Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

MIL wanting 1:1 time with GC aged 1

260 replies

Hideousfrump · 17/11/2025 14:39

DS has just turned 1 and MIL has started asking if she can have him for the day on her own as she feels like she doesn’t get any quality time with him (we see her every 1-2 weeks) and to ‘give me a break’.

I’m not really sure how I feel about it - 1 feels very young for him to be doing this and MIL is v pushy so if I say yes once then she’ll constantly expect it and I know she’ll be pestering for sleepovers as well. I also love spending time with my little man and don’t need or want a break anyway!

DS still naps in his cot for hours at a time so it’s not like she can take him out for the day anyway so it will mean MIL taking him to one of his toddler classes which selfishly I really like doing with him. She looks after SILs children 3+ times a week so she gets to do all of that anyway albeit not with DS.

MIL took about a decade to accept me as part of the family as well so I do feel like this is her way of managing me out of the picture as well.

AIBU to not want her having DS on her own yet?

OP posts:
babyproblems · 17/11/2025 16:16

I think if he naps the whole day is pointless but I think at 1 a few hours with him is ok. It sounds like you dont like her much - that’s ok but remember your child needs a relationship with her regardless of that. Grandmas are lovely even if they don’t make good MILs! X

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:16

Bedtelly · 17/11/2025 16:01

Mine spent one on one time with grandparents from younger than 1 tbh, I was very happy to let them.

If you don't like her or don't trust her then that's fine just say that. This whole my child should never be apart from me very Mumsnet and quite disingenuous.

This whole my child should never be apart from me very Mumsnet and quite disingenuous.

But IS op actually saying that?

There is a world of difference between being happy to leave your child with someone else, and being happy about someone else requesting you leave your child with them. Fair enough the MIl wants to spend time, but quality time with a child doesn't require the absence of parents. or shouldn't.

Strawberry53 · 17/11/2025 16:16

He’s your baby and it’s your decision. If you wanted to meet her half way perhaps you could let her take him to a class or take him for a couple of hours while you get your nails done or something and meet them afterwards but it’s completely your call. I don’t really get MIL being overbearing like this though, they should take the lead from the mum. Also she should really be focussed on working on her relationship with you first especially if she was not accepting of you at the beginning (why was she not by the way?) building a good relationship with your daughter in law should come first and then the rest will naturally follow.

lanthanum · 17/11/2025 16:16

Deliberations · 17/11/2025 15:18

Honestly I'm shocked with the vote with soe many people agreeing with you.

Surely it's perfectly normal for a grandmother to want to have their grandchildren alone? Especially as this grandmother already has experience as they've been looking after their other grand children.

My children (now adults) had their grandparents looking after them from about 6 months - gradually building up the time.
It's great development for any baby to have time apart from their parents - otherwise you might have problems when you need to drop them off at nursery or pre-school etc.

If your MIL has form for pushing boundaries I can understand your concern to a point - but if you put boundaries in place - perhaps just start with an afternoon every now and then? If that builds up to sleepovers - perfect that means you get to have some quality time of your own!

"Surely it's perfectly normal for a grandmother to want to have their grandchildren alone?"

It's perfectly normal for them to want to spend time with their grandchildren. It's perfectly normal for them to be willing to have their grandchildren alone.

But why should they need the parents not to be there? Do they want to do something the parents wouldn't be happy with? Do they dislike the mother that much?

If it's "so mum can have a break" and mum doesn't want a long break, there's no need. Grandma can come and visit, maybe look after the baby while mum gets lunch ready / has a shower / goes out for a haircut, and maybe later on it will be useful for her to take them for longer.

I don't think mine got left with anyone else for more than a couple of hours until she started 3-hour nursery sessions at 2 (with which she coped fine). Grandparents were involved, but were happy to enjoy playing with her in my presence.

Happyharper · 17/11/2025 16:15

My DS is a similar age - are you not back at work yet? I'd love this as an alternative to paid childcare - I'm quite jealous! Although completely get feeling strange about leaving him with someone else all day but better family than strangers.

JournalistEmily · 17/11/2025 16:14

Surely this is a kind thing to do? They only benefit from that time I promise you! Also you want them to have a strong loving rship when they’re older.

MMmomDD · 17/11/2025 16:14

@Hideousfrump - it’s your first child and you are being very PFB, which is fine. Many of us have been there.

FWIW - it’s not about ‘managing you out of the picture’. She is already babysitting other GKs regularly. MILs cant get it right generally - MN is full of posts about MIL doing so much for one set of GK’s but not the other.

You don’t need to leave her with your child on her own yet- totally your choice. But you also don’t need to demonise her and look for evil intentions. It’s not a bad thing for kids to have close relationship with other family members. It’s how we used to grow up - with grandparents and cousins around. Grandparents can be very helpful, and one day you may actually need that help.

How about babysitting in the evening - so you and H can have a date-night? Lets you have a bit of adult time which is important for any relationship, and she can feel helpful.

noidea69 · 17/11/2025 16:14

Does your mum have one on one time with your child?

RubySquid · 17/11/2025 16:14

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:07

But I don't get the impression OP wants the child distant from the MIL. She just doesn't want a kind of "temporary custody rights" arrangement.

Edited

How is it temporary custody rights?

HereintheloveofChristIstand · 17/11/2025 16:12

fast forward 5 years :
'MIL treats my SIL's kids far better, takes them out, buys them more presents, and we are the poor relations'.

MintTwirl · 17/11/2025 16:12

If you really don’t want to do it then say no.

I wouldn’t give up the things you enjoy doing with ds but you could use it to your advantage and do things that aren’t so fun with a toddler in tow like getting your hair done, medical appointments, looking around the shops, meetings friend for coffee or a lunch out with DH. It doesn’t need to be a regular arrangement but it can be very helpful to have someone who you can leave dc with if necessary.

MrFluffyDogIsMyBestFriend · 17/11/2025 16:12

Um she's just a grandmother who wants to see her grandchild. I wouldn't do it while he still has naps if you think she won't follow the routine but I'm not really sure why you wouldn't want your child to have a proper relationship with their grandma (which she can't have if you're there because it seems obvious you'll be watching her every move).

RubySquid · 17/11/2025 16:11

thepariscrimefiles · 17/11/2025 15:39

Maybe OP isn't comfortable about leaving her baby with someone who refused to welcome OP into the family for 10 years. It sounds as though she is only interested now because OP has given birth to her grandchild. Therefore, as far as OP is concerned, she isn't a particularly nice person so she will be wary of leaving her child with her.

Normally, you don't get to treat someone like shit for 10 years and then expect them to like and trust you enough to feel comfortable leaving your baby with them.

Hmm my mother and nana ( her MIL) detested each other. Yet i was still allowed to stay at Nanas very regularly, spent plenty of time with her from very young. However my mother did her best to avoid seeing her MIL. Didn't affect my relationship with mum or nana tbh

fruitfly3 · 17/11/2025 16:09

Appreciate the many comments saying they’d bite your hand off - well yes, if there was no undercurrent of control in the situation. That’s not the case though. I had this with my Dad who had mild narcissistic tendencies. It came loaded with ‘I’ll be doing things my way’ and judgement of what I did for my DC. So it was a hard no. If it had been my lovely mum, then I would had snapped her hand off. It’s a consistent theme OP, controlling (and to be fair, sometimes lovely normal GP) wanting 1:1 time with their GC. If it’s not necessary, then I don’t see the absolute need for it - the only people most one year old wants are their mum and dad.

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:08

canklesmctacotits · 17/11/2025 16:06

My MIL was like this, my DC were her first GDC. She wanted them to "need" her, rely on her even if just for milk/food, come to her rather than me when they fell and needed cuddles etc. She also loves children, all children, and is very good with them. She wants nothing more than for her GDC (she has many now) to say "I love you grandma!" - it's what fills her cup. Obviously there's nothing bad about that, quite the contrary - but all her GDC are now old enough to sense or feel that this neediness is off-putting. They all know, in an age-appropriate way, that the way she is with them is about her and not about them. As a consequence, they can all take or leave her, so now she finds herself bribing them with gifts and experiences and things she knows her parents wouldn't splurge on (under the guise of grandparents are there to spoil their grandkids - but everyone knows the real reason, including the grandchildren).

I gave up work to be with my DC, so the whole overnight/have a day off didn't fly with me. But from the age of 5 or 6 they would go to her for a week in the summer holidays, and had a grand old time. All the annual holidays were/are spent with the in-laws (my family abroad), and they saw them pretty much whenever they wanted. They're good and decent people so I would never have said no, but there was never any denying that this need for "alone time" was all about her and her children rejecting her/feeling lonely, and not at all about the children themselves, let alone DH or me.

Totally agree with this.

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:07

RubySquid · 17/11/2025 16:03

That's fine Do as you wish. Just don't moan when you mil has a better relationship with SIL kids or you want a break later on and she's then not willing

But I don't get the impression OP wants the child distant from the MIL. She just doesn't want a kind of "temporary custody rights" arrangement.

canklesmctacotits · 17/11/2025 16:06

My MIL was like this, my DC were her first GDC. She wanted them to "need" her, rely on her even if just for milk/food, come to her rather than me when they fell and needed cuddles etc. She also loves children, all children, and is very good with them. She wants nothing more than for her GDC (she has many now) to say "I love you grandma!" - it's what fills her cup. Obviously there's nothing bad about that, quite the contrary - but all her GDC are now old enough to sense or feel that this neediness is off-putting. They all know, in an age-appropriate way, that the way she is with them is about her and not about them. As a consequence, they can all take or leave her, so now she finds herself bribing them with gifts and experiences and things she knows her parents wouldn't splurge on (under the guise of grandparents are there to spoil their grandkids - but everyone knows the real reason, including the grandchildren).

I gave up work to be with my DC, so the whole overnight/have a day off didn't fly with me. But from the age of 5 or 6 they would go to her for a week in the summer holidays, and had a grand old time. All the annual holidays were/are spent with the in-laws (my family abroad), and they saw them pretty much whenever they wanted. They're good and decent people so I would never have said no, but there was never any denying that this need for "alone time" was all about her and her children rejecting her/feeling lonely, and not at all about the children themselves, let alone DH or me.

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:05

Rosemary183 · 17/11/2025 16:03

I don’t know why, but I get an impression that she’s possibly wanting to do it for her own needs and not so much yours or your child’s. GP who truly care about you will first ask what you need and want instead of making suggestions based on what they would like. Definitely trust your gut and only do what you’re comfortable with.

BINGO!!

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 16:05

Praying4Peace · 17/11/2025 16:03

Because she can take him out and about ( or play /read stories etc).
It is healthy for the gp/gc relationship and I am unsure why you feel it wouldn't be a positive thing.
Would you feel the same if it was your mum who was asking?
Just a thought.
When my GC was a baby, I took him out every week (work permitting). Walks in park /feeding ducks etc.
Your child will positively benefit from the experience and as much as you adore your child, some 'you' time will be good

I have trouble imagining her mum asking op not to come along if she preferred to though.

It's actually a weird request.

Rosemary183 · 17/11/2025 16:03

I don’t know why, but I get an impression that she’s possibly wanting to do it for her own needs and not so much yours or your child’s. GP who truly care about you will first ask what you need and want instead of making suggestions based on what they would like. Definitely trust your gut and only do what you’re comfortable with.

RubySquid · 17/11/2025 16:03

Hideousfrump · 17/11/2025 14:39

DS has just turned 1 and MIL has started asking if she can have him for the day on her own as she feels like she doesn’t get any quality time with him (we see her every 1-2 weeks) and to ‘give me a break’.

I’m not really sure how I feel about it - 1 feels very young for him to be doing this and MIL is v pushy so if I say yes once then she’ll constantly expect it and I know she’ll be pestering for sleepovers as well. I also love spending time with my little man and don’t need or want a break anyway!

DS still naps in his cot for hours at a time so it’s not like she can take him out for the day anyway so it will mean MIL taking him to one of his toddler classes which selfishly I really like doing with him. She looks after SILs children 3+ times a week so she gets to do all of that anyway albeit not with DS.

MIL took about a decade to accept me as part of the family as well so I do feel like this is her way of managing me out of the picture as well.

AIBU to not want her having DS on her own yet?

That's fine Do as you wish. Just don't moan when you mil has a better relationship with SIL kids or you want a break later on and she's then not willing

Praying4Peace · 17/11/2025 16:03

Hideousfrump · 17/11/2025 14:46

This is how I feel tbh - great she wants to spend time with him but why does it need to be without me and DH

Because she can take him out and about ( or play /read stories etc).
It is healthy for the gp/gc relationship and I am unsure why you feel it wouldn't be a positive thing.
Would you feel the same if it was your mum who was asking?
Just a thought.
When my GC was a baby, I took him out every week (work permitting). Walks in park /feeding ducks etc.
Your child will positively benefit from the experience and as much as you adore your child, some 'you' time will be good

CorneliaCupp · 17/11/2025 16:02

Calliopespa · 17/11/2025 15:59

As a DIL myself, I get really irritated by many of the DILs on these threads because I think they are way too precious about how their MIL looks, thinks, breathes - and especially what they are "allowed" to say or give as gifts.

Generally speaking, I think Mums let these dynamics get in the way to the detriment of the children, and I am a strong advocate of deepening family ties for the benefit of children

That said, anyone - GP or otherwise - specifically asking to spend time with my dc without me present would leave me uncomfortable. My DM, in particular, has been very involved with ours and HAS looked after them on her own, but it is something that happened organically. She has never, not once, asked that DH and I not be present when spending time with them. I cannot imagine that she ever would either, because I think, like me, she sees family relationships as something that develops naturally in a family setting and sees no reason to remove them from that setting to develop the relationship.

I can only think that sort of request is for the adult's comfort and ease, and has nothing to do with thinking of the child. That isn't to say that children can't be perfectly comfortable alone with their grandparents - and ours have been and ARE comfortable ( though i think at 1 it was only when really needed and they did fret a little after a while; a day is a long time and normally only something a mother does if she has to to make working etc possible).

There is just something that doesn't sit right with me when it is requested or demanded. It sort of has overtones of those feudal rights of a landlord to sleep with his vassal's new wife - droit de seigneur or whatever! It's a kind of assertion of rights over the child - which actually GP don't really have in the UK - rather than a natural enjoyment of time spent with them. Why can't anyone develop a relationship with a child without needing others specifically excluded? If I think back to time with my grandparents - which I loved - it didn't make any difference to me if my parents were there or not, and actually, had I known my Mum was sort of "expected" to make herself scarce, I would have felt a bit creeped out. To me it's not a natural request.

I retierate: nothing wrong with leaving DC with grandparents. Just a bit odd to stipulate no parent attendance.

Edited

Fully agree with all of this.

Bedtelly · 17/11/2025 16:01

Mine spent one on one time with grandparents from younger than 1 tbh, I was very happy to let them.

If you don't like her or don't trust her then that's fine just say that. This whole my child should never be apart from me very Mumsnet and quite disingenuous.

WFHforevermore · 17/11/2025 16:01

sittingonabeach · 17/11/2025 15:59

@WFHforevermore I feel sorry for OP who has been treated like shit for 10 years by her MIL.

Also many GPs are still working so won’t be able to take up the slack for working parents. I actually feel sorry for some GPs who seem to do more hours than the parents as they still work but are also expected to take on child care duties too

No-one should expect anything from a grandparent. They are a privilege and should be respected as so.

And like any post on MN its one side of the story......

Swipe left for the next trending thread