Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Am I the only one that thinks that the budget is good?!

614 replies

isitactuallybadthough · 26/11/2025 18:31

NC’d for obvious reasons.

I mean it seems that they’re trying to help the working class?

I am not on benefits. I’m also not lucky enough to live in a property worth over £2,000,000. But surely the worst off in society will be better off under this? With the energy bill cut and two child benefit scrap? Also books for libraries, national wage increases. I do understand people feeling frustrated at the pension/ISA parts, that will probably affect DH and I but overall I’m pleased as the worst off will be slightly less worse off?

OP posts:
AccidentallyWesAnderson · 26/11/2025 22:03

Discofish · 26/11/2025 22:01

No one can be sure when they have 3 children that their circumstances won't ever change. Evidently you DO seem to bugrudge people needing universal credit due to cancer, parkinsons, or any other type of illness, especially if they happen to have more than 2 children. Your essentially saying only billionaires can have more than 2 kids, okay sure- lets leave Ellon Musk to populate the planet.

Yeah that’s exactly what I said 🙄.

Discofish · 26/11/2025 22:01

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 26/11/2025 21:00

Well you can’t prevent yourself getting cancer, Parkinson’s no, are people begrudging this type of benefit? No one chooses this.

Or is it more about that you can prevent getting pregnant, and one should consider things like what would happen if a relationship breaks down or death of a partner occurs (not new phenomenons) and if you can work/support yourself if the above occurs, before having 3/4/5 children. It’s this that people have a problem with. Supporting other people’s life choices. Choice being the word here.

I don’t think this is delusional.

No one can be sure when they have 3 children that their circumstances won't ever change. Evidently you DO seem to bugrudge people needing universal credit due to cancer, parkinsons, or any other type of illness, especially if they happen to have more than 2 children. Your essentially saying only billionaires can have more than 2 kids, okay sure- lets leave Ellon Musk to populate the planet.

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 26/11/2025 21:56

Justacigarette · 26/11/2025 21:44

the £60-£70k families are not rich. Behave yourself

As a family with 2 working adults you could earn £120k and get full child benefit as a household. I personally think you either scrap it entirely and slightly adjust universal credit so more families with kids can claim it or you recognise it as being a payment to under 18s like the state pension is a payment to the elderly and give it to everyone regardless of income.

JassyRadlett · 26/11/2025 21:56

KitWyn · 26/11/2025 21:18

But doesn't that shock you?

Everyone I know well enough to discuss such things, thought long and hard before having another child. The biggest question being can we afford it? And if they couldn't they (sadly) didn't have another.

Yes, accidents can happen. But if after the surprise third child, you're really struggling, then why not look for more permanent/failsafe family planning options. It's not difficult and it's free.

Are so many people really that financially illiterate and unable to sensibly plan for their family's future?

It doesn't matter whether it shocks me or not.

On the question of whether the two-child benefit cap disincentivised families having more children, there is an evidence base to draw on.

SpryLilacSnake · 26/11/2025 21:53

Freezing tax thresholds just encourages people to work less to float below the thresholds. I know a few tradespeople who don't work a couple of months a year specifically to stay below the threshold. Increase the thresholds, increase growth.

rainbowunicorn · 26/11/2025 21:53

Justacigarette · 26/11/2025 21:44

the £60-£70k families are not rich. Behave yourself

You behave yourself. I never said they were rich. I was pointing out to the pp that the threshold for stopping receiving child benefit is no longer £60,000 as they had sa8d body with an income of £60,000 gets child benefit.

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 21:50

Theolittle · 26/11/2025 21:49

Isn’t it reforms policy to remove the 2 child benefit cap anyway?

Yes it is slightly oddly,.

Theolittle · 26/11/2025 21:49

GentleOlive · 26/11/2025 21:19

Wait until Reform get hold of the stats being reported by the spectator. The two child benefit cap removal will give more money to 341k foreign born families. So basically an out of control immigration system and then giving out even more benefits to foreign born parents who have never contributed enough and never will contribute enough to pay for all these extra benefits.

Nothing racist about it, the numbers are starting to spill out and they’re a gift to Reform. And understandably so.

Isn’t it reforms policy to remove the 2 child benefit cap anyway?

RedRiverShore5 · 26/11/2025 21:47

Justacigarette · 26/11/2025 21:42

Do you really think an extra £100 a month would encourage someone to have another child? The child would cost more to bring up than that

It's a lot more than £100 a month, are you confusing it with Child benefit which is a different thing.

ToughTimes88 · 26/11/2025 21:46

@isitactuallybadthough yes. Minimum wage may be going up but that will only affect businesses that will put their produce up. So shipping will cost more. Especially if you’re a smoker or a drinker as now cig and alcohol tax is going up (doesn’t affect me but that’s by the by) Also with tax and NI, they may not be able to afford appropriate wages and result in closing altogether. It won’t affect big businesses but will affect local, small, family businesses who may need to close.

Also benefit cap for 2 children being lifted, may help you in the short term (again doesn help help me) but who’s paying for that? The tax payers. So anyone who has more Han 2 children will get more benefits but everyone else is paying for those, therefore a tax hike will be incoming. Electric vehicle tax (which does affect me and I think is ridiculous considering electric vehicles don’t affect emissions at all) and will affect multiple others who have decided to go green and avoid petrol/diesel.

tax on gambling seems like a win win but at the end of the day only affects the middle man cos those who are seriously in debt with declare themselves bankrupt.

pensioners again being caught in the fire line! It’s a sin to grow old these days!

You can’t save as much money tax free anymore! Because tax needs to start from when you’re born, to when you’re breathing to when you die!

it’s an absolute shit show and if you support it, you’re part of the problem.

Justacigarette · 26/11/2025 21:44

rainbowunicorn · 26/11/2025 21:43

Yes you do. Child benefit high income charge dosent start until £60,000. You then lose 1% per £200 over £60,000 up to a maximum of £80,000. There are plenty of families in the 60 - 70k range who claim child benefit.

the £60-£70k families are not rich. Behave yourself

rainbowunicorn · 26/11/2025 21:43

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 21:17

Except you don’t get child benefit if you earn over £60k…

Yes you do. Child benefit high income charge dosent start until £60,000. You then lose 1% per £200 over £60,000 up to a maximum of £80,000. There are plenty of families in the 60 - 70k range who claim child benefit.

PurpleCyclamen · 26/11/2025 21:42

I agree with you OP. It’s a good, solid budget.

Justacigarette · 26/11/2025 21:42

NoWittyNamesAvailable · 26/11/2025 18:51

My family will benefit from the removal of the child benefit cap, i have 3. My husband works full time, but we also have a disabled child which means between various regular appointments and my husbands scheduled hours changing weekly I'm unable to work. BUT we would be fine without it. (We obviously didn't plan for the possibility of a disabled child and the separate challenges that brings).

I am glad that child poverty, in theory, should decrease but i do worry will people deliberately have more children now?

Do you really think an extra £100 a month would encourage someone to have another child? The child would cost more to bring up than that

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 26/11/2025 21:39

I think the measures to have a bit more tax on unearned income vs earned seems like a decent move and the benefits for extra children being reinstated seems like the right thing to do (particularly given there is no actual evidence taking them away made any difference to the number of children people had anyway). I’m not keen on the pensions change for salary sacrifice. I accept it’s going to make more difference for businesses than employees but it feels regressive & I’d have expected encouraging saving would be a good thing. Maybe though the main benefit of this is for higher earners and the economy would be better off if those people saved a bit less and spent a bit more?

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 21:32

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 21:24

Also to add unemployment is 4.4% which is very low. I grew up in the north under Thatcher and it was 25%. Now that’s unemployment to lose sleep over. The main worry about unemployment is the number of NEETS - young people too anxious etc to work, study or whatever. Opting out of working life at a young age is of course a real concern. The govt has launched an investigation into this so I guess measures will follow and may be reflected in the next budget. But raising the minimum wage for 18-20 year olds is a nudge in the right direction IMO.

Unemployment is people actively looking for work. How many are economically inactive?

OneAmberFinch · 26/11/2025 21:32

TattiePants · 26/11/2025 21:04

Looking solely at the economic arguments of scrapping the benefit cap, hundreds of thousands of children growing up in poverty is extremely expensive for a country. Children in poverty have poorer health outcomes, significantly worse educational attainment, poorer social mobility, more likely to fall into crime etc. Poverty is often multi-generational so children growing up in poverty often become parents raising their own children in poverty and so the cycle continues.

Of course there are ‘feckless’ parents out there, no one’s disputing that but there are significantly more families that are trying their hardest to feed, clothe and house their children but are finding it increasingly hard to do so. Ultimately, even if you still think families are living in poverty due to the poor choices of the parents, it’s never the child’s fault.

On the other hand, supporting families in dire straits also sometimes has the paradoxical effect of increasing the number of families who are experiencing the thing you're trying to protect them from.

I don't think it's a simple story of either "give them money so the innocent children grow up to be productive taxpayers" or "let the kids starve to punish their feckless parents" but depends on the details of how the incentives play out across the whole population.

Cyclingmummy1 · 26/11/2025 21:32

LemaxObsessive · 26/11/2025 19:08

My widowed pensioner mum is already living in poverty due to having to pay £55 per month in tax on her state pension and due to the budget is now going to be paying over £130 per month in tax on her state pension. She’s 81 and worked all her life but due to a series of unfortunate circumstances beyond her own control, she’s only got a tiny private pension (£27pm) and is not entitled to pension credit. She’s fallen through the net. She called me crying her heart out. That extra £80 is literally her food budget each month. She’s saying she won’t be able to ever use the heating again and is going to have to sell her car and lose her last remaining independence, just to get through the next year. The last thing she said to me before she ended the call was “Hopefully I won’t be here anymore by the time the car money has gone”. It’s heartbreaking.
(No, I can’t help financially at all as I’m also on an extremely low income and a single parent. Besides, she would never, ever accept a penny from me)

Could you run me through the figures on this one please?

My reckoning - £130 pm in tax is £7800 pa taxable income so an income of over £20k pa. This is a net income of £350 pw. What are her expenses which mean she can't manage on this?

ShoveItUpYourArseMargaret · 26/11/2025 21:31

Re the removal of the Two Child Benefit cap: I am a lone parent to one child and am significantly worse off than those with two children in terms of benefits. I understand that two children cost more but I am still a lone parent which massively limits my capacity to maximise my earning potential. I disagree with lifting the cap.

Bloozie · 26/11/2025 21:29

I’m a business owner and additional rate tax payer. I think it’s a fair budget. I want the country to succeed and thrive - all of us, not just the wealthiest of us.

I don’t understand the pearl clutching over it. It’s the best any government could have done in the circumstances. No one wants to pay more tax. We are where we are. It feels quite elegantly done and fairly spread.

suki1964 · 26/11/2025 21:28

Im now going to join the working taxed and we will be clobbered with the EV milage when it comes in, but that's about it for us

We live in a reasonable priced area, a big house but cheap ( compared to London which we moved out of 20 years ago so no where near 2million ). Neither of us earn enough that less savings is going to make a huge difference

We dont have a bad life, sure I need to shop around and we dont splash the cash like its going out of fashion, we spend carefully - so I dont feel that we are doing so bad, even though our joint income is below 30K

How price increases across the board to cover the pay rise Im going to get effects us - who knows - Im sure a lot more items will become treats

Americasfavouritefightingfrenchman · 26/11/2025 21:27

YetAnotherNewUserMoniker · 26/11/2025 20:35

Or….. you are going without other stuff to prioritise your retirement.

Have you seen the amount that’s needed in a private pension pot for a decent retirement? Especially compared to the public sector (and I speak as one currently working in the public sector which has been a real eye opener).

Yep. I’m private sector but have a non contributory, defined benefit pension. There are years my employer has put 50% of my gross salary into my pension pot.

mellicauli · 26/11/2025 21:25

I think it's fine. We earn well but not exceptionally. They will take a little hee and there ..but I was expecting worse to be honest. I feel there are a lot of people which questionable agendas on here trying to make it all more dramatic than the boring budget it really is.

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 21:24

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 21:09

The markets gave the budget a ringing endorsement which means lower borrowing costs - think Liza Truss in reverse. That’s good for business. Also the government has invested heavily into science and tech inc AI, nuclear and quantum technologies, with big chunks of money going to Scotland and Wales. Also investment in car manufacturing advanced technologies - DRIVE35. Growth is forecast to rise and interest rates are forecast to fall.

Also to add unemployment is 4.4% which is very low. I grew up in the north under Thatcher and it was 25%. Now that’s unemployment to lose sleep over. The main worry about unemployment is the number of NEETS - young people too anxious etc to work, study or whatever. Opting out of working life at a young age is of course a real concern. The govt has launched an investigation into this so I guess measures will follow and may be reflected in the next budget. But raising the minimum wage for 18-20 year olds is a nudge in the right direction IMO.

Lamentingalways · 26/11/2025 21:21

BorgQueen · 26/11/2025 18:57

It’s not awful but I am annoyed on a personal level that when we retire in 2028, the tax threshold won’t rise like it should have and so we’ll be dragged into paying tax after carefully planning our pensions in order not to pay tax for 5 years till State pensions start in 2032.

That is annoying tbh. I think the budget was reasonable but it does seem a little unfair that some of the most sensible people (like yourself) are losing out because you paid into something they wanted you to. I guess there will always be some people that it affects negatively that aren’t rich by any means.