Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Resentment at 100k

797 replies

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 00:49

Theres a lot of vitriol spilt towards people being “high earners” at 100k and over. As net contributors, and most likely having made sacrifices, stresses and difficult life decisions, there’s many judgements about life choices , expectations and living within one’s means. What is the motivation to push forward in a career and to try and be as successful as one can if there’s no personal gain? It’s all well and good saying those with the broadest shoulders should take on the most - but to what end?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Megifer · 28/11/2025 15:59

Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:49

Newcastle, Leeds, Manchester...

Manchester is amazing it definitely has London vibes when it comes to fun etc. but with far less risk of being flattened by a Deliveroo moped or having your phone pinched

Patchedupsocks · 28/11/2025 15:53

Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 13:13

Did you have support from the government during this time?

Not much help financially, so I couldn't shank it on holidays and having my nails done, spa days and the usual shit that 'benefit scrougers' are supposed to be doing. Took ages to get the basics sorted with rent and money for food on the table.

HelenHywater · 28/11/2025 15:53

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:53

I’m just amazed so many people just accept that this is the way it is, put up and shut up. Childcare costs are a massive barrier to women in the workplace yet it seems many women are just happy to accept the status quo.

People don't accept this, there are lots of people campaigning for a completely different childcare system - but until people like you join them, it will never change. I suggest you stop moaning on here and do something about it.

Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:49

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:46

If you want fun and excitement and a city that never sleeps where do people move to in the UK?

Newcastle, Leeds, Manchester...

SleeplessInWherever · 28/11/2025 15:48

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:46

If you want fun and excitement and a city that never sleeps where do people move to in the UK?

None of the things you’ve just said describe London, for most people.

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:46

SleeplessInWherever · 28/11/2025 15:30

You’re quite right. We don’t even have electricity Oop Norf, I have to work by candle light.

I make my children hold them for me after their shifts down t’ mines.

If you want fun and excitement and a city that never sleeps where do people move to in the UK?

Phonicshaskilledmeoff · 28/11/2025 15:45

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 01:06

I’m not whining about paying tax, I’m questioning the incentives to achieve. Falling into a tax bracket where you lose any child care support and personal allowance off a cliff. A surrounding cloud of resentment that of course you don’t need any support, whilst effectively taking a 20k pay cut

I entirely agree. I think the incentive to make the right choices is being eroded.

I also have no issue with paying higher taxes for it to end up in the right places, but I don’t think it is.

In my personal life I’m very prudent, believe in financial resilience, personal responsibility and value for money. It’s hard to see it being spent in the way it is.

SleeplessInWherever · 28/11/2025 15:30

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:28

Most of the action in the country is in London. It's where things happen.

You’re quite right. We don’t even have electricity Oop Norf, I have to work by candle light.

I make my children hold them for me after their shifts down t’ mines.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:30

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:28

Wales might be a bit far, but people can and do commute from the midlands to London. Or perhaps you should choose a career where you work from home. After all, according to this thread, you just pick the job you want and as long as you're a hard worker you can have it.

Yes, your correct - I just waltzed into a flashy central london office and demanded a role no questions asked

OP posts:
AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:29

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:28

Most of the action in the country is in London. It's where things happen.

That's right. All of us in the rest of the country are just sitting on a dry stone wall, staring gormlessly at a sheep.

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:28

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:25

ooh! how had i never thought of that.... i'll move to wales and commute from there

Wales might be a bit far, but people can and do commute from the midlands to London. Or perhaps you should choose a career where you work from home. After all, according to this thread, you just pick the job you want and as long as you're a hard worker you can have it.

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 15:28

Most of the action in the country is in London. It's where things happen.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:26

Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:24

That you could have stayed there until you no longer had to pay childcare, instead of getting a massive mortgage and then complaining that you can't afford the lifestyle you want.

Im not talking about lifestyle, Im talking about a badly devised policy

OP posts:
Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:25

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:24

Did you know that the world doesn't end at the M25 and you could live outside of London? Or even (gasp!) outside the South East!

ooh! how had i never thought of that.... i'll move to wales and commute from there

OP posts:
Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:24

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:22

I lived in one of the cheapest surburbs of London prior to having a child. Im not sure what your point is? That I could have been saving all my life?

That you could have stayed there until you no longer had to pay childcare, instead of getting a massive mortgage and then complaining that you can't afford the lifestyle you want.

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:24

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:22

I lived in one of the cheapest surburbs of London prior to having a child. Im not sure what your point is? That I could have been saving all my life?

Did you know that the world doesn't end at the M25 and you could live outside of London? Or even (gasp!) outside the South East!

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:22

Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:18

I agree that the child care allowance should taper off instead of just stopping, especially in the SE, where things are stupidly expensive, but is it really a really block to earning more?

You had options prior to having a child, such as living somewhere cheaper and having a longer commute, but you opted not to take them, and that's fine; it's your choice, your money, but you did have that choice. A lot of people don't have that because they cannot afford to buy a home.

Plus, you will still benefit in the long term from earning more even if things are a bit tighter while the children are young. Childcare is not preventing you from earning more; it's just making it a bit harder in the short term.

I lived in one of the cheapest surburbs of London prior to having a child. Im not sure what your point is? That I could have been saving all my life?

OP posts:
Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:19

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:18

So you don't mind not getting it as long as other people get less too?

sure, if you want to read it like that

OP posts:
AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 15:18

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:16

yes i believe a tapered benefit would make more sense

So you don't mind not getting it as long as other people get less too?

Frequency · 28/11/2025 15:18

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:10

im not denying i am in a privaledged position. Just that there is a clear road block for progression. Perhaps when my kids are out of nursery I wont care again, but that doesnt mean i cant highlight a policy issue

I agree that the child care allowance should taper off instead of just stopping, especially in the SE, where things are stupidly expensive, but is it really a really block to earning more?

You had options prior to having a child, such as living somewhere cheaper and having a longer commute, but you opted not to take them, and that's fine; it's your choice, your money, but you did have that choice. A lot of people don't have that because they cannot afford to buy a home.

Plus, you will still benefit in the long term from earning more even if things are a bit tighter while the children are young. Childcare is not preventing you from earning more; it's just making it a bit harder in the short term.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:16

SleeplessInWherever · 28/11/2025 15:15

You may have responded to this already, apologies if so.

Is there a different policy decision you’d support?

I think it’s inevitable that those who earn over a certain amount would lose that benefit, but personally I’d taper it - and start doing so at an earlier salary.

yes i believe a tapered benefit would make more sense

OP posts:
WorriedRelative · 28/11/2025 15:16

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 14:23

i can afford to look after them….however it makes more financial sense to cut back working hours when the 100k threshold is reached

The £100k - £125k bracket is a bit of a weird anomaly that really should be smoothed out. However if you are earning at that level at the stage in life when you're paying childcare it is likely to be short term pain for a long term gain.

You could cut your hours, but that might impact your progression. You could alternatively use salary sacrifice significantly for those years. Either way there is still an incentive to acheive as childcare is only an issue for a short time and salaries continue to increase as you progress.

Megifer · 28/11/2025 15:16

quietlysad · 28/11/2025 14:56

Also, I don’t agree that we do all work as hard as each other. Someone working in a supermarket 40 hours a week is not up until 2 o clock in the morning working and worrying. Nor do they have the extreme stress that often comes with a higher paid role. They aren’t answering emails all evening and weekends. They don’t have to work even when they are on holiday. We do not all work the same, we don’t all make the same sacrifices and it’s silly to suggest otherwise.

Try being ill in a supermarket job. Try needing to have adjustments made. Try asking if you can finish half an hour early so you can see your kids nativity. Try having to make gp appointments around your working hours so you arent docked pay. Try having a bereavement and knowing a few hours to go to the funeral will be unpaid. Try being spat at. Shouted at. Coughed on. Working in a freezing environment. Having to help with heavy deliveries because "any other reasonable duties within your remit". Dirty old men wiggling cucumbers at you while you laugh like its the first time you've heard that joke.

Try saying no to being asked to do extra hours with a few hours notice to cover for Janet when its in your contract overtime is mandatory.

Never being allowed Christmas off. Holidays being cancelled. Shifts changed to shitty hours.

Like fuck would I ever work in retail again. At least when im up til midnight working extra by choice im in my pj's in a warm house knowing i could turn my laptop off any time and just get up earlier to finish off.

That being said, anyone regularly having to work til 2am is clearly struggling with their role - whether capability or resource wise - so should raise this with their employer.

SleeplessInWherever · 28/11/2025 15:15

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 15:10

im not denying i am in a privaledged position. Just that there is a clear road block for progression. Perhaps when my kids are out of nursery I wont care again, but that doesnt mean i cant highlight a policy issue

You may have responded to this already, apologies if so.

Is there a different policy decision you’d support?

I think it’s inevitable that those who earn over a certain amount would lose that benefit, but personally I’d taper it - and start doing so at an earlier salary.

Dgll · 28/11/2025 15:12

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 14:47

They might be forgiven by you, but at any moment they might get into an accident or develop a serious illness which costs the NHS huge amounts to treat and means they will never work again, at which point they might feel a bit more grateful for the fact that it's free at the point of use for everyone. Or they might use their common sense before that and be grateful that they don't need millions of pounds of NHS treatment. Anyone on PIP payments whilst going through life-prolonging treatment for terminal cancer would be very happy to swap places, not need the use of the NHS and instead "only" keep 2/3 of a £100k.

If you pay into the system for a long time or pay a lot of tax, it is like paying insurance. Do you feel gratitude towards your insurance company? Sure, it is a relief when they pay out and you accept that you might not have to claim when others will need to, but no one pretends it is free or goes around saying how grateful they are to insurance companies.