Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Labour's new policies for asylum seekers

994 replies

frommyheadtomyfeet · 17/11/2025 07:51

Are rumoured to follow Denmark's, which include the seizure of valuables from people arriving here to pay their accommodation costs.

Is anyone else disgusted by this?! How will it work, they can take people's jewellery, phones etc., and leave them with nothing? What sort of message does that send?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 09:07

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:55

Of course it does. However I think the problem is wider than that.

Well you either have to sit an exam or prove your comprehension skills in some way or you just have what we have had for 1000 years.

I thought the whole point of jurors was that they were supposed to be normal average people and defendants were judged by their peers. Until recently if you were legally qualified (so would understand what was going on) you couldn't sit as a juror anyway. Im a solicitor and I would have huge trouble concentrating through a long fraud trial.

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 08:56

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Yeah this was my thought. 3/12 being led by one juror is pretty scary though!

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:55

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 19/11/2025 08:49

In some complex financial fraud cases, maybe.

Otherwise it's perfectly possible for both counsel to present their evidence clearly and understandably and it's up to the judge to direct the jury and to sum up.

Lack of language comprehension hinders that.

Of course it does. However I think the problem is wider than that.

Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 08:54

MaturingCheeseball · 19/11/2025 08:49

The problem is non-assimilation - caused by sheer weight of numbers and technology. In the past there was the tv… or the tv. Now people can live in a bubble of their own culture quite easily.

I think there should be an English language proficiency test before coming to UK - for legal immigration. As it is we are continuously importing a first generation with marriages. One of the independent MPs is leading a campaign for the UK to fund a large new airport in Pakistan for to-ing and fro-ing.

That is just guaranteed to wind everyone up.

MaturingCheeseball · 19/11/2025 08:54

Regarding juries there is also the problem of herd bias. One example being the case of the councillor doing slitting throat motion about far-right people who was found not guilty straightaway. There is no chance of fair trials if we get in an OJ situation.

That is in addition to in some areas swathes of people being unfit for jury duty due to language problems. Are women in some communities even allowed to participate? One fears not.

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:53

Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 08:42

Well its been going for nearly 1000 years so presumably it worked OK up until people who couldn't speak the language were asked to become jurors.

I think nowadays people often have shorter attention spans and reduced capacity to follow verbal output.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 19/11/2025 08:49

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:40

Where did I say it was OK for people not to understand or speak the language at all? I was merely pointing out that jury service suffers from wider comprehension issues.

In some complex financial fraud cases, maybe.

Otherwise it's perfectly possible for both counsel to present their evidence clearly and understandably and it's up to the judge to direct the jury and to sum up.

Lack of language comprehension hinders that.

MaturingCheeseball · 19/11/2025 08:49

The problem is non-assimilation - caused by sheer weight of numbers and technology. In the past there was the tv… or the tv. Now people can live in a bubble of their own culture quite easily.

I think there should be an English language proficiency test before coming to UK - for legal immigration. As it is we are continuously importing a first generation with marriages. One of the independent MPs is leading a campaign for the UK to fund a large new airport in Pakistan for to-ing and fro-ing.

Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 08:42

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:40

Where did I say it was OK for people not to understand or speak the language at all? I was merely pointing out that jury service suffers from wider comprehension issues.

Well its been going for nearly 1000 years so presumably it worked OK up until people who couldn't speak the language were asked to become jurors.

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:40

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 19/11/2025 08:34

How can you say that?

So because you think some jurors don't have enough comprehension in their language then it's ok for some not to understand, or speak, the language at all.

These a people who decide what someone's life.

Where did I say it was OK for people not to understand or speak the language at all? I was merely pointing out that jury service suffers from wider comprehension issues.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 19/11/2025 08:34

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:22

There are actually plenty of native English speakers unable to understand or follow the legal case they're assessing as jurors. The problem isn't just a language issue

How can you say that?

So because you think some jurors don't have enough comprehension in their language then it's ok for some not to understand, or speak, the language at all.

These a people who decide what someone's life.

Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 08:32

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 08:28

Well that didn’t happen in this case! The women said they couldn’t speak English and the staff shrugged/didn’t believe them

I can totally believe that. They may have been worried they would have been accused of racism.

DebbiesKitchen · 19/11/2025 08:30

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 08:28

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 08:12

The ability to understand English is a requirement to be on a jury and interpreters are not allowed.

Well that didn’t happen in this case! The women said they couldn’t speak English and the staff shrugged/didn’t believe them

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 08:28

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 08:12

The ability to understand English is a requirement to be on a jury and interpreters are not allowed.

Well that didn’t happen in this case! The women said they couldn’t speak English and the staff shrugged/didn’t believe them

ilovesooty · 19/11/2025 08:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

There are actually plenty of native English speakers unable to understand or follow the legal case they're assessing as jurors. The problem isn't just a language issue

DebbiesKitchen · 19/11/2025 08:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 08:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

The Judge, defence, prosecution barristers & court officials would not allow this.

Fellow juries would also highlight, as should the pp DH.

DebbiesKitchen · 19/11/2025 08:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

DebbiesKitchen · 19/11/2025 08:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 08:12

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 00:00

People live in bubbles and don’t realise how rapid non-assimilated immigration can impact them. About ten years ago my husband had jury duty and 3 people on the jury couldn’t speak English well enough to understand anything that was going on. Another member of the jury (by coincidence) spoke their language and could translate. That could be a jury deciding your fate or the fate of one of your dc…

The ability to understand English is a requirement to be on a jury and interpreters are not allowed.

Leavesfalling · 19/11/2025 07:58

Rhayader · 19/11/2025 00:00

People live in bubbles and don’t realise how rapid non-assimilated immigration can impact them. About ten years ago my husband had jury duty and 3 people on the jury couldn’t speak English well enough to understand anything that was going on. Another member of the jury (by coincidence) spoke their language and could translate. That could be a jury deciding your fate or the fate of one of your dc…

Prefering diversity over justice. Terrifying. And mental. Why don't the government or any of our governments do something about this ridiculous situation our country is in? Something fundamental rather than tinkering for political expediency.

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 07:56

HearMeOutt · 19/11/2025 07:41

700!!!!!!

Thats what Mahmood said.

Utter bonkers, Albania isn't at war, has no famine.

HearMeOutt · 19/11/2025 07:41

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 07:01

Its not just a few Labour backbenchers, who i guess have large numbers of ethnic constituents, its many who support refugees too.

One defending the 700 Albanian families here, living in social housing, who came here under the Tories.

The whole thing is topsy turvy

Can't they see that their stupidity puts at risk the genuine claimant?

Edited

700!!!!!!

Southernecho · 19/11/2025 07:21

Corp Tax is already competitive, 19% or 25% over 50k and no NI, they can also sell and get CGT relief

Look at business taxes in Germany? around 36% or the US? flat rate of 21% plus state taxes, up to 11% in addition to the federal rate.

Investors get ISA allowances of 20k per year, 40k as a couple, all tax free, pay just 24% as a higher rate payer and no NI.

It would be better if we junked some CO2 taxes and reduced industry energy costs.

Swipe left for the next trending thread