Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

EMPIRE- did you know this history?

211 replies

Needacupofteaandcrackers · 15/11/2025 07:50

Just watched Empire on BBC….. I didn’t realise the timelines of how long it was tolerated. I’ve been to a few trust sites and only now I’m made to connections on wealth. 🥹

OP posts:
SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 20:44

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 08:28

It was a different time.

I think yes there were regrettable things that happened… but, you can’t judge the Victorian era by the standards of today.

And - it wasn’t all bad. Look at the commonwealth, many countries actually like the links to the UK.

And it wasn’t just us - all the Europeans were at it…!

The Commonwealth is voluntary.
Empire was in most cases certainly not.

Papyrophile · 15/11/2025 20:44

Why would the National Trust feel any need to apologise?

Papyrophile · 15/11/2025 20:43

I'd like to recommend Niall Ferguson's Empire to everyone reading this thread. Apart from being readable and engaging, he manages to tease out some of the good things the Empire created around the world. Common law is probably the greatest.

SeaAndStars · 15/11/2025 20:40

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 10:07

But what do the others say? The Trust and others barely touch on the horror of working class life and yet fall over themselves to issue trite apologies and trigger warnings about slavery and empire. Why are they apologising? Their job is to educate. There is some really great research about empire and slavery and some sites and exhibitions do it really well, and its important. But its not the only exploitation story in history. Do the other sites apologise about exploitation in mining and industry?

Unless I'm mistaken The National Trust hasn't issued any apology about slavery and empire. It covers the history, but doesn't apologise.

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 20:30

AmadeustheAlpaca · 15/11/2025 20:06

Have you read the book, do you know what he actually says in it. Is there anything in his book that you disagree with? You clearly don't like him because he is "a theologian a crank and a Tory peer". 'Hmm, nothing wrong with being a theologian or a Tory peer. I've no idea whether he's a crank or not.
So if the Ethics and Empire project was heavily criticised- who did the criticism? And it's blindingly obvious that he is being slated by those who are keen to push the Evil British Empire narrative. It seems to me that being peer reviewed and not engaging with contemporary scholarship isn't a bad thing, it means you're not a sheep looking for approval and publicity about how liberal you are and attempting to build a career by pandering to what's fashionable in academia. You don't need to be a formal historian to write history books - history books are for everyone to read, not just academics.
You sound as if you would like to have his books banned, because you don't agree with him and he's not following the accepted dogma.
It's good to read books with differing opinions to your own, that's what I did when I was at university

I haven’t read that book, so can’t comment, but I loved the Jan Morris Pax Britannica trilogy. They mix the macro geopolitics with incidental trivia that injects incredible dry wit. Sometimes simply stating a fact, such as a particular individual or group thought or cosines something, is enough to shine a light on their limited world view, while also getting under the skin of how people justified things to themselves. It’s so extensive too. Morris seems to have travelled the globe and read perhaps more extensively than anyone else on this topic. It’s a masterpiece.

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 20:08

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 20:05

The thread asks whether people were aware of the history explored by David Olusoga in his series ‘Empire’, which focuses on the British empire. I don’t think anyone imagines it was the only one.

I'm referring to the British working class and the African traders and dealers who traded with the British empire.

AmadeustheAlpaca · 15/11/2025 20:06

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 16:17

Nigel Biggar, whom I knew at Oxford, is not a historian, but a theologian, crank and Tory peer with a background in conservative thinktanks. His book was an output from a widely criticised project called Ethics and Empire — criticised for not engaging with contemporary scholarship, and not being rigorously peer-reviewed. Bloomsbury declined to publish the book after the MS came in and was sent to review. Harper Collins published It almost immediately.I certainly don’t think he had any massive struggle to publish. I don’t know of any historians who would regard it as a serious contribution to knowledge. It’s been described as ‘cartoonish’. A previous book was called In Defence of War. He followed his Colonialism book up with a book on why reparations are unnecessary.

Have you read the book, do you know what he actually says in it. Is there anything in his book that you disagree with? You clearly don't like him because he is "a theologian a crank and a Tory peer". 'Hmm, nothing wrong with being a theologian or a Tory peer. I've no idea whether he's a crank or not.
So if the Ethics and Empire project was heavily criticised- who did the criticism? And it's blindingly obvious that he is being slated by those who are keen to push the Evil British Empire narrative. It seems to me that being peer reviewed and not engaging with contemporary scholarship isn't a bad thing, it means you're not a sheep looking for approval and publicity about how liberal you are and attempting to build a career by pandering to what's fashionable in academia. You don't need to be a formal historian to write history books - history books are for everyone to read, not just academics.
You sound as if you would like to have his books banned, because you don't agree with him and he's not following the accepted dogma.
It's good to read books with differing opinions to your own, that's what I did when I was at university

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 20:05

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:24

But they were part of a completely interlinked system. How extraordinary to only care about one group of exploiters and exploited. I thought this thread was about the understanding of empire?

The thread asks whether people were aware of the history explored by David Olusoga in his series ‘Empire’, which focuses on the British empire. I don’t think anyone imagines it was the only one.

Iwiicit · 15/11/2025 19:33

I binge watched all 3 episodes of David Olusoga's Empire series last weekend. Partly because I was ill, partly because I think he is absolutely gorgeous and partly because it was excellent. I thought he was very even handed, well balanced and thoughtful in his presentation.

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:32

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:30

I didnt say anywhere I don’t care about other groups

So why would we exclude them from a full understanding of the empire?

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:30

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:24

But they were part of a completely interlinked system. How extraordinary to only care about one group of exploiters and exploited. I thought this thread was about the understanding of empire?

I didnt say anywhere I don’t care about other groups

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:24

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:22

I meant you bringing up other groups of exploited/exploiters

But they were part of a completely interlinked system. How extraordinary to only care about one group of exploiters and exploited. I thought this thread was about the understanding of empire?

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:22

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:18

You brought up reparations!

I meant you bringing up other groups of exploited/exploiters

wafflesmgee · 15/11/2025 19:21

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 08:28

It was a different time.

I think yes there were regrettable things that happened… but, you can’t judge the Victorian era by the standards of today.

And - it wasn’t all bad. Look at the commonwealth, many countries actually like the links to the UK.

And it wasn’t just us - all the Europeans were at it…!

I think it’s important to avoid comments like this. We aren’t saying if it was good or bad, we are saying/acknowledging that it happened. For many years this hasn’t been fully acknowledged and there is power in recognising the facts of history, slavery, exploitation and empire. By stating the facts of what happened we can more forwards, if we get caught up in attempting to justify/vilify we avoid the original conversation entirely.

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:18

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:16

These are side issues distracting from what we are talking about

You brought up reparations!

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 19:16

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:14

Do you think the working class in this country who were also suffering should pay reparations? Should the descendants of slave owners and dealers in Africa benefit ftom reparations? Some of them did very well out of the slave trade.

Edited

These are side issues distracting from what we are talking about

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:15

OnlyOnAFriday · 15/11/2025 18:05

Yes, I’d need to do more research, sorry it’s all quite confusing and I don’t know enough. I know the name of one side of the family but not the other if that makes sense. So one of my ancestors was white, English and went to Guyana as an indentured servant (which I’d no idea happened), but had a relationship with another indentured servant over there and seems she was from India. But i don’t know her name. At some point some of their descendants came to the U.K.

I really don’t know a lot as there’s no direct family knowledge as I found out via a dna test that my grandfather wasn’t my grandfather. I have a name for my biological grandfather and have researched his family tree, spoken to some distant relatives I’ve met online.

So interrsting. I know there are lots of resources now to help you find out. I hope you find out more!

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 19:14

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 18:54

That’s why it’s still relevant and reparation is needed

we are beneficiaries big time of this

Do you think the working class in this country who were also suffering should pay reparations? Should the descendants of slave owners and dealers in Africa benefit ftom reparations? Some of them did very well out of the slave trade.

PropertyTaxExpert · 15/11/2025 19:05

I didn't study history at school. I've read the Jeremy Paxman book and found it interesting and readable.
(I've also read Roots by Alex Haley and Conrad's Heart of Darkness, so no way an expert, but not completely unaware. I know enough to know I don't know much).

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 18:54

missmollygreen · 15/11/2025 18:52

Very much this.

Also, would you give up everything potentially if you could undo the Empire?
You can bet the average person in the UK would be in a very different position today if the country had never gained from the empire.

That’s why it’s still relevant and reparation is needed

we are beneficiaries big time of this

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 18:53

Doggielovecharlotte · 15/11/2025 18:32

This!

thank you!

And those slave owners thought they were “banging Christianity into the women they were repeatedly raping”

pp re Christianity and Christian ways being the leading light in abolition!

Socrateswasrightaboutvoting · 15/11/2025 18:52

ginasevern · 15/11/2025 18:35

Not to mention the Belgians. Their crimes against humanity were unbelievably horrific in Africa.

Their crimes do not diminish the crimes of the British.

missmollygreen · 15/11/2025 18:52

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 08:28

It was a different time.

I think yes there were regrettable things that happened… but, you can’t judge the Victorian era by the standards of today.

And - it wasn’t all bad. Look at the commonwealth, many countries actually like the links to the UK.

And it wasn’t just us - all the Europeans were at it…!

Very much this.

Also, would you give up everything potentially if you could undo the Empire?
You can bet the average person in the UK would be in a very different position today if the country had never gained from the empire.

RoamingToaster · 15/11/2025 18:47

If you’re going to argue that slavery under the British was worse than all other civilisations that had it before I don’t understand why you’d spend a lot of that argument on how unfair the process of ending it was, considering slavery never ended in those other civilisations.

ginasevern · 15/11/2025 18:35

Bungle2168 · 15/11/2025 08:41

Read up on what the Portuguese, Spanish, and Dutch were up to at the time. Makes the English East India Company look like a hippy commune.

Not to mention the Belgians. Their crimes against humanity were unbelievably horrific in Africa.