Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is this admission fraud? AIBU to report it?

907 replies

grammarmom · 24/11/2025 16:21

Here's the situation.

We live in a grammar school catchment area that gets smaller every year. When we bought our house several years ago, it was very comfortably within the catchment for an excellent local grammar (very high in the league tables), and oh boy was it reflected in the price. Now we're right on the boundary. Among the thirty or so houses around us, some children got in last year and some didn't, literally a difference of a few yards.

Another child on our street, who is in the same class as my DC, only just passed the 11+ (a few points above the pass threshold). We live on the same road, but they are about 50 yards further from the school gate. Based on last year's distances, my child would likely get a place while theirs wouldn't.

Over the weekend, during a sleepover, the child mentioned that her mother has now rented a house much closer to the school to secure a higher priority for admission. The tenancy was apparently signed one day before the cut-off date, making it "legal" for admission purposes. She still owns their original home, but the story being presented is that relatives who were previously "homeless" will now live there free of charge, and all bills and utilities have been transferred into those relatives' names (I strongly suspect that the mother will in fact pay these bills as those relatives are penniless).

She's even moved the children's belongings to the rented property and makes them spend nights there (they hate it). There's no doubt that once the school place is obtained, they will move right back.

This effectively pushes my child down the priority list and means they may now miss out.

Would this constitute admissions fraud? It feels incredibly unfair that someone with £40k to spare for rent can effectively buy their way into a top grammar school, especially when their child didn't perform particularly well in the exam (despite being tutored for hours every day).

Should I report this? I have no more detail apart from what this child told me (and they obviously weren't too sure about some aspects of it due to age).

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
cantkeepawayforever · 27/11/2025 13:10

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:53

Oh please, don't compare this to reporting child abuse/ violence .

This is more like all the Curtain twitchers in Covid who went out of their way to report anyone they perceived to be breaking "the Rules".

in this case reporting their friend after manipulating a child in their care into sharing personal info they had no business inquiring into.

Edited

Apologies, I was not meaning to draw a false moral equivalence between fraud and violence, any more than it is appropriate to create a false moral equivalence between the OP’s purchase of a house and short term renting of a second address of convenience (only one of those is fraud).

I was just making a point that there is a continuum of illegal behaviour, from ‘minor’ to ‘major’, and our personal ‘reporting thresholds’ are different, for a host of reasons - and a supplementary point that wherever one lies in that spectrum, there can be downsides to not reporting as well as to reporting.

TwoTuesday · 27/11/2025 12:59

She's played the system yes, but so have you, by buying in the catchment? Both are buying a place at the grammar, in a way. If neither of you had the money to live in the area, your kids would not be going. She's just paid twice.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:58

Susiy · 27/11/2025 12:57

She is clearly spiteful and jealous of her neighbour and used information she may have manipulated out of a small child to report the parents for trying to do their best for their child. She's just jealous another parent out-played her.
Buying a house as close as possible to the school is also gaming the system.
Hypocrite to boot.

Edited

Sorry sorry I agree. Got my wires crossed x

Susiy · 27/11/2025 12:57

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:54

.

Edited

She is clearly spiteful and jealous of her neighbour and used information she may have manipulated out of a small child to report the parents for trying to do their best for their child. She's just jealous another parent out-played her.
Buying a house as close as possible to the school is also gaming the system.
Hypocrite to boot.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:54

Susiy · 27/11/2025 12:52

It really is.

.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:53

cantkeepawayforever · 27/11/2025 12:50

Exactly.

There will be one of three outcomes:

  • The LA will decide it is fraud, and the permanent address will fall out of the effective catchment, so the child will not get a place (and a child who has applied for a place honestly will get it)
  • The LA will decide it is fraud but the permanent address will be in the effective catchment, so the child will get a place.
  • The LA will decide it is not fraud, and the child will get a place.

Whichever happens is independent of the OP’s child, who will get a place if their house is in catchment.

Despite those throwing around ‘moral equivalence’ of purchasing / renting a sole home with an eye to schools vs renting a short term second home for the specific purpose of school admissions, only one of these is fraud.

All of us have a point in the ‘continuum of concerns or potentially illegal behaviour’ when we would report it to the authorities. We know from eg child abuse cases; people found in houses long after their death that many people don’t report when they perhaps should, and the cry us then ‘why did nobody tell anyone?’ As it happens, the OP’s point in that continuum is ‘where there is a reasonable suspicion of the crime of fraud’. Others may have different points eg only theft, or only GBH, or only violent offences towards someone they know personally. It’s ok to have different ‘thresholds for reporting’ - the OP, in common with many other posters, would report fraud, and that’s ok.

Oh please, don't compare this to reporting child abuse/ violence .

This is more like all the Curtain twitchers in Covid who went out of their way to report anyone they perceived to be breaking "the Rules".

in this case reporting their friend after manipulating a child in their care into sharing personal info they had no business inquiring into.

Susiy · 27/11/2025 12:52

thing47 · 27/11/2025 11:40

It’s really not

It really is.

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 12:51

Great post @cantkeepawayforever

cantkeepawayforever · 27/11/2025 12:50

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 12:24

Well, the council will decide, and if the council agree, then that's cool.

Exactly.

There will be one of three outcomes:

  • The LA will decide it is fraud, and the permanent address will fall out of the effective catchment, so the child will not get a place (and a child who has applied for a place honestly will get it)
  • The LA will decide it is fraud but the permanent address will be in the effective catchment, so the child will get a place.
  • The LA will decide it is not fraud, and the child will get a place.

Whichever happens is independent of the OP’s child, who will get a place if their house is in catchment.

Despite those throwing around ‘moral equivalence’ of purchasing / renting a sole home with an eye to schools vs renting a short term second home for the specific purpose of school admissions, only one of these is fraud.

All of us have a point in the ‘continuum of concerns or potentially illegal behaviour’ when we would report it to the authorities. We know from eg child abuse cases; people found in houses long after their death that many people don’t report when they perhaps should, and the cry us then ‘why did nobody tell anyone?’ As it happens, the OP’s point in that continuum is ‘where there is a reasonable suspicion of the crime of fraud’. Others may have different points eg only theft, or only GBH, or only violent offences towards someone they know personally. It’s ok to have different ‘thresholds for reporting’ - the OP, in common with many other posters, would report fraud, and that’s ok.

CowTown · 27/11/2025 12:39

surreygirly · 27/11/2025 12:23

It is NOT fraud they rent the property

It is fraud.

Mydogsmellslikewee · 27/11/2025 12:30

TheNightingalesStarling · 27/11/2025 12:19

O do wonder how many people would be so blase about this if it was their own child who hadn't got a school place then found out someone committed fraud. Would they just shrug it off then, think its all fair?

Anyway... the council will now decide whether it is fraud or not. Same as verifying all the other addresses.

Honestly, I’ve got bigger problems. And actually, I wouldn’t know, because beyond asking if my 11 year olds friends would like anything to eat or drink, I don’t go questioning them about their lives.

I keep to my own lane and don’t go digging. My life is far more peaceful that way.

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 12:24

surreygirly · 27/11/2025 12:23

It is NOT fraud they rent the property

Well, the council will decide, and if the council agree, then that's cool.

Susiy · 27/11/2025 12:24

grammarmom · 27/11/2025 10:35

Thanks everyone. I reported to the admissions officer of the school in question. Hopefully they will look into it, and as many of you said - if everything is indeed legit, she doesn't have to fear anything.

Jealousy is the strongest human emotion.

surreygirly · 27/11/2025 12:23

TheNightingalesStarling · 27/11/2025 12:19

O do wonder how many people would be so blase about this if it was their own child who hadn't got a school place then found out someone committed fraud. Would they just shrug it off then, think its all fair?

Anyway... the council will now decide whether it is fraud or not. Same as verifying all the other addresses.

It is NOT fraud they rent the property

surreygirly · 27/11/2025 12:22

FlipzMilk · 24/11/2025 16:34

I would ditch the family, who wants to be around someone with those morals? I would tell my daughter to walk on by if they catch your attention.

LOL
High horse#
They are doing the best for their kid
It is not a big deal in the great scheme of life

TheNightingalesStarling · 27/11/2025 12:19

O do wonder how many people would be so blase about this if it was their own child who hadn't got a school place then found out someone committed fraud. Would they just shrug it off then, think its all fair?

Anyway... the council will now decide whether it is fraud or not. Same as verifying all the other addresses.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 12:16

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 11:57

As I said - pretty likely

As I also said above - engaging with you is pointless - I would prefer you not to quote me again, but if you do, I shan’t respond.

ok 💁🏼‍♀️

FlipzMilk · 27/11/2025 12:09

That's an early life lesson for the boy, avoid any discussions with your friends Mum in future.

Mydogsmellslikewee · 27/11/2025 12:07

Ladygodalmighty · 27/11/2025 12:01

Exactly! The hypocrisy is astounding 😲

Yep. It’s almost like two mothers wanted to try and do the best by their children and went about it in different ways.

I can’t get over telling the school like a little perfect prefect. Let alone questioning the child about it. I’d have kept to my own business. If it’s any consolation, I used to work in a school office and we’d sometimes get parents calling about similar things (it was a popular but heavily over subscribed school), and honestly, we’d think they were absolute dicks for doing it. Some of them would be so gleeful about it as well.

It’s done now though, and obviously the OP feels that she’s done the right thing, even if it’s something I wouldn’t have done.

Ladygodalmighty · 27/11/2025 12:01

Frequency · 24/11/2025 16:39

Why is her renting a house in the catchment area different from you buying one?

I know you say she had no reason to rent a house, but equally, you had no reason to pay a premium to buy a house within the catchment area, yet you did for the same reasons as she is renting one.

Exactly! The hypocrisy is astounding 😲

Mydogsmellslikewee · 27/11/2025 11:59

TheignT · 27/11/2025 11:34

Years ago someone reported me when my son got a grammar school place. I had recently remarried and my husband's house was out of catchment, he lived over the border in a different LA but was actually closer to the school. So school busybody reported on the basis we lived our of catchment in a house "we" owned. I still had the house id been renting in the catchment area, I had joint custody with exH and he had a house in catchment area. Son kept his place.

I still feel sad for the mother I think it was, she had spent seven years resenting my son doing better at academic stuff than her son, better at football than her son (captain of the team) better at swimming than her son (always picked to swim in the local schools gala.). It must be hard being so jealous that you'd spite a child.

Jealously and spitefulness is a nasty trait, but there’s a special breed of arsehole that would direct it towards a child. I’d just feel pity that she was so bitter.

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 11:57

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 11:45

If that were true there'd be no need for OP to involve herself in her friends housing arrangements.

As I said - pretty likely

As I also said above - engaging with you is pointless - I would prefer you not to quote me again, but if you do, I shan’t respond.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 11:47

thing47 · 27/11/2025 11:40

It’s really not

well people have different moral standards not they. This sort of behaviour definitely doesn't fit mine.

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 11:45

SheilaFentiman · 27/11/2025 11:22

To set people’s minds at ease - it’s pretty likely that the LA would be looking closely at this even without OP alerting them, given the recent change of address. And it is FAR better that - if there is a problem - it is discovered before the boy is offered a place rather than a place being withdrawn.

If that were true there'd be no need for OP to involve herself in her friends housing arrangements.

thing47 · 27/11/2025 11:40

puppymaddness · 27/11/2025 10:58

How awful

It’s really not

Swipe left for the next trending thread