for prescriptions/dentists and sometimes go without to save on cost. We pay childcare to keep our jobs returning to work whilst our babies still need us and watch some mums staying home for years getting to do activities with their child.

The welfare bill seems to be spinning out of control and we all know someone who admits or boasts about receiving disability money for anxiety, depression, ADHD but working the money on things which are junk or a luxury which some workers cannot afford. No one begrudges a severally disabled person a good quality of life and slreasonable adjustments to continue working but saying too anxious to work or leave house then spending benefit money on holidays/days out is a joke! Need a move to paying for care packages.

I haven’t been abroad since 2016 and cannot afford the luxury even tho would love to take my daughter on holiday but hear of people who get benefits and don’t work due to being anxious and having ADHD children who do go on holidays etc and it becomes frustrating. Not sure this government is working for working families.

Oh and just to be absolutely clear my son gets the highest rates of DLA due to his severe disabilities and we csnt afford to go abroad either the last time I went abroad was in 2008
We have had one holiday in six years a week away on a Haven site.

x2boys · 04/12/2025 20:16

alphabetti · 04/12/2025 19:59

I think many working people are just sick of feeling like working decent jobs just to survive. When have a mortgage (through saving for a deposit and continuing working so can make repayments) get no help but those who don’t work or work the minimum they can and don’t save get housed. Yes not all but with such lack of social housing a worker with no disabilities as to either suck up high rents or get a mortgage. I feel it is better long term for people to own as won’t be needing long term housing benefits but it can be a struggle at times whilst raising children.

We pay our taxes/NI contributions but then hear we may never get a state pension. We pay for prescriptions/dentists and sometimes go without to save on cost. We pay childcare to keep our jobs returning to work whilst our babies still need us and watch some mums staying home for years getting to do activities with their child.

The welfare bill seems to be spinning out of control and we all know someone who admits or boasts about receiving disability money for anxiety, depression, ADHD but working the money on things which are junk or a luxury which some workers cannot afford. No one begrudges a severally disabled person a good quality of life and slreasonable adjustments to continue working but saying too anxious to work or leave house then spending benefit money on holidays/days out is a joke! Need a move to paying for care packages.

I haven’t been abroad since 2016 and cannot afford the luxury even tho would love to take my daughter on holiday but hear of people who get benefits and don’t work due to being anxious and having ADHD children who do go on holidays etc and it becomes frustrating. Not sure this government is working for working families.

Only they dont because yet again it goes on need not diagnosis.

alphabetti · 04/12/2025 19:59

I think many working people are just sick of feeling like working decent jobs just to survive. When have a mortgage (through saving for a deposit and continuing working so can make repayments) get no help but those who don’t work or work the minimum they can and don’t save get housed. Yes not all but with such lack of social housing a worker with no disabilities as to either suck up high rents or get a mortgage. I feel it is better long term for people to own as won’t be needing long term housing benefits but it can be a struggle at times whilst raising children.

We pay our taxes/NI contributions but then hear we may never get a state pension. We pay for prescriptions/dentists and sometimes go without to save on cost. We pay childcare to keep our jobs returning to work whilst our babies still need us and watch some mums staying home for years getting to do activities with their child.

The welfare bill seems to be spinning out of control and we all know someone who admits or boasts about receiving disability money for anxiety, depression, ADHD but working the money on things which are junk or a luxury which some workers cannot afford. No one begrudges a severally disabled person a good quality of life and slreasonable adjustments to continue working but saying too anxious to work or leave house then spending benefit money on holidays/days out is a joke! Need a move to paying for care packages.

I haven’t been abroad since 2016 and cannot afford the luxury even tho would love to take my daughter on holiday but hear of people who get benefits and don’t work due to being anxious and having ADHD children who do go on holidays etc and it becomes frustrating. Not sure this government is working for working families.

Kirbert2 · 04/12/2025 18:27

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 17:32

I would say the children woukd be traumatised if they are left with terrible parents. Bad parenting severely damages childhood and their adult potential outcome.

Removing a child from their parents tends to be a last resort because it is acknowledged what poor outcomes children in care have.

Bumblebee72 · 04/12/2025 18:12

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 17:32

I would say the children woukd be traumatised if they are left with terrible parents. Bad parenting severely damages childhood and their adult potential outcome.

It's lose lose for these kids. That's why the 2 child cap was put in place to begin - to discourage parents from having children they couldn't afford. It turns out that feckless parents just don't give a shit and will have them anyway.

Bumblebee72 · 04/12/2025 18:11

phantomofthepopera · 04/12/2025 15:04

NI increased by 1.2%. That’s about £25 a month for your average nursery worker. If your childcare bill has gone up 30%, it’s not down to NIC increases.

For low earners the reduction in the earning threshold had a bigger impact than the rate increase. That added another £60. So the overall increase in cost was £85 per month.

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 17:32

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 04/12/2025 16:25

The Care system has terrible outcomes, you want to traumatize the children and reduce their life chances to punish the parents?

I would say the children woukd be traumatised if they are left with terrible parents. Bad parenting severely damages childhood and their adult potential outcome.

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 04/12/2025 16:25

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 14:07

At the moment there is no consequence to bad anti social behaviour.

Yes the children should be put in care and their parents denied housing and benefits.

Yes it would be expensive for the children but absolutely necessary. In the long term, once people realise their behaviour has consequences I bet their behaviour would be modified.

The Care system has terrible outcomes, you want to traumatize the children and reduce their life chances to punish the parents?

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 04/12/2025 16:15

UserFront242 · 01/12/2025 00:10

They are. The landlord's mortgage.
I don't know the exact details, but UC will pay towards mortgage interest after a few months of claiming, and I believe it is a loan. Why should the government be paying off your asset?

They're not if they're only paying the interest. I can't see how forcing people to lose their home - and possibly remain in debt to their mortgage provider - and then have to pay potentially more for their rent is a better or more cost effective plan.

Kirbert2 · 04/12/2025 16:10

january1244 · 04/12/2025 14:27

Also if you are in a couple, there are minimum AET’s. So a couple only has to earn one 30 hour minimum wage equivalent between them to qualify for universal credit and to not be made to search for more hours

Yeah, I was aware of that just because when we were waiting for our sons DLA to go through, DH had his hours lowered and I was constantly called in for appointments because we didn't meet the AET but I also couldn't work so it was a bit of a nightmare at the time until DH's hours picked up again and then when my son's DLA came through I was no longer required by them to work.

Southernecho · 04/12/2025 16:10

january1244 · 04/12/2025 16:01

@SouthernechoI fully support min wage increases and I think that nursery workers should be paid more. They’re great. I was just pointing out the cost, and how much it has gone up in the last year, to those that might not have kids in nursery right now and might not be aware.

However let’s be real, all of the stealth tax increases by Labour have gone on their spending choices. The NI isn’t going to the free hours. And the hourly rate was put up additionally by nurseries already to cover the underfunding, so parents are paying even more.

£2.5k per child per month at nursery is a huge cost. It was £1.8k a month 2.5 years ago in London, which is meant to be more expensive

Yes they have gone on Labours spending choices, one of which is funding Free child care, up to 30hours per week... that currently costs around £8 billion this year and will keep going up as wages increase etc.

Of course the NI increases go towards childcare, along with an extra 29billion for the NHS, 7 billion extra for road mtce and the £11 billion NI cut we all got from Jeremy Hunt.
Then there is 60 billion for defence, 12 billion for PO scandal, 6 billion for blood scandal, billions for the MOD deafness compensation, even more billions for the Post Office Capture scandal, 10s of billions to improve the Prison system, billions more to remove the 80,000 cases in the courts system etc etc

All has to be paid for.

The dropping of the 2 child cap, will cost 3 billion but thats not yet in and will come from this budget, not last year

january1244 · 04/12/2025 16:01

@SouthernechoI fully support min wage increases and I think that nursery workers should be paid more. They’re great. I was just pointing out the cost, and how much it has gone up in the last year, to those that might not have kids in nursery right now and might not be aware.

However let’s be real, all of the stealth tax increases by Labour have gone on their spending choices. The NI isn’t going to the free hours. And the hourly rate was put up additionally by nurseries already to cover the underfunding, so parents are paying even more.

£2.5k per child per month at nursery is a huge cost. It was £1.8k a month 2.5 years ago in London, which is meant to be more expensive

Southernecho · 04/12/2025 15:30

january1244 · 04/12/2025 15:25

They halved the threshold for employers NI also. They referenced it in the increase letter

Total cost for a worker on NMW i.e most nursery staff, is £900 to £1000 per year.

The Min wage went up too, which added another £1300.

Significant increases but do you want the staff who look after your children to earn more and those free childcare places have to be paid for, through extra taxation.

january1244 · 04/12/2025 15:25

phantomofthepopera · 04/12/2025 15:04

NI increased by 1.2%. That’s about £25 a month for your average nursery worker. If your childcare bill has gone up 30%, it’s not down to NIC increases.

They halved the threshold for employers NI also. They referenced it in the increase letter

Southernecho · 04/12/2025 15:19

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 14:07

At the moment there is no consequence to bad anti social behaviour.

Yes the children should be put in care and their parents denied housing and benefits.

Yes it would be expensive for the children but absolutely necessary. In the long term, once people realise their behaviour has consequences I bet their behaviour would be modified.

There are no capacity in care, a massive shortage of foster parents too.

The parents may be idiots but they could be half decent parents too, every case would be different, of course, but taking the children off them as a consequence, is a bit extreme.

A better way might be to have community punishments, cleaning, litter picking etc etc as i agree, ASB needs to be dealt with harshly

phantomofthepopera · 04/12/2025 15:04

january1244 · 04/12/2025 13:11

@Coffeeandbooks88my friend has the 30 hours funded and nursery still costs her £1200 a month for one child. This lady refers to £800 nursery, so I’d assume that it is including the 30 hours funded.

My nursery for two children (I don’t receive funding) is over £5k a month. Just for context, childcare currently is high. The bills went up significantly after the NI raid from labours budget (30% more for me, raised in April)

NI increased by 1.2%. That’s about £25 a month for your average nursery worker. If your childcare bill has gone up 30%, it’s not down to NIC increases.

january1244 · 04/12/2025 14:27

Kirbert2 · 04/12/2025 13:27

I've just looked it up and it does seem as though becoming a caregiver, which I'm assuming means a child under 3 falls under their good cause requirement for leaving a job which would mean no sanction.

You're correct.

Also if you are in a couple, there are minimum AET’s. So a couple only has to earn one 30 hour minimum wage equivalent between them to qualify for universal credit and to not be made to search for more hours

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 14:07

Southernecho · 04/12/2025 13:59

Most people, in fact everyone awarded a council/social housing now, would have kids, so what would you do with such families where they are evicted for ASB?

The waiting list for council/social housing in my locality is around 10years.

Taking their children into care, will costs far more than re housing, let alone temp housing in a B&B.

But say that was done, the parent/s then left to live on the streets, committing crime, taking drugs or god forbid getting in your way as you leave the Theatre.

At the moment there is no consequence to bad anti social behaviour.

Yes the children should be put in care and their parents denied housing and benefits.

Yes it would be expensive for the children but absolutely necessary. In the long term, once people realise their behaviour has consequences I bet their behaviour would be modified.

Southernecho · 04/12/2025 14:03

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 13:58

That is what I thought but many mumsnetters insist it is the going rate....

We need one system for all renters. Same security and same rents. If you want more security you need to buy.

So you would nationalise private rented housing, paid for how exactly?

No, the ans is more and more social/council housing, gradually moving those in the private sector & in temp housing, into the public sector, this would bring down rents, save councils money and release more housing for sale.

A city council near me, has borrowed £10m to do exactly that, the savings out weigh the costs.

x2boys · 04/12/2025 14:02

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 13:58

That is what I thought but many mumsnetters insist it is the going rate....

We need one system for all renters. Same security and same rents. If you want more security you need to buy.

Alot will be dependent on area if you live in London or the southeast there will usually be a massive difference in social rent and private
But in a cheaper less desirable area of the UK sometimes not so much.

BrownTroutBluesAgain · 04/12/2025 14:00

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 13:52

I am not saying that. I thought social housing tenants pay less than private rentals but other mumsnetters have corrected me.

Taking that as gospel I am saying we need uniform equal rent rates for all? Social housing rent charged at the same level as private rent and the whole system renamed.

Just found the relevant Shelter article on Social housing noting how much cheaper it is
ie 64%

Working families £18k worse off than benefits claimants after budget
Working families £18k worse off than benefits claimants after budget
Southernecho · 04/12/2025 13:59

Novemberstorm · 03/12/2025 17:33

Some people in social housing with a history of anti social behaviour are rehoused by the Council. I find this appalling.

Receiving any form of subsidised housing is a privilege. If you then abuse the situation you should lose all right to any future Council and subsidised housing.

Most people, in fact everyone awarded a council/social housing now, would have kids, so what would you do with such families where they are evicted for ASB?

The waiting list for council/social housing in my locality is around 10years.

Taking their children into care, will costs far more than re housing, let alone temp housing in a B&B.

But say that was done, the parent/s then left to live on the streets, committing crime, taking drugs or god forbid getting in your way as you leave the Theatre.

Novemberstorm · 04/12/2025 13:58

BrownTroutBluesAgain · 04/12/2025 13:55

Normally it is cheaper

That is what I thought but many mumsnetters insist it is the going rate....

We need one system for all renters. Same security and same rents. If you want more security you need to buy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread