Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Am I the only one that thinks that the budget is good?!

614 replies

isitactuallybadthough · 26/11/2025 18:31

NC’d for obvious reasons.

I mean it seems that they’re trying to help the working class?

I am not on benefits. I’m also not lucky enough to live in a property worth over £2,000,000. But surely the worst off in society will be better off under this? With the energy bill cut and two child benefit scrap? Also books for libraries, national wage increases. I do understand people feeling frustrated at the pension/ISA parts, that will probably affect DH and I but overall I’m pleased as the worst off will be slightly less worse off?

OP posts:
Carandache18 · 26/11/2025 19:25

LemaxObsessive

Could you get your mum to Citizens' Advice? What you describe doesn't seem fair or correct.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:25

Redhairandhottubs · 26/11/2025 19:22

I don’t have any issues with any of it. The country needs to raise more money. People in this country want excellent public services but don’t want to pay for them. If this means paying a bit more tax, then that’s what has to happen. Scrapping the two child benefit cap may help families in poverty struggle a little less. Tax on electric vehicles is a good thing.

It’s so depressing that people think the only way to pay for things is to raise tax.

GentleOlive · 26/11/2025 19:23

LemaxObsessive · 26/11/2025 19:19

You do realise that unless you’re severely disabled, ‘benefits’ don’t just allow you to claim forever as a choice, don’t you? Once your child turns 2, you have to begin preparing to look for work and then I think it’s when they’re two and a half years or 3 years old, you have to go back to work. Of course they could have more & more kids but there has to be an end at some point!
Those who are simply unemployed, have to log on and be tracked as they spend a minimum of 35 hours per week applying for jobs and working on their CV. So again, you absolutely cannot just ‘do nothing on benefits’. Even mildly disabled/unwell claimants have to do work related activities for a certain number of hours per week. It’s only severely disabled or terminally ill people who are left alone to ‘Sit on Benefits’ - which I doubt anyone with any empathy, would begrudge the severely disabled & terminally ill amongst us…….

Pretending to look for work is not exactly a hardship.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:23

Bedtelly · 26/11/2025 19:19

59% of parents claiming UC are in work so I think that's a very harsh statement.

No they’re not. It’s 37%.

venus7 · 26/11/2025 19:23

NoWittyNamesAvailable · 26/11/2025 18:51

My family will benefit from the removal of the child benefit cap, i have 3. My husband works full time, but we also have a disabled child which means between various regular appointments and my husbands scheduled hours changing weekly I'm unable to work. BUT we would be fine without it. (We obviously didn't plan for the possibility of a disabled child and the separate challenges that brings).

I am glad that child poverty, in theory, should decrease but i do worry will people deliberately have more children now?

Those who deliberately have more children will do so, whatever the fiscal disincentives. Unfortunately.

Redhairandhottubs · 26/11/2025 19:22

I don’t have any issues with any of it. The country needs to raise more money. People in this country want excellent public services but don’t want to pay for them. If this means paying a bit more tax, then that’s what has to happen. Scrapping the two child benefit cap may help families in poverty struggle a little less. Tax on electric vehicles is a good thing.

MoodyMargaret11 · 26/11/2025 19:22

LemaxObsessive · 26/11/2025 19:19

You do realise that unless you’re severely disabled, ‘benefits’ don’t just allow you to claim forever as a choice, don’t you? Once your child turns 2, you have to begin preparing to look for work and then I think it’s when they’re two and a half years or 3 years old, you have to go back to work. Of course they could have more & more kids but there has to be an end at some point!
Those who are simply unemployed, have to log on and be tracked as they spend a minimum of 35 hours per week applying for jobs and working on their CV. So again, you absolutely cannot just ‘do nothing on benefits’. Even mildly disabled/unwell claimants have to do work related activities for a certain number of hours per week. It’s only severely disabled or terminally ill people who are left alone to ‘Sit on Benefits’ - which I doubt anyone with any empathy, would begrudge the severely disabled & terminally ill amongst us…….

You can claim for quite awhile actually and the 35 hr isnt true - certainly not for both parents or single parents who can get away with about 16 hrs per week, even when their child is way over 2 yrs old.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:21

JennyForeigner · 26/11/2025 19:20

There was funding for health centres wasn't there?

Yes, all 250 of them. Wow.

ProfPerfectlySoftButter · 26/11/2025 19:21

This is still going to hammer the “starter jobs” market (so pubs/shops/leisure centres, where kids try to get some money for Uni or something on their CV to help them get shortlisted).

Have you noticed that pubs and restaurants etc don’t tend to open Monday/Tuesday any more, or maybe they open later and close earlier? Just wait until after Christmas. If you are trying to balance a budget (or even make a profit), you have the choice of either cutting costs (the most ££ of which might be staff and/or utilities) or you put up prices. If you aren’t confident that people will be willing to pay the price hike, your unit sales will decline (which means you need to revisit the staff/utility costs). It becomes a downward spiral.

I am sure there are a few snippets of sensible ideas in the budget, but I’ve not spotted them yet.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:20

JennyForeigner · 26/11/2025 19:17

I agree. It was a decent safe piece of work which has been received that way despite a jumpy market. Some people are so determined to have been right about doom mongering that they will say anything at this stage not to admit it was fine.

It was completely uninspiring and with no eye on the bigger picture.

This is not surprising as Labour do not have a plan or a vision for the future.

JennyForeigner · 26/11/2025 19:20

Tryingtokeepgoing · 26/11/2025 19:15

There’s nothing for growth, nothing for housing and nothing for the NHS. There’s no welfare reform, and the poor will be worse off because the increase in the minimum wage is more than offset by inflation (caused by the last budget) and freezing the personal allowance for longer, putting more of an already low income in the governments hands in the form of tax and national insurance.

There was funding for health centres wasn't there?

LemaxObsessive · 26/11/2025 19:19

GentleOlive · 26/11/2025 19:12

If you work and pay your way fully, you don’t get the luxury of having a limitless number of children that someone else pays for. Yet, if you are on benefits, you get everything without ever having to make tough choices.

If you work, you don’t get to decide whether you will get an above inflation play rise, yet if you are benefits, you will get exactly that.

The lifting of two child benefit cap is an extra £5 a year for these people. How many people making sensible life choices get this kind of luxury for being reckless. It’s beyond scandalous.

You do realise that unless you’re severely disabled, ‘benefits’ don’t just allow you to claim forever as a choice, don’t you? Once your child turns 2, you have to begin preparing to look for work and then I think it’s when they’re two and a half years or 3 years old, you have to go back to work. Of course they could have more & more kids but there has to be an end at some point!
Those who are simply unemployed, have to log on and be tracked as they spend a minimum of 35 hours per week applying for jobs and working on their CV. So again, you absolutely cannot just ‘do nothing on benefits’. Even mildly disabled/unwell claimants have to do work related activities for a certain number of hours per week. It’s only severely disabled or terminally ill people who are left alone to ‘Sit on Benefits’ - which I doubt anyone with any empathy, would begrudge the severely disabled & terminally ill amongst us…….

dynamiccactus · 26/11/2025 19:19

One thing they could have done was raise the age for free prescriptions to 67. My DH gets his free, and he is still working full time!

Bedtelly · 26/11/2025 19:19

Thankyourose · 26/11/2025 18:57

Conflicted about this, but it’s not the fault of the children of their parents are lazy or feckless. And there are a lot of working parents who need the extra help.

59% of parents claiming UC are in work so I think that's a very harsh statement.

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 19:19

I’m not surprised some on mn like it but overall the benefit change won’t be wanted. They’ve probably bought some time until the local elections.

Upstartled · 26/11/2025 19:19

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:17

Everyone is affected by the freeze on income tax thresholds which aren’t even going up in line with inflation.

To those who are pleased with this budget, do they not bother you? Or do you not recognise them as de facto tax rises?

Yes, workers are wedged between high inflation, stagnant tax thresholds and paying even more tax so that Reeves can save her own skin to pay off her backbenchers to boot.

HelenaWaiting · 26/11/2025 19:18

GentleOlive · 26/11/2025 19:08

No, they are all about the benefits class. As shown today.

Taxing working people to give to those who make bad life choices is not being an advocate for working people.

Are you always this heartless or just having a bad day?

LBFseBrom · 26/11/2025 19:18

I think it is pretty good on the whole but I've never known a budget that pleases everyone.

RobinStrike · 26/11/2025 19:18

The reduction in energy bills with removal of the Green levy, freezing train fares and bus fares for commuters will improve cost of living expenses. Improving the minimum wage and pensions as well as the 2 child benefit cap again helps with individuals having enough to live on. I think guaranteeing school libraries in every primary and secondary school is important, plus investing in playgrounds, and freezing the price of prescriptions. Making PIP assessments face to face again is a good move, and narrowing down the motability cars allowed is also a positive. Yes, I wish there was more I could see for industry but it’s not a disaster which I thought it might have been and I am pleased with where the money is going.

Autumngirl5 · 26/11/2025 19:18

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 26/11/2025 18:58

There isn’t one. They’ve decided their voting base is people on welfare.

And that is what is going to drag the country down further.

VegBox · 26/11/2025 19:18

LemaxObsessive · 26/11/2025 19:11

I beg your pardon? Bad life choices? So everyone on benefits, are so due to “bad life choices?!?!????” 🤨

Not everyone but some people are reliant on benefits due to bad life choices. In any case, having children when you are reliant on state benefits is a bad life choice and having more than two children unless you are very secure financially is a bad life choice. I am now subsidising those choices and being penalised for being responsible and having sensible pension arrangements.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 19:17

Everyone is affected by the freeze on income tax thresholds which aren’t even going up in line with inflation.

To those who are pleased with this budget, do they not bother you? Or do you not recognise them as de facto tax rises?

JennyForeigner · 26/11/2025 19:17

I agree. It was a decent safe piece of work which has been received that way despite a jumpy market. Some people are so determined to have been right about doom mongering that they will say anything at this stage not to admit it was fine.

dynamiccactus · 26/11/2025 19:16

I'm cross about the two child benefits cap being lifted but otherwise it doesn't seem too bad. There is some sensible stuff in there but it gets drowned out by the MSM moaning about things like the cash ISA limit being reduced (which my DH is really cross about but as I put some of my allowance in a shares ISA anyway, I don't care about that).

On the two child thing, I'd prefer the money to go into things like Surestart, libraries and childcare tax breaks.

mutinyonthetwix · 26/11/2025 19:16

Increasing income tax would have been more honest than freezing thresholds. It's also more progressive - when you freeze thresholds more of the burden falls on lower earners than when you raise the headline rate. Strong party over country vibes there for me.

A LOT of the measures are also rated as having a high or very high level of uncertainty on what they will raise so only time will tell if it has been a success in raising the money needed for all this extra spending.

Swipe left for the next trending thread