Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

It wouldn’t be a bad idea if we paid for GP appointments?

412 replies

Babybear260 · 20/11/2025 23:13

I’m no economist or politician but it occurred to be that if everyone (or the majority of the populn excluding students, under 18,s , pensioners and very low income households) paid, I don’t know ~£5 every time they saw a GP, could that improve the NHS?

I know many, many people that spend twice that a week on lattes and cappuccinos (including myself) so I wonder whether if the majority of the population could stump £5 per appointment it would help?? Because most people aren’t seeing GP’s weekly so surely people wouldn’t mind contributing?

sure people have thought of this before and there must be a reason why it wouldn’t work because obviously if if did, it would be an option.

OP posts:
Stressedoutmummyof3 · 21/11/2025 01:15

I have to go to the nurse every 4-8 weeks so it's going to cost me a fortune. I don't think people should have to pay for being ill. Also on the rare occasion when I have seen a GP they are always running late (sometimes up to an hour). I would resent paying for that.
I do agree people who don't show up for appointments should be charged.

Butterbean21 · 21/11/2025 01:09

Like everything else the fees would be exempt for those who are in receipt of certain benefits, over 60 or under 16 and the vast majority of GP appointment slots are taken up by people with complex health histories who are less likely to be working and be able to pay an appointment fee. Therefore it would be an expensive system to put in place for a low net gain of income.

Tigergirl80 · 21/11/2025 01:07

I do think there should be fines for missed appointments and inappropriate use of A&E. A few years ago someone took their child to A&E because they had dog dirt on their shoe.

saffglass · 21/11/2025 01:03

I'm not for it it would start as a small fee and quickly end up out of hand leading the most vulnerable without proper care. I'd rather pay more tax.

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 21/11/2025 00:56

SummerInSun · 20/11/2025 23:16

That is - very roughly - the Australian system, and I think the system in many continental European countries. Everyone makes a small contribution when they go to the GP or use other medical services. Seems obvious to me. But it goes against the absolute article of faith in the U.K. that all healthcare must be completely free for everyone, even those of us who wouldn’t even notice it if we kicked in £10 every time we went to the GP. Especially if that meant we could actually get an appointment.

Small?!

A regular GP appointment costs me more than $100. I will get about a third of that back as a Medicare rebate, but have to stump up for the full cost upfront then wait a couple of days.

It hasn't led to better access btw - last time I called for an appointment it was a 3 week wait (to discuss tests results re: possible cancer) and their books are closed to new patients moving into the area. Despite the difficulty and cost of getting an appointment, if I don't go at least every 2 years they will throw me off their books and give my 'spot' to a new patient.

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 21/11/2025 00:51

Notmymarmosets · 21/11/2025 00:38

Swedish model max out at £115 per year. Yes it sounds good. I'm going to say more or less everyone could afford this. It's £2 per week fgs. Less than one school lunch, the same as a bus fare. I'm sure we would prefer not to pay, but if our health depended on it, we would re prioritise and pay.

So people could simply let their kids go hungry at school every Wednesday to pay for it? And if they need a bus to and from the GP, then that suddenly makes it the equivalent of three bus fares.

At least with the Starbucks cliche, it's only a luxury that people with health conditions can be expected to do without.

lowo · 21/11/2025 00:48

I’d want more freedom of which gp you can go to not just the one surgery, like with private drs. I’d be resentful and want a refund if I’d had to pay for the multiple multiple appts I went to my gp prior to my cancer diagnosis where he kept calling me anxious and didn’t refer me, I ended up having to go to a private to progress with that.

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 21/11/2025 00:46

I also agree with pp that said it changes expectations.

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 21/11/2025 00:44

Maybe we should also start charging people £10 if they have to call out the fire brigade? Why should it be free and funded centrally by taxpayers, eh?

After all, if your house is burning down and it's a tenner before they'll turn the hoses on, it's got to be worth prioritising and finding the money somewhere, isn't it.......?

youalright · 21/11/2025 00:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You are everything what is wrong with healthcare you work for the nhs. You think people are abusing the system, wasting your time, are entitled and you dislike the elderly and blame them for the state of the country. And you seem to think drs can do no wrong

Kirbert2 · 21/11/2025 00:41

youalright · 21/11/2025 00:28

8 to 10 years to get a diagnosis. Speak to anyone who has the diagnosis and they will tell you how they was repeatedly dismissed by drs. What about sepsis up to 20% of cases are missed by drs. I could go on.

Yep.

The main reason my son spent 308 days in hospital and is now disabled?

Sepsis which progressed to septic shock. It was missed despite low blood pressure and a heart rate of 165.

Negroany · 21/11/2025 00:40

Not against it in principle but implementing it, with the admin, the collection of the money, the means testing of those who don't pay.....not just that it would cost millions to set up, but also with the NHS track record of implementing new systems, it would never get done.

Daytimetellyqueen · 21/11/2025 00:40

bottledboot · 20/11/2025 23:19

Everyone makes a small contribution when they go to the GP or use other medical services. Seems obvious to me

But our model isn’t like other European countries. I would be happy to move to a system like France but a lot of the public won’t want it.

What is the French system?

Justacigarette · 21/11/2025 00:38

It would end up being the type that don’t work and already get lots of bloody benefits that get free appointments, and yet those in lower paid jobs who probably come out with less who would have to pay

Notmymarmosets · 21/11/2025 00:38

Swedish model max out at £115 per year. Yes it sounds good. I'm going to say more or less everyone could afford this. It's £2 per week fgs. Less than one school lunch, the same as a bus fare. I'm sure we would prefer not to pay, but if our health depended on it, we would re prioritise and pay.

KitTea3 · 21/11/2025 00:37

My GP apparently can see the future
(Sorry was supposed to be quoting a post but it disappeared)

The blood tests I had 18 months ago came back "normal" every single one of my original symptoms has persisted and now have additional ones but according to my GP they don't need to ever repeat blood tests because they were fine 18 months ago and it's just anxiety. 🤔

Apparently blood tests never change , so there's little point in me going back. So I guess if they want to save money they can just tell us it's all in our heads 🤷

I figure it's either going to worsen to the point I end up hospitalised, at which point they might actually try and find out what's wrong or ill end up dead 🫠

As an aside I don't actually mind paying for my prescriptions, I have a PPC which is about £11 a month and being on about 7 different meds or saves money. But also all of those meds actually help and treat me. Same can't be said for paying for a GP appointment....

Pinkfluffypencilcase · 21/11/2025 00:37

SummerInSun · 20/11/2025 23:23

See I wonder about this. Or is the British “mustn’t bother the doctor / waste the doctor’s time” attitude that causes so many people not to see the doctor until well after they should partly because it is free? If they were paying even a contribution, might people feel more entitled to actually go? (Should be free for people on very low incomes who would notice the £5 or £10 charge though).

Interesting idea. But I think a charge would put people off. It certainly would’ve put me off going to see the doctor about a lump that turned out to be cancer. I only went because my mum made me.

Maybe a charge for no shows? Or second no show.

Oldgreeneyedone · 21/11/2025 00:35

Yeah and home visits...

bottledboot · 21/11/2025 00:34

If I paid more I would want a better service, more appointments on the weekends & in the evenings for one.

XenoBitch · 21/11/2025 00:32

As someone who has a phobia about all things medical, putting a charge on seeing a GP would just be another barrier to me getting help.

TempestTost · 21/11/2025 00:32

The devil is in the details OP, but systems like this seem to work well in other places.

Overall I think something like a European style system seems to work best. I understand why people like theidea of a free at point of use model for all, I really do, but in the end that's an ideological thing. I'm pragmatic, what actually produces a good working healthcare system.

Oldgreeneyedone · 21/11/2025 00:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I am not sure what old people you know but most of them I know are on the breadline

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 21/11/2025 00:32

Kirbert2 · 21/11/2025 00:16

It would still mean that ultimately, having a disability or chronic health condition etc would just become more expensive.

Absolutely this. If it's 'only' £115 or whatever, how would the people who dismiss this as trivial feel about being charged a routine £115 'admin fee' each year for the GP, just because they are lucky enough to enjoy excellent health and never need to see them?

There is a lot wrong with the NHS, but as somebody with a life-limiting illness requiring a lot of medication and healthcare, I love the fact that we don't punish people financially in this country for suffering from poor health.

youalright · 21/11/2025 00:31

user1471538275 · 21/11/2025 00:27

People already make demands that are unrealistic.

This is common in other countries and I think we would simply get used to it.

We would adjust our expectations and maybe start to actually appreciate health care and health care professionals a bit more - maybe actually listening to what they say if we're paying for it rather than immediately saying they're wrong because Dr google says otherwise and demanding a second opinion.

Anyway, too late for me now. (and the continuation of free universal healthcare)

If i was paying id expect them to listen to what I had to say. You think people are entitled now you wait. Id also be significantly quicker to sue if id paid. Ive been almost killed so many times by drs and have let it go and tried to understand mistakes happen but if im paying my expectations will be significantly higher.

DeedlessIndeed · 21/11/2025 00:31

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 21/11/2025 00:24

It would change the whole dynamic, with people ceasing to think of themselves as patients and instead as paying customers - even if the amount they contribute is only a fraction of the true cost.

People would demand much better healthcare - maybe to an unrealistic level - and on their own terms. Demands on GP surgery staff would increase sharply and people would refuse to be fobbed off or asked to keep coming back another time.

People would also be much more selective about whether they go to the GP or not, BUT not based on the right reasons. A millionaire with an annoying sniffly cold could toddle along without thinking twice; whereas a very poor person who fears they may have cancer, or diabetes, or meningitis - or maybe more likely has symptoms of this that they don't appreciate the severity of - could put off getting it checked out, and it could well end up too late for them.

This is a really good point about changing expectations, even for a nominal fee.
I imagine that some patients would become insufferable with a "the customer is always right" type of attitude.