Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Am I the only one that thinks that the budget is good?!

614 replies

isitactuallybadthough · 26/11/2025 18:31

NC’d for obvious reasons.

I mean it seems that they’re trying to help the working class?

I am not on benefits. I’m also not lucky enough to live in a property worth over £2,000,000. But surely the worst off in society will be better off under this? With the energy bill cut and two child benefit scrap? Also books for libraries, national wage increases. I do understand people feeling frustrated at the pension/ISA parts, that will probably affect DH and I but overall I’m pleased as the worst off will be slightly less worse off?

OP posts:
CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 19:31

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 19:22

Gosh, everyone obsessed with the Tory pie when I never even mentioned it….

Are they? 😂 I mean the prior 14 years of the Tories is the obvious comparison isn’t it? Otherwise what’s your more tax and less growth under Labour relative to?

either way - let’s agree a bigger pie and less party politics for all!

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 19:22

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 19:12

I mean how was that pie under Tory rule…
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/conservatives-and-economy-2010-24 “on a per person basis, economic growth has been slower than in the US, the EU27 and Germany in that time. The slowdown has been particularly stark given that the UK economy, and its productivity, were growing quite quickly prior to 2008”.

If you’re looking at GDP as the measure of growth, it’s always something strongly effected by external factors and things outside the control of the government of the day. A logical comparison is probably the GDP of other developed nations https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/Final_The_IFS_Green_Budget_2025_full_report_amended%202.pdf optimistic prediction here that the UK will be second in the G7.

But I honestly hate party politics. It’s such a distraction and a waste of time fighting between parties and even worse when it’s infighting. 🤦🏽‍♀️ And I’ve tried focusing on what’s published by independent bodies rather than some of the headline grabbing from both the left and right wing press.

but what I do think is really interesting is the research on the links between child poverty and wider society.

Gosh, everyone obsessed with the Tory pie when I never even mentioned it….

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 19:12

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:29

Being proud to pay your taxes is admirable. But under this government, the need for more and more tax is inevitable. They do not have an economic strategy that promotes growth.

Imagine a pie, shared among 100 people. If more people need a share of the pie, but the pie doesn't grow, then what? The share gets smaller. Under Labour, that is what will happen. Low growth, wealth redistribution and the pie gets ever smaller.

I hope you continue to feel good about paying more and more tax. You're going to need to.

I mean how was that pie under Tory rule…
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/conservatives-and-economy-2010-24 “on a per person basis, economic growth has been slower than in the US, the EU27 and Germany in that time. The slowdown has been particularly stark given that the UK economy, and its productivity, were growing quite quickly prior to 2008”.

If you’re looking at GDP as the measure of growth, it’s always something strongly effected by external factors and things outside the control of the government of the day. A logical comparison is probably the GDP of other developed nations https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/Final_The_IFS_Green_Budget_2025_full_report_amended%202.pdf optimistic prediction here that the UK will be second in the G7.

But I honestly hate party politics. It’s such a distraction and a waste of time fighting between parties and even worse when it’s infighting. 🤦🏽‍♀️ And I’ve tried focusing on what’s published by independent bodies rather than some of the headline grabbing from both the left and right wing press.

but what I do think is really interesting is the research on the links between child poverty and wider society.

https://ifs.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-10/Final_The_IFS_Green_Budget_2025_full_report_amended%202.pdf

EasternStandard · 05/12/2025 18:48

NorthXNorthWest · 05/12/2025 18:38

The same old straw man gets wheeled out: question a Labour policy and suddenly you’re a deranged right-winger.

In reality, only the uninformed think Labour’s habit of taxing everything owned by workers, actually lifts children out of poverty. It’s a feel-good fantasy worthy of Steven Spielberg, designed to win brownie points from the uneducated, the resentful, and the well-off do-gooders who love the warm glow of their own ‘tax sacrifice’. It’s pissing in the wind while the structural challenges remain. With so little growth, what exactly is Labour going to do when they run out of other people’s money to spend in their race to the bottom?

I think people are realising. It all hinges on jobs and that’s the problem for Labour.

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 18:41

NorthXNorthWest · 05/12/2025 18:13

I’m a high earner and proud to pay my taxes.

You are proud to pay for children to stay in poverty and the limited life choices that comes with that?

Yes, give your self a big charitable pat on back.

I’m not sure I understand your response. You might find this useful https://ifs.org.uk/articles/closer-look-child-poverty-understanding-problem-and-potential-policy-solutions

There’s lots of other research on the effect of child poverty on economic growth and society. For example children left to live in poverty are more likely to end up in the criminal justice system, more likely to be unemployed and have poor health outcomes.

NorthXNorthWest · 05/12/2025 18:38

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 18:08

Please point to wherever in my post I said that the Tories had done well?

The same old straw man gets wheeled out: question a Labour policy and suddenly you’re a deranged right-winger.

In reality, only the uninformed think Labour’s habit of taxing everything owned by workers, actually lifts children out of poverty. It’s a feel-good fantasy worthy of Steven Spielberg, designed to win brownie points from the uneducated, the resentful, and the well-off do-gooders who love the warm glow of their own ‘tax sacrifice’. It’s pissing in the wind while the structural challenges remain. With so little growth, what exactly is Labour going to do when they run out of other people’s money to spend in their race to the bottom?

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 18:29

NiftyBird · 05/12/2025 17:21

Imagine a pie that only grew 0.4% in 2023 (the last full year of the Tories).

Now imagine a pie that was growing at 1.5% in 2025 (Labour's first full year).

Now imagine that welfare spending as a proportion of GDP under the current government (10.3%) is at the low end of where it had been under the Tories over the last decade.

Now image that lifting the child benefit cap is likely to cause only a 0.1% - 0.2% increase over the next 5 years.

Now imagine that maintaining the triple lock for 2026 alone is forecasted to add 0.3% to welfare spending as a proportion of GDP.

Finally, imagine putting down the right wing tabloids, eating a pie instead, and gaining a sense of perspective.

Also worth pointing out that while I have very little time for the Tories, you’re being slightly disingenuous about their record on welfare.

Under the Coalition, welfare spending as a share of GDP peaked at around 12% in 2012/13, largely in response to the economic downturn post financial crash.

They Tories then reduced it to 10% pre-Covid, after which it spiked again

So the Tory record is probably best reported as around the 10%.

NorthXNorthWest · 05/12/2025 18:13

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 16:16

Yes. I agree.

it’s sad to have seen such an outpouring of moaning. I wish it felt like people cared about the poorest in society.

lifting children out of poverty has huge cumulative effects over time for society as a whole.

I’m a high earner and proud to pay my taxes.

I’m a high earner and proud to pay my taxes.

You are proud to pay for children to stay in poverty and the limited life choices that comes with that?

Yes, give your self a big charitable pat on back.

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 18:08

NiftyBird · 05/12/2025 17:21

Imagine a pie that only grew 0.4% in 2023 (the last full year of the Tories).

Now imagine a pie that was growing at 1.5% in 2025 (Labour's first full year).

Now imagine that welfare spending as a proportion of GDP under the current government (10.3%) is at the low end of where it had been under the Tories over the last decade.

Now image that lifting the child benefit cap is likely to cause only a 0.1% - 0.2% increase over the next 5 years.

Now imagine that maintaining the triple lock for 2026 alone is forecasted to add 0.3% to welfare spending as a proportion of GDP.

Finally, imagine putting down the right wing tabloids, eating a pie instead, and gaining a sense of perspective.

Please point to wherever in my post I said that the Tories had done well?

NorthXNorthWest · 05/12/2025 18:08

Upstartled · 05/12/2025 15:30

We really need a sarcasm emoji 😁

Teach me to speed read and run😂

NiftyBird · 05/12/2025 17:50

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 17:23

It’s disingenuous to keep posting the Gareth Morgan “report” - for want of a better word. Are you really suggesting the CfSJ are tweaking their figures? If so, perhaps you should let them know rather than keep dismissing it on here?

FWIW - and this has been pointed out to you previously by other posters - it’s Gareth Morgan who appears to be comparing apples with oranges. His workings appear to resemble that of a GCSE psychology assignment where you need to include stats.

Edited

CSJ are a right wing think tank, whose expertise is in lobbying for conservative economic and social policy (mostly, for cutting benefits), with limited technical expertise in welfare system modelling.

Gareth Morgan is a widely respected independent expert, with decades of experience in providing technical, non-partisan, evidence-based consultancy services in the area of welfare system modeling.

Who ever to believe??

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 17:40

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 16:31

Workings are on last page. Nothing not to understand.

This is the 22 page report, note the actual report not the press release. Please tell me which page the workings for those two (non) comparable examples are on.

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/CSJ-Benefits_Budget.pdf

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 17:28

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 17:23

It’s disingenuous to keep posting the Gareth Morgan “report” - for want of a better word. Are you really suggesting the CfSJ are tweaking their figures? If so, perhaps you should let them know rather than keep dismissing it on here?

FWIW - and this has been pointed out to you previously by other posters - it’s Gareth Morgan who appears to be comparing apples with oranges. His workings appear to resemble that of a GCSE psychology assignment where you need to include stats.

Edited

Try reading the press release you posted.

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 17:23

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 16:54

That reinforces that their “workings” - which don’t appear in the report - are comparing apples and oranges. I think you’re quite intelligent enough to understand this but are hoping others aren’t. It’s disingenuous to keep defending this, just as the CfSJ press office is dishonest.

It’s disingenuous to keep posting the Gareth Morgan “report” - for want of a better word. Are you really suggesting the CfSJ are tweaking their figures? If so, perhaps you should let them know rather than keep dismissing it on here?

FWIW - and this has been pointed out to you previously by other posters - it’s Gareth Morgan who appears to be comparing apples with oranges. His workings appear to resemble that of a GCSE psychology assignment where you need to include stats.

NiftyBird · 05/12/2025 17:21

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:29

Being proud to pay your taxes is admirable. But under this government, the need for more and more tax is inevitable. They do not have an economic strategy that promotes growth.

Imagine a pie, shared among 100 people. If more people need a share of the pie, but the pie doesn't grow, then what? The share gets smaller. Under Labour, that is what will happen. Low growth, wealth redistribution and the pie gets ever smaller.

I hope you continue to feel good about paying more and more tax. You're going to need to.

Imagine a pie that only grew 0.4% in 2023 (the last full year of the Tories).

Now imagine a pie that was growing at 1.5% in 2025 (Labour's first full year).

Now imagine that welfare spending as a proportion of GDP under the current government (10.3%) is at the low end of where it had been under the Tories over the last decade.

Now image that lifting the child benefit cap is likely to cause only a 0.1% - 0.2% increase over the next 5 years.

Now imagine that maintaining the triple lock for 2026 alone is forecasted to add 0.3% to welfare spending as a proportion of GDP.

Finally, imagine putting down the right wing tabloids, eating a pie instead, and gaining a sense of perspective.

Boomer55 · 05/12/2025 16:58

ICanSpellConfusionWithaK · 26/11/2025 19:04

Labour are all about the working class.

No, they’re all about the dependency class. There is a difference.🙄

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 16:54

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 16:24

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/post-budget-research

I expect you’ll come back with some whataboutery. I would certainly tend to believe anything the CSJ published over the workings of Gareth Morgan, whoever he may be.

That reinforces that their “workings” - which don’t appear in the report - are comparing apples and oranges. I think you’re quite intelligent enough to understand this but are hoping others aren’t. It’s disingenuous to keep defending this, just as the CfSJ press office is dishonest.

Giddykiddy · 05/12/2025 16:45

It's awful - completely disincentivises people to save, particularly to their pensions and invest in business. Nothing to help economic growth. Landlords hammered again which will likely be passed on to tenants. I'd have much preferred a 1/2% rise in tax so everyone pays based on their salaries. I'm also against removal of the 2 child benefit cap. Ridiculous encouraging people to buy electric cars for environmental reasons then eliminating the tax breaks.

EasternStandard · 05/12/2025 16:37

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:29

Being proud to pay your taxes is admirable. But under this government, the need for more and more tax is inevitable. They do not have an economic strategy that promotes growth.

Imagine a pie, shared among 100 people. If more people need a share of the pie, but the pie doesn't grow, then what? The share gets smaller. Under Labour, that is what will happen. Low growth, wealth redistribution and the pie gets ever smaller.

I hope you continue to feel good about paying more and more tax. You're going to need to.

Yep. I think some will buy I feel good about paying more as the pp but not many.

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 16:31

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 16:24

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/post-budget-research

I expect you’ll come back with some whataboutery. I would certainly tend to believe anything the CSJ published over the workings of Gareth Morgan, whoever he may be.

Workings are on last page. Nothing not to understand.

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:29

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 16:16

Yes. I agree.

it’s sad to have seen such an outpouring of moaning. I wish it felt like people cared about the poorest in society.

lifting children out of poverty has huge cumulative effects over time for society as a whole.

I’m a high earner and proud to pay my taxes.

Being proud to pay your taxes is admirable. But under this government, the need for more and more tax is inevitable. They do not have an economic strategy that promotes growth.

Imagine a pie, shared among 100 people. If more people need a share of the pie, but the pie doesn't grow, then what? The share gets smaller. Under Labour, that is what will happen. Low growth, wealth redistribution and the pie gets ever smaller.

I hope you continue to feel good about paying more and more tax. You're going to need to.

Julen7 · 05/12/2025 16:24

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 16:09

It’s not. I’ve read the CoJ report in its entirety and invited someone who made the same assertion as you to tell me which page the “workings” are on. Tumbleweed. Because they’re not there. Of course if you can find them and post a link …

Edited

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/post-budget-research

I expect you’ll come back with some whataboutery. I would certainly tend to believe anything the CSJ published over the workings of Gareth Morgan, whoever he may be.

Three-child family in work needs £71,000 a year before tax to match equivalent jobless family – post Budget research

Jobless families on combined benefits will now take home £18,000 more per year than the post-tax wages of a working family, following the abolition of the two child limit, a new analysis reveals.

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/post-budget-research

PapaSatanicus · 05/12/2025 16:21

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:11

How are the workings bollocks?

is it not true that someone can be on benefits equating to 70k pre-tax earnings if they meet the right criteria?

It’s true, the workings are not bollocks, but it is an extreme example.

It has been like this for years, the benefits system is being used to prop up house prices, and child-care should not be paid for by the government imho.

CopeNorth · 05/12/2025 16:16

Yes. I agree.

it’s sad to have seen such an outpouring of moaning. I wish it felt like people cared about the poorest in society.

lifting children out of poverty has huge cumulative effects over time for society as a whole.

I’m a high earner and proud to pay my taxes.

TeenagersAngst · 05/12/2025 16:11

BIossomtoes · 05/12/2025 15:44

I didn’t forget and I will continue to post it until you acknowledge that the Telegraph’s “workings” are bollocks. Every time you repeat it I’ll post it.

How are the workings bollocks?

is it not true that someone can be on benefits equating to 70k pre-tax earnings if they meet the right criteria?