Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be delighted PIP assessments are to be face to face?

464 replies

PAYE · 26/11/2025 14:04

The only good thing about the budget is that Rachel Reeves announced that face to face assessments for PIP and disability benefits are being brought back. AIBU to think that this is a great thing?

It will make sure that the money goes to those who need it. It is madness that such face to face assessments were ever stopped.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
KitTea3 · 26/11/2025 20:56

WhyCantISayFork · 26/11/2025 18:55

My DH was visited by an assessor with no medical background or qualifications. She had an active cold and my DH was on immunosuppressants. She could have killed him. What’s wrong with listening to the doctors and experts about these things? How does a capita assessor improve anything for anyone?

My previous phone assessment was carried out by a physiotherapist

I was claiming for severe mental illness.

The report was....barely coherent and so unbelievably incorrect it was extremely easy to over turn even at the MR stage.
He lied and for every single descriptior denied me points because he wrote (verbatim) "she work 6 days a week she have no issues with this"

Despite the fact that I was quite easily able to prove I actually only could work part time over 4 days 🤦🏼‍♀️

And there was a hit where it asked for his professional input and it legitimately said
"I have none" 🫠

At the absolute bear minimum I would expect someone with severe mental illness to be assessed by a mental health nurse or just anyone with ACTUAL relevent qualifications

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:56

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:02

I don’t use the system myself, but the person I know definitely attended an assessment in a job centre.

Nope. They may have attended the assessment centre on shared premises but medical assessments for disability benefits are not carried out in Jobcentres. The assessments are carried out by private companies - they have nothing to do with jobcentres, and PIP applications are not submitted to Jobcentres, they are collated and distributed to assessment providers via dedicated centres.

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:52

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:35

Completely glossing over the fact that ‘ have you been out of the UK for more than four weeks in the last year’ is one of the questions asked on claim and review forms. Lying is benefit fraud and easily checkable.

Guess what? Some people, when presented with a tick box sheet, tick the ‘no’ box.

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:52

Catladywithoutacat · 26/11/2025 20:48

I thought they were always face to face

They were before Covid - suspended during the pandemic, and within the last couple of years have gradually been brought back in. The government would have you believe that’s down to them. It’s not. And whether the assessment is face to face, over the phone, or by video call, the rules and guidelines for assessment are still the same. What matters is the quality of the assessor and the accuracy of the decision. Assessment by other means has it’s place for those too disabled to travel, or for those who have provided enough paper evidence to support a claim, where a few points need to be cleared up. Assessments cost the tax payer - why do it where it’s not needed ?

breezyyy · 26/11/2025 20:52

Mumsnet will be thin on the ground on those days.

breezyyy · 26/11/2025 20:51

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:47

Agree. 100%. And as far as I can see this is just another benefit bashing thread. I’m surprised nobody has trotted out the Stephen Hawking analogy yet (unless I’ve missed it) !!

Edited

Yes, the agenda has been pushed for a very long time. Maybe we should set up a public hanging platform for all those who have received some kind benefit and the mob can get comfortable with their knitting.

Catladywithoutacat · 26/11/2025 20:48

I thought they were always face to face

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:47

breezyyy · 26/11/2025 20:43

What the baying mob, the term Hellohelga resents, actually want is for there to be no benefits completely. He/she will deny that but that’s exactly what the endless, repetitive threads are all about. To the mob no one is entitled to ‘free’ money, ‘tax payers’ money. What the baying mob would absolutely love is for them to be put in charge of the decisions and for it to be made as humiliating as possible, such is their fury. But the old disclaimer will be trotted out about it just being about the fakers.

Agree. 100%. And as far as I can see this is just another benefit bashing thread. I’m surprised nobody has trotted out the Stephen Hawking analogy yet (unless I’ve missed it) !!

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:46

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:00

As someone else down the thread pointed out, the DWP haven’t linked passports to PIPs yet, and even if they had, they might not uncover everyone’s movements.

I don’t understand why people are so reluctant to accept this anecdote. There’s huge resistance to believing me. I got a message on WhatsApp about ten days ago, saying my friend’s mobile number had changed, as she exited one country and entered another - presumably she changed her SIM card. So she’s still travelling (solo).

Do you really think government agencies don’t talk to each other ? There are warnings all over benefit claim forms advising claimants that DWP shares information to verify the claims. One of the questions on claim forms is ‘have you been out of the country for more than four weeks in the last year’. It appears on PIP claim forms and also on review forms. People can lie - of course they can. But DWP aren’t stupid and systems exist to easily check.

breezyyy · 26/11/2025 20:43

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 19:50

Maybe because fraud and error is round 0.4% in the disability benefits system, which is very low, and yet disabled people are being painted as feckless and workshy for claiming benefits they’re perfectly entitled to ?

What the baying mob, the term Hellohelga resents, actually want is for there to be no benefits completely. He/she will deny that but that’s exactly what the endless, repetitive threads are all about. To the mob no one is entitled to ‘free’ money, ‘tax payers’ money. What the baying mob would absolutely love is for them to be put in charge of the decisions and for it to be made as humiliating as possible, such is their fury. But the old disclaimer will be trotted out about it just being about the fakers.

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:40

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 19:58

New govt rules will stop…
third parties booking driving tests - in a bid to stop bots and resale sites,
resale of gig tickets at above face value - in a bid to stop ticket touts,
handing out PIP without laying eyes on the person - in a bid to stop benefits cheats.

Do you see a trend here. There are some obvious ways of stopping cheats making easy money, but the previous government couldn’t be bothered to do them. This government is doing them. Honest people should be happy including genuine PIP recipients. Weeding out the cheats will stop resentment and PPs saying…my neighbour gets it and there’s nothing wrong with him, it’s all a scam.

Anyone who has been through the PIP assessment will tell you that whether or not you are genuinely disabled is not the point. It’s a forty minute snapshot of your life as a disabled person, assessed by a nurse, physio or paramedic who have a few days training and who are generally woefully under qualified to be assessing complex disability. And assessors routinely challenge claimants’ own medical evidence supplied by HCP’s far above the their own pay grade. I don’t know of any other area of medical assessment that would tolerate this, but it’s OK for our disabled ?

The government promised root and branch reform to make the assessment process fairer and more transparent. What disabled people actually got was more tinkering around the edges which will actually make it harder for the genuinely disabled to secure an award.

Arran2024 · 26/11/2025 20:35

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:22

My friend was last heard of exiting Thailand, entering a neighbouring country, and hiring a bicycle. Funded by UC and PIP.

But you’re right. You all know this person far better than I do. I’m just inventing it all.

Edited

These people had their benefits stopped for supposedly leaving the country https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/nov/16/i-was-scared-parents-reveal-stress-of-hmrcs-child-benefit-errors?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

‘I was scared’: parents reveal stress of HMRC’s child benefit errors

From incorrect repayment demands to mistaken claims about emigration or non-existent holidays, those caught in anti-fraud debacle tell their stories

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/nov/16/i-was-scared-parents-reveal-stress-of-hmrcs-child-benefit-errors?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:35

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:14

Finally. Thank you. Again!

Completely glossing over the fact that ‘ have you been out of the UK for more than four weeks in the last year’ is one of the questions asked on claim and review forms. Lying is benefit fraud and easily checkable.

Zov · 26/11/2025 20:33

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:32

This. The average assessment is around 40 minutes. There are no doctors employed by assessment companies, in the main they are nurses, physios and paramedics. They are not qualified to assess complex disability, or to challenge medical evidence supplied by claimant’s own doctors and consultants. They have no specialist knowledge and are given a few days training as ‘disability analysts’.

The assessment is indeed about functional ability, but how much of that can be assessed in 40 minutes ? If the assessor doesn’t have a working knowledge of the limitations and challenges presented by the claimants’ disability, they haven’t a hope in hell of providing a fair and balanced assessment. The 70% success rate at tribunal speaks for itself, because the professionals who sit on panels are much more qualified than those employed to do the assessments. We’re hanging our disabled people out to dry with this nonsense, and then blaming them for claiming benefits they’re perfectly entitled to claim.

100% this, in spades!

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 20:32

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 20:23

How can they accurately assess how someone's condition affects their ability to function in day to day life if they have little knowledge of the actual condition? If it is life long and medical evidence states that it isn't going to change, what is the point other than wasting everyone's time?

If they want face to face assessments, at least have it be someone who knows what they are talking about.

Edited

This. The average assessment is around 40 minutes. There are no doctors employed by assessment companies, in the main they are nurses, physios and paramedics. They are not qualified to assess complex disability, or to challenge medical evidence supplied by claimant’s own doctors and consultants. They have no specialist knowledge and are given a few days training as ‘disability analysts’.

The assessment is indeed about functional ability, but how much of that can be assessed in 40 minutes ? If the assessor doesn’t have a working knowledge of the limitations and challenges presented by the claimants’ disability, they haven’t a hope in hell of providing a fair and balanced assessment. The 70% success rate at tribunal speaks for itself, because the professionals who sit on panels are much more qualified than those employed to do the assessments. We’re hanging our disabled people out to dry with this nonsense, and then blaming them for claiming benefits they’re perfectly entitled to claim.

Zov · 26/11/2025 20:31

🙄

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:27

thewintergarden · 26/11/2025 20:20

Why would you automatically assume it isn't true?

I think as a nation we just don't want to believe some people are playing the system

Because some people have had such secluded lives, they can’t conceive of such blatant contempt for wider society. People (like my friend) who take liberties to such an extent are outside these posters’ personal experience.

It’s literally the only explanation I can think of. 🤷

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 20:23

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 26/11/2025 20:06

They don’t assess your condition, they assess your ability to perform certain tasks and how your condition affects your ability to function in day to day life! They don’t need to be an expert in your condition, they are following a set of guidelines set by the DWP!

How can they accurately assess how someone's condition affects their ability to function in day to day life if they have little knowledge of the actual condition? If it is life long and medical evidence states that it isn't going to change, what is the point other than wasting everyone's time?

If they want face to face assessments, at least have it be someone who knows what they are talking about.

thewintergarden · 26/11/2025 20:22

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:22

My friend was last heard of exiting Thailand, entering a neighbouring country, and hiring a bicycle. Funded by UC and PIP.

But you’re right. You all know this person far better than I do. I’m just inventing it all.

Edited

Have you reported them? I absolutely would!!

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:22

Zov · 26/11/2025 20:18

100% agree with you.

My friend was last heard of exiting Thailand, entering a neighbouring country, and hiring a bicycle. Funded by UC and PIP.

But you’re right. You all know this person far better than I do. I’m just inventing it all.

thewintergarden · 26/11/2025 20:20

MsPavlichenko · 26/11/2025 20:11

It’s not true, that’s why we don’t believe you. Your friend may exist, she may be telling you this, but if so she’s lying.

More likely you are to be fair.

Why would you automatically assume it isn't true?

I think as a nation we just don't want to believe some people are playing the system

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 26/11/2025 20:19

What a waste of taxpayers money!

Anybody with severe learning disabilities or profound and multiple learning disabilities is never, within the realms of current scientific knowledge, going to get better. There will be a wealth of paperwork, probably going back to age 2 and definitely their entry into the education system, detailing this - statements, EHC plans, IQ tests, social care assessments, care plans, you name it.

OP, what do you think a face to face assessment is going to add to pages of paperwork? Don’t you think it’s blindingly obvious, when they start talking or not, in the case of the non verbal?

thewintergarden · 26/11/2025 20:19

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 14:11

How often though? And when will it start? As I’ve mentioned on another thread, I know someone travelling around south-east Asia. Claiming PIP and disability allowance and UC. Has a flat paid for by the state which has her stuff in it but is otherwise unoccupied.

She feels confident to continue her holiday / travelling, because her claim isn't reassessed until 2027.

I guess some disabilities would mean you can still travel? I travel with a wheelchair etc. But that does seem hard to swallow when I work full time and don't qualify for any benefits

deepseaargyllfish · 26/11/2025 20:18

MsPavlichenko · 26/11/2025 20:11

It’s not true, that’s why we don’t believe you. Your friend may exist, she may be telling you this, but if so she’s lying.

More likely you are to be fair.

Okayyyyy. Whatever. I give up .

You obviously don’t know many (or any) chancers, grifters, dysfunctional people… and you might live in a middle-class bubble.

Wake-up call to @MsPavlichenko : the underbelly of society consists of gigantic piss takers who don’t care about the taxpayer.

Zov · 26/11/2025 20:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

100% agree with you.

Swipe left for the next trending thread