Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Poor life planning..

369 replies

pocketpairs · 26/11/2025 12:01

With the upcoming budget seen many "poor me" posts, particularly from high/middle earners. I find it frustrating that rather than blame themselves for thier life (& financial planning) choices, they blame some arbitrary government policy changes, such as upcoming introduction of new council tax bands.

Example: Sister & hubby earn £14k net p/m. But their choice to buy a nearly £x.xm house in SE & send DCs to private school means they have £3k (approx) to spend on everything else. They could have taken different choices...£1m houses &/or move to grammar school areas.

Clearly this is an extreme example, but I really don't understand why a family can't survive on £4-6k p/m, especially outside of London. Up until recently, I survived on much less and managed to put myself a firmer financial footing in 40s.

Sure this means some sacrifices, but it seems everyone wants to 'have their cake and eat it'.

OP posts:
randomchap · 27/11/2025 22:10

TheWK · 27/11/2025 22:04

Yes I get that, and expect my taxes to go towards education for all. Education is a public good.

What I object to is a punitive tax on private schools.

i don t mind paying twice (through general taxation and fees) but I do object to paying three times through general taxation, then through fees and now through a specific tax on private school fees

We're never going to agree, and the conversation has been done 1000 times, so I'll just leave it there. Our positions are entrenched and immovable.

TheWK · 27/11/2025 22:04

randomchap · 27/11/2025 21:21

The education that your tax pays for benefits you indirectly by producing an educated populace? It's quite obvious if you think about it

Yes I get that, and expect my taxes to go towards education for all. Education is a public good.

What I object to is a punitive tax on private schools.

i don t mind paying twice (through general taxation and fees) but I do object to paying three times through general taxation, then through fees and now through a specific tax on private school fees

UnhappyHobbit · 27/11/2025 22:02

MiddleAgedDread · 26/11/2025 13:35

I think this is my issue with the benefits system - people who get more than they would have as earning capacity if they worked. There's people with bugger all qualifications and work experience raking in the equivalent of a good degree qualified mid-management salary and that feels wrong.

Exactly this. I’m a little torn as I do understand that people need a decent standard of living. I work as a manager in a company and a few women I work with, single mothers, are earning more than me and my DH also a manager once their wages and benefits are totted up. They have a very low stress position and walk out the door with more money and that feels wrong.

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 22:02

Bringemout · 27/11/2025 20:34

I mean if we are critical of people who make poor choices why not people who have kids when they clearly can’t afford it? People who didn’t finish school or imporve themselves in any way? People who use payday loans or spend stupid amounts at xmas, people who seem incapable of working full time hours ever they. Plenty of people make silly choices.

Earning lots of money through hard work and then being a bit miffed that you are getting shaken down even more to sub people who make really really bad choices doesn’t seem unreasonable to me tbh. Your sister didn’t make bad choices but she’s now hostage to other peoples bad choices.

Agree with the first paragraph, and had this conversation with a close friend, who earns marginally above minimum wage has 4 DCs, but is extremely passive (or lazy).

Disagree with the second point. Dsis earns significantly, but has just chosen to allocate her resources to her chosen pots. External factors, such as the budget, are beyond her control, so own your choices. yesterday's budget, or the one last year or the Hunt one before have actually impacted the majority of at the margins.

OP posts:
randomchap · 27/11/2025 22:00

Cyclingmummy1 · 27/11/2025 21:59

Loophole?

You mean policy driven by spite.

Bitter much?

Cyclingmummy1 · 27/11/2025 21:59

randomchap · 26/11/2025 12:06

Some people just like whinging about paying tax. They don't seem to understand that they can only earn because of the state that supports them. Taxes are what we pay to live in a civilised society.

It's been especially prevalent since the private school loophole was closed. Lots of whinging that a luxury choice was being taxed as a luxury.

Loophole?

You mean policy driven by spite.

Spookyspaghetti · 27/11/2025 21:57

JudgeJ · 27/11/2025 21:43

So if the idea is that everyone should get identical lives, where is the incentive to improve one's lot, why did I slog through an OU degree when I was at home with two young children if not to be able to get a better job once they were in school? No country, however left wing, has ever successfully applied this, in fact the gap between haves and have nots in these countries was far greater.
The OP talks disparagingly about her family's life choices, what about her own life choices?

You have misunderstood. Op is saying that the rich should live within their means just as the poor have to live within their means. If you do or don’t have a degree you still need to choose a mortgage or school or holiday or car that reflects your income. People need to leave enough aside for other day to day expenses. Some well off Mumsneters think they should be exempt from sound financial planning. A lot of these threads make you wonder how some of these people ended up with such high income in the first place.

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 21:51

Umbrella15 · 27/11/2025 20:28

Op, im not a high earner like the people you are referring to, however I do earn 48k a year. My husband is on the minimum wage. To do this I work 13 hour shifts 4 days a week. I work bank holidays, weekends, xmas. I live in a morgaged terrace house that needs work doing to it. Between us my husband and I have enough to pay the bills, buy food and run 2 cars. We have teenage children. At the end of each month we have a bit to save (for a 49 yr old, I dont have much savings), and we have 1 holiday a year to Spain or Portugal. I dont go out much due to the cost of things. If I was to get a pay raise, I would be put into the higher tax bracket. I would then have a choice, save or have my 1 holiday a year. I know people who earn less than me, who have houses in a perfect condition, a few foreign holidays a year, brand new cars, and 1 of these people is a single mum of 3, with whose kids have diffetent fathers and hs never worked a day in her life. Yet I am expected to pay more out of my hard earned wages to support her lif style, and your wondering why people are getting angry ?

Totally understand why you feel frustrated. If you were to eat more, it's only the additional amount above £50k that would be taxed at 40%, so you'd be financially better off.

Also obviously I don't know the person you mentioned in the text, but sometimes appearances can be deceptive. It's unlikely that they will be able to afford 3 foreign holidays (presumably with DCs) & a brand new car with just benefits.

OP posts:
Spookyspaghetti · 27/11/2025 21:48

Benjithedog · 26/11/2025 12:27

If they pay tax they can

I think you mean any voter can have an opinion. A lot of people pay tax but don’t vote, they may as well write their complaint on a piece of paper and chuck it in the bin!

Im sick of all the high income families complaining that they don’t want to keep libraries open and keep OAPs off of trollies in between bragging about their expenses lifestyles.

It is completely true that the poorest get told to put up/shut up/batch cook/take in ironing when they complain about struggling.

Also, this is what happens when you vote to pay less tax and deplete the system for 10 years. The system crumbles and needs putting back together. There was a time, maybe before the 80s, when people were happy to actively contribute to society. Although there are always peaks and troughs. Children dying in mouldy slum housing in the 2010’s is very comparable to people dying of poor conditions in the Victorian slums.

theriseandfallofFranklinSaint · 27/11/2025 21:48

theriseandfallofFranklinSaint · 27/11/2025 21:18

I'd sort my 3 year old's sleep out, not because of my husband but because my child is 3 and should be in his own bed. But then I never had my kids in my bed, they were in their own rooms from 12 weeks and slept through from 6 months 🤷‍♀️

Sorry, wrong thread!!!

JudgeJ · 27/11/2025 21:43

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

So if the idea is that everyone should get identical lives, where is the incentive to improve one's lot, why did I slog through an OU degree when I was at home with two young children if not to be able to get a better job once they were in school? No country, however left wing, has ever successfully applied this, in fact the gap between haves and have nots in these countries was far greater.
The OP talks disparagingly about her family's life choices, what about her own life choices?

Happilyobtuse · 27/11/2025 21:31

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

It is also arrogant to assume that tax payers should pay for all your supposed “basics”! Where is your own sense of responsibility?! If you want nice things, get off your butt and work for it like the rest of us. Not take from those who have slogged hard all their life and give it to those who can’t even be arsed to get up and get a job!

BruhWhy · 27/11/2025 21:23

It's debt. In our case, anyway. We're (suddenly, due to both a really fortuitous change of circumstances and a massive amount of hard work) better off than we've ever been. More money than we'd ever hoped to earn. We were desperately skint before this, though, and scraped by with debt coming out of our arseholes, living in a financial hole we never thought we'd climb our way out of.

The debt hasn't disappeared, we still have it. We're just able to actually pay it off now, which leaves us with nothing despite a nice income.

Not gonna moan though, it is what it is. I'd still rather be in this position than our previous one. It's about perspective I spose.

I just think most people live beyond their means. Lifestyles inflate to match and then eclipse increased salaries, and then it's too easy to become entitled and lose touch with reality a bit.

randomchap · 27/11/2025 21:21

TheWK · 27/11/2025 20:01

Not paying VAT on private schools was not a loophole….you didn’t pay VAT on education materials such as SEN provision, university courses and books.

And why the fuck should you pay a punitive tax to give your children a better education?

You already pay twice for education through general taxes and fees

The education that your tax pays for benefits you indirectly by producing an educated populace? It's quite obvious if you think about it

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 21:20

Theroadt · 27/11/2025 19:55

Not sure I’d agree with you that grammar schools were “better” than private schools - or non-selective state schools for that matter, but we’d have to agree first what “better” means - not being goady, some grammars are excellent but some are meh

Agree most private schools are better and have better pastoral care, but the differences (imo) isn't worth £25k+ pa.

OP posts:
theriseandfallofFranklinSaint · 27/11/2025 21:18

I'd sort my 3 year old's sleep out, not because of my husband but because my child is 3 and should be in his own bed. But then I never had my kids in my bed, they were in their own rooms from 12 weeks and slept through from 6 months 🤷‍♀️

pocketpairs · 27/11/2025 21:07

shuggles · 27/11/2025 19:40

@pocketpairs You also assuming that the careless parents that have many children while being totally reliant on benefits make proactive family planning decisions.

I'm assuming they don't.

I'm saying they should.

I'm also saying same thing. Regardless of whether the 2 child benefit cap exists or not, they'll probably have another child if they decide.

OP posts:
Beesandhoney123 · 27/11/2025 20:53

ContinuewithGoogle · 26/11/2025 12:51

It's not about "surviving" is it.

If you go for a better paid job, it's only fair to want to enjoy the rewards.
And you are looking at it backwards: it's because they wanted a private school that often they went for their current job!

Why should they be penalised. It's a bloody joke to pay taxes for everybody else, who get child benefits etc and not get anything yourself.

might as well go for an easy office job, 9 to 5.

I do agree with this. There is not a huge amount of incentive for continuous education, aspiration, saving so the dc have a better life than if we didn't, saving money into a pension only to see it decrease in value and taxes go up!

What on earth is the point, if I can't enjoy it? I don't mean swan about living the life of Riley. I mean go out for dinner once jn a while, take the dc to cinema. Put petrol in the car and have a day out and not have to take cheap snacks.

Charity begins at home, not at the treasury.

Oldwmn · 27/11/2025 20:51

Calamitousness · 26/11/2025 12:13

I think you’re not being realistic. It’s like saying to you, well I survived on 10p a week so your choices should be same as mine and you’d manage fine too. Everyone has different priorities and likes etc. I disagree that if you don’t get child benefit you're a high earner. You’re very much middle ground earner and I agree this is the demographic hit hardest. High earners pay high tax anyway but there’s something to be done around assets and loopholes for big business held outwith UK but operating here. Don’t drag everyone down because they earn more than you.

But if they were talking about the complaints of a much lower earner, they're quick to sneer at the 'poor choices' those people have (allegedly) made! The fact is, for both groups, they merrily live up to their income. Experience tells me that the much lower earner has far fewer choice than the higher earner. I read a whiny thread from someone who whinged about how hard their life was on £5 a month & I laughed because I was the dreaded single mother with 2 kids, earning a quarter of that + child benefit. We got by, it was a bit of a struggle but nobody died. By god, what I could I have done with the equivalent of £5k a month! Maybe I would have over extended too - who knows.
Everyone should contribute to our society. It's what ensures that we have the nice things & not a few ridiculously wealthy people + an underclass of under educated, resentful rabble. I know it's what people have been enthusiastically voting for this last decade & a half but it hasn't turned out well so far, has it? I don't bear a torch for Labour but they don't stand a chance if the electorate just squawk like hungry baby birds, beaks agape for More.

Miaminmoo · 27/11/2025 20:40

itsthetea · 26/11/2025 12:28

No one has a right to anything beyond the most basic of food and a roof over their head, and I would say also an education and health care

no no one has a right to a posh house or nice holidays

yes people do think they deserve it but until everyone has the basics it’s a bit much to expect that you can have so much more, it’s a lot arrogant to assume you are worth so much more

North Korea will welcome you with open arms 🙄

Papyrophile · 27/11/2025 20:36

BunnyMcDougall · 27/11/2025 20:20

Only on Mumsnet—the people with good careers, who have bought nice homes, who want to send their kids to good schools—these are the people who haven’t made good life choices. Mumsnet never ceases to amaze me.

Not really. I had an excellent career and I was equally good at being self-employed for 20-odd years. But if the then version of me had been in the same situation now, I would definitely just have gone offshore. I worked, I saved, bought a home, put money into a pension... Right now to little personal benefit because my taxes are being used to finance the incompetent and inadequate. I don't mind paying my due tax share for schools, hospitals, roads and justice at all.

Bringemout · 27/11/2025 20:34

I mean if we are critical of people who make poor choices why not people who have kids when they clearly can’t afford it? People who didn’t finish school or imporve themselves in any way? People who use payday loans or spend stupid amounts at xmas, people who seem incapable of working full time hours ever they. Plenty of people make silly choices.

Earning lots of money through hard work and then being a bit miffed that you are getting shaken down even more to sub people who make really really bad choices doesn’t seem unreasonable to me tbh. Your sister didn’t make bad choices but she’s now hostage to other peoples bad choices.

Miaminmoo · 27/11/2025 20:33

Benjithedog · 26/11/2025 12:08

If you are a taxpayer you can have an opinion on it.

100%

SwirlingAroundSleep · 27/11/2025 20:33

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

RollOnSunshine · 27/11/2025 20:31

A lot of peoples problems comes down to financial illiteracy. It usually follows that higher wages = higher spending but no thoughts towards generating passive income or building up a buffer for a rainy day.

Swipe left for the next trending thread